InpharmD™





Add Drug Information Pharmacists

Without Adding FTEs

So you can practice at top of license.

Get Started Free

Trusted by 20,000+ clinical pharmacists.

Play Circle

Learn about InpharmD™ in under 90 seconds

What is InpharmD™?


Literature searching is tedious. InpharmD™ is here to help.

Clinical pharmacists can ask any question, anytime, from anywhere, and we’ll perform a custom literature search.

(And a 32% chance it’s already been asked.)


More than 30 of the world's best health systems hire an InpharmD™ virtual DI pharmacist, yielding:


156,974

Clinical Pharmacist Hours Saved

4x +

ROI

100%

Customer Satisfaction Rate

This is how InpharmD™ transforms LITERATURE.

What's Being Asked...

What are the available regimens and evidence for use of inhaled Amikacin (not Arykace) for Mycobacterial infection?
Are there any studies researching accelerated oral sotalol loading using 120mg or 160mg in patients with renal dysfun...
What are the alternatives to chloroform for the treatment of maggots?
What other options are available for difficult to treat candida auris fungemia besides micafungin and amphotericin B?...
What are the treatment recommendations for enteroinvasive E Coli (EIEC)? Should antimicrobials be used for treatment?

What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Muna Said, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

Published evidence describes conventional (non-liposomal) inhaled amikacin as an adjunct to multidrug therapy for refractory NTM pulmonary disease, although the available data are limited and heterogeneous. In observational studies, parenteral amikacin administered by inhalation ranged from 250-500 mg once daily to 15 mg/kg once daily and was generally added to an existing multidrug regimen. Notably, joint societal guidelines do not recommend conventional inhaled amikacin as initial therapy b...

According to the 2020 joint American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID)/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines on the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease, inhaled conventional (parenteral formulation) amikacin is not recommended as part of the initial treatment regimen for newly diagnosed macrolide-susceptible Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease because available evidence is limited and of very low certainty. In patients with treatment-refractory MAC pulmonary disease who remain culture-positive after at least 6 months of guideline-based therapy, the guidelines recommend adding amikacin liposome inhalation suspension. However, when the liposomal formulation is unavailable, the guidelines state that addition of inhaled parenteral amikacin is a reasonable alternative. In these guidelines, evidence for conventional inhaled amikacin comes prim...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 6 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the evidence for use of conventional (non-liposomal) inhaled amikacin for Mycobacterial infection?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, et al. Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease: An Official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(4):905-913. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1125

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Neil Patel, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

Evidence specifically evaluating accelerated oral sotalol loading in patients with renal dysfunction requiring frequency adjustment is limited. A recent preprint study was identified that used population pharmacokinetic modeling to evaluate an accelerated oral loading strategy across renal function categories, including a 120-mg regimen with the second dose administered 24 hours later for patients with CrCl 30-59 mL/min and 48 hours later for those with CrCl 10-29 mL/min. However, the finding...

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

Are there any studies researching accelerated oral sotalol loading using 120mg or 160mg in patients with renal dysfunction requiring a frequency adjustment?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:AJ Carvajal, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

Management of myiasis (maggot/larval infestation) has traditionally relied upon mechanical removal, including physical and surgical extraction and irrigation/debridement supplemented with chloroform or ether/turpentine oil. However, much of the literature supporting first-line and alternative strategies for myiasis is based on case reviews/series and veterinary data, and there is limited robust clinical trial data. Alternatives to chloroform include standard wound-cleansing solutions (e.g., D...

