InpharmD™





One touch literature search.

So you can spend more time with patients

Ask any clinical question, receive a curated response.

Get Started Free

Trusted by 10,000+ clinical pharmacists.

                                                 

Play Circle

Learn about InpharmD™ in under 90 seconds

What is InpharmD™?


Literature searching is tedious. InpharmD™ is here to help.

Clinical pharmacists can ask any question, anytime, from anywhere, and we’ll perform a custom literature search.

(And a 32% chance it’s already been asked.)


More than 30 of the world's best health systems hire an InpharmD™ virtual DI pharmacist, yielding:


147,150

Clinical Pharmacist Hours Saved

4x +

ROI

100%

Customer Satisfaction Rate

This is how InpharmD™ transforms LITERATURE.

What's Being Asked...

Can you provide me information beta-lactam monotherapy for hospitalized patients with non-severe community acquired p...
Please compare clinical outcomes for treatment of proteus mirabilis mitral valve endocarditis with large vegetation w...
Does semaglutide need to be discontinued in a patient who develops Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
list available literature on initiating step up dosing for BiTE therapy in outpatient setting in the community hospit...
Is there a recommended AST/ALT threshold for safe administration of gemcitabine?

What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Dena Homayounieh, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

For hospitalized patients with non-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), current evidence regarding β-lactam monotherapy is mixed. While the 2019 ATS/IDSA guidelines recommend either a β-lactam plus macrolide combination or respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy as preferred empiric treatment options, several randomized and observational studies have evaluated β-lactam monotherapy with varying results. Overall, available data suggest that β-lactam monotherapy may achieve similar mortali...

The 2019 American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) provide a detailed and updated framework for clinical decision-making. For hospitalized adults with non-severe CAP who do not have risk factors for MRSA or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the guideline recommends either a β-lactam plus macrolide combination regimen or respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy as preferred empiric treatment options. These recommendations are supported by randomized trials and systematic reviews demonstrating similar clinical outcomes between β-lactam/macrolide combination therapy and fluoroquinolone monotherapy, while observational evidence generally suggests lower mortality with these regimens compared with β-lactam monotherapy. The panel specifically evaluated β-lactam monotherapy as a potential treatment strategy; however, available evidence, including randomized and observational studies,...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

Can you provide me information beta-lactam monotherapy for hospitalized patients with non-severe community acquired pneumonia.

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(7):e45-e67. doi:10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST
[2] Bai AD, Loeb M. Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. NEJM Evid. 2025;4(12):EVIDra2500170. doi:10.1056/EVIDra2500170
[3] Kolditz M, Halank M, Höffken G. Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy in Patients Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Treat Respir Med. 2006;5(6):371-383. doi:10.2165/00151829-200605060-00002
[4] Mills GD, Oehley MR, Arrol B. Effectiveness of beta lactam antibiotics compared with antibiotics active against atypical pathogens in non-severe community acquired pneumonia: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2005;330(7489):456. doi:10.1136/bmj.38334.591586.82

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:zophia@inpharmd.com, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

Published evidence is limited to case reports and a small literature review, with no direct comparisons of ceftriaxone versus ceftriaxone plus an aminoglycoside for Proteus mirabilis mitral valve endocarditis with large vegetation. Reported ceftriaxone monotherapy outcomes were mixed, including cure without surgery in a smaller-vegetation case, cure after mitral valve replacement in a large-vegetation case, and death in a large-vegetation case complicated by embolic events, limited source con...

A 2021 case report and literature review identified 14 published cases of infective endocarditis due to Proteus species, including the authors’ case, with native valve involvement in 10 cases and mitral valve involvement in 8 of those native valve cases. Among the reported native mitral valve cases, two patients received ceftriaxone monotherapy: one was treated with ceftriaxone for 4 weeks without surgical intervention and was cured, and another received ceftriaxone for 3 weeks with mitral valve replacement and was cured. The review did not identify a native mitral valve case treated specifically with ceftriaxone plus an aminoglycoside; however, aminoglycoside-containing beta-lactam regimens were reported in other cases, including ampicillin plus gentamicin for 6 weeks in a native mitral valve case with cure, ampicillin plus gentamicin followed by carbenicillin plus kanamycin in a native mitral valve case with death, ceftriaxone plus gentamicin for 6 weeks in a native aortic valve c...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 5 studies investigating the researchable question:

Please compare clinical outcomes for treatment of Proteus mirabilis mitral valve endocarditis with large vegetation with ceftriaxone vs ceftriaxone plus aminoglycoside.

