|
Prevalence of tinnitus in patients withhypertension and the impact of different anti hypertensive drugs on the incidence of tinnitus: A prospective, single-blind, observational study
|
|
Design
|
Prospective, single-center, single-blind, observational study in Italy
N=476
|
|
Objective
|
To determine the prevalence of tinnitus in hypertensive patients, and the impact of different antihypertensive drugs on the incidence of tinnitus in these patients
|
|
Study Groups
|
Tinnitus (n=84)
No tinnitus (n=392)
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Consecutive, unselected, treated hypertensive patients who were referred for the first time to the clinic. The cohort included adults aged 18 to 75 years with mild to moderate hypertension, defined as European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology (ESH-ESC) grade I or II blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mmHg who were receiving antihypertensive treatment at the time of enrollment. Patients could also be receiving HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and/or antithrombotic agents.
|
|
Exclusion Criteria
|
Known secondary causes of hypertension, exposure to noise of ≥85 dB for 8 hours/day for at least 1 month, history of otologic disorders or previous episodes of hearing impairment or disturbances, unable to follow study protocol, active pregnancy, presence of ≥1 major concomitant disease, receiving treatment with drugs other than the study drugs
|
|
Methods
|
In patients whose BP values were elevated despite receiving antihypertensive therapy, an additional antihypertensive drug was added to the existing regimen on completion of study procedures.
On the morning before the first study visit, patients completed an internally validated questionnaire assessing the presence, frequency, and duration of tinnitus. The results of the questionnaire were reviewed by a trained, experienced audiologist to confirm the presence or absence of tinnitus. Patients who were determined to have tinnitus underwent a complete cardiovascular examination, including BP measurement and standard 12-lead electrocardiography. Resting supine and standing BPs were measured in the dominant arm using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer to the nearest 2 mm Hg. The mean of 3 consecutive BP measurements recorded at 1-minute intervals was used. The mean of 3 resting supine heart rate measurements also was used.
The next day, 12-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was conducted to assess the relationship between the onset of tinnitus and the extent of BP changes. On ABPM, BP was measured at 15-minute intervals from 9 AM (+1 hour) to 9 PM (+1 hour). During ABPM, patients were asked to record the times of the onset and resolution of tinnitus using a diary. To better define the relationship between the onset of tinnitus and the occurrence of sudden changes in BP, patients were also instructed to immediately push a "start" button on the monitor whenever they began to experience tinnitus.
|
|
Duration
|
September 1, 2004 through November 30, 2004
|
|
Outcome Measures
|
Incidence of tinnitus, association of tinnitus with different antihypertensive treatments, impact of tinnitus incidence on BP
|
|
Baseline Characteristics
|
|
Tinnitus
(n=84)
|
No tinnitus
(n=392)
|
Overall
(N=476)
|
|
Mean age, years
|
60.3±11.2 |
61.6±7.1 |
- |
|
Female sex, n (%)
|
39/193 (20.2) |
154/193 (80) |
- |
|
Mean supine heart rate, beats/min
|
67.6±7.3 |
68.2±8.6 |
- |
|
Mean supine BP, mmHg
Systolic
Diastolic
|
140.6±10.1
87.3±7.2
|
143.2±11.2
88.7±7.1
|
- |
|
Concomitant risk factors, n (%)
Dyslipidemia
Diabetes
|
43/254 (16.9)
20/110 (18.2)
|
132/162 (81.5)
90/110 (81.8)
|
- |
|
Current antihypertensive treatment, n (%)
Monotherapy
Combination therapy
|
43/254 (16.9)
41/222 (18.5)
|
211/254 (83.1)
181/222 (81.5)
|
- |
|
Medications used, n (%)
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)
Diuretic
Beta-blocker
Calcium channel blocker (CCB)
Antithrombotic
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
Alpha-blocker
Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)
|
- |
- |
293 (61.6)
265 (55.7)
240 (50.4)
225 (47.3)
80 (16.8)
73 (15.3)
55 (11.6)
37 (7.8)
|
| |
|
Results
|
Tinnitus observed in 17.6% of included patients overall.
The prevalence of tinnitus was significantly lower in patients treated with ARBs (5/37, 13.5%) and alpha-blockers (12/55, 21.8%) vs patients treated with diuretics (72/265, 27.2%), p<0.05 for both comparisons.
Tinnitus was significantly more prevalent in patients treated with a diuretic (72/265, 27.2%) vs those treated with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (9/73, 12.3%), p<0.05; this was not observed for patients treated with an antithrombotic drug, including aspirin (15/80, 18.8%).
Mean systolic BP was significantly higher in patients without tinnitus vs those with tinnitus (143.2±11.1 mmHg vs 140.6±10.3 mmHg, p<0.005.
|
|
Adverse Events
|
Only tinnitus reported in this study
|
|
Study Author Conclusions
|
In this study of tinnitus in patients receiving antihypertensive therapy, tinnitus was found in 17.6% of patients. Tinnitus was associated with the use of diuretics and with low SBP. Further studies are needed.
|
|
Critique
|
This study found the presence of tinnitus to be significantly lower among patients treated with ARBs and alpha-blockers, whereas tinnitus was significantly higher among patients treated with diuretics. This may indicate a possible protective role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation on the sympathetic nervous system in the development of tinnitus. This study was limited by its single-center, non-randomized design with lack of a comparator group, limiting its broader generalizability. Also, considering the use of European guidelines for management of hypertension, the findings may not be fully generalizable to the US population, where agents such as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and antithrombotics are not generally considered part of the armamentarium to manage hypertension. Additionally, the use of either clinical or audiologic determination of tinnitus, even if verified by an audiologist, introduced potential for confounding and selection bias.
|