The increasing incidence rates of serotonin syndrome are believed to parallel the increased frequency of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use. Symptoms of serotonin syndrome may also be confused with other central nervous system pathologies or overlooked entirely, as recognition of serotonin syndrome is more a diagnosis of exclusion and requires a high index of suspicion. Combination with other drugs (e.g., monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAOIs], tricyclic antidepressants, cough medicine, etc.) may also potentiate the risk of developing serotonin syndrome. Because of these factors, measuring the incidence rate of serotonin syndrome caused by SSRI/SNRI and methylene blue is deemed a difficult endeavor. [1], [2]
Methylene blue can precipitate severe serotonin toxicity when administered to patients taking SSRIs due to its mechanisms as a potent reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A), the enzyme responsible for serotonin metabolism. SSRIs increase extracellular serotonin by blocking serotonin reuptake, while methylene blue inhibits serotonin breakdown; together, this combination can substantially increase serotonergic activity and produce a serotonin-toxicity toxidrome characterized by agitation, confusion, hyperreflexia, clonus, tremor or jerky movements, hypertension, and hyperthermia. The interaction appears particularly relevant in perioperative settings, such as parathyroid surgery where methylene blue has been used for gland localization, because postoperative neurologic changes may be misattributed to delirium or metabolic encephalopathy. Additional reports and retrospective series elucidate that among 325 parathyroidectomy patients given methylene blue, CNS toxicity occurred in 17 of 45 patients taking SSRIs preoperatively, compared with no cases among 280 patients not taking SSRIs. Even common methylene blue doses used clinically may exceed concentrations required for MAO-A inhibition. [3]
A 2010 systematic review examined whether methylene blue can precipitate serotonin syndrome when given to patients receiving serotonin reuptake inhibitors or other highly serotonergic antidepressants. Although historically considered relatively safe, the review focused on a series of postoperative neurologic and autonomic complications occurring after intravenous methylene blue, especially in patients taking SSRIs or SNRIs. The authors searched MEDLINE and PsychInfo through September 2008 and included studies in which patients received methylene blue and then developed acute confusional states, neuropsychiatric complications, or autonomic instability. A total of 9 case reports and 2 retrospective reviews were identified. In total, 26 patients developed postoperative confusion or neuropsychiatric symptoms after intravenous methylene blue; 24 were taking a serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 1 was taking clomipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant with strong serotonergic activity. [4]
The case reports primarily involved patients undergoing elective parathyroidectomy with methylene blue used for gland localization, although one patient received methylene blue for persistent hypotension during mitral valve replacement. Most affected patients were taking SSRIs or SNRIs such as fluoxetine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, citalopram, or clomipramine, and their antidepressants were generally continued until the day of surgery. Reported methylene blue doses ranged from lower doses such as 1.75 to 2 mg/kg to standard parathyroidectomy doses of 5 to 7.5 mg/kg. Clinical manifestations varied but commonly included confusion, agitation, reduced consciousness, aphasia, hyperthermia, diaphoresis, hypertonicity, tremor, hyperreflexia, myoclonus, nystagmus, and abnormal limb movements consistent with possible clonus. Several patients required ICU admission, reintubation, or prolonged ventilator support; one patient had a prolonged hospitalization, required hemodialysis, and recovered over approximately 2 weeks. Despite the severity of symptoms, all 9 case-report patients recovered with supportive care. [4]
Additionally, two retrospective parathyroidectomy audits provided the strongest incidence signal. In one review of 193 parathyroidectomies using methylene blue 7.5 mg/kg, 12 patients developed toxic metabolic encephalopathy characterized mainly by confusion and difficulty arousing; all 12 were taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Among patients taking SRIs, the incidence of postoperative encephalopathy was 43%. In a second review of 132 parathyroidectomies using methylene blue doses of 3 to 5 mg/kg, 5 patients taking SRIs developed postoperative encephalopathy with confusion, lethargy, and aphasia; 2 required reintubation, and symptom onset occurred within 1 to 5 hours. Among patients taking SRIs in this study, the incidence of neurologic complications was 29%. When pooled, the retrospective data showed an overall 38% incidence of confusion or neuropsychiatric symptoms among patients taking SRIs who received methylene blue, with mean symptom duration of 42.1 hours and a range from 1 hour to 2 weeks. [4]
Overall, the review concluded that intravenous methylene blue can cause a serious adverse reaction consistent with serotonin syndrome when given to patients taking SRIs or other highly serotonergic antidepressants. The authors recommended that psychiatrists, surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical-care clinicians recognize this interaction before planned procedures or urgent use of methylene blue. For elective parathyroid surgery, they suggested considering alternative localization strategies, such as high-resolution ultrasound or radionuclide scanning, when antidepressants cannot be safely discontinued. They also noted that simply stopping antidepressants before surgery may not always be practical or safe, particularly because some SRIs have long half-lives and discontinuation may destabilize psychiatric illness. For vasodilatory shock or other urgent indications, the authors advised extreme caution if methylene blue is used in patients taking serotonergic drugs. [4]
A 2023 meta-analysis compared indocyanine green (IG) fluorescence versus blue dye, technetium-99m, or both in sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in early breast cancer patients. However, from a total of 39 included studies, the results largely favor IG. The consistency of superiority analysis, where SLN detection metrics were 2.00 to 4.99% or ≥ 5.00% greater for IG than blue dye/99mTc, suggests that IG was superior to blue dye 73 times versus 1, to technetium-99m 42 times versus 9, and to technetium-99 plus blue dye 6 times versus 0. Therefore, utilizing alternatives to IG for early breast cancer screening may not be appropriate. [5]