Is there evidence in the literature that generic moxifloxacin ophthalmic drops are associated with a higher risk of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) compared with brand-name Vigamox, when used in cataract surgery patients?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

There is a lack of comparative literature directly assessing differences in reported rates of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) between Vigamox and generic moxifloxacin ophthalmic drops, with most data derived from intracameral moxifloxacin studies. One retrospective case series reported an interim analysis comparing generic versus brand intracameral moxifloxacin in cataract surgery and found comparable postoperative outcomes and no cases of TASS in either group, though full data for statistical analysis have not yet been reported. In general, available evidence indicates that reported TASS cases associated with moxifloxacin most often involve intraocular administration with compounded or repackaged formulations, higher volumes or concentrations, certain inactive ingredients, and preparation or handling factors. No literature was identified to support a higher TASS risk with generic topical moxifloxacin eye drops compared with Vigamox, with reported cases instead associated with intraocular administration and preparation factors.

Search of PubMed and Google Scholar for (toxic anterior segment syndrome OR TASS) AND (moxifloxacin OR Vigamox OR generic moxifloxacin OR ophthalmic drops OR eye drops) AND (cataract surgery OR phacoemulsification OR intracameral OR topical)

Background

A 2024 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Annual Meeting abstract reported a retrospective case series evaluating generic versus brand intracameral moxifloxacin in cataract surgery at a U.S. safety-net hospital. An interim analysis included 265 eyes (81.5% generic, 18.5% brand) from surgeries performed between April 2021 and April 2023. On postoperative day 1, rates were similar for corneal edema (63.9% generic vs 65.3% brand), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/40 (60.9% vs 62.5%), and intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mmHg (20.7% vs 22.2%); at postoperative month 1, persistent inflammation occurred in 11.2% vs 21.4% and corneal edema in 0.6% vs 11.1%, respectively. No cases of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) or endophthalmitis were observed in either group in this interim analysis, with authors noting the limited sample size. Of note, these findings reflect intraoperative intracameral use and may not be generalizable to routine postoperative topical moxifloxacin eye drops. [1]

A 2020 FDA Alert reported TASS cases associated with intraocular administration of moxifloxacin, noting that topical products such as Vigamox (moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution) 0.5% and Moxeza (moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution) 0.5% are FDA-approved only for topical use and are not approved for intraocular injection. Review of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) through December 19, 2019 identified 29 TASS cases linked to intraocular drugs containing moxifloxacin, including 16 compounded from bulk drug substance, 10 repackaged Moxeza, 2 Vigamox, and 1 Moxeza, with most following cataract surgery. Of these, five cases reported 0.5% moxifloxacin at a volume of 0.5 mL and one case reported 0.1% moxifloxacin at 0.1 mL, while 23 did not report volume. In one facility, 10 cases developed within one week, ceased after discontinuation, and recurred after reintroduction of compounded moxifloxacin. The FDA highlights that risk relates to concentration, volume, and inactive ingredients, noting that Moxeza contains xanthan gum, which has been linked to TASS. Published studies have described intraocular use at ≤0.3 mL with concentrations ≤0.5% as unlikely to cause significant adverse events. Therefore, clinicians are cautioned to carefully consider the formulation before any intraocular administration. Importantly, this communication does not evaluate generic topical moxifloxacin formulations. [2]

A review of more recent publicly available FAERS data identified 41 reports of moxifloxacin-associated TASS from 2012 to 2025; importantly, these reports may represent a mix of brand and generic products and different formulations or routes of use, as product naming and formulation details in FAERS are variable and not standardized. Given the nature of FAERS, which relies on voluntary reporting and may include incomplete or unverified information, these data should be interpreted cautiously and cannot be used to determine incidence or establish causality. [3]

A 2021 literature review described multiple case reports in which intracameral Vigamox 0.1 mL of 5 mg/mL (0.5%) was associated with findings such as anterior chamber inflammation, pigment dispersion, pupillary abnormalities, and elevated IOP, with onset reported at ~2 to 6 weeks after cataract, glaucoma, or vitrectomy surgery. In contrast, large series using diluted or lower-dose intracameral moxifloxacin (including 50 to 500 mcg/mL and volumes up to 0.3 to 0.4 mL) noted no cases of TASS, while in vitro studies showed cell toxicity at concentrations >500 mcg/mL. The authors emphasize that, regardless of antibiotic choice, the drug name, preservative status, concentration, and planned injection volume should be verified at each step of preparation by involved personnel, with the surgeon serving as the final check before intraocular administration. If an error occurs and results in anterior segment toxicity, prompt control of inflammation and intraocular pressure is indicated. [4]