A 2012 narrative review comprehensively examines myiasis, including its evaluation and management strategies. Myiasis is defined as the infestation of live vertebrates (humans and/or animals) with dipterous larvae from flies. Anatomical classification of myiasis includes sanguinivorous (bloodsucking), dermal-subdermal (cutaneous tissue-destroying), nasopharyngeal (infestation of the head passages), intestinal, and urogenital. First-line management centers on mechanical removal of larvae. Recommended strategies for mechanical removal include: (1) occlusion of the respiratory punctum via application of petrolatum, liquid paraffin, or similar substances to induce hypoxia and force larval emergence, after which the larvae can be physically removed using forceps; (2) surgical excision of deeply embedded/anchored larvae; and (3) irrigation and debridement of wound-based myiasis supplemented by chloroform oil, ether, or turpentine to immobilize the larvae. Alternatives to mechanical remova...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

What are the alternatives to chloroform for the treatment of maggots?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Francesconi F, Lupi O. Myiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(1):79-105. doi:10.1128/CMR.00010-11

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Naveed Aijaz, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

Current CDC guidance recommends an echinocandin as initial therapy and liposomal amphotericin B for echinocandin resistance or lack of improvement after 5 days; fosmanogepix or ibrexafungerp may be considered through expanded access for pan-resistant infections. In a single-arm phase 2 study of 9 patients with C. auris candidemia, fosmanogepix achieved treatment success in 88.9% at the end of therapy and 66.7% at 2-week follow-up, with 88.9% survival at Day 30. In contrast, published clinical...

According to 2024 CDC recommendations, an echinocandin is the preferred initial treatment for Candida auris infection in adults and children aged ≥2 months; available options include anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin. Liposomal amphotericin B (5 mg/kg IV daily) should be considered when susceptibility testing indicates echinocandin resistance or when the patient does not improve after 5 days of echinocandin therapy. For infections caused by pan-resistant isolates, the investigational antifungals fosmanogepix or ibrexafungerp may be considered through expanded-access programs, although the CDC states that treatment recommendations for echinocandin-resistant and pan-resistant infections are based on limited evidence. The guidance does not discuss adding flucytosine or provide data supporting flucytosine-containing combination therapy for persistent C. auris fungemia. [1] With the growing concerns of multi-resistant Candida species, such as Candida auris and some Candida gla...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

What other options are available for difficult to treat candida auris fungemia besides micafungin and amphotericin B? Is there any data to add flucytosine or alternative antifungal for persistent fungemia?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical treatment of Candida auris infections. Updated April 24, 2024. Accessed August 10, 2026.
[2] Lamoth F. Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Invasive Candidiasis: Considerations for the Clinician. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;16:1087-1097. Published 2023 Feb 22. doi:10.2147/IDR.S375625
[3] Jallow S, Govender NP. Ibrexafungerp: A First-in-Class Oral Triterpenoid Glucan Synthase Inhibitor. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(3):163. Published 2021 Feb 25. doi:10.3390/jof7030163
[4] Colombo RE, Vazquez JA. An evaluation of ibrexafungerp for the treatment of invasive candidiasis: the evidence to date. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22(7):797-807. doi:10.1080/14656566.2021.1890026
[5] Ghannoum M, Arendrup MC, Chaturvedi VP, et al. Ibrexafungerp: A Novel Oral Triterpenoid Antifungal in Development for the Treatment of Candida auris Infections. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9(9):539. Published 2020 Aug 25. doi:10.3390/antibiotics9090539
[6] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) in Patients With Candidiasis Caused by Candida Auris (CARES) (CARES). Updated June 27, 2023. Accessed August 15, 2023.
[7] Spec A, Pullman J, Thompson GR, et al. MSG-10: a Phase 2 study of oral ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) following initial echinocandin therapy in non-neutropenic patients with invasive candidiasis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(10):3056-3062. doi:10.1093/jac/dkz277
[8] Zhu YC, Barat SA, Borroto-Esoda K, Angulo D, Chaturvedi S, Chaturvedi V. Pan-resistant Candida auris isolates from the outbreak in New York are susceptible to ibrexafungerp (a glucan synthase inhibitor). Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(4):105922. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105922
[9] Arendrup MC, Jørgensen KM, Hare RK, Chowdhary A. In Vitro Activity of Ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) against Candida auris Isolates as Determined by EUCAST Methodology and Comparison with Activity against C. albicans and C. glabrata and with the Activities of Six Comparator Agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(3):e02136-19. Published 2020 Feb 21. doi:10.1128/AAC.02136-19
[10] https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03363841

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Frances Beckett-Ansa, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI LEARN MORE 

Current clinical practice guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on traveler’s diarrhea and infectious diarrhea recommend that enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) cases initially be managed with supportive/symptomatic care, as most cases are acute and self-limiting. For persistent symptoms (>14-day duration), antibiotic treatment is indicated, with azithromycin or a fluoroquinolone recommended for EIEC; ciprofloxacin is the preferred fluoroquinolone given its narrow...

