What risks are associated with giving zoledronic acid in the setting of renal impairment?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Data evaluating the use of zoledronic acid for hypercalcemia in patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction are limited to retrospective studies (see Tables 1-4). Given the lack of randomized controlled trials, conclusions regarding the optimal and safe use of zoledronic acid in this patient population remain inconclusive. Monitoring the renal function of the patients is highly recommended, particularly in patients with preexisting risk factors or impaired renal function. Notably, prescribing information lists acute renal impairment as a contraindication to the use of zoledronic acid due to the risk of renal toxicity.

Background

Renal function impairment is a known potential side effect of bisphosphonates, including zoledronic acid, which necessitates careful consideration in patients with pre-existing renal conditions. Despite this, the consensus among experts suggests that the risks associated with its renal toxicity are generally manageable through regular monitoring of renal function through serum creatinine levels before each recommended dose. However, several underlying risk factors including previous bisphosphonate therapy, and use of nephrotoxic medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can potentially exacerbate the renal impairment condition. A 2011 expert review of the literature described the results from phase 3 clinical trials of patients with bone metastases from myeloma, breast, prostate, lung, or other solid tumors. Results from the clinical trials revealed that the incidence of renal impairment following zoledronic acid infusion during two years of 3-4 weekly infusions was approximately 10-15%, demonstrating an overall comparable renal safety profile of zoledronic acid compared to pamidronate. While renal toxicity remains a serious consideration in the use of zoledronic acid, adherence to guidelines on dosing and infusion, along with pre-treatment assessment and regular monitoring of renal function, allows for the safe use of zoledronic acid in a majority of patients. [1], [2], [3], [4]

A meta-analysis of three trials (N= 2,514) compared the 4-week versus 12-week reports of kidney dysfunction in patients with bone metastasis receiving zoledronic acid. A significant difference was not found (risk ratio [RR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 1.15; p= 0.15), and both groups generally reported low rates of kidney dysfunction (2.45% in the 4-week group and 1.68% in the 12-week group). [5]

Reports from a French adverse event database revealed that up to July 2004, seven patients (aged 52-70 years) with multiple myeloma or different types of metastatic cancer experienced renal impairment during treatment with zoledronic acid. Four of these patients with different cancer-related histories (one having bone metastasis) developed acute renal impairment with renal toxicity while on zoledronic acid, whereas three of them experienced acute deterioration of preexisting chronic renal failure. The duration of zoledronic acid therapy varied (1-120 days). The mean duration of renal failure was 40 days, with three cases being recovered completely. Death occurred in two of the patients. However, owing to the underlying comorbidities and terminal illness, the causal association of death with zoledronic acid therapy can not be ascertained. While renal toxicity of zoledronic acid appears to be both dose and infusion-time-dependent, close and regular monitoring of renal function is highly advised, particularly in patients with preexisting risk factors or impaired renal function. [6]

A 2017 pilot study, including 23 patients with osteoporosis or fragility fractures, did not find a difference in biomarkers of acute kidney injury (plasma C-terminal FGF23, serum Klotho, or urinary AKI biomarkers) at 30 days from a single 5 mg intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid injection. This pilot study does not reveal a potential direct acute effect of zoledronic acid on kidney function. However, those with GFR <30 mL/min were excluded from the study as recommended by the prescribing information. [7]

