What are the indications for Ketamine infusions in ER and ICU settings and would there be a case that it is preferred over fentanyl infusion?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

A growing body of literature has evaluated ketamine use in ED and ICU settings, with the strongest evidence supporting acute pain management and opioid-sparing strategies. Expert guidance supports subanesthetic ketamine as a stand-alone analgesic or adjunct to opioids in the ED for acute traumatic and nontraumatic pain, refractory pain, and opioid-tolerant patients; in the ICU, recommendations primarily support low-dose ketamine as an adjunct to opioids or multimodal analgosedation to reduce opioid exposure. Additional ICU applications described in the literature include mechanically ventilated patients, rapid sequence intubation, sepsis or septic shock, severe asthma, status epilepticus, acute brain injury, and other selected critically ill populations, although evidence for many of these applications remains limited. When considering ketamine over a fentanyl infusion, available comparative data suggest it may be reasonable in selected patients when opioid-sparing is desired or when concerns exist regarding opioid tolerance, respiratory depression, or hemodynamic instability; however, studies generally show similar analgesic efficacy with lower overall opioid requirements rather than clear superiority of ketamine over fentanyl.

Background

According to the 2018 Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU, opioids remain a mainstay of pain management in critically ill adults; however, concerns regarding opioid-associated adverse effects, including sedation, delirium, respiratory depression, ileus, and immunosuppression, have led to evaluation of multimodal analgesic strategies incorporating nonopioid agents such as ketamine. The guideline panel generally supported multimodal pharmacotherapy as part of an analgesia-first approach to reduce opioid and sedative exposure. For ketamine specifically, the guideline issued a conditional recommendation based on very low-quality evidence suggesting the use of low-dose ketamine (0.5 mg/kg IV push followed by a continuous infusion of 1-2 mcg/kg/min) as an adjunct to opioid therapy when seeking to reduce opioid consumption in postsurgical adults admitted to the ICU. This recommendation was primarily based on a single-center randomized controlled trial of 93 postoperative abdominal surgery ICU patients in which adjunctive ketamine was associated with reduced morphine consumption compared with opioids alone, while patient-reported pain scores and the incidence of adverse effects, including delirium, hallucinations, hypoventilation, pruritus, nausea, and sedation, were similar between groups. [1]

According to a 2017 policy statement from the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), sub-dissociative dose ketamine (SDK), also referred to as low-dose ketamine (LDK), is a safe and effective analgesic option for use in the emergency department and may be used alone or as part of a multimodal pain management strategy for both traumatic and non-traumatic pain. At analgesic doses, ketamine functions as an opioid-sparing agent and has demonstrated analgesic efficacy comparable to morphine, with evidence suggesting improved pain control in some settings, reduced opioid requirements, and less need for repeat opioid dosing. Additional advantages compared with opioids include minimal respiratory depression, preservation of hemodynamic stability and cardiac output, and utility in patients with opioid tolerance, contraindications to opioids, or hypotension related to trauma or sepsis. Recommended intravenous dosing is 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg administered over approximately 15 minutes. ACEP notes that SDK has an excellent safety profile and generally does not require monitoring or administration procedures beyond those used for other standard parenteral analgesics. Patients should be counseled regarding the possibility of transient adverse effects, most commonly nausea, dizziness, and mild dysphoria, which are typically brief and may occur less frequently when ketamine is administered as a short infusion rather than a rapid bolus; emergence reactions are uncommon at analgesic dosing ranges, and available evidence does not support avoiding low-dose ketamine solely because of underlying psychiatric illness. Overall, ACEP considers SDK a safe, effective, and practical alternative to opioid therapy for acute pain management in the emergency department. [2], [3], [4]

According to the 2024 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Protocol Guidance for Ketamine for the Management of Acute Pain in Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Centers, ketamine may be used for acute pain or intractable pain when conventional treatments have failed or when ketamine is determined to be a more suitable agent. Sub-dissociative ketamine may be used as a safe and effective alternative or adjunct to opioids and does not produce many of the potentially adverse respiratory or hemodynamic effects associated with other analgesics. Ketamine has been studied in opioid-tolerant patients, as an adjunct to opioid therapy for acute pain, and may be advantageous in patients receiving partial opioid agonist or antagonist therapy who have acute tissue-trauma pain. The protocol allows repeat dosing or initiation of a continuous infusion of 0.15 to 0.2 mg/kg/hour for ongoing pain management. The guidance specifically addresses ketamine for acute pain management in the ED/UCC and excludes use for deep sedation, rapid sequence intubation, airway management, and mechanically ventilated patients. [5]

