Is there an incidence of tinnitus with amlodipine or losartan?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

The prescribing information for both amlodipine and losartan lists tinnitus as an adverse event, with a low prevalence rate (between 0.1% to 1% for amlodipine and <2% for losartan). The available literature, however, provides somewhat conflicting data. Consensus guidance based on European pharmacovigilance reporting categorized both agents as associated with reports of drug-induced tinnitus; losartan is classified as having a more common prevalence rate at 1-10%, while a prevalence rate for amlodipine is not provided. However, primary studies that have reported on antihypertensive agents in patients who develop tinnitus have suggested that calcium channel blockers are more associated with tinnitus and angiotensin receptor blockers are less associated with tinnitus. Given this discrepancy, clinicians should carefully weigh the benefits of treatment with either amlodipine or losartan with the risk of ototoxicity, in the context of other potential ototoxic concomitant medications and other available treatment options.

An extensive literature search identified 1 tertiary and 3 primary studies relevant to this inquiry.

Background

A 2020 clinical guide provided an evidence summary of commercially available drugs associated with audiovestibular side effects, including hearing loss, tinnitus, dizziness, and vertigo, using the British National Formulary reference book and reported pharmacovigilance from pharmaceutical companies and health agencies. This consensus document provided an update of similar guidance published originally in 2005 and then in 2011, including a comprehensive listing of medications associated with ototoxic effects. It is noted that drug-induced tinnitus may be associated with continuous or pulsatile low-/high-pitched ringing in the ear(s) or may be asymptomatic, with pulsatile tinnitus tending to be unilateral and a more indirect sequela of ototoxic medications given its vascular origin. A 4-level classification system is used to stratify drug-induced ototoxicity: (1) ototoxic drugs, (2) drugs inducing tinnitus, (3) drugs inducing vertigo or dizziness, and (4) drugs inducing generic hearing disorders. Amlodipine is classified as group 2 and group 3, indicating explicit reporting of inducing tinnitus. Losartan is classified as group 2 and group 3b, indicating it can induce tinnitus commonly (prevalence ≥1% to <10%). [1]

References: [1] Altissimi G, Colizza A, Cianfrone G, de Vincentiis M, Greco A, Taurone S, Musacchio A, Ciofalo A, Turchetta R, Angeletti D, Ralli M. Drugs inducing hearing loss, tinnitus, dizziness and vertigo: an updated guide. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Aug;24(15):7946-7952. doi:10.26355/eurrev_2022477 008_2
Relevant Prescribing Information

Adverse Reactions [1]
The following events occurred in <1% but >0.1% of patients in controlled clinical trials or under conditions of open trials or marketing experience where a causal relationship is uncertain; they are listed to alert the physician to a possible relationship:
Special Senses: abnormal vision, conjunctivitis, diplopia, eye pain, tinnitus.

Adverse Reactions [2]
Treatment with COZAAR was well-tolerated with an overall incidence of adverse events similar to that of placebo. In controlled clinical trials, discontinuation of therapy for adverse events occurred in 2.3% of patients treated with COZAAR and 3.7% of patients given placebo. In 4 clinical trials involving over 1000 patients on various doses (10-150 mg) of losartan potassium and over 300 patients given placebo, the adverse events that occurred in ≥2% of patients treated with COZAAR and more commonly than placebo were: dizziness (3% vs. 2%), upper respiratory infection (8% vs. 7%), nasal congestion (2% vs. 1%), and back pain (2% vs. 1%).
The following less common adverse reactions have been reported:
Ear and labyrinth disorders: Vertigo, tinnitus.

References: [1] Amlodipine Besylate Tablet. Prescribing information. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2024.
[2] Cozaar (losartan potassium tablet, film coated). Prescribing information. Organon LLC; 2026.
Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

Is there an incidence of tinnitus with amlodipine or losartan?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-3 for your response.


