InpharmD™





One touch literature search.

So you can spend more time with patients

Ask any clinical question, receive a curated response.

Get Started Free

Trusted by 20,000+ physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists.

                     

Play Circle

Learn about InpharmD™ in under 90 seconds

What is InpharmD™?


Literature searching is tedious. InpharmD™ is here to help.

Clinical pharmacists can ask any question, anytime, from anywhere, and we’ll perform a custom literature search.

(And a 32% chance it’s already been asked.)


85,232

Clinical Pharmacist Hours Saved

4x +

ROI

100%

Clinical Pharmacist Satisfaction Rate

This is how InpharmD™ transforms LITERATURE.

What's Being Asked...

Is there newer data to support the possibility of giving a GLP-1 agonist to a patient with DM and obesity with a hist...
What data is there to support loading doses of topiramate for refractory seizures?
What alternative dyes (e.g., methylene blue, indocyanine green, etc.) are there to trypan blue for use in ophthalmolo...
what is the evidence for exclusively using ideal body weight for IVIG dosing
is vasopressin only effective 50% of the time for blood pressure

What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: Naveed Aijaz, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Although the majority of clinical trials involving glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) typically exclude individuals with a history of pancreatitis, limited data has suggested GLP-1 RAs may be used in patients with diabetes and a history of pancreatitis without significant risk of recurrence. GLP-1 RAs may be considered in tandem with vigilant monitoring if the known cause of pancreatitis is currently well-managed and a discussion of risks versus benefits has taken place.

As noted in a 2020 meta-analysis, clinical trials of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have historically excluded patients with a history of pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer. While GLP-1 RAs are generally not reported increasing the risk of acute pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer for treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), whether these safety findings can be extrapolated to patients with prior pancreatitis remains uncertain. However, the LEADER study included such patients and did not find liraglutide, in particular, to serve as a cumulative risk factor for acute pancreatic adverse events in patients with prior history of acute pancreatitis (See Table 2). [1,2] Per a poster abstract on pancreatitis risk with GLP-1 receptor agonists at the American College of Gastroenterology’s Annual Scientific Meeting in 2022, risk factors are type 2 diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, and advanced chronic kidney disease (stage 3 or greater). The retrospective, single-cent...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

Is there newer data to support the possibility of giving a GLP-1 agonist to a patient with DM and obesity with a history of acute pancreatitis (due to a known cause such as hypertriglyceridemia)?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Cao C, Yang S, Zhou Z. GLP-1 receptor agonists and pancreatic safety concerns in type 2 diabetic patients: data from cardiovascular outcome trials. Endocrine. 2020;68(3):518-525. doi:10.1007/s12020-020-02223-6
[2] Murphy CF, le Roux CW. Can we exonerate GLP-1 receptor agonists from blame for adverse pancreatic events?. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(10):186. doi:10.21037/atm.2018.03.06
[3] Postlethwaite R. 18 - Predictors of Pancreatitis on Initiation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss. Presented at American College of Gastroenterology’s Annual Scientific Meeting; Charlotte, NC. Octob...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: Neil Patel, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

The optimal loading dose of topiramate remains unclear due to the wide variability in dosing and patient populations across the limited number of studies. While lower loading doses of 2-5 mg/kg have been effective in neonates and children, the evidence in adults is more conflicting, with initial doses ranging from 25-500 mg and maintenance doses from 25-900 mg/day. Loading doses have even been administered up to 1000 mg in some patients. Potential adverse events such as hyperammonemia, acidos...

A 2021 systematic review investigated the efficacy of topiramate as add-on therapy for refractory status epilepticus (RSE) based on studies that report response rate, mortality rate, or long-term outcomes. A total of 8 studies were included, with one being prospectively designed (see Table 1). The majority of studies included a small number of patients (N= 6 to 27) with the largest retrospective study including 106 patients (Fechner et al., Table 2). Studies varied in types of seizures and population characteristics were largely similar. Doses were highly variable with max daily doses ranging from 400-1600 mg while minimum daily dose ranged from 50-400 mg. The response rate, defined as termination in-hospital until 72 hours after administration, varied from 27% to 100% while mortality rate varied from 5.9% to 68%. Long-term positive outcomes such as discharge, return to baseline, or rehabilitation reported to range from 4% and 55%. The only notable adverse event was hyperammonemia t...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

