A systematic review and meta-analysis compared the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with obesity and morbid obesity (BMI >40 kg/m^2). The incidence of VTE recurrence in patients with a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m^2 was similar between DOACs and VKA/LMWH therapy (8.5% vs. 8.2%; risk ratio [RR] 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93 to 1.15). A similar result was seen in morbidly obese patients (15.7% vs. 14.9%; RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.19). Both analyses had acceptable heterogeneity (I^2= 0% for both), but they were heavily weighted (>79%) by one study comparing rivaroxaban to warfarin. DOACs were significantly associated with fewer major bleeding events in both obese (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.94; p= 0.03) and morbidly obese (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.00; p= 0.05) subgroups than those of VKA/LMWH subgroups. Neither safety nor efficacy was examined among DOACs. This analysis primarily used observational data, including unpublished poster presentations. [1]
Although not specifying failure rates, a recent 2022 meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of DOACs compared to VKA in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by analyzing 13 studies. Direct oral anticoagulants did not differ from VKA in reducing stroke/systemic embolism (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.29). Obese patients with AF who used DOACs had a lower risk of stroke/systemic embolism than non-obese patients (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.84). Subgroup analyses for patients who received apixaban or rivaroxaban were not conducted. [2]
A 2022 study comparing the safety and efficacy of apixaban versus warfarin in morbidly obese patients with a BMI > 40 mg/m^2 found no difference in thromboembolic events or major bleeding between groups. The rate of thromboembolic complications occurred in 7 of 125 (5.6%) patients receiving apixaban with 5 patients developing stroke and two developing deep vein thrombosis. The warfarin group reported 9 (7.2%) major thromboembolic events. Thus, the overall rate of treatment failure was deemed to be comparable to warfarin. [3]
A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis (N= 5 studies) found no statistically significant difference in stroke or systemic embolism event rate between DOAC and warfarin groups for obese patients with AF (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.19; p= 0.35, I2= 0%). DOAC use was associated with a significantly lower rate of major bleeding than warfarin (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.94; p= 0.02, I2 = 30%). Ultimately, DOACs were recommended as options for oral anticoagulation in this patient population. [4]
Another 2020 meta-analysis aimed to explore if there is an “obesity paradox” in anticoagulated AF patients, and compare the treatment effects between DOACs and warfarin in AF patients across BMI categories. A total of 9 studies were included for analysis. Overweight or obesity was related with reduced rates of stroke or systemic embolism (overweight: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71–0.91; obesity: RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61–0.78) and all-cause death (overweight: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64–0.83; obesity: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66–0.79). Subgroup analyses based on the DOAC received were not conducted. [5]
A recent analysis integrated 5 United States healthcare claims databases to evaluate the risk of recurrent VTE among VTE patients who initiated apixaban versus warfarin, stratified by obesity. A total of 112,024 non-obese patients and 43,095 obese patients were identified, of whom 19,751 were morbidly obese. Among inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) obese and morbidly obese patients, apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent VTE as compared with warfarin (obese: 5.6% vs. 7.3%, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.84; morbidly obese: 5.4% vs. 8.0%, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.80). [6]