 

Ototoxic Adverse Drug Reactions: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the Italian Spontaneous Reporting Database
Design

Retrospective analysis using a case/non-case postmarketing methodology

N= 325,980

Objective To perform an analysis of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports describing drug-induced ototoxicity from the Italian spontaneous reporting system (SRS)
Study Groups

Cases (n= 652)

Non-cases (n= 325,328)

Inclusion Criteria All ADR reports regarding drug-induced ototoxicity recorded in the RNF database (an extensive network managed by the Italian Medicines Agency Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco that connects each other, pharmaceutical companies, regional/local health authorities, research centers, and regional pharmacovigilance centers)
Exclusion Criteria Literature cases, duplicate reports, reports of vaccine-related adverse events
Methods Calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a case/non-case methodology. Cases were all suspected ADR reports regarding drug-induced ototoxicity collected into the Italian SRS from 2001 to 2017. Non-cases included all other ADRs reported in the same period. Reports containing "vertigo" as a preferred term were excluded from the analysis due to potential signaling bias. 
Duration December 1, 2001 through December 31, 2017
Outcome Measures

Primary: Identification of drugs with significant adjusted RORs for ototoxicity

Secondary: Identification of unexpected ototoxic ADRs

Baseline Characteristics  

Cases

(n = 652)

Non-cases

(n = 325,328)

p value
Females 337 (51.7%) 182,226 (56.0%) 0.021
Median age n (IQR: Q1–Q3) 60 (45–70) 61 (44–74) 0.088
Serious ADRs - Serious 187 (28.7%) 113,127 (34.8%) 0.008
Outcome of ADRs - Complete recovery 203 (31.1%) 136,366 (41.9%) <0.001
Results   Active Substances Ototoxic ADR reports (n) Adjusted ROR (95% CI) Relevant PT (n) with significant adjusted ROR (95% CI) Unexpected Ototoxic ADR
Selective calcium channel blockers with mainly vascular effects Amlodipine 3 1.10 (0.35–3.41) Tinnitus (n = 5; 8.06, 3.32–19.56) Yes
Agents acting on the renin–angiotensin system Irbesartan 7 10.44 (4.91–22.17) Tinnitus (n = 7; 19.60, 9.19–41.80) No
Adverse Events Significant adjusted RORs were found for drugs such as quinolones, macrolides, aminoglycosides, antidepressants, beta-blockers, and others. Unexpected ototoxic ADRs included tinnitus related to etoposide, nebivolol, betamethasone, abatacept, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, and tapentadol.
Study Author Conclusions This study is largely consistent with results from literature. However, some drugs like propafenone, antituberculars, hormone antagonists, teriparatide, tramadol, and pomalidomide are not known for being ototoxic. Further investigation is needed to better define the risk due to the paucity of data.
Critique The study provides valuable insights into drug-induced ototoxicity using a large database. However, the retrospective design and reliance on spontaneous reporting may introduce biases. The lack of detailed clinical data and potential under-reporting are limitations. Further studies are needed to confirm unexpected findings. 
References:
[1] [1] Barbieri MA, Cicala G, Cutroneo PM, et al. Ototoxic Adverse Drug Reactions: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the Italian Spontaneous Reporting Database. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1161. Published 2019 Oct 8. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01161
Positive Association between Tinnitus and Arterial Hypertension
Design

Transversal case–control study

N= 284

Objective To analyze the presence of arterial hypertension in tinnitus and non-tinnitus patients, and to evaluate the association between tinnitus and various antihypertensive drugs
Study Groups

Tinnitus group (n= 144)

Control group (n= 140)

Inclusion Criteria Patients 18 years or older with and without tinnitus, selected at the author's ENT clinic from 2011 to 2014
Exclusion Criteria Patients allegedly normotensive with high blood pressure detected at the physical examination
Methods Patients were submitted to anamnesis, otorhinolaryngological examination, and arterial pressure measurements. Tinnitus patients underwent psychoacoustic measurements and classified their tinnitus using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney, chi-square, Fisher, Spearman coefficient, and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests.
Duration 2011 to 2014
Outcome Measures