A 2018 case report described a successful treatment of hypercalcemia in a 43-year-old female receiving maintenance hemodialysis with a reduced dose of zoledronate. She had received peritoneal dialysis for 6 years and hemodialysis for 3 years and had received a living-related-donor kidney transplant for 21 years. Upon admission, her serum calcium level was elevated at 2.55 mmol/L, progressing to 4.23 mmol/L, despite treatment with low-calcium dialysate baths. A consciousness disorder complicated her case, and the patient was diagnosed with immobilization-induced hypercalcemia after ruling out other causes of hypercalcemia, such as hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D intoxication. A reduced dose of zoledronate (3 mg) was administered intravenously, leading to a rapid decrease in serum calcium level; her corrected serum calcium level was 2.23 mmol/L 14 days after zoledronate treatment and remained at 2.13–2.63 mmol/L thereafter. Three months later, she developed another hypercalcemia (2.05 mmol/L) but was successfully treated with a reduced dose of zoledronate (2 mg) with no adverse effects. The patient was subsequently transferred to another institution for maintenance hemodialysis and rehabilitation. Based on the findings, the authors concluded that reduced-dose zoledronate is a safe and useful treatment option for acute and transient hypercalcemia in hemodialysis patients. However, the findings are limited to a single patient experience, limiting the generalizability to the general hemodialysis population. [8]

References:

[1] Coleman R, Burkinshaw R, Winter M, et al. Zoledronic acid. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011;10(1):133-145. doi:10.1517/14740338.2011.540387
[2] Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial. Cancer. 2003;98(8):1735-1744. doi:10.1002/cncr.11701
[3] Markowitz GS, Fine PL, Stack JI, et al. Toxic acute tubular necrosis following treatment with zoledronate (Zometa). Kidney Int. 2003;64(1):281-289. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00071.x
[4] Chang JT, Green L, Beitz J. Renal failure with the use of zoledronic acid. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(17):1676-1679. doi:10.1056/NEJM200310233491721
[5] Cao L, Yang YJ, Diao JD, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing zoledronic acid administered at 12-week and 4-week intervals in patients with bone metastasis [published correction appears in Oncotarget. 2018 Aug 14;9(63):32273]. Oncotarget. 2017;8(52):90308-90314. Published 2017 Aug 3. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.19856
[6] Munier A, Gras V, Andrejak M, et al. Zoledronic acid and renal toxicity: data from French adverse effect reporting database. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(7-8):1194-1197. doi:10.1345/aph.1E589
[7] Cipriani C, Pepe J, Clementelli C, et al. Effect of a single intravenous zoledronic acid administration on biomarkers of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with osteoporosis: a pilot study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(10):2266-2273. doi:10.1111/bcp.13332
[8] Yamada S, Arase H, Tachibana S, et al. Immobilization-induced severe hypercalcaemia successfully treated with reduced dose of zoledronate in a maintenance haemodialysis patient. Nephrology (Carlton). 2018;23(10):963-964. doi:10.1111/nep.13246

Relevant Prescribing Information

CONTRAINDICATIONS
-Hypocalcemia
-Patients with creatinine clearance less than 35 mL/min and in those with evidence of acute renal impairment

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Renal Impairment: A single dose should not exceed 5 mg and the duration of infusion should be no less than 15 minutes. Renal toxicity may be greater in patients with underlying renal impairment or with other risk factors, including advanced age or dehydration. Monitor creatinine clearance before each dose.

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS
Renal impairment: Zoledronic acid injection is contraindicated in patients with creatinine clearance less than 35 mL/min and in those with evidence of acute renal impairment. There are no safety or efficacy data to support the adjustment of the zoledronic acid injection dose based on baseline renal function. Therefore, no dosage adjustment is required in patients with a creatinine clearance of greater than or equal to 35 mL/min. Risk of acute renal failure may increase with underlying renal disease and dehydration secondary to fever, sepsis, gastrointestinal losses, diuretic therapy, advanced age, etc.

References:

[9] Zoledronic acid injection. Prescribing information. BluePoint Laboratories; 2024

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

What risks are associated with giving zoledronic acid in the setting of renal impairment?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-4 for your response.