A 2025 Yellow Book chapter on post-travel diarrhea issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides guidance for evaluating international travelers who present with diarrhea after travel. Most cases of travelers’ diarrhea (TD) are acute and self-limiting and secondary to infectious pathogens, but some patients do develop persistent symptoms (>14-day duration). Persistent diarrhea symptoms are classified as either ongoing infection or coinfection with a second organism not targeted by initial therapy, previously undiagnosed gastrointestinal (GI) disease unmasked by the enteric infection, or post-infectious phenomena. Pathogen-specific antimicrobial management is recommended for most pathogens. Azithromycin or a fluoroquinolone is recommended for Shigella/enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), while explicit avoidance of antimicrobials is recommended for enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC)/Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) given the risk for hemolytic uremic syndrome. F...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

What are the treatment recommendations for enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC)? Should antimicrobials be used for treatment?

Level of evidence
D - Case reports or unreliable data  

READ MORE→

[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Yellow Book. Post-Travel Diarrhea. Published April 23, 2025. Accessed August 10, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/yellow-book/hcp/post-travel-evaluation/post-travel-diarrhea.html
[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: E. coli Infection (Escherichia coli). Information for Clinicians. Published May 14, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/hcp/guidance/index.html
[3] Shane AL, Mody RK, Crump JA, et al. 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Infectious Diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(12):e45-e80. doi:10.1093/cid/cix669
[4] Riddle MS, Connor BA, Beeching NJ, et al. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of travelers' diarrhea: a graded expert panel report. J Travel Med. 2017;24(suppl_1):S57-S74. doi:10.1093/jtm/tax026

Why choose InpharmD™?

Find answers, not documents.

Before InpharmD™


BeforeTime
Your team spends hours per week cobbling together literature from different studies, many behind paywalls, leaving little time for action.
BeforeTime
TI opportunities are discovered (or presented by third parties) months after the fact, resulting in costly missed savings.
BeforeTime
Decisions may be made without a complete picture, or pushed out while gathering consensus.

After InpharmD™


BeforeTime
InpharmD™ delivers customized, actionable drug information in real time, so you can focus on execution.
BeforeTime
Your team stays informed immediately when new data emerges or prices change, and you’ll always be the first to know when any changes impact your formulary.
BeforeTime
With InpharmD™, your team can make faster, more informed decisions and move forward with confidence.

What Clinical Pharmacists Are Saying...


     

Assists in our research and is a great way or us to get an answer to a medical question without spending an average of 2 hours researching UptoDate or PubMed ourselves.


  Jordan C., PharmD, New Jersey

     

Huge time saver with thorough responses.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I’d never heard of a DI pharmacist before, now I have one. In. My. Pocket. Amazing!


     

Holy Shhh. Cow! Holy Cow! These summaries are beautiful.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I just want to say: This is such a brilliant idea! You people are genius.


     

OH MY GOD WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ALL MY LIFE!


     

I can’t tell you how much time I spend literature searching. And how I CANNOT STAND PAYWALLS. THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!! (covers face for sec) thank you, thank you, thank you!


     

So they’re basically connecting academic researchers with front line providers and then automating everything. It’s simply brilliant.


     

The clinical pharmacist was our secret weapon anyway. (Smiles wryly) This pharmacist AI seems superhuman. I’m just blown away, honestly. (Looks at camera somberly.)


     

It’s an ENTIRE DI DEPARTMENT, that lives in Epic. Give me a second. I’m just having a hard time wrapping my head around that.


     

Sorry just give me a second, my mind is blown.


     

Stop reading and just download the app already! I’ve tried all of them. This is by far the most advanced, best-in-class.


What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

Sign up for a free trial & start right away.

Get Started Free