Primary: Presence of arterial hypertension in tinnitus patients

Secondary: Differences in tinnitus impact and psychoacoustic measurements between hypertensive and normotensive patients

Baseline Characteristics  

Tinnitus

(n= 144)

No Tinnitus

(n= 140)

Gender - Male 62 (43.1%) 65 (46.4%)
Gender - Female 82 (56.9%) 75 (53.6%)
Age ≤40 18 (12.5%) 14 (10.0%)
Age 41–59 55 (38.2%) 60 (42.9%)
Age 60–69 40 (27.8%) 36 (25.7%)
Age ≥70 31 (21.5%) 30 (21.4%)
Race - White 93 (71.5%) 98 (70.0%)
Race - Brown 22 (16.9%) 24 (17.1%)
Race - Black 15 (11.5%) 18 (12.9%)
Arterial Hypertension - Yes 64 (44.4%) 44 (31.4%)
Arterial Hypertension - No 80 (55.6%) 96 (68.6%)
Results   Tinnitus No Tinnitus p-Value
Arterial hypertension duration (months) 120 (39–216) 180 (84–240) 0.019
Caffeine (ml/day) 100 (50–200) 300 (200–400) 0.0001
Hearing loss - Yes 111 (81.3%) 75 (53.6%) <0.0001
Hearing loss - No 32 (18.7%) 65 (46.4%) -- 
Adverse Events Not applicable
Study Author Conclusions There is an association between tinnitus and arterial hypertension. This association is particularly strong in older patients. Hypertension treatment with diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers were more prevalent in tinnitus patients, suggesting an eventual ototoxicity of these drugs may be involved in tinnitus pathophysiology, a hypothesis that should be evaluated in further studies. 
Critique The study provides valuable insights into the association between tinnitus and arterial hypertension, highlighting the prevalence of hearing loss among tinnitus patients. However, the study's cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causality. The reliance on self-reported data for some variables may introduce bias. Additionally, the study does not account for potential confounding factors such as lifestyle and environmental influences that could impact the results. 
References:
[1] [1] Figueiredo RR, Azevedo AA, Penido NO. Positive Association between Tinnitus and Arterial Hypertension. Front Neurol. 2016;7:171. Published 2016 Oct 5. doi:10.3389/fneur.2016.00171

 

Prevalence of tinnitus in patients withhypertension and the impact of different anti hypertensive drugs on the incidence of tinnitus: A prospective, single-blind, observational study

Design

Prospective, single-center, single-blind, observational study in Italy

N=476

Objective

To determine the prevalence of tinnitus in hypertensive patients, and the impact of different antihypertensive drugs on the incidence of tinnitus in these patients

Study Groups

Tinnitus (n=84)

No tinnitus (n=392)

Inclusion Criteria

Consecutive, unselected, treated hypertensive patients who were referred for the first time to the clinic. The cohort included adults aged 18 to 75 years with mild to moderate hypertension, defined as European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology (ESH-ESC) grade I or II blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mmHg who were receiving antihypertensive treatment at the time of enrollment. Patients could also be receiving HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and/or antithrombotic agents.

Exclusion Criteria

Known secondary causes of hypertension, exposure to noise of ≥85 dB for 8 hours/day for at least 1 month, history of otologic disorders or previous episodes of hearing impairment or disturbances, unable to follow study protocol, active pregnancy, presence of ≥1 major concomitant disease, receiving treatment with drugs other than the study drugs

Methods

In patients whose BP values were elevated despite receiving antihypertensive therapy, an additional antihypertensive drug was added to the existing regimen on completion of study procedures.

On the morning before the first study visit, patients completed an internally validated questionnaire assessing the presence, frequency, and duration of tinnitus. The results of the questionnaire were reviewed by a trained, experienced audiologist to confirm the presence or absence of tinnitus. Patients who were determined to have tinnitus underwent a complete cardiovascular examination, including BP measurement and standard 12-lead electrocardiography. Resting supine and standing BPs were measured in the dominant arm using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer to the nearest 2 mm Hg. The mean of 3 consecutive BP measurements recorded at 1-minute intervals was used. The mean of 3 resting supine heart rate measurements also was used. 