 

Safety of Intravenous Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Hypercalcemia in Patients with Preexisting Renal Dysfunction

Design

Retrospective analysis

N= 113

Objective

To describe the safety and efficacy of pamidronate and zoledronic acid (ZA) in the treatment of hypercalcemia in patients with baseline renal dysfunction

Study Groups

Zoledronic acid (n= 58)

CrCl <30 mL/min (n= 41)

CrCl ≥30 mL/min (n= 72)

Inclusion Criteria

Adult hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with creatinine clearance (CrCl) <60 mL/min who developed hypercalcemia secondary to all causes and were treated with intravenous (IV) pamidronate or zoledronic acid

Exclusion Criteria

Received any previous bisphosphonate

Methods

Participants were picked utilizing institutional data analytics software on the basis of documented administration of IV zoledronic acid or pamidronate. Hypercalcemia was defined by a corrected serum calcium (CSC) level ≥10.5 mg/dL, and renal dysfunction was defined as CrCl <60 mL/min. Data were collected on bisphosphonate treatment day and then days 7, 10, and 30 post-administration. 

Of note, only results for zoledronic are reported within this table.

Duration

Charts reviewed: April 4, 2014 to April 30, 2019

Outcome Measures

Primary: all-grade SCr elevation based on severity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5 (CTCAE-V.5)

Safety: CSC decrease ≥1.0 mg/dL by day 7 of index date of bisphosphonate administration; normalization of CSC ≤10.5 mg/dL by day 10; CSC normalization of ≤10.5 mg/dL by day 30; incidence of refractory hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia by day 30 of index date of bisphosphonate administration and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) up to 1 year after index date of bisphosphonate administration

Baseline Characteristics

 

CrCl <30 mL/min (n= 41)

CrCl ≥30 mL/min (n= 72)

 

Age, years (range)

67 (31-80) 67 (38-88)   

Female

24 (58.5%)  47 (65.3%)   

Race

White

Black

Other

 

23 (56.1%)

15 (36.6%)

3 (7.3%)

 

34 (47.2%) 

34 (47.2%)

4 (5.6%)

 

Body mass index, kg/m2 (range)

25.6 (15.7-46.6)  24.8 (11.8-47.1)  

Indication for bisphosphonate

HCM

Hyperparathyroidism

HCI

Other

 

35 (85.4%)

1 (2.4%)

2 (4.9%)

2 (4.9%)

 

57 (79.2%)

7 (9.7%)

5 (6.9%)

3 (4.2%)

 

Degree of hypercalcemia

Mild (10.5-11.9 mg/dL)

Moderate (12-13.9 mg/dL)

Severe (> 14 mg/dL)

10 (24.4%)

13 (31.7%)

13 (31.7%)

17 (23.6%)

15 (20.8%)

15 (20.8%)

 

Bisphosphonate administered

Zoledronic acid

Pamidronate

 

8 (19.5%)

33 (80.5%)

 

50 (69.4%)

22 (30.6%)

 

Baseline CSC, mg/dL (range)

Zoledronic acid

Pamidronate


14.3 (12.2-15.3)

13 (10.6-20.4)


13.1 (10.4-20.1)

13.1 (11.1-18.8)

 

SCr, mg/dL (range)

3 (1.33-8.52)

1.3 (0.7-2.3)

 

Home medications

Calcium

Vitamin D

Thiazide diuretics

 

8 (19.5%)

12 (29.3%)

3 (7.3%)

 

8 (11.1%)

15 (20.8%)

6 (8.3%)

 

Other hypercalcemia treatment

Furosemide

Calcitonin

 

23 (56.1%)

17 (41.5%)

 

31 (43.1%)

29 (25.7%)

 

HCM: Hypercalcemia of malignancy, HCI: Hypercalcemia of immobility

Results

Endpoint

Zoledronic acid (n= 58) CrCl <30 mL/min (n= 41) CrCl ≥30 mL/min (n= 72)

All-grade SCr increase

All ZA doses

3-3.5 mg ZA dose

4 mg ZA dose

15-minute ZA infusion

60-minute ZA infusion


13/58 (22%)

2/9 (22%)

12/49 (24%)

11/44 (25%)

3/14 (21%)

   

CSC ≤10.5 mg/dL by day 10

All ZA doses

3-3.5 mg ZA dose

4 mg ZA dose

15-minute ZA infusion

60-minute ZA infusion


37/58 (63.8%)

