When transitioning to warfarin from rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation, is it recommended to leave the rivaroxaban on until the INR is 2 or greater?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Literature defining the optimal timing of rivaroxaban discontinuation when transitioning to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is very limited. The Xarelto prescribing information and several reviews and guidance documents note the lack of clinical trial data and commonly recommend discontinuing rivaroxaban and initiating a parenteral anticoagulant, such as unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, with warfarin until the INR is ≥ 2.0 for at least 24 hours. A 2014 study in healthy volunteers appears to provide the only human data evaluating overlap; in that study, rivaroxaban was discontinued once an INR ≥ 2.0 was achieved, which occurred within 2 to 4 days in most participants. Limited guidance from the European Medicines Agency and guidance developed for venous thromboembolism similarly support concurrent rivaroxaban and warfarin until an INR of ≥ 2.0, at which point rivaroxaban may be discontinued. A 2014 review also describes a pharmacokinetic-based approach in which warfarin is initiated 2 to 4 days before rivaroxaban discontinuation depending on creatinine clearance. Overall, evidence for transitioning from rivaroxaban to warfarin in patients with AF remains sparse, but short-term overlap until an INR ≥ 2.0 is achieved may be reasonable. Given the limited high-quality supporting evidence, this approach should be done cautiously.
Background

The 2014 European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidance recommends overlapping rivaroxaban with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) during conversion to maintain continuous anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban and the VKA should be administered concurrently until the INR is ≥ 2.0. Standard initial VKA dosing should be used for the first 2 days of the transition, followed by INR-guided dose adjustment. Because rivaroxaban can influence the INR, INR testing should not be performed earlier than 24 hours after the previous rivaroxaban dose. [1]

A 2016 guidance document on practical management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for venous thromboembolism emphasizes that transitions between anticoagulants can increase both thromboembolic and bleeding risk if therapeutic anticoagulation is interrupted. In the ROCKET AF and ARISTOTLE trials, an approximate 4-fold increase in stroke or bleeding was observed at study completion, which was attributed to gaps in anticoagulation during transition to warfarin and highlights the need for a structured transition plan. For rivaroxaban to warfarin, one recommended approach is to stop rivaroxaban and begin warfarin plus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) at the time the next rivaroxaban dose would have been due, continuing LMWH until the INR is ≥ 2.0. The guidance also describes an alternative strategy which involves overlapping warfarin with the DOAC, measuring the INR immediately before the next scheduled DOAC dose, and discontinuing the DOAC once the INR is ≥ 2.0. [2]

A 2014 review on switching between oral anticoagulants noted that no clinical trials had evaluated conversion from rivaroxaban to warfarin and that manufacturer guidance favored avoiding any interruption in anticoagulation. One approach is to discontinue rivaroxaban and begin a parenteral anticoagulant when the next rivaroxaban dose would have been due, with warfarin started on day 1 or 2 of heparin therapy and parenteral anticoagulation continued for at least 5 days and until the INR is ≥ 2 for at least 24 hours. An alternative strategy used in European practice is to overlap rivaroxaban with warfarin for at least 2 days and continue both until the INR is ≥ 2; because rivaroxaban can increase the INR, the review notes that INR should not be assessed until at least 24 hours after the previous rivaroxaban dose. A pharmacokinetic-based approach was also described, with warfarin started 4 days before stopping rivaroxaban for CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min, 3 days before for CrCl 31–50 mL/min, and 2 days before for CrCl 15–30 mL/min. No transition recommendation was provided for CrCl <15 mL/min. The review emphasizes that transitions should be managed carefully because even a brief lapse in anticoagulation, including a missed rivaroxaban dose, may increase thrombotic risk. [3]

A 2014 open-label, nonrandomized pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study (Table 1) evaluated transition from rivaroxaban to warfarin in healthy adults aged 18 to 60 years. Subjects received rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily for 5 days, followed by rivaroxaban plus warfarin 5 or 10 mg daily a target trough international normalized ratio (INR) of ≥ 2.0 was achieved, after which rivaroxaban was discontinued and warfarin monotherapy continued. Co-administration produced greater-than-additive anticoagulant effects, with mean maximum INR values of 2.79 to 4.15, while rivaroxaban had minimal effect on INR at trough concentrations. Therapeutic INR was achieved within 2 to 4 days of overlap, supporting INR measurement at rivaroxaban trough when adjusting warfarin. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed no meaningful changes in drug exposure during co-administration, and no major bleeding events occurred. Overall, the study supports short-term overlap of rivaroxaban and warfarin during transition, with INR monitoring performed near the rivaroxaban trough to minimize interference. [4]

