What evidence supports the use of supplemental post-hemodialysis acyclovir dosing for the treatment of varicella-zoster ophthalmic infection in patients receiving scheduled intermittent hemodialysis? Specifically, how do available data compare the regimen of acyclovir 200 mg ORALLY twice daily without supplemental dosing versus 200 mg orally twice daily with an additional 200 mg dose administered after each hemodialysis session [HD days 200 mg in the morning followed by 400 mg nightly (after HD)]?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

While there are no studies or case reports specifically detailing oral acyclovir dosing in intermittent dialysis patients being treated for herpes zoster ophthalmicus, pharmacokinetic data suggest a loading dose of 400 mg and a maintenance dose of 200 mg BID is sufficient to maintain therapeutic plasma levels and prevent neurotoxicity in dialysis-dependent patients. The prescribing information advocates adding an additional dose after each dialysis session; one pharmacokinetic study (Table 1) recommends a further loading dose to replenish what was lost during dialysis.

acyclovir post-hemodialysis dosing herpes zoster ophthalmicus PubMed: acyclovir hemodialysis = 198 results

Background

Acyclovir is primarily eliminated through renal excretion and possesses a narrow therapeutic index, particularly in patients with renal impairment, necessitating careful dosing and monitoring. Its pharmacokinetic properties include a small molecular size, low protein-binding capacity, and high water solubility, making acyclovir efficiently removed by all modalities of dialysis, including continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and intermittent hemodialysis. Notably, the clearance of acyclovir over a 24-hour period during CRRT is comparable to that achieved in a single session of intermittent hemodialysis. Current limited pharmacokinetic data support an intravenous dose of 5 mg/kg every 24 hours (calculated based on ideal body weight) or an oral dose of 400-800 mg/d, which is deemed sufficient for treating most infections in patients undergoing CRRT, regardless of the specific CRRT modality employed. For infections involving the central nervous system (CNS), such as herpes simplex virus encephalitis, a higher dose of 7.5 mg/kg IV every 24 hours is recommended to achieve adequate CNS penetration and therapeutic effect. Given acyclovir’s narrow therapeutic window and variability in clearance associated with renal replacement therapies, therapeutic drug monitoring of acyclovir concentrations is advised when feasible to optimize dosing and minimize the risk of toxicity in this vulnerable patient population. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]

Background References: [1] Trotman RL, Williamson JC, Shoemaker DM, Salzer WL. Antibiotic dosing in critically ill adult patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(8):1159-1166. doi:10.1086/444500
[2] Brandariz-Nuñez D, Correas-Sanahuja M, Maya-Gallego S, Martín Herranz I. Neurotoxicity associated with acyclovir and valacyclovir: A systematic review of cases. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;46(4):918-926. doi:10.1111/jcpt.13464
[3] Krasny HC, Liao SH, de Miranda P, Laskin OL, Whelton A, Lietman PS. Influence of hemodialysis on acyclovir pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic renal failure. Am J Med. 1982;73(1A):202-204. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(82)90091-2
[4] Boulieu R, Bastien O, Gaillard S, Flamens C. Pharmacokinetics of acyclovir in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodialysis. Ther Drug Monit. 1997;19(6):701-704. doi:10.1097/00007691-199712000-00016
[5] Khajehdehi P, Jamal JA, Bastani B. Removal of acyclovir during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration with high-efficiency membranes. Clin Nephrol. 2000;54(4):351-355.
[6] Bleyzac N, Barou P, Massenavette B, et al. Assessment of acyclovir intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability during continuous hemofiltration, continuous hemodiafiltration, and continuous hemodialysis. Ther Drug Monit. 1999;21(5):520-525. doi:10.1097/00007691-199910000-00005
Relevant Prescribing Information

Hemodialysis
For patients who require hemodialysis, the mean plasma half-life of acyclovir during hemodialysis is approximately 5 hours. This results in a 60% decrease in plasma concentrations following a 6-hour dialysis period. Therefore, the patient’s dosing schedule should be adjusted so that an additional dose is administered after each dialysis. [7]

Relevant Prescribing Information References: [7] Acyclovir capsule. Prescribing information. Apotex Corp; 2025.
Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

What evidence supports the use of supplemental post-hemodialysis acyclovir dosing for the treatment of varicella-zoster ophthalmic infection in patients receiving scheduled intermittent hemodialysis? Specifically, how do available data compare the regimen of acyclovir 200 mg ORALLY twice daily without supplemental dosing versus 200 mg orally twice daily with an additional 200 mg dose administered after each hemodialysis session [HD days 200 mg in the morning followed by 400 mg nightly (after HD)]?