5/9 (56%)

32/49 (65%

30/44 (68%)

7/14 (50%)

35 (85.4%) 57 (79.2%)

Hypocalcemia

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3


9 (15.5%)

5 (8.6%)

1 (1.7%)


8 (19.5%)

10 (24.4%)

1 (2.4%)


10 (13.9%)

6 (8.3%)

1 (1.4%)

CSC decrease by 1.0 mg/dL by day 7

48 (82.8%) 35 (85.4%) 57 (79.2%)

CSC ≤10.5 mg/dL by day 30

34 (58.6%)* 33 (80.5%)** 44 (61.1%)

* Significantly more patients who received zoledronic acid achieved CSC ≤10.5 mg/dL by day 30 compared to patients who received pamidronate (78.2%).

**Significantly more patients achieved CSC ≤10.5 mg/dL by day 30 in the subgroup of CrCl <30 mL/min compared to the subgroup of CrCl ≥30 mL/min.    

Adverse Events

Osteonecrosis of the jaw did not occur in any groups; no other adverse effects were disclosed.

Study Author Conclusions

The analysis suggests an association between IV bisphosphonates and increased rates of SCr elevations among patients with preexisting renal dysfunction. Future prospective studies are necessary to elucidate these findings

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This study was unable to distinguish outcome differences in acute and chronic kidney renal dysfunction. This study does not clearly identify whether zoledronic acid is an effective treatment for hypercalcemia.

References:

Palmer S, Tillman F 3rd, Sharma P, et al. Safety of Intravenous Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Hypercalcemia in Patients With Preexisting Renal Dysfunction. Ann Pharmacother. 2021;55(3):303-310. doi:10.1177/1060028020953501

 

Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Hypercalcemia in Patients with Cancer and Baseline Renal Dysfunction

Design

Retrospective cohort study

N= 18

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid and IV pamidronate in patients with hypercalcemia of malignancy with and without renal dysfunction

Study Groups

Zoledronic acid in severe renal dysfunction (n= 5)

Pamidronate in severe renal dysfunction (n= 13)

Inclusion Criteria

Age ≥18 years or older, hospitalized at the medical center

Exclusion Criteria

Allergic reaction or sensitivity to bisphosphonates, received IV or oral bisphosphonates within the last 90 days

Methods

In the primary analysis of the study, 100 patients were divided (1:1) into 2 groups: normal renal function (CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min) or reduced renal function (CrCl < 60 mL/min). An additional subanalysis was conducted in patients receiving zoledronic acid with severe renal dysfunction (CrCl < 30 mL/min) and will be the focus of the table. Baseline serum creatinine values were determined as the most recent value prior to bisphosphonate administration.

Duration

Data collection: January 1, 2012 to October 1, 2020

Outcome Measures

Corrected serum calcium, relapse or refractory hypercalcemia, safety

Baseline Characteristics

 

Study population (N= 100)

 

Age, years

60  

Female

35%  

White

62%  

Body mass index, kg/m2

24.81  

Baseline SCr, mg/dL

1.2  

Results

Endpoint

Zoledronic acid in severe renal dysfunction (n= 5)

Pamidronate in severe renal dysfunction (n= 13)

Corrected serum calcium ≤ 10.5 mg/dL by day 10

4 (80%)

11 (84.6%)

Corrected serum calcium decrease by 1 mg/dL by day 7

5 (100%)

12 (92.3%)

Relapsed or refractory hypercalcemia

1 (20%)

1 (7.7%)

Safety

All-grade serum creatinine elevation

Hypocalcemia

 

2 (40%)

0

 

2 (15.4%)

6 (46.2%)

Adverse Events

See above

Study Author Conclusions

Future prospective studies are needed to inform the optimal bisphosphonate therapy in patients with severe renal dysfunction.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Use of zoledronic acid in severe renal dysfunction was limited to a subanalysis which requires validation in future studies. Results were similar to pamidronate, but its efficacy versus an untreated group was not established.



