InpharmD™





One touch literature search.

So you can spend more time with patients

Ask any clinical question, receive a curated response.

Get Started Free

Trusted by 20,000+ physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists.

                     

Play Circle

Learn about InpharmD™ in under 90 seconds

What is InpharmD™?


Literature searching is tedious. InpharmD™ is here to help.

Clinical pharmacists can ask any question, anytime, from anywhere, and we’ll perform a custom literature search.

(And a 32% chance it’s already been asked.)


107,478

Clinical Pharmacist Hours Saved

4x +

ROI

100%

Customer Satisfaction Rate

This is how InpharmD™ transforms LITERATURE.

What's Being Asked...

What evidence is available regarding impact of azithromycin (IV or PO) on gastric emptying?
What evidence is there for use of doses > 5 mg of tadalafil for treatment of BPH?
What is the clinical evidence and safety data for using ketamine to treat bronchospasms?
What is the current evidence to support the use of Riluzole in patients with deficits post spine surgery?
Is there any data to support using naloxegol (Movantik) over alvimopan (Entereg) and/or methylnatrexone (Relistor)?

What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Muna Said, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Evidence regarding the clinical utility of azithromycin for the treatment of gastric emptying is sparse. While no high-quality comparative trials were identified, available data show that azithromycin demonstrates comparable efficacy to erythromycin for the treatment of gastric emptying, with a lower risk of cardiac arrhythmia development and QTc prolongation, in addition to a longer half-life and greater antral contractility in both pharmacokinetic and retrospective trials. The long-term saf...

Erythromycin has motilin receptor agonist activity, which improves gastric-emptying rates by stimulating enteric contractility. It causes pyloric relaxation and is a potent gastric-emptying stimulant. However, its use is limited by many drug interactions and adverse effects, including QT-interval prolongation. As a result, azithromycin has been studied as a potential alternative to erythromycin for treating gastroparesis because it has fewer adverse effects and drug interactions than erythromycin. [1] Azithromycin is assumed to have prokinetic characteristics similar to those of erythromycin. In one study, small-bowel manometric data of 30 patients with chronic digestive problems or documented refractory gastroparesis revealed that azithromycin and erythromycin has a similar effect on antral activity when the same dosage of 250 mg is administered intravenously (IV). Another study using gastric-emptying scintigraphy showed that azithromycin’s effect on accelerating gastric emptyin...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

What evidence is available regarding impact of azithromycin (IV or PO) on gastric emptying?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Nguyen N. Controversies in Using IV Azithromycin to Treat Gastroparesis. US Pharm. 2014;39(12):HS13-HS17.
[2] Lacy BE, Tack J, Gyawali CP. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(3):491-500. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.038
[3] Camilleri M, Kuo B, Nguyen L, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(8):1197-1220. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001874
[4] Liu N, Abell T. Gastroparesis Updates on Pathogenesis and Management. Gut Liver. 2017;11(5):579-589.
[5] Shakir AK...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Neil Patel, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

The available evidence does not strongly support the use of tadalafil doses >5 mg for treating BPH, due to the lack of data directly comparing between doses. While one urodynamic study suggested higher doses (e.g., 20 mg) were not associated with adverse effects, most meta-analyses found significant benefits only with the 5 mg dose, particularly for Qmax. Primarily literature observed a trend towards greater effects with higher doses, but robust efficacy and safety comparisons to confirm a be...

A 2015 systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical efficacy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is), including tadalafil, in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), both with and without concurrent erectile dysfunction (ED). The analysis incorporated data from 16 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to assess the various primary outcomes. Tadalafil 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg were only assessed together for the outcome of maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) in LUTS/BPH, which was found to not be statistically significant (effect estimate 0.22; mean difference -0.04 to 0.49; p= 0.10). There did not appear to be any further assessments for tadalafil doses > 5 mg. In contrast, the 5 mg dose of tadalafil alone significantly improved the Qmax (mean difference 0.33; p= 0.03). [1] Additionally, a 2013 meta-analysis synthesized data from eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controll...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