According to the 2018 consensus guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), ketamine infusions have become a mainstay of treatment in emergency departments, in the perioperative period in individuals with refractory pain, and in opioid-tolerant patients. Evidence supports the use of ketamine for acute pain as a stand-alone treatment or as an adjunct to opioids. The guidelines recommend that subanesthetic ketamine infusions should be considered for patients undergoing painful surgery (Grade B recommendation, moderate certainty) and may be considered for opioid-dependent or opioid-tolerant patients undergoing surgery (Grade B recommendation, low certainty), opioid-dependent or opioid-tolerant patients with sickle cell pain (Grade C recommendation, low certainty), and patients with obstructive sleep apnea as an adjunct to limit opioid use (Grade C recommendation, low certainty). Additionally, the guidelines note that ketamine has demonstrated opioid-sparing effects, including reduced opioid consumption in mechanically ventilated surgical ICU patients receiving opioid infusions; however, the supporting evidence is limited. [6]

In a 2022 meta-analysis examining the impact of ketamine on analgosedative consumption in critically ill patients, investigators synthesized evidence comparing continuous infusion ketamine-based regimens with non-ketamine analgosedation strategies in ICU populations. The analysis included 19 studies in total (13 randomized controlled trials, 5 retrospective studies, and 1 prospective cohort study), encompassing 2,255 participants, with primary focus on daily opioid and sedative requirements. Across six randomized controlled trials included in the primary quantitative analysis (n= 494), ketamine-based regimens were associated with a significant reduction in opioid consumption, with a mean difference of -13.19 mcg/kg/hour morphine equivalents (95% confidence interval [CI] -22.10 to -4.28, p= 0.004). However, there was no significant difference observed in sedative requirements, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU or hospital length of stay, intracranial pressure, or mortality between groups. Overall, the findings suggest that ketamine may serve as a useful adjunct in ICU analgosedation protocols primarily by reducing opioid exposure, particularly in postoperative and mechanically ventilated patients. However, the absence of consistent effects on broader clinical outcomes and the limited size of available trials highlight the need for further large, well-designed randomized controlled studies before routine adoption in select ICU populations. [7]

In the context of critically ill patients, several review articles discuss the use of ketamine across a broad range of intensive care unit (ICU) applications. The literature describes potential roles for ketamine as an opioid-sparing analgesic, an adjunctive sedative for mechanically ventilated patients, an induction agent for rapid sequence intubation, and a treatment option in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Additional areas of investigation include sedation following cardiac surgery, management of acute brain injury, super-refractory status epilepticus, acute severe asthma and severe asthma exacerbations, delirium prevention or management, and psychiatric conditions such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. These diverse applications stem from ketamine’s distinctive pharmacologic profile, which combines analgesic, sedative, dissociative, bronchodilatory, and sympathomimetic properties while generally preserving respiratory drive. Across these indications, ketamine has demonstrated potential benefits including reduced opioid and sedative requirements, maintenance of hemodynamic stability, facilitation of airway management, bronchodilation, anticonvulsant effects, and possible neuropsychiatric benefits. However, the overall quality of evidence remains limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous patient populations, variable dosing strategies, and a predominance of observational data. Although current evidence suggests that ketamine may be particularly useful in selected critically ill patients, especially those with hemodynamic instability, experts consistently emphasize that its role in many ICU applications remains incompletely defined and that further large, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify its efficacy, safety, and optimal use across these clinical settings. [8], [9], [10]

A 2016 review describes subdissociative-dose intravenous ketamine as effective and safe for the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department that may be used either as a single agent or as an adjunct to opioid analgesics. The review notes that ketamine may serve as a feasible alternative to traditional opioids, particularly given opioid-associated adverse effects such as respiratory depression, hypotension, sedation, and potential for abuse. Subdissociative-dose ketamine (0.1–0.4 mg/kg IV) preserves protective airway reflexes, spontaneous respiration, and cardiopulmonary stability and has been shown to provide analgesia while reducing opioid requirements in patients with acute traumatic and nontraumatic pain and in opioid-tolerant patients. The review concluded that ketamine is effective as both an adjunct to opioids (Class A recommendation) and as a single agent for acute pain management in the ED (Class A recommendation) and noted that its use is associated with relatively high rates of minor but short-lived adverse effects. [11]