An additional review describes 2 cases of TASS, later linked to a systemwide outbreak from reusable cannulas that resolved after switching to disposable cannulas, highlighting instrument-related contamination as a potential source of TASS rather than moxifloxacin itself. [5]

Lastly, a 2006 prospective safety study evaluated prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin 0.5% (Vigamox) in 65 eyes undergoing cataract surgery, with 0.1 mL injected at the end of phacoemulsification. At 1 month, all eyes achieved BCVA ≥20/30, showed only trace anterior chamber cells/flare on day 1, and had no significant change in endothelial cell density (mean difference [MD] −70 cells/mm²; p= 0.737) or corneal thickness (+17.8 µm; p> 0.65). The authors concluded that intracameral Vigamox appeared nontoxic in terms of visual rehabilitation, anterior chamber reaction, pachymetry, and corneal endothelial cell density, although TASS was not explicitly assessed or reported as an outcome. [6]

References: [1] Milner D, Volkin J, Knott R, Patnaik J, Capitena Young C, St Peter D. Generic preservative-free intracameral moxifloxacin for the prevention of endophthalmitis in cataract surgery: a case series. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024;65(7):550.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA alerts health care professionals of risks associated with intraocular use of compounded moxifloxacin. Published August 12, 2020. Accessed December 22, 2025.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard. Accessed December 22, 2025. https://fis.fda.gov/sense/app/95239e26-e0be-42d9-a960-9a5f7f1c25ee/sheet/45beeb74-30ab-46be-8267-5756582633b4/state/analysis
[4] Amireskandari A, Bean A, Mauger T. Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome with Intracameral Moxifloxacin: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2021;2021:5526097. Published 2021 Mar 2. doi:10.1155/2021/5526097
[5] Anderson J, Young S, Cockerham G, Chomsky A, Parr NJ. Evidence Brief: Intracameral Moxifloxacin for Prevention of Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery. Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2022. Accessed December 22, 2025. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK581595/
[6] Espiritu CR, Caparas VL, Bolinao JG. Safety of prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution in cataract surgery patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(1):63-68. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.09.019
Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

Is there evidence in the literature that generic moxifloxacin ophthalmic drops are associated with a higher risk of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) compared with brand-name Vigamox, when used in cataract surgery patients?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Table 1 for your response.


 

Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome with Intracameral Moxifloxacin: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Design

 Case report

Case presentation

A 74-year-old female presented with persistent corneal edema and a fixed, dilated pupil in the left eye after routine cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and implantation of a single-piece acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) (Acrysof UltraSert ACU0T0). At surgery, approximately 0.2 mL of preservative-free 1% lidocaine was given intracamerally, followed by ~0.6 mL of intracameral moxifloxacin (Vigamox) at the end of the case; the surgeon was inadvertently provided 0.5% undiluted Vigamox instead of the intended 0.1% concentration for all 7 cases that day, with all showing more inflammation than expected. This patient developed significant corneal edema, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), and anterior segment inflammation persisting at postoperative week 1, consistent with concern for toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS), and at 2 months had persistent corneal edema and a fixed mydriatic pupil, while the fellow eye previously received 0.6 mL of 0.1% intracameral Vigamox without complication. On presentation 2 months postoperatively, vision was counting fingers (CF) at 3 feet OS, with IOP 21 mmHg OS, with limbus-to-limbus bullous keratopathy and a large iris transillumination defect; endothelial keratoplasty and iris repair were performed. Postoperatively, visual acuity improved to 20/40 at week 1 and month 1, and at 9 months, best-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 OS with IOP 18 mmHg on topical therapy.

Study Author Conclusions

The authors conclude that this case of TASS was thought to be due to instillation of a high volume (~0.6 cc) of undiluted 0.5% intracameral Vigamox, the only known deviation among 7 cases that day with unexpected postoperative inflammation. Other potential causes to consider include infectious etiologies, as well as possible contamination or alteration of balanced salt solution, lidocaine, viscoelastics, or residues from surgical instruments, and note that no cultures or PCR were performed.

References:
[1] Amireskandari A, Bean A, Mauger T. Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome with Intracameral Moxifloxacin: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2021;2021:5526097. Published 2021 Mar 2. doi:10.1155/2021/5526097