Level of evidence

D - Case reports or unreliable data  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-4 for your response.


 

Avoiding Acyclovir Neurotoxicity in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure Undergoing Haemodialysis

Design

Prospective pharmacokinetic study

N= 7

Objective

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of oral acyclovir in dialysis-dependent patients and propose a modified dosing regimen to prevent neurotoxicity

Study Groups All patients (n= 7)
Inclusion Criteria

Patients established on unit-based haemodialysis with a dialysis duration of 4-6 hours, interdialytic period of 48 hours, oliguric renal failure (<200mL urine/day), no previous exposure to acyclovir, and no history of neuro/psychiatric symptoms

Exclusion Criteria

Not specified

Methods

Following routine haemodialysis, each patient received a single 800 mg tablet of acyclovir. Plasma acyclovir levels were monitored over 48 hours, including before and after the next dialysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using computer modeling to predict serum levels from varying maintenance and loading doses.

Duration Not specified
Outcome Measures

Primary: Plasma acyclovir concentration levels

Secondary: Pharmacokinetic parameters such as half-life, clearance, and volume of distribution

Baseline Characteristics  

All patients (n= 7)

Age range, years 43-72
Male 5 (71.4%)
Weight range, kg 53-74.5
Dialysis duration (range), h 4-5
Results  

All patients (n= 7)

Mean acyclovir concentration, µM

After 1 h

After 2 h

After 3 h

After 5 h

After 18 h

After 24 h

After 48 h (before next HD)

 

3.10

9.27

12.54

11.13

6.29

4.66

2.21

Elimination half-life, h (range)

Clearance, mL/min (range)

Vd, L (range)

20.2 (10.0-42.8)

206.5 (120.6-341.4)

334.2 (190.2-532.8)

Acyclovir removal via hemodialysis is efficient, removing approximately 51-60% of the drug. Based on pharmacokinetic modeling, administration of oral acyclovir at 200 mg twice daily (12-hourly) with loading doses of 400 or 800 mg predicts steady-state plasma concentrations averaging around 6.4 ± 0.8 µM, with higher loading doses (800 mg) associated with supratherapeutic plasma levels (~12.2 ± 2 µM). These elevated concentrations approach or exceed the threshold associated with neurotoxicity (reported as 12–34 µM), a well-documented adverse effect in patients with renal impairment.

One patient exhibited an unusually high plasma concentration at 1 hour post-dose without clear explanation, highlighting unpredictable pharmacokinetics in this population.
Adverse Events No adverse effects were reported by the patients
Study Author Conclusions

A modified dosing regimen of acyclovir, with a loading dose of 400 mg and a maintenance dose of 200 mg twice daily, is sufficient to maintain therapeutic plasma levels and prevent neurotoxicity in dialysis-dependent patients. A further loading dose after dialysis is recommended to replace the drug removed during dialysis.

Critique The study provides valuable insights into the pharmacokinetics of oral acyclovir in dialysis patients and suggests a practical dosing modification to prevent neurotoxicity. However, the small sample size and lack of a control group limit the generalizability of the findings. The individual variation in acyclovir pharmacokinetics also may have affected the results (e.g., one patient having a 42.8 h half-life, an outlier that appears to have affected the mean).

 

Table 1 References:
[8] Almond MK, Fan S, Dhillon S, Pollock AM, Raftery MJ. Avoiding acyclovir neurotoxicity in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing haemodialysis. Nephron. 1995;69(4):428-432. doi:10.1159/000188514

 

Impact of continuous hemodiafiltration on serum acyclovir concentrations in a patient with encephalopathy

Design

Case report

Case presentation

This clinical case involves a Japanese woman in her 70s with a complex medical history including renal failure, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, reflux esophagitis, chronic gastritis, and chronic bronchitis. Her regular medications were amlodipine, lansoprazole, rebamipide, atorvastatin, epinastine, and ambroxol, and her body weight was 66.2 kg.

The patient was treated with valacyclovir at 1000 mg TID for herpes zoster ophthalmicus, starting eight days before hospital admission. After seven days of valacyclovir therapy, she developed neurological symptoms including fever, dysarthria, altered consciousness, hallucinations, and headache, leading to admission to a local hospital. Her laboratory tests showed a marked decline in renal function, with serum creatinine escalating to 4.02 mg/dL and estimated creatinine clearance dropping to 12.9 mL/min, indicating acute kidney injury.

Based on clinical suspicion of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) encephalitis, intravenous acyclovir (ACV) was initiated. However, after three days without neurological improvement and with worsening renal impairment, the patient was transferred to a tertiary care emergency unit. Upon admission (Day 0), ACV-induced nephropathy and encephalopathy were strongly suspected. Consequently, ACV was discontinued, and continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) was initiated to enhance drug clearance.