The next day, 12-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was conducted to assess the relationship between the onset of tinnitus and the extent of BP changes. On ABPM, BP was measured at 15-minute intervals from 9 AM (+1 hour) to 9 PM (+1 hour). During ABPM, patients were asked to record the times of the onset and resolution of tinnitus using a diary. To better define the relationship between the onset of tinnitus and the occurrence of sudden changes in BP, patients were also instructed to immediately push a "start" button on the monitor whenever they began to experience tinnitus.

Duration

September 1, 2004 through November 30, 2004

Outcome Measures

Incidence of tinnitus, association of tinnitus with different antihypertensive treatments, impact of tinnitus incidence on BP

Baseline Characteristics

 

Tinnitus

(n=84)

No tinnitus

(n=392)

Overall

(N=476)

Mean age, years

60.3±11.2 61.6±7.1 -

Female sex, n (%)

39/193 (20.2) 154/193 (80)

Mean supine heart rate, beats/min

67.6±7.3 68.2±8.6

Mean supine BP, mmHg

Systolic

Diastolic

 

140.6±10.1

87.3±7.2

 

143.2±11.2

88.7±7.1

Concomitant risk factors, n (%)

Dyslipidemia

Diabetes

 

43/254 (16.9)

20/110 (18.2)

 

132/162 (81.5)

90/110 (81.8)

Current antihypertensive treatment, n (%)

Monotherapy

Combination therapy

 

43/254 (16.9)

41/222 (18.5)

 

211/254 (83.1)

181/222 (81.5)

Medications used, n (%)

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)

Diuretic

Beta-blocker

Calcium channel blocker (CCB)

Antithrombotic

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor

Alpha-blocker

Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)

- -

 

293 (61.6)

265 (55.7)

240 (50.4)

225 (47.3)

80 (16.8)

73 (15.3)

55 (11.6)

37 (7.8)

 

Results

Tinnitus observed in 17.6% of included patients overall.

The prevalence of tinnitus was significantly lower in patients treated with ARBs (5/37, 13.5%) and alpha-blockers (12/55, 21.8%) vs patients treated with diuretics (72/265, 27.2%), p<0.05 for both comparisons.

Tinnitus was significantly more prevalent in patients treated with a diuretic (72/265, 27.2%) vs those treated with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (9/73, 12.3%), p<0.05; this was not observed for patients treated with an antithrombotic drug, including aspirin (15/80, 18.8%).

Mean systolic BP was significantly higher in patients without tinnitus vs those with tinnitus (143.2±11.1 mmHg vs 140.6±10.3 mmHg, p<0.005.

Adverse Events

Only tinnitus reported in this study

Study Author Conclusions

In this study of tinnitus in patients receiving antihypertensive therapy, tinnitus was found in 17.6% of patients. Tinnitus was associated with the use of diuretics and with low SBP. Further studies are needed.

Critique

This study found the presence of tinnitus to be significantly lower among patients treated with ARBs and alpha-blockers, whereas tinnitus was significantly higher among patients treated with diuretics. This may indicate a possible protective role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation on the sympathetic nervous system in the development of tinnitus. This study was limited by its single-center, non-randomized design with lack of a comparator group, limiting its broader generalizability. Also, considering the use of European guidelines for management of hypertension, the findings may not be fully generalizable to the US population, where agents such as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and antithrombotics are not generally considered part of the armamentarium to manage hypertension. Additionally, the use of either clinical or audiologic determination of tinnitus, even if verified by an audiologist, introduced potential for confounding and selection bias.



References:
[1] [1] Borghi C, Brandolini C, Prandin MG, Dormi A, Modugno GC, Pirodda A. Prevalence of tinnitus in patients withhypertension and the impact of different anti hypertensive drugs on the incidence of tinnitus: A prospective, single-blind, observational study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2005;66(5):420-432. doi:10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.10.001