| Memantine for Prevention of Cognitive Late Effects in Children and Adolescents Receiving Radiotherapy for Brain Tumors: A Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Trial |
| Design |
Randomized, double-blind, controlled, pilot trial
N= 30
|
| Objective |
To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of memantine for reducing cognitive late effects in children and adolescents undergoing radiotherapy |
| Study Groups |
Memantine (n= 16)
Placebo (n= 14)
|
| Inclusion Criteria |
Children and adolescents with a localized brain tumor, aged 6-21, initiating focal radiotherapy, normal lab tests and ECG, English proficiency, IQ ≥ 70, adequate vision and hearing, negative pregnancy test for females of childbearing age |
| Exclusion Criteria |
Significant neurologic disease, psychiatric conditions precluding participation, medical disorders endangering participation, recent start of psychotropic medication, history of substance abuse |
| Methods |
Participants were randomized to receive memantine (20 mg/d) or placebo for 12 weeks, overlapping with 6 weeks of radiation therapy. Cognitive assessments were conducted at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 1 year. Adherence was monitored via pill counts and side effects via structured interviews. |
| Duration |
November 2017 to June 2023 |
| Outcome Measures |
Feasibility based on study participation, medication adherence, and cognitive assessment completion |
| Baseline Characteristics |
|
All Participants (N = 30) |
Memantine (n = 16) |
Placebo (n = 14) |
p-value |
| Male |
14 (47%) |
9 (56%) |
5 (36%) |
0.2607 |
| White race |
23 (77%) |
12 (75%) |
11 (79%) |
0.8220 |
|
Diagnosis
Craniopharyngioma
Low grade glioma
Germinoma
|
16 (53%)
13 (43%)
1 (3%)
|
6 (38%)
10 (62%)
0 (0%)
|
10 (71%)
3 (21%)
1 (7%)
|
0.0419 |
|
Tumor Location
Supratentorial
|
26 (87%)
|
14 (87%)
|
12 (86%)
|
0.886
|
| Age at radiation therapy, years |
11.93 ± 2.87 |
12.29 ± 3.37 |
11.51 ± 2.23 |
0.4699 |
| Baseline IQ |
107.38 ± 14.04 |
108.58 ± 15.99 |
106.17 ± 12.39 |
0.6829 |
| Results |
|
Memantine (n= 16) |
| Cogstate Identification effect size (ES) |
0.61 |
| WJ-IV Math Fluency ES |
0.81 |
| WJ-IV Reading Fluency ES |
0.45 |
| PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale ES |
0.72 |
|
The evaluation of baseline cognitive performance compared to the one-year time point revealed that two measures of academic fluency, WJ-IV Math Fluency (ES = 0.71) and Reading Fluency (ES = 0.65), exhibited medium to large effect sizes with confidence intervals excluding zero. However, an observed trend suggested differences in radiation dose between the memantine and placebo groups (p = .054), attributed to one participant receiving 30 Gy. After excluding this participant from the analysis, five of the six effect sizes continued to be medium to large. Notably, WJ-IV Reading Fluency showed a decrease at the 12-week mark (ES = 0.38) but sustained a medium effect size by the one-year point (ES = 0.58).
|
| Adverse Events |
Side effects were minimal with no significant differences between groups. Placebo group reported greater symptoms 11 out of 14 times (79%). |
| Study Author Conclusions |
Memantine as a neuroprotectant during irradiation is feasible and acceptable, with preliminary evidence for improved cognitive outcomes, warranting validation in a larger trial. |
| Critique |
The study demonstrated feasibility and potential cognitive benefits of memantine, but the small sample size and pilot nature limit the generalizability. The study's focus on proton irradiation and limited tumor diversity may not reflect broader clinical settings. Future studies should include larger samples and diverse treatment modalities to confirm findings. |