References:

Hsu EH, Beechinor R. Safety and Effiacy of Intravenous Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Hypercalcemia in Patients with Cancer and Baseline Renal Dysfunction. JHOP. 2022; 12(4).

 

Risk of renal failure in cancer patients with bone metastasis treated with renally adjusted zoledronic acid

Design

Retrospective observational chart review

N= 220 (1,472 doses)

Objective

To evaluate the incidence of acute renal failure (ARF) in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction, receiving renally adjusted zoledronic acid (ZA) and compare it to patients with normal baseline renal function, receiving standard-dose ZA.

Study Groups

Normal (n= 184)

Impaired (n= 36)

Inclusion Criteria

Ages 18-89 years, documented metastatic bone disease, received at least one dose of ZA, baseline serum creatinine (SCr) and at least one follow-up SCr available

Exclusion Criteria

Treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy, received ZA within 14 days of a previous dose, documented episode of ARF within 1 month

Methods

Data were identified of patients meeting criteria at the VA North Texas Health Care System via pharmacy records. Patients were divided into two groups: a normal group with baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) > 60 mL/min and standard ZA dose, and an impaired group with baseline CrCl of 30-60 mL/min and renally adjusted ZA dose. ZA was administered at 4 mg until 2005, when labeling changes for patients with impaired renal function (30-60 mL/min) changed, and the manufacturer recommended a dose of 3-3.5 mg for patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction. Incidence of ARF was defined as an SCr increase of 0.5 mg/dL or 1.0 mg/dL from a baseline SCr of <1.4 mg/dL or ≥ 1.4 mg/dL, respectively.

Duration

August 20, 2001 to September 30, 2009

Outcome Measures

Incidence of ARF

Baseline Characteristics

 

Normal (n= 184)

Impaired (n= 36)

Age (median), years*

64 77

Weight (median), kg

83.4 79.1

Baseline SCr (median), mg/dL*

0.9 1.4

Baseline CrCl (median), mL/min*

82.7 49.7

ZA dose (median), mg

4 mg, n (%)

3.5 mg, n (%)

3.3 mg, n (%)

3 mg, n (%)

4

184 (100%)

-

-

-

3.4

-

18 (50%)

16 (44%)

2 (6%)

ZA infusions per patient, mean*

7.1

4.6

Concomitant nephrotoxic agents, %

69.6%

75%

*p< 0.05

Results

Endpoint

Normal (n= 184)

Impaired (n= 36)

ARF based on SCr

ARF incidence, n (%)

Mean time to ARF, months

 

38 (20.7%)

6.1

 

7 (19.4%)

6.1

ARF based on CrCl

ARF incidence, n (%)

Mean time to ARF, months

 

72 (39.1%)

5.4

 

15 (41.7%)

4.1

Dialysis, n (%)

1 (0.5%) 1 (2.8%)

Maximum change in SCr, mean

0.39 0.70

Incidence of skeletal-related events

10.3%

13.9%

There was no difference in the incidence of ARF based on SCr or CrCl between the groups.

Skeletal-related events were defined as the following: pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy to bone, or surgery to bone.

Regression analysis identified receipt of greater than 3 ZA infusions was a significant factor influencing the incidence of ARF based on SCr (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.02-3.96). 

Univariate and multivariate analyses identified age greater than 65 as another risk factor associated with ARF based on CrCl.

Adverse Events

N/A

Study Author Conclusions

The incidence of ARF is similar between patients in the normal group and impaired group when the ZA dose is renally adjusted.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Due to label changes, use of 4 mg was not explored in patients with renal dysfunction. Additionally, this study did not determine safety nor efficacy of zoledronic acid administration in patients with acute kidney injury; thus, these results may not be extrapolatable to the current inquiry.

