A 2025 systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in the treatment of acute viral myocarditis in children by exploring randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A literature search was conducted across five databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, along with trial registries and grey literature sources. Despite identifying 9,524 records initially, none met the eligibility criteria as RCTs focusing on the pediatric population with acute viral myocarditis. The review underscored the urgent need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to substantiate the role of IVIg in managing acute viral myocarditis in children; previous reviews and studies included in broader analyses had methodological limitations, such as combining adult and pediatric data or relying on quasi-randomized designs, which do not provide the rigorous evidence necessary for clinical recommendations. [1]
A 2020 Cochrane review examined the efficacy and outcomes of IVIg for presumed viral myocarditis in both the adult and pediatric patient population. In general, however, included trials provide very low certainty evidence, and only one pediatric trial was included, with very low-certainty evidence for all evaluated outcomes. Pediatric patients were randomized to 1 g/kg IVIg or placebo for two days, then received echocardiography 1 and 6 months after randomization to determine evidence of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) or left ventricular shortening fraction (LVSF). No differences were observed between groups in survival after six months following IVIg administration, nor improvement in LVEDD and LVSF after six months. No data for safety, hospitalization, complete recovery, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement, or functional capacity were reported. These limited outcomes underscore a need for more robustly designed studies to elucidate the precise benefit-risk calculus of the IVIg. [2]