Laboratory analysis on admission revealed elevated serum creatinine consistent with acute renal failure. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis via lumbar puncture showed normal cell counts and protein levels, with negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for VZV and herpes simplex virus, and negative antibody titers (IgM and IgG). Additionally, the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel detected no pathogens, ruling out active infectious encephalitis.

Measurement of serum ACV concentrations revealed toxic levels at 14.1 μg/mL, exceeding the neurotoxic threshold of 3.4 μg/mL. The pharmacokinetics of ACV in this patient were characterized by an extended elimination half-life of 19.5 hours due to end-stage renal disease. Following initiation of CHDF, serum ACV levels declined rapidly, supporting the efficacy of CHDF in clearing ACV and mitigating toxicity.

The clinical course demonstrated progressive improvement in consciousness, as indicated by rising Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores concurrent with declining ACV concentrations during CHDF treatment. CHDF was discontinued on Day 3, and the patient showed no evidence of ongoing VZV infection, with no need to restart antiviral therapy. She was discharged on Day 17 without neurological sequelae or VZV relapse.

Study Author Conclusions

This case underlines the importance of cautious use of renally-excreted antivirals like valacyclovir and acyclovir in elderly patients with pre-existing renal impairment and comorbidities such as hypertension and female sex, which are recognized risk factors for ACV-induced nephrotoxicity. It highlights the need for careful renal function monitoring and dosage adjustment to prevent accumulation and neurotoxicity. The rapid reduction of ACV serum levels and neurological recovery with CHDF emphasize continuous hemodiafiltration as an effective intervention in cases of ACV overdose or toxicity in patients with compromised renal function.

Furthermore, alternative therapies which do not require renal dose adjustment may be considered in similar clinical scenarios, although their CSF penetration and potential adverse effects warrant consideration. This clinical experience adds valuable insight into the pharmacokinetics and management of ACV neurotoxicity in patients with renal dysfunction, supporting vigilant therapeutic drug monitoring and tailored renal replacement strategies to optimize patient outcomes.

 

Table 2 References:
[9] Ito T, Itohara K, Hirata S, et al. Impact of continuous hemodiafiltration on serum acyclovir concentrations in a patient with encephalopathy. J Infect Chemother. 2025;31(12):102859. doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2025.102859

 

Manic symptoms caused by acyclovir in a hemodialysis patient

Design

Case report

Case presentation

The case involves a 59-year-old male patient with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who has been undergoing hemodialysis (HD) since the age of 53. His baseline premorbid condition was described as modest and quiet. The patient developed an infectious condition characterized by pain, papules, and blisters localized to the left facial area in a distribution consistent with the trigeminal nerve. Clinical diagnosis by a dermatologist confirmed herpes zoster virus infection, supported by elevated herpes zoster virus antibody titers in the blood.

The patient was promptly initiated on oral acyclovir at a dose of 15 mg/kg/day. However, after two days of therapy, he exhibited an abrupt neuropsychiatric deterioration, marked by restlessness, talkativeness, irritability, hyperkinesis, flight of ideas, and delusions of grandeur, all indicative of manic symptoms. Consciousness remained clear throughout this psychiatric episode.

On hospital admission, no significant laboratory abnormalities were noted outside those expected in ESRD patients, including elevated BUN (82.3 mg/dL) and creatinine (13.5 mg/dL). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis was unremarkable and did not demonstrate herpes zoster virus antibodies, effectively ruling out central nervous system viral involvement.

Acyclovir was discontinued on the third hospital day. Manic symptoms persisted for an additional three days before gradually resolving. Blood concentrations of acyclovir were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography, revealing supratherapeutic levels: 10.9 μg/mL on day 2, decreasing to 3.0 μg/mL before HD and 1.0 μg/mL after HD on day 4. The normal therapeutic range for acyclovir plasma concentration is 2.02-2.30 μg/mL, indicating significant drug accumulation prior to HD.

Study Author Conclusions

This case highlights the risk of neurotoxicity and manic symptoms associated with acyclovir in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. The impaired renal clearance likely resulted in drug accumulation and consequent central nervous system adverse effects. Hemodialysis partially reduced acyclovir plasma levels but did not prevent symptom onset. Clinicians should exercise caution with acyclovir dosing in ESRD patients, considering dose adjustments or alternative antiviral agents to mitigate neuropsychiatric toxicity. Close monitoring for neurotoxic symptoms and therapeutic drug monitoring may be warranted when using acyclovir in this population.