Level of evidence
D - Case reports or unreliable data  

READ MORE→

[1] Tiri B, Priante G, Mariottini A, et al. Endocarditis of native valve due to Proteus mirabilis: case report and literature review. SN Compr Clin Med. 2021;3:312-316. doi:10.1007/s42399-020-00721-2.

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:azkaa@inpharmd.com, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

Current guidance on semaglutide use after non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) remains mixed and is based primarily on pharmacovigilance and observational evidence. While the World Health Organization recommends discontinuing semaglutide once NAION is confirmed as a precaution, available data are inconsistent and do not clearly demonstrate a consistent increase in risk attributable to therapy (see Tables 1-3). Due to this, some experts do not support routine discontinuatio...

A 2025 World Health Organization (WHO) safety alert highlighted concerns regarding a potential association between semaglutide and non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Following a review of nonclinical studies, clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance data, and published literature, the European Medicines Agency's Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) concluded that NAION is a very rare adverse effect of semaglutide, occurring in up to 1 in 10,000 patients. The WHO Advisory Committee on Safety of Medicinal Products subsequently recommended that NAION be included as a potential risk in semaglutide risk management plans. The WHO advised that patients experiencing sudden vision loss or rapidly worsening vision during semaglutide therapy should undergo prompt evaluation and that semaglutide should be discontinued if NAION is confirmed. This recommendation was based on pharmacovigilance and safety review data rather than studies evaluating outcomes a...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

Does semaglutide need to be discontinued in a patient who develops Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] World Health Organization. The use of semaglutide medicines and risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Published June 27, 2025. Accessed June 17, 2026. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-06-2025-27-06-2025-semaglutide-medicines-naion
[2] Eisa N, Barood O. Semaglutide and Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. AACE Endocrinol Diabetes. 2026;13(2):259-269. Published 2026 Jan 17. doi:10.1016/j.aed.2026.01.001
[3] Hidalgo Ramos RA, Ortiz M, Dufner Krieger S, Secades D. Semaglutide and Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2025;17(8):e89656. Published 2025 Aug 8. doi:10.7759/cureus.89656

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:zophia@inpharmd.com, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

Available literature on outpatient or community-based initiation of step-up dosing (SUD) for T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma remains limited and consists largely of consensus guidance, retrospective/observational studies, implementation reports, structured reviews, and provider-experience data. Published outpatient models describe use in carefully selected, clinically stable patients with caregiver and proximity requirements, patient/caregiv...

Guideline and consensus literature addressing outpatient or community-based initiation of step-up dosing (SUD) for T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma emphasizes patient selection, toxicity monitoring, infection prophylaxis, caregiver support, and institutional readiness rather than prospective comparative data specific to community hospital initiation. The International Myeloma Working Group Immunotherapy Committee consensus review provides broader clinical-practice guidance for bispecific antibody use in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, describing these agents as therapies that simultaneously bind CD3 on T cells and a tumor-cell surface antigen, and noting that cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is generally grade 1 or 2 and typically occurs during SUD or the first full dose; the review also states that initial clinical trials required inpatient monitoring during SUD and/or first full dosing, while outpatient dosing and tocilizumab prophylaxis are bei...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 5 studies investigating the researchable question:

List available literature on initiating step up dosing for BiTE therapy in outpatient setting in the community hospital setting

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Mateos MV, Zamagni E, Gentile M, et al. European recommendations for transitioning the care of patients with multiple myeloma treated with B-cell maturation antigen bispecific antibodies from academic hospitals to community-based centers and for outpatient step-up dosing. eJHaem. 2026;7:e70290. doi:10.1002/jha2.70290
[2] Rodriguez-Otero P, Usmani S, Cohen AD, et al; International Myeloma Working Group. International Myeloma Working Group immunotherapy committee consensus guidelines and recommendations for optimal use of T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(5):e205-e216. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00043-3.
[3] Wang X, Zhao A, Zhu J, Niu T. Efficacy and safety of bispecific antibodies therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1348955. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1348955
[4] Resnick Y, Boland P, Winters JP. Implementation of a model program at an independent community oncology practice for the outpatient administration of B-cell maturation antigen–directed bispecific antibody step-up doses. JCO Oncol Pract. Published online April 23, 2026. doi:10.1200/OP-25-00585
[5] Song Y, Zhou X, Wang L. Outpatient step-up dosing of bispecific antibodies in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: an oncology nursing framework for monitoring and supportive care. Front Oncol. 2026;16:1859755. doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1859755