References:

Shah SR, Jean GW, Keisner SV, Ussery SM, Dowell JE. Risk of renal failure in cancer patients with bone metastasis treated with renally adjusted zoledronic acid. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(1):87-93. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-1067-7

 

Renal safety of zoledronic acid for osteoporosis in adults 75 years and older

Design

Retrospective, cross-sectional, pre-post analysis

N= 558 zoledronic acid infusions (327 patients)

Objective

To examine renal function change in older adults with osteoporosis, treated with zoledronic acid

Study Groups

Pre-infusion (n= 558)

Post-infusion (n= 558)

Inclusion Criteria

Aged≥ 75 years; diagnosis of osteoporosis; received at least one 5 mg/100 mL dose of intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid at a rate of 200–400 mL/h; at least one serum creatinine (SCr) documentation in the year before the zoledronic acid infusion and in the year following the infusion that was not drawn on the same day as the infusion

Exclusion Criteria

Received > one dose of zoledronic acid in 12 months; received a zoledronic acid dose other than 5 mg; diagnosis of cancer or a neoplasm of unknown behavior 

Methods

Data from the period of zoledronic acid infusion were collected via electronic health records, and changes in serum creatinine (SCr) before and after zoledronic acid infusions were analyzed. If a patient had multiple infusions separated by 12 months or more, data from each infusion was included.

All levels were reviewed if multiple SCr levels were drawn in the year following the zoledronic acid infusion. However, only the level closest to a year after the infusion was used in the pre-post analysis. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined as stage 1 which equates to ≥0.3 mg/dL or ≥1.5 × baseline increase in SCr.

Duration

One year

Outcome Measures

Primary: Mean change in SCr from baseline to after the zoledronic acid infusion

Secondary: other renal function parameters (e.g., creatinine clearance [CCr], glomerular filtration rate)

Baseline Characteristics

 

Patients age≥75 (n= 558)

Patients age ≥ 75 with CCr < 35 mL/min (n= 25)

 

Age, years

80 ± 3.4 82 ± 3.7  

Female

92.8% 100%  

White

99.6% 100%  

Body mass index, kg/m2

25.6 ± 4.7 21.4 ± 2.8  

Infusion time

15 min

>15 min

 

94.3%

5.7%

 

96%

4%

 

Renal function

Serum creatinine, mg/dL

CrCl*, mL/min

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), mL/min

 

0.85 ± 0.19

56.7 ± 14.9

72.0 ± 14.5

 

1.09 ± 0.17

30.8 ± 4.1

52.1 ± 8.3

 

*CCr estimated using Cockcroft-Gault equation

Results

Endpoint

Pre-infusion (n= 558)

Post-infusion (n= 558)

p-value

Serum creatinine, mg/dL

0.85 ± 0.19 0.84 ± 0.19 0.005

CrCl, mL/min

56.7 ± 14.9 57.6 ± 15.4 -

GFR, mL/min

72.0 ± 14.5 73.1 ± 14.4 -

Sustained creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL or ≥1.5 × baseline

- 0 -

Transient creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL or ≥1.5 × baseline

- 1.4% -

Mean SCr decreased by 0.01 mg/dL in the year following zoledronic acid infusions (p= 0.005).

AKI occurred in 1.4% of patients and all had CCr > 45 mL/min; 4.5% of patients had CCr < 35 mL/min and none experienced an AKI.

Adverse Events

N/A

Study Author Conclusions

There was no clinically relevant change in SCr after zoledronic acid infusions. Risk of nephrotoxicity was low and similar to risk seen in randomized trials occurring in younger patients. Kidney function estimates were dramatically lower using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation in comparison to CKD-EPI. We believe the use of the CG equation in this population may be inappropriately limiting our ability to use zoledronic acid for treatment of osteoporosis in older adults but more evidence is necessary.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Aside from limitations based on the study's single-center, retrospective, observational nature, the included patients were primarily white women, potentially limiting the generalizability of the results. Moreover, no data were available on the potential risk factors for AKI, such as concurrent nephrotoxic medications at baseline. 



References:

Fixen CW, Fixen DR. Renal safety of zoledronic acid for osteoporosis in adults 75 years and older. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(11):2417-2422. doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06499-4