Background References: [1] Savelieva I, Camm AJ. Practical considerations for using novel oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2014;37(1):32-47. doi:10.1002/clc.22204
[2] Burnett AE, Mahan CE, Vazquez SR, Oertel LB, Garcia DA, Ansell J. Guidance for the practical management of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in VTE treatment. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41(1):206-232. doi:10.1007/s11239-015-1310-7
[3] Strasser KM, Qasem A, Madhusudhana S. Switching between Oral Anticoagulants. Hospital Practice. 2014;42(3):68-74. doi:10.3810/hp.2014.08.1119
[4] Moore KT, Byra W, Vaidyanathan S, et al. Switching from rivaroxaban to warfarin: an open label pharmacodynamic study in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;79(6):907-917. doi:10.1111/bcp.12559
Relevant Prescribing Information

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION [5]

Switching from XARELTO to Warfarin
Adults:
No clinical trial data are available to guide converting patients from XARELTO to warfarin. XARELTO affects INR, so INR measurements made during coadministration with warfarin may not be useful for determining the appropriate dose of warfarin. One approach is to discontinue XARELTO and begin both a parenteral anticoagulant and warfarin at the time the next dose of XARELTO would have been taken.

Pediatric Patients:
To ensure adequate anticoagulation during the transition from XARELTO to warfarin, continue XARELTO for at least 2 days after the first dose of warfarin. After 2 days of coadministration, an INR should be obtained prior to the next scheduled dose of XARELTO. Co-administration of XARELTO and warfarin is advised to continue until the INR is ≥ 2.0.

Once XARELTO is discontinued, INR testing may be done reliably 24 hours after the last dose.

Relevant Prescribing Information References: [5] Xarelto (rivaroxaban tablet, film coated). Prescribing information. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2026
Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

When transitioning to warfarin from rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation, is it recommended to leave the rivaroxaban on until the INR is 2 or greater?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Table 1 for your response.


Switching from rivaroxaban to warfarin: an open label pharmacodynamic study in healthy subjects

Design

Open-label, non-randomized, sequential two period study

N= 31

Objective

To assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) changes during the transition from rivaroxaban to warfarin in healthy subjects, to mimic a potential clinical scenario in which such a transition would have to be undertaken in a patient.

Study Groups

Healthy volunteers (n= 31)

Inclusion Criteria

Healthy subjects aged 18-60 years with BMI between 18 and 30 kg/m², body weight ≥50 kg, normal coagulation test results, and fewer than three variant CYP2C9 and VKORC1 gene alleles

Exclusion Criteria

History of significant medical illness, increased risk of bleeding, abnormal lab values, use of drugs affecting coagulation or CYP metabolism, positive drug test, or history of drug/alcohol abuse

Methods

Subjects received rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily for 5 days, followed by co-administration with warfarin (5 or 10 mg) until INR ≥2.0. Rivaroxaban was then discontinued, and warfarin continued as monotherapy. In treatment period 2, subjects received warfarin without rivaroxaban

Duration

Approximately 14 days for treatment period 1 and 8 days for treatment period 2, with a washout period of at least 14 days between periods

Outcome Measures

Primary: Pharmacodynamic changes (INR and PT) during transition

Secondary: Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics

Baseline Characteristics

 

Healthy volunteers (n= 46)*

Age, years

47.7 ± 8.8

Male

28 (61%)

White

45 (98%)

Body mass index, kg/m2

26 ± 3.1

*46 volunteers were initially enrolled and included in baseline characteristics but were ultimately excluded in the final results.

Results

Endpoint

Healthy volunteers (n= 39)

Mean, maximum effect for INR, warfarin 10 mg

Co-administration rivaroxban plus warfarin

Warfarin alone

 

2.79 to 4.15

1.41 to 1.74

Mean, maximum effect for INR, warfarin 5 mg

Co-administration rivaroxban plus warfarin

Warfarin alone

 

2.55 to 4.33

1.22 to 1.58

Mean, maximum effect for PT, warfarin 10 mg

Co-administration rivaroxban plus warfarin

Warfarin alone

 

41.0 to 62.7

20.1 to 25.2

 

Mean, maximum effect for PT, warfarin 5 mg

Co-administration rivaroxban plus warfarin

Warfarin alone

 

37.2 to 65.2

17.0 to 22.4

Adverse Events

32 subjects (69.6%) reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Common TEAEs included headache (32.6%), nasopharyngitis (15.2%), and muscle spasms (15.2%). No significant bleeding events were observed.

Study Author Conclusions

The combined pharmacodynamic effects during co-administration of rivaroxaban and warfarin were greater than additive, but the pharmacokinetics of both drugs were unaffected. Co-administration was well tolerated. INR monitoring during co-administration should be performed at the trough rivaroxaban concentration to minimize the effect of rivaroxaban on INR.

Critique

The study was well-designed to explore pharmacodynamic changes during the transition from rivaroxaban to warfarin. However, the study was limited by its small sample size and the use of healthy subjects, which may not fully represent the typical patient population requiring anticoagulation therapy. The findings may not be directly applicable to older patients or those with comorbidities.
Table 1 References:
[6] Moore KT, Byra W, Vaidyanathan S, et al. Switching from rivaroxaban to warfarin: an open label pharmacodynamic study in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;79(6):907-17.