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Dena Homayounieh, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

Although gemcitabine is reported to cause elevations in serum aminotransferase levels, dose modification is typically only suggested according to bilirubin levels in the setting of liver dysfunction. Published literature assessing gemcitabine therapy in patients with liver dysfunction primarily report recruitment of patients with AST/ALT levels <2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), though one small trial (Table 1) enrolled patients with AST/ALT >2x ULN. In this trial, doses were red...

Though gemcitabine can cause elevations in serum aminotransferase levels (up to 30-90%), these elevations are typically mild and self-limited, and rarely require dose modifications. However, more severe elevations above 5 times the upper limit of normal can occur in 1-4% of gemcitabine patients. Additionally, gemcitable has also been associated with rare cases of liver injury in patients with underlying chronic liver disease or extensive hepatic metastases, as well as complications like hepatitis B reactivation. Therefore, close monitoring is warranted, especially in patients with pre-existing liver dysfunction, and dose adjustments may be necessary to manage the potential for liver toxicity. [1] A 2005 article reviewed the complexities of chemotherapy dosing in cancer patients with liver dysfunction, emphasizing the interplay between hepatic impairment and drug pharmacokinetics. Liver dysfunction alters drug clearance via reduced hepatic metabolism, compromised biliary excretio...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

Is there a recommended AST/ALT threshold for safe administration of gemcitabine?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] LiverTox®: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2012-. Gemcitabine. [Updated 2018 Mar 9]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK548575/
[2] Eklund JW, Trifilio S, Mulcahy MF. Chemotherapy dosing in the setting of liver dysfunction. Oncology (Williston Park). 2005;19(8):1057-1069.

Why choose InpharmD™?

Find answers, not documents.

Before InpharmD™


BeforeTime
Your team spends hours per week cobbling together literature from different studies, many behind paywalls, leaving little time for action.
BeforeTime
TI opportunities are discovered (or presented by third parties) months after the fact, resulting in costly missed savings.
BeforeTime
Decisions may be made without a complete picture, or pushed out while gathering consensus.

After InpharmD™


BeforeTime
InpharmD™ delivers customized, actionable drug information in real time, so you can focus on execution.
BeforeTime
Your team stays informed immediately when new data emerges or prices change, and you’ll always be the first to know when any changes impact your formulary.
BeforeTime
With InpharmD™, your team can make faster, more informed decisions and move forward with confidence.

What Clinical Pharmacists Are Saying...


     

Assists in our research and is a great way or us to get an answer to a medical question without spending an average of 2 hours researching UptoDate or PubMed ourselves.


  Jordan C., PharmD, New Jersey

     

Huge time saver with thorough responses.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I’d never heard of a DI pharmacist before, now I have one. In. My. Pocket. Amazing!


     

Holy Shhh. Cow! Holy Cow! These summaries are beautiful.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I just want to say: This is such a brilliant idea! You people are genius.


     

OH MY GOD WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ALL MY LIFE!


     

I can’t tell you how much time I spend literature searching. And how I CANNOT STAND PAYWALLS. THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!! (covers face for sec) thank you, thank you, thank you!


     

So they’re basically connecting academic researchers with front line providers and then automating everything. It’s simply brilliant.


     

The clinical pharmacist was our secret weapon anyway. (Smiles wryly) This pharmacist AI seems superhuman. I’m just blown away, honestly. (Looks at camera somberly.)


     

It’s an ENTIRE DI DEPARTMENT, that lives in Epic. Give me a second. I’m just having a hard time wrapping my head around that.


     

Sorry just give me a second, my mind is blown.


     

Stop reading and just download the app already! I’ve tried all of them. This is by far the most advanced, best-in-class.


What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

Sign up for a free trial & start right away.

Get Started Free