 

Table 3 References:
[10] Fukunishi I, Inada T, Horie Y. Manic symptoms caused by acyclovir in a hemodialysis patient. Nephron. 1994;67(4):494. doi:10.1159/000188030

 

A Case Report of Neurotoxicity After Prolonged Doses of Acyclovir in a Patient With Renal Dysfunction

Design

Case report

Case presentation

A 57-year-old male with multiple significant comorbidities (including end-stage renal disease [ESRD] on hemodialysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and a history of shingles and recurrent thigh abscesses) presented initially with a classic dermatomal vesicular rash diagnosed as herpes zoster. He was prescribed a full-dose oral acyclovir regimen 800 mg five times daily for 10 days and discharged from the emergency department.

Four days later, the patient was readmitted due to worsening symptoms including multiple episodes of diarrhea and signs of right thigh cellulitis and myositis with early abscess formation on MRI, alongside persistent herpes zoster lesions on the chest wall. The patient’s home oral acyclovir was resumed along with supportive care and continued thrice-weekly hemodialysis.

During hospitalization, the patient’s antiviral therapy was escalated to include intravenous acyclovir dosed at 5 mg/kg once, administered with concurrent oral dosing. This transition was followed by the emergence of neurological symptoms starting approximately five hours post IV dose, including dizziness, mild lethargy, slowed verbal response, progressing over the next days to disorientation, altered mentation, and myoclonic movements. These clinical manifestations raised high suspicion for acyclovir-induced neurotoxicity, particularly in the context of his ESRD, which significantly impairs drug clearance and predisposes to accumulation.

Extensive work-up including brain imaging (CT, MRI), EEG, and lumbar puncture with CSF analysis was performed to exclude infectious or malignant causes of encephalopathy. CSF studies showed lymphocytic predominance without evidence of viral infection by PCR, and other infectious panels were negative. Acyclovir serum levels drawn approximately 18 hours after dosing and following hemodialysis were elevated (8.5 mmol/L), consistent with accumulation and toxicity.

The management included holding intravenous acyclovir, continuation of hemodialysis, and close neurological monitoring. The patient’s altered mental status and myoclonic activity gradually improved by day 8 and resolved fully by day 9, with neurological examination returning to baseline. The herpes zoster lesions were noted to be healing well. The patient was subsequently discharged to a skilled nursing facility with planned outpatient follow-up.

Study Author Conclusions

This case exemplifies the critical importance of modifying antiviral dosing in patients with renal impairment, given acyclovir’s primary renal excretion and narrow therapeutic window. In this patient, full-dose oral acyclovir (800 mg five times daily) was administered for six days without renal dose adjustments. Despite the relatively low oral bioavailability of acyclovir (10–20%), the combination of prolonged therapy and decreased renal clearance likely resulted in elevated systemic levels and neurotoxicity. Notably, the onset of toxicity occurred eight days after initiation, which is slightly delayed compared to previous reports typically noting onset within five days. This delay may be attributed to the low bioavailability of the oral form and the intermittent hemodialysis session two days prior, which would have partially cleared the drug. Administration of an intravenous acyclovir dose on day five, adjusted for renal impairment and with higher bioavailability, likely exacerbated neurological symptoms.

Serum acyclovir levels in patients experiencing neurotoxicity exhibit wide variability, ranging from 1.12 to 295 mmol/L with a mean around 80.8 mmol/L. The patient's level was measured at 8.5 mmol/L, which falls on the lower end, but this sample was drawn 31 hours post-hemodialysis and 18 hours after the last dose, suggesting pre-dialysis levels would have been significantly higher. Importantly, neurotoxicity can manifest despite subtherapeutic or moderate serum levels due to the delayed correlation between peak concentrations and clinical symptoms, which may appear 24–48 hours after peak levels.

Hemodialysis effectively removes acyclovir; approximately 45–60% of the drug can be cleared during sessions lasting 3 to 6 hours. In this case, elevated post-dialysis acyclovir levels helped confirm drug-induced neurotoxicity as the etiology. Although the patient was concurrently on other neurotoxic risk medications such as cefepime and metronidazole, both were dosed appropriately for renal function and discontinued without symptom resolution, reinforcing acyclovir as the culprit.

Clinical improvement correlated with cessation of acyclovir and completion of two hemodialysis sessions, consistent with prior reports showing neurological recovery with drug discontinuation and enhanced clearance. This case underscores the critical importance of renal dose adjustment for acyclovir to prevent neurotoxicity, especially in ESRD patients.

 

Table 4 References:
[11] Umoru GO, Shah PJ, Tariq F. A Case Report of Neurotoxicity After Prolonged Doses of Acyclovir in a Patient With Renal Dysfunction. J Pharm Pract. 2020;33(2):217-221. doi:10.1177/0897190018825033