What evidence is there for use of doses over 5 mg of tadalafil for treatment of BPH?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Zhang LT, Park JK. Are phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors effective for the management of lower urinary symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia?. World J Nephrol. 2015;4(1):138-147. doi:10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.138
[2] Dong Y, Hao L, Shi Z, Wang G, Zhang Z, Han C. Efficacy and safety of tadalafil monotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2013;91(1):10-18. doi:10.1159/000351405

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Neil Patel, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Evidence on the use of ketamine for bronchospasm consists of older, small trials (Tables 1-3) with varying results and doses studied. Results are generally favorable, with most cases refractory to other treatments. However, a more recent study found no significant difference between ketamine 2 mg/kg/min and fentanyl 1 mcg/kg/min, but it was limited by high mortality.

Status asthmaticus is a common cause of morbidity and mortality and the addition of ketamine to standard treatment for severe asthma has been associated with improved outcomes and a reduced need for mechanical ventilation. Notably, a 2013 review article evaluated the pulmonary effects of ketamine and whether sufficient evidence supports its use in refractory status asthmaticus. The review identified twenty reports involving a total of 244 patients ranging in age from 5 months to 70 years. Ketamine was used in different settings: in 13 articles (53 patients), it served as a rescue agent for patients with respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; in 3 reports (58 patients), it was used as an anesthetic during surgery in asthmatic patients; in 3 studies (131 patients), it was administered in the emergency department to patients with status asthmaticus; and in 1 study (2 patients), it was used postoperatively for analgesia and sedation. Ketamine was initiated only after a po...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the clinical evidence and safety data for using ketamine to treat bronchospasms?

Level of evidence
B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  

READ MORE→

[1] Goyal S, Agrawal A. Ketamine in status asthmaticus: A review. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2013;17(3):154-161. doi:10.4103/0972-5229.117048
[2] Jat KR, Chawla D. Ketamine for management of acute exacerbations of asthma in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11(11):CD009293. Published 2012 Nov 14. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009293.pub2
[3] Allen JY, Macias CG. The efficacy of ketamine in pediatric emergency department patients who present with acute severe asthma. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(1):43-50. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.02.024
[4] Farshadfar K, Sohooli M, Shekouhi R, Taherinya A,...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Muna Said, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Currently, there is a lack of evidence specifically assessing the use of riluzole for the management of neurological deficits post-spine surgery. Available data are primarily derived from spinal cord injury studies that suggest riluzole may offer functional benefits and is generally well tolerated when administered early after injury. However, trials in related conditions, such as degenerative cervical myelopathy, have shown mixed results, with no clear improvement beyond surgical interventio...

A 2025 systematic review scrutinized the efficacy and safety of various pharmacological treatments targeting the acute phase of secondary spinal cord injury (SCI). This review aggregated data from 25 studies encompassing 3017 patients, with an average age of 43.3 years. It aimed to evaluate current management strategies and identify potential therapeutic options to improve outcomes in SCI patients. The findings highlighted that erythropoietin (EPO) was associated with improved motor function and reduced neurological impairment post-SCI, attributed to its antioxidative, anti-apoptotic, and neurogenic properties. Despite its widespread use, methylprednisolone demonstrated uncertain efficacy in enhancing neurological outcomes, aligning with previous evidence suggesting a risk of adverse effects. The review also emphasized the promising potential of monosialotetrahexosylganglioside sodium salt (GM-1) and riluzole, both of which were linked to favorable neurological outcomes. Riluzole ha...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the current evidence to support the use of Riluzole in patients with deficits post spine surgery?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Migliorini F, Pilone M, Eschweiler J, Katusic D, Memminger MK, Maffulli N. Therapeutic strategies that modulate the acute phase of secondary spinal cord injury scarring and inflammation and improve injury outcomes. Expert Rev Neurother. 2025;25(4):477-490. doi:10.1080/14737175.2025.2470326
[2] Weisbrod LJ, Nilles-Melchert TT, Bergjord JR, Surdell DL. Safety and Efficacy of Riluzole in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses. Neurotrauma Rep. 2024;5(1):117-127. Published 2024 Feb 19. doi:10.1089/neur.2023.0114

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Muna Said, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Based on the current evidence, naloxegol does not appear to be superior to alvimopan or methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation (OIC). Results from meta-analyses suggest that methylnaltrexone trends towards greater improvement of OIC compared to naloxegol, although included studies were placebo-based and indirectly compared. Direct comparisons between naloxegol and the other agents also focused on demonstrating non-significant differences to potentially use as an alternative agent.