References: [1] Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825-e873. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299
[2] American College of Emergency Physicians, Emergency Nurses Association, Society of Emergency Medicine Physician Assistants. Sub-dissociative Dose Ketamine for Analgesia. Policy statement. Approved October 2017. Accessed June 10, 2026. https://www.ena.org/sites/default/files/2025-08/Sub-dissociative%20Dose%20Ketamine%20for%20Analgesia.pdf
[3] Bang S. Sub-dissociative dose ketamine in the emergency department. American College of Emergency Physicians Pain Management and Addiction Medicine Section. Published January 14, 2021. Accessed June 10, 2026. https://www.acep.org/painmanagement/newsroom/jan2021/sub-dissociative-dose-ketamine-in-the-emergency-department
[4] Freess D, Schiller E. ACEP policy on low-dose ketamine. ACEP Now. January 30, 2018. Accessed June 10, 2026. https://www.acepnow.com/article/acep-policy-low-dose-ketamine/
[5] Veterans Health Administration. Ketamine for the Management of Acute Pain in VHA Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Centers: National Protocol Guidance. Updated March 2024. Accessed June 10, 2026. https://www.va.gov/formularyadvisor/DOC_PDF/CRE_Ketamine_for_Acute_Pain_in_VHA_ED_or_UCC_Rev_APR_2024.pdf
[6] Schwenk ES, Viscusi ER, Buvanendran A, et al. Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Acute Pain Management From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(5):456-466. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000806
[7] Chan K, Burry LD, Tse C, Wunsch H, De Castro C, Williamson DR. Impact of Ketamine on Analgosedative Consumption in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2022;56(10):1139-1158. doi:10.1177/10600280211069617
[8] Midega TD, Chaves RCF, Ashihara C, et al. Ketamine use in critically ill patients: a narrative review. Uso de cetamina em pacientes críticos: uma revisão narrativa. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022;34(2):287-294. doi:10.5935/0103-507X.20220027-pt
[9] Yao Z, Dhipeng Z, Guan C, Cui S, Quan Z, Li Y, Zheng J. Ketamine use in adult intensive care unit: a narrative review of emerging applications, efficacy challenges, and safety concerns. Emerg Crit Care Med. 2025;5(3):153-160. doi:10.1097/EC9.0000000000000152
[10] Casamento A, Niccol T. Efficacy and safety of ketamine in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a scoping review. Crit Care Resusc. 2023;24(1):71-82. Published 2023 Oct 18. doi:10.51893/2022.1.OA9
[11] Motov S, Rosenbaum S, Vilke GM, Nakajima Y. Is There a Role for Intravenous Subdissociative-Dose Ketamine Administered as an Adjunct to Opioids or as a Single Agent for Acute Pain Management in the Emergency Department?. J Emerg Med. 2016;51(6):752-757. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.07.087
Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

What are the indications for Ketamine infusions in ER and ICU settings and would there be a case that it is preferred over fentanyl infusion?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-2 for your response.


Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Low-Dose Ketamine Versus Fentanyl in Patients With Long Bone Fractures in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study

Design

Single-center, prospective observational study

N= 100

Objective

To compare low-dose ketamine and fentanyl infusions in terms of their pain-relieving effects and observed adverse effects in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with isolated long bone fractures

Study Groups

Fentanyl (n= 52)

Ketamine (n= 48)

Inclusion Criteria

Trauma patients over the age of 16 years with isolated long bone fracture, stable hemodynamics, no unconsciousness, and no known allergy to ketamine or fentanyl

Exclusion Criteria Patients who withdrew consent or required sedation during follow-up
Methods

Patients received either low-dose ketamine (0.3 mg/kg) or fentanyl (1 mcg/kg) for pain relief. Pain scores were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline, 30, and 60 minutes after administration. Adverse effects and need for rescue analgesics were recorded.

Duration

August 2018 to December 2019

Outcome Measures

Primary: Changes in VAS scores at 30 and 60 minutes

Secondary: Changes in vital signs, need for rescue analgesics, and side effects

Baseline Characteristics   Fentanyl (n= 52) Ketamine (n= 48)

Total (N= 100)

Age, years (IQR)

51.5 (33.0-73.7) 44.0 (30.0-60.0) 46.5 (32.2-65.2)

Female

15 (50.0%) 15 (50.0%) 30 (100.0%)

Cause of injury - Fall

30 (57.7%) 22 (42.3%) 52 (100.0%)

Cause of injury - MVC

19 (54.3%) 16 (45.7%) 35 (100.0%)

Cause of injury - Assault

1 (25.0%) 3 (75.0%) 4 (100.0%)

Cause of injury - Crashing

2 (22.2%) 7 (77.8%) 9 (100.0%)

Fracture location - Femur

23 (65.7%) 12 (34.3%) 35 (100.0%)

Fracture location - Tibia

9 (34.6%) 17 (65.4%) 26 (100.0%)

Fracture location - Fibula

40 (54.8%) 33 (45.2%) 73 (100.0%)

Fracture location - Humerus

12 (44.4%) 15 (55.6%) 27 (100.0%)

Fracture location - Radius

9 (52.9%) 8 (47.1%) 17 (100.0%)

Fracture location - Ulna

8 (52.9%) 9 (47.1%) 17 (100.0%)

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range.

