| Tailored Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction Dosing for Kidney Transplantation |
| Design |
Single-center retrospective cohort study
N= 224
|
| Objective |
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of reduced rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) dosing in kidney transplant recipients, aiming to minimize acute rejection while reducing costs and adverse effects |
| Study Groups |
Cumulative dose groups:
rATG, 3 mg/kg (n= 96)
rATG, 4.5 mg/kg (n= 102)
rATG, 6 mg/kg (n= 26)
|
| Inclusion Criteria |
Adult kidney transplant recipients at Maine Medical Center between July 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013, with follow-up through January 1, 2015 |
| Exclusion Criteria |
No immunosuppression, identical twin transplant, kidney transplant from prior bone marrow donor, Interleukin-2 Receptor induction therapy, rATG therapy interrupted, graft thrombosis, death within 1 month of transplant |
| Methods |
Recipients were divided into three groups based on cumulative rATG dosing: 3 mg/kg for nonsensitized living donor recipients, 4.5 mg/kg for nonsensitized deceased donor recipients, and 6 mg/kg for higher immunologic risk recipients. rATG dose was calcuated using actual body weight, with the first dose given intraoperatively; until November 2010, this intraoperative dose was given as 1.5 mg/kg, but was increased to 3 mg/kg to facilitate earlier discharge. The frequency of administration of subsequent doses of 1.5 mg/kg rATG was dictated by clinical progress and provider discretion. Maintenance immunosuppression included methylprednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was provided with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clotrimazole or nystatin, and valganciclovir or acyclovir based on cytomegalovirus risk profile. |
| Duration |
July 1, 2008, to December 31, 2013, with follow-up through January 1, 2015 |
| Outcome Measures |
Primary: Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) within the first year posttransplant
Secondary: Patient survival, graft survival, costs, and length of stay (LOS)
|
| Baseline Characteristics |
|
All recipients
(n= 224)
|
rATG, 3 mg/kg
(n= 96)
|
rATG, 4.5 mg/kg
(n= 102)
|
rATG, 6 mg/kg
(n= 26)
|
| Mean age (± standard deviation [SD]), years |
49.6 ± 12.7 |
49 ± 13.5 |
52 ± 11.2 |
45 ± 14 |
| Male sex |
151 (67.4%) |
63 (65.6%) |
74 (72.5%) |
14 (53.8%) |
| White |
215 (96%) |
92 (95.8%) |
98 (96.1%) |
25 (96.2%) |
|
ESRD etiology
Chronic glomerulonephritis
Diabetes mellitus
Hypertension
Obstructive uropathy
Polycystic kidney disease
Other
|
79 (35.3%)
50 (22.3%)
25 (11.2%)
24 (10.7%)
26 (11.6%)
20 (8.9%)
|
38 (39.6%)
23 (24.0%)
8 (8.3%)
9 (9.4%)
8 (8.3%)
10 (10.4%)
|
33 (32.4%)
27 (26.5%)
16 (15.7%)
3 (2.9%)
16 (15.7%)
7 (6.9%)
|
8 (30.8%)
0
1 (3.8%)
12 (46.2%)
2 (7.7%)
3 (11.4%)
|
| Preemptive |
27 (12.1%) |
25 (26.0%) |
1 (1%) |
1 (3.8%) |
| Deceased donor |
118 (52.7%) |
4 (4.2%) |
93 (91.2%) |
21 (80.8%) |
| History of previous transplant |
37 (16.5%) |
1 (0.1%) |
13 (12.7%) |
23 (88.5%) |
| Mean human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch ± SD |
3.9 ± 1.6 |
3.4 ± 1.7 |
4.5 ± 1.1 |
3.2 ± 2.1 |
| Mean Cumulative rATG dosage delivered (±SD), mg/kg |
4.0 ± 1.0 |
3.0 ± 0 |
4.5 ± 0 |
6.1 ± 0.3 |
|
Maintenance immunosuppression
Calcineurin inhibitor
Antimetabolite
Steroid
|
224 (100%)
211 (94.2%)
224 (100%)
|
96 (100%)
88 (91.7%)
96 (100%)
|
102 (100%)
97 (95.1%)
102 (100%)
|
26 (100%)
26 (100%)
26 (100%)
|
| Mean follow-up (±SD), months |
42.3 ± 20.0 |
43 ± 18.8 |
42 ± 20.7 |
39 ± 22.2 |
| Results |
|
All recipients
(n= 224)
|
rATG, 3 mg/kg
(n= 96)
|
rATG, 4.5 mg/kg
(n= 102)
|
rATG, 6 mg/kg
(n= 26)
|
| Mean serum creatinine at 1 year (±SD), mg/dL |
1.5 ± 0.6 |
1.5 ± 0.5 |
1.5 ± 0.5 |
1.8 ± 0.9 |
| No. biopsies |
87 (39%) |
33 (34%) |
34 (33%) |
20 (76%) |
| No. patients with one or more biopsies, n (%) |
71 (31.7%) |
29 (30.2%) |
27 (26.5%) |
15 (57.7%) |
| Mean time to first biopsy (± SD), days |
118 ± 102 |
144 ± 110 |
116 ± 100 |
71 ± 69 |
| Donor-specific antibody (DSA) screen |
97 (43.3%) |
46 (47.9%) |
34 (33.3%) |
17 (65.4%) |
|
DSA positivity
Class I
Class II
|
16 (7.1%)
18 (8.0%)
-
|
7 (7.3%)
10 (10.4%)
-
|
6 (5.9%)
4 (3.9%)
-
|
3 (11.4%)
4 (15.4%)
-
|
| No. patients with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) |
21 (9.4%) |
8 (8.3%) |
9 (8.8%) |
4 (15.4%) |
| No. BPAR episodes |
29 (12.9%) |
9 (9.3%) |
13 (12.7%) |
7 (26.9%) |
|
Death-censored graft survival
1-year
End-of-study
|
224 (100%)
212 (94.6%)
|
96 (100%)
90 (93.8%)
|
102 (100%)
99 (97.1%)
|
26 (100%)
23 (88.5%)
|
| Deaths at 1 y |
8 (3.6%) |
2 (2.1%) |
4 (3.9%) |
2 (7.7%) |
| Deaths at the end of study |
15 (6.7%) |
4 (4.2%) |
9 (8.8%) |
2 (7.7%) |
| Adverse Events |
Infection rates were comparable with those reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. There were no episodes of phlebitis. |
| Study Author Conclusions |
The study concludes that tailored rATG dosing is safe and effective for kidney transplant recipients, providing excellent allograft outcomes and substantial cost savings without increasing adverse effects. Peripheral administration and reduced dosing are novel findings that contribute to favorable safety and reduced length of stay. |
| Critique |
The study's strengths include a large sample size (N= 224), long follow-up period, and clear cost savings. However, its retrospective design and predominantly Caucasian population may limit generalizability. The small size of the higher immunologic risk group and lack of diversity in the study population are noted limitations. |