A 2021 systematic review evaluating the existing studies (N= 26) on peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) compared the relative clinical advantages and disadvantages of different agents in patients with OIC. Compared to placebo, all included medications are more efficacious in reducing OIC. While methylnaltrexone is mostly studied in its subcutaneous formulation (n= 10/14), the oral formulation (n= 3/14) is associated with a more rapid reduction of OIC than naloxegol (n= 4) and placebo. Overall, the tolerability is consistent across different agents, and the gastrointestinal tract (GI) effects with flatulence and diarrhea are mainly seen at high dosages. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies and the lack of head-to-head studies, a quantitative meta-analysis was not performed. The authors concluded that further studies have to be undertaken to establish a definitive conclusion regarding cost-effectiveness, safety, and effect on pain scores, as the exis...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 6 studies investigating the researchable question:

Is there any data to support using naloxegol (Movantik) over alvimopan (Entereg) and/or methylnatrexone (Relistor)?

Level of evidence
A - Multiple high-quality studies with consistent results  

READ MORE→

[1] Rekatsina M, Paladini A, Drewes AM, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonist (PAMORAs) for the Management of Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16201. Published 2021 Jul 5. doi:10.7759/cureus.16201
[2] Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G. Drugs for Treating Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Mixed Treatment Comparison Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials [published correction appears in J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):e11]. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;55(2):468-479.e1. doi:10....

Find answers, not documents.

Before InpharmD™


BeforeTime
Your team spends hours per week cobbling together literature from different studies, many behind paywalls, leaving little time for action.
BeforeTime
TI opportunities are discovered (or presented by third parties) months after the fact, resulting in costly missed savings.
BeforeTime
Decisions may be made without a complete picture, or pushed out while gathering consensus.

After InpharmD™


BeforeTime
InpharmD™ delivers customized, actionable drug information in real time, so you can focus on execution.
BeforeTime
Your team stays informed immediately when new data emerges or prices change, and you’ll always be the first to know when any changes impact your formulary.
BeforeTime
With InpharmD™, your team can make faster, more informed decisions and move forward with confidence.

What Clinical Pharmacists Are Saying...


     

Assists in our research and is a great way or us to get an answer to a medical question without spending an average of 2 hours researching UptoDate or PubMed ourselves.


  Jordan C., PharmD, New Jersey

     

Huge time saver with thorough responses.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I’d never heard of a DI pharmacist before, now I have one. In. My. Pocket. Amazing!


     

Holy Shhh. Cow! Holy Cow! These summaries are beautiful.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I just want to say: This is such a brilliant idea! You people are genius.


     

OH MY GOD WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ALL MY LIFE!


     

I can’t tell you how much time I spend literature searching. And how I CANNOT STAND PAYWALLS. THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!! (covers face for sec) thank you, thank you, thank you!


     

So they’re basically connecting academic researchers with front line providers and then automating everything. It’s simply brilliant.


     

The clinical pharmacist was our secret weapon anyway. (Smiles wryly) This pharmacist AI seems superhuman. I’m just blown away, honestly. (Looks at camera somberly.)


     

It’s an ENTIRE DI DEPARTMENT, that lives in Epic. Give me a second. I’m just having a hard time wrapping my head around that.


     

Sorry just give me a second, my mind is blown.


     

Stop reading and just download the app already! I’ve tried all of them. This is by far the most advanced, best-in-class.


What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

Sign up for a free trial & start right away.

Get Started Free