| Liver cyst penetration of antibiotics at the target site of infection: a randomized pharmacokinetic trial |
| Design |
Prospective, randomized single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) study
N= 20
|
| Objective |
To investigate tissue penetration of four antibiotics in non-infected liver cysts and explore influencing factors |
| Study Groups |
Group 1: ciprofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam (n= 11)
Group 2: co-trimoxazole and doxycycline (n= 10)
|
| Inclusion Criteria |
Adult patients with symptomatic liver cyst(s) without current cyst infection, suitable for percutaneous aspiration sclerotherapy |
| Exclusion Criteria |
Allergy or contraindications for study drug use, severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), use of antibiotics in the 7 days before aspiration sclerotherapy |
| Methods |
Group 1 received IV ciprofloxacin (200 mg) and piperacillin/tazobactam (4000/500 mg). Group 2 received IV trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (160/800 mg) and doxycycline (200 mg). Cyst fluid and blood samples were collected and analyzed using LC-MS/MS |
| Duration |
Patients were included between 2019 and 2020. Analysis completed in 2023 |
| Outcome Measures |
Liver cyst penetration (cyst-fluid-to-plasma concentration ratio) |
| Baseline Characteristics |
|
Total group (n = 20; cysts = 21) |
Group 1: ciprofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 10; cysts = 11) |
Group 2: co-trimoxazole and doxycycline (n = 10; cysts = 10) |
| Age, years |
61 (55–68) |
59 (44–65) |
63 (55–72) |
| Female |
18 (90%) |
9 (90%) |
9 (90%) |
|
Aetiology
Solitary cyst
Polycystic liver ADPLD
Polycystic liver ADPKD
|
11 (55%)
7 (35%)
2 (10%)
|
7 (70%)
2 (20%)
1 (10%)
|
4 (40%)
5 (50%)
1 (10%) |
| Length, m |
1.69 (1.6–1.8) |
1.71 (1.6–1.8) |
1.66 (1.62–1.80) |
| Weight, kg |
70.9 (59.3–95.4) |
74.0 (57.8–113.1) |
66.4 (59.0–80.2) |
| BMI, kg/m2 |
23.7 (20.7–30.0) |
24.5 (20.1–35.7) |
23.7 (21.8–27.7) |
|
Renal function (eGFR)
Normal (≥90)
Mild (60–89)
Moderate (30–59)
|
9 (45%)
10 (50%)
1 (5%)
|
6 (60%)
3 (30%)
1 (10%)
|
3 (30%)
7 (70%)
0 (0%)
|
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 |
88 (69 – >90) |
>90 (81 – >90) |
80 (64 – >90) |
| Cyst diameter, cm |
123 (91–145) |
113 (98–134) |
131 (87–174) |
| Aspirated cyst volume, mL |
700 (375–1200) |
700 (470–800) |
800 (288–2525) |
|
Cyst fluid appearance
Clear
Opaque
|
15 (71%)
6 (29%)
|
8 (73%)
3 (27%)
|
6 (67%)
3 (33%)
|
|
Cyst location (segments)
Right hepatic lobe (segment 5–8)
Left hepatic lobe (segment 2–4)
|
13 (62%)
8 (38%)
|
6 (55%)
5 (45%)
|
7 (70%)
3 (30%)
|
|
Blood values
Haemoglobin, mmol/L
White blood cell count, 109/L
Total protein, g/L
Creatinine, μmol/L
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2
|
8.3 (7.5–8.7)
6.0 (5.0–7.0)
73.0 (71.0–76.0)
68.0 (61.0–77.9)
87.5 (68.8 – ≥90)
|
8.5 (7.5–8.8)
5.6 (4.3–7.4)
73.0 (71.5–75.5)
66.0 (57.8–69.8)
≥90 (81 – ≥90)
|
8.0 (7.4–8.8)
6.2 (5.4–6.7)
73.5 (70.8–77.3)
76.5 (64.0–81.3)
80 (64 – ≥90)
|
|
Cyst fluid values
Erythrocytes, 109/L
White blood cell count, 109/L
Protein, g/L
pH
|
1.0 (0.0–9.0)
0.0 (0.0–0.5)
9.7 (5.0–22.6) 7.6 (7.5–7.7)
|
0.5 (0.0–11.0)
0.1 (0.0–4.4)
9.7 (4.8–22.0)
7.7 (7.6–7.7)
|
2.0 (0.0–54.5)
0.0 (0.0–0.6)
10.5 (5.0–28.7)
7.6 (7.5–7.7)
|
| ADPLD, autosomal-dominant polycystic liver disease; ADPKD, autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease; BMI, body mass index; CKD, chronic kidney disease |
| Results |
|
Cyst-fluid-to-plasma concentration ratio (%) |
Median (IQR) |
| Ciprofloxacin |
4.2% |
(1.6%–8.9%) |
| Piperacillin |
0.3% |
(0.0%–1.3%) |
| Tazobactam |
0.2% |
(0.0%–1.3%) |
| Trimethoprim |
12.2% |
(6.3%–16.1%) |
| Sulfamethoxazole |
0.4% |
(0.2%–3.8%) |
| Doxycycline |
1.6% |
(0.9%–2.3%) |
| Adverse Events |
There were no adverse events related to the administration of the investigational products. There were no severe adverse events during the study. |
| Study Author Conclusions |
Trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin have the highest penetration ratios amongst antibiotics tested. Liver cyst penetration varies widely between drugs after a single IV dose. |
| Critique |
The study's strength lies in its controlled setting and randomized design, which minimizes biases. However, the single time point for drainage limits comprehensive pharmacokinetic analysis. The small sample size and single-dose design may not fully reflect clinical settings, and the lack of unbound drug concentration measurement is a limitation. Future studies should consider multiple doses and time points for a more complete understanding of drug penetration dynamics. |