Results   Fentanyl (n= 52) Ketamine (n= 48)

Total (N= 100)

p-value

VAS, t0

9.0 (7.0-10.0) 9.0 (7.3-10.0) 9.0 (7.0-10.0) 0.319

VAS, t30

6.0 (4.3-8.0) 6.0 (5.0-8.0) 6.0 (5.0-8.0) 0.631

VAS, t60

5.0 (4.0-6.0) 5.0 (4.0-7.0) 5.0 (4.0-6.8) 0.347

Δ VAS, t0-t30

2.0 (1.0-3.0) 2.0 (1.0-3.8) 2.0 (1.0-3.0) 0.759

Δ VAS, t30-t60

1.0 (0.0-2.0) 1.0 (0.0-2.0) 1.0 (0.0-2.0) 0.461

Δ VAS, t0-t60

3.5 (2.0-5.0) 3.0 (1.3-4.8) 3.0 (2.0-5.0) 0.453

Pain scores decreased significantly over time within both groups (p< 0.001), but there was no significant difference between ketamine and fentanyl in pain reduction (p= 0.682). Mean arterial pressure also changed over time within both groups (p< 0.001), with no significant difference between groups (p= 0.086).

Adverse Events

Adverse effects were uncommon. Hypoxia occurred in 3 fentanyl-treated patients and 2 ketamine-treated patients. Dizziness occurred more frequently with ketamine than fentanyl (8 vs 1 patients; p= 0.010). Nausea (n= 2), numbness (n= 3), sleeping state (n= 1), and slowed reactions (n= 1) were reported only in the ketamine group. No adverse event required medical intervention and all resolved spontaneously. Rescue analgesia was required in 10 patients in the fentanyl group and 20 patients in the ketamine group (p= 0.014).

Study Author Conclusions

Low-dose ketamine appears to be an alternative to fentanyl for pain treatment in patients with long bone fractures in the ED. Although no serious adverse effects were observed in our study, dizziness was more frequent in patients treated with ketamine. Therefore, ED physicians should be aware of these adverse effects. We believe that ketamine will be used more frequently as an alternative to opioids with future randomized controlled studies.

Critique

The study provides valuable insights into the use of low-dose ketamine as an alternative to opioids for pain management in the ED. However, the single-center design and the observational nature may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the study did not evaluate the infusion rates of the drugs, which could impact the incidence of adverse effects like dizziness. A longer follow-up period could provide more comprehensive data on the long-term effects and efficacy of the analgesics used.

References:
[1] [1] Ylmaz M, Kudu E, Sanri E, Karacabey S, Akoglu H, Denizbasi A. Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Low-Dose Ketamine Versus Fentanyl in Patients With Long Bone Fractures in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e46344. Published 2023 Oct 2. doi:10.7759/cureus.46344

 

Impact of ketamine versus fentanyl continuous infusion on opioid use in patients admitted to a surgical-trauma intensive care unit
Design

Retrospective chart review; abstract only 

N= 46

Objective To compare opioid requirements between ketamine/propofol and fentanyl/propofol continuous infusion groups during mechanical ventilation
Study Groups

Ketamine/propofol (KP) group (n= 22)

Fentanyl/propofol (FP) group (n= 24)

Inclusion Criteria Mechanically ventilated adult patients (≥18 years) in the surgery-trauma intensive care unit (STICU) with continuous infusion ketamine or fentanyl with concomitant propofol for at least 12 hours
Exclusion Criteria Not specified
Methods Patients in the STICU received continuous infusions of either ketamine/propofol (KP) or fentanyl/propofol (FP). Opioid requirements were measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) during mechanical ventilation
Duration Not specified
Outcome Measures Opioid requirements during mechanical ventilation S
Baseline Characteristics Not specified within abstract
Results   Ketamine/propofol (n= 22) Fentanyl/propofol (n= 24) p-value

Median opioid requirement during mechanical ventilation, MME (IQR)

206.3 (87-510) 1,392 (709.5-2,292) <0.001

Time at goal Critical Care Pain Observation Tool, % (IQR)

77.6 (71.9-85.2) 88.9 (76.9-97.4) 0.003
Adverse Events The proportions of patients developing adverse effects were not significantly different between the two groups.
Study Author Conclusions Among critically ill mechanically ventilated patients in the STICU, continuous ketamine resulted in significantly less opioids during mechanical ventilation. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to assess the appropriate dosing strategy for ketamine to produce adequate analgesia when used as a primary analgesic in mechanically ventilated patients
Critique The study provides valuable insights into the potential of ketamine as a primary analgesic strategy in critically ill patients, showing a significant reduction in opioid use. However, the small sample size and retrospective design limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, only the abstract was available for scrutiny. 
References:
[1] [1] Pazhani Y, Roth J, Kataria V, Nguyen HL, Ramos A, Mooney J. Impact of ketamine versus fentanyl continuous infusion on opioid use in patients admitted to a surgical-trauma intensive care unit. J Opioid Manag. 2022;18(3):257-264. doi:10.5055/jom.2022.0717