What data is there to support loading doses of topiramate for refractory seizures?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Welling LC, Rabelo NN, Yoshikawa MH, Telles JPM, Teixeira MJ, Figueiredo EG. Efficacy of topiramate as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory status epilepticus: a short systematic review. Eficácia do topiramato como terapia adicional em pacientes com estado epiléptico refratário: uma breve revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021;33(3):440-444. Published 2021 Oct 25. doi:10.5935/0103-507X.20210054
[2] Ochoa JG, Dougherty M, Papanastassiou A, Gidal B, Mohamed I, Vossler DG. Treatment of Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Review [published online ahead of print, 2021...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: Brenda Nguyen, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Though limited to indirect comparisons, NMA of various dyes (indocyanine green, trypan blue, brilliant blue G, triamcinolone acetonide) used in macular hole surgery with an adjuvant-assisted ILM peeling indicate that trypan blue, brilliant blue G, and triamcinolone acetonide outperformed in visual and functional outcomes according to ranking data. Direct comparative data suggest brilliant blue G exhibited equivalent staining efficiency to trypan blue without major perioperative complications.

A 2021 systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of 17 studies, including five randomized controlled trials and twelve retrospective trials, evaluated the efficacy of various dyes for assisting internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in patients with idiopathic macular hole (IMH). The analysis examined 1,492 participants undergoing ILM peeling assisted with chromovitrectomy dyes such as indocyanine green (ICG), trypan blue (TB), brilliant blue G (BBG), and triamcinolone acetonide (TA), comparing different concentrations of these dyes in terms of IMH closure rates and postoperative visual acuity (VA). The trials utilized a frequentist framework to calculate the mean difference and odds ratio for different dye concentrations, including 0.05% BBG, 0.15% TB, 0.5% ICG, 0.25% ICG, and 40 mg/ml TA, among others. The NMA aimed to establish the optimum dye concentration for improving anatomical outcomes such as IMH closure and functional recovery like VA. The analysis showed that th...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

What alternative dyes (e.g., methylene blue, indocyanine green, etc.) are there to trypan blue for use in ophthalmology cases that are safe and effective?

Level of evidence
A - Multiple high-quality studies with consistent results  

READ MORE→

[1] Li SS, Li M, You R, et al. Efficacy of different doses of dye-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling in idiopathic macular hole: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(3):1129-1140. doi:10.1007/s10792-020-01656-2
[2] Wang XW, Long Y, Gu YS, Guo DY. Outcomes of 4 surgical adjuvants used for internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery: a systematic review and network Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(3):481-487. Published 2020 Mar 18. doi:10.18240/ijo.2020.03.17
[3] Magana-García D, Ramos-Espinoza K, Bonilla-Barraza C, Romo-Garc...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: Neil Patel, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Limited evidence suggests that dosing intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) based on ideal body weight (IBW) or adjusted body weight (adjBW) may be a preferable alternative to actual body weight (ABW) dosing. Therefore, the use of IBW exclusively for IVIG dosing appears appropriate. Observational studies in patients with various indications for immunoglobulin replacement found no significant differences in infection rates or immunoglobulin G (IgG)-level response between IBW-based dosing and ABW-b...

A recent review discussing immunoglobulin (IG) replacement in hematological malignancies indicates that IG replacement is typically dosed based on actual body weight (ABW). However, due to its small volume of distribution, ideal body weight (IBW) or adjusted body weight (adjBW)-based dosing may be preferable and reduce costs and dose-dependent side effects. While data comparing dosing strategies for RIG are lacking, several observational studies have evaluated the dosing strategies of IG in the setting of hematological malignancies. A single-center retrospective study of 209 adult patients with secondary immunodeficiency (SID) received IG replacement doses using either ABW (n= 125) or IBW or adjBW (n= 84). No difference between the groups was observed in the 30- and 60-day infection rates. Additionally, both groups observed an 86% response rate for improving immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels from below 4 g/L at baseline to greater than 4 g/L within two weeks after treatment (see Table 1...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the evidence for using ideal body weight for IVIG dosing?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Sim B, Ng JY, Teh BW, Talaulikar D. Immunoglobulin replacement in hematological malignancies: a focus on evidence, alternatives, dosing strategy, and cessation rule. Leuk Lymphoma. 2023;64(1):18-29. doi:10.1080/10428194.2022.2131424
[2] Stump SE, Schepers AJ, Jones AR, Alexander MD, Auten JJ. Comparison of Weight-Based Dosing Strategies for Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37(12):1530-1536. doi:10.1002/phar.2047
[3] Grindeland JW, Grindeland CJ, Moen C, Leedahl ND, Leedahl DD. Outcomes Associated With Standardized Ideal Body ...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: AJ Carvajal, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Most studies investigating use of vasopressin focus on clinical outcomes in the treatment of septic shock, such as mortality, duration of hospitalization, and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Limited data are available regarding the effects of vasopressin on blood pressure reduction, with one study reporting an average of 63% of patients treated with vasopressin achieved goal mean arterial pressure (see Table 1). Impact of vasopressin on clinical outcomes appears to be mixed across o...

Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines published in 2021 provide guidance for patients hospitalized with sepsis or septic shock. Adults who are on norepinephrine for septic shock but unable to reach mean arterial pressure levels are recommended to receive adjunct vasopressin instead of escalating norepinephrine doses. Vasopressin’s effect on blood pressure was not addressed. [1] A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of vasopressin use in patients with septic shock using data compiled from 5 studies (N= 788 patients); most studies were small-scale single center cohort studies, with only one randomized controlled trial included. All studies included patients receiving vasopressin infusion within 6 hours of septic shock diagnosis compared to control group patients receiving no vasopressin or vasopressin infusion later than 6 hours after diagnosis. While study outcomes did not compare the effect of vasopressin on blood pressure outcomes, pooled data indi...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

Is vasopressin only effective 50% of the time for blood pressure?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337
[2] Huang H, Wu C, Shen Q, Xu H, Fang Y, Mao W. The effect of early vasopressin use on patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;48:203-208. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.007
[3] Nagendran M, Russell JA, Walley KR, et al. Vasopressin in septic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Intensive C...

Find answers, not documents.

Before InpharmD™


BeforeTime
Your team spends hours per week cobbling together literature from different studies, many behind paywalls, leaving little time for action.
BeforeTime
TI opportunities are discovered (or presented by third parties) months after the fact, resulting in costly missed savings.
BeforeTime
Decisions may be made without a complete picture, or pushed out while gathering consensus.

After InpharmD™


BeforeTime
InpharmD™ delivers customized, actionable drug information in real time, so you can focus on execution.
BeforeTime
Your team stays informed immediately when new data emerges or prices change, and you’ll always be the first to know when any changes impact your formulary.
BeforeTime
With InpharmD™, your team can make faster, more informed decisions and move forward with confidence.

What Clinical Pharmacists Are Saying...


     

Assists in our research and is a great way or us to get an answer to a medical question without spending an average of 2 hours researching UptoDate or PubMed ourselves.


  Jordan C., PharmD, New Jersey

     

Huge time saver with thorough responses.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I’d never heard of a DI pharmacist before, now I have one. In. My. Pocket. Amazing!


     

Holy Shhh. Cow! Holy Cow! These summaries are beautiful.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I just want to say: This is such a brilliant idea! You people are genius.


     

OH MY GOD WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ALL MY LIFE!


     

I can’t tell you how much time I spend literature searching. And how I CANNOT STAND PAYWALLS. THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!! (covers face for sec) thank you, thank you, thank you!


     

So they’re basically connecting academic researchers with front line providers and then automating everything. It’s simply brilliant.


     

The clinical pharmacist was our our secret weapon anyway. (Smiles wryly) This pharmacist AI seems superhuman. I’m just blown away, honestly. (Looks at camera somberly.)


     

It’s an ENTIRE DI DEPARTMENT, that lives in Epic. Give me a second. I’m just having a hard time wrapping my head around that.


     

Sorry just give me a second, my mind is blown.


     

Wow. . Just wow.


     

Answers are evidence based and help me make clinical decisions. Quick turn around time for some urgent questions.


     

Was bragging about you and your outstanding business the other day while on vacation. I recently used your service and was blown away at how fast and thorough I got your response


     

It would be helpful to provide a discussion of the questions frequently submitted to InpharmD. Other than that it is excellent, please keep it up!


     

A must have resource for evidence based medicine!


     

All information provided is up to date.


     

Provides a good summary of information with citations.


     

Answers clinically relevant questions with quick responses.


     

The review of evidence provided is excellent.


     

I find the vaccination guideline information the most useful.


     

The tables provided from the studies used to formulate the responses are very helpful for review.


     

It is helpful that InpharmD provides indications to treat adverse effects of various drugs in similar classes.


What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

Sign up for a free trial & start right away.

Get Started Free