Should magnesium sulfate continuous infusion be used for the treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Most available evidence does not support the use of intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) continuous infusion in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Results from meta-analyses on IV MgSO4 have been mixed regarding its association with reductions in vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, or improved functional recovery. However, these studies, in addition to two large pivotal phase 3 trials, have consistently shown that MgSO4 in this setting has no clear benefit on mortality or overall survival. For these same reasons, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) advises against the routine use of magnesium sulfate to improve neurological outcomes in patients with aneurysmal SAH.

Background

According to the 2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA), preclinical studies initially indicated that magnesium sulfate might enhance cerebral blood flow (CBF) and reduce vasospasm. However, clinical trials have shown no beneficial outcomes when intravenous magnesium sulfate is administered, failing to demonstrate improvements in cerebral infarction rates or mortality reduction. Two meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) similarly found no advantage in these clinical outcomes. Some have hypothesized that the concentration of magnesium in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), rather than in the peripheral circulation, might be crucial, but this theory has not been validated. Consequently, current evidence advises against the routine use of magnesium sulfate to improve neurological outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). [1]

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis undertook an extensive evaluation of the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm and associated complications following aSAH. Researchers conducted a thorough search for RCTs dating up to March 2023 that assessed magnesium sulfate against standard treatments like saline. A total of 16 studies, encompassing 3,503 participants, were incorporated into the analysis, yielding significant findings favoring magnesium sulfate over control treatments. Specifically, the use of magnesium sulfate was associated with a notable reduction in cerebral vasospasm (CV; odds ratio [OR] 0.61, p = 0.04), delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI; OR 0.57, p = 0.01), secondary cerebral infarction (OR = 0.49, p = 0.01), and neurological dysfunction (OR = 0.55, p = 0.04). The pooled data analysis demonstrated that while significant heterogeneity was present across the included studies, sensitivity analyses corroborated the robustness of the results favoring magnesium sulfate for several outcomes. However, no significant differences were observed in terms of mortality (OR = 0.92, p = 0.47) or rebleeding (OR = 0.68, p = 0.55), suggesting potential limitations in detecting effects on these particular outcomes due to sample size constraints. The systematic review underscores magnesium sulfate's potential benefits in mitigating complications such as CV and DCI following aSAH, yet highlights the need for further randomized trials with larger cohorts to validate these findings and explore the nuanced impact on mortality and rebleeding incidents. [2]

A 2011 meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate in improving outcomes for patients with aneurysmal SAH. This comprehensive analysis incorporated data from eight controlled clinical trials, encompassing a total of 936 patients. The patients were treated with intravenous magnesium sulfate, with treatment initiation occurring within a few days following SAH. The administration protocols differed across studies, with dosing ranging from 12 to 48 grams per day and treatment durations extending from 12 to 18 days post-hemorrhage. Magnesium sulfate's potential benefits were assessed against a standardized control group, and the primary outcome measured was the risk of poor functional outcomes at 3 to 6 months post-SAH, defined by severe disability, persistent vegetative state, or death. The meta-analysis found that magnesium sulfate treatment resulted in a 20% relative risk reduction in poor outcomes compared to the control group, indicating a significant potential benefit in functional recovery post-SAH. Despite the promising findings regarding functional outcomes, the meta-analysis revealed no significant impact of magnesium sulfate treatment on mortality rates after SAH. The analysis noted consistent mortality rates between the treatment group and the control group, suggesting that while magnesium sulfate may enhance recovery in terms of functional outcomes, it does not appear to influence overall survival after aneurysmal SAH. The investigators highlighted the need for further studies with larger population sizes and standardized outcomes to refine the understanding of magnesium's role in SAH management. The results of this meta-analysis contribute valuable insight into potential therapeutic strategies for improving patient outcomes following this life-threatening condition. [3]

A 2015 individual patient data meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of early magnesium sulfate treatment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). This comprehensive analysis included data from five randomized controlled trials, totaling 1981 patients, to determine if early administration of magnesium sulfate could improve clinical outcomes or reduce delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Patients were stratified into four categories based on the timing of the initiation of magnesium treatment: less than 6 hours, 6 to 12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, and more than 24 hours post-SAH. All included trials utilized a continuous infusion approach, while some also added a bolus. The primary outcome measure was poor clinical outcome, defined as death or dependency at 3 to 6 months, while the secondary outcome measure was the occurrence of DCI. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that there was no statistically significant beneficial effect of magnesium treatment on poor clinical outcomes or the occurrence of DCI across the different timing groups. Specifically, the adjusted risk ratios for poor outcomes were 1.44 for magnesium treatment initiated within 6 hours, 1.03 for 6 to 12 hours, 0.84 for 12 to 24 hours, and 1.06 for more than 24 hours. For DCI, the risk ratios were similarly inconclusive, with values of 1.76 for treatment within 6 hours, 2.09 for 6 to 12 hours, 0.80 for 12 to 24 hours, and 1.08 for more than 24 hours. Despite the inclusion of 1981 patients, only 83 were treated within 6 hours of SAH onset, limiting the statistical power to detect a small beneficial effect. Consequently, the meta-analysis provides no justification for further trials focusing on early magnesium treatment after SAH, as it does not support its use in improving outcomes or reducing DCI incidence. [4]

References:

[1] Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. 2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2023;54(7):e314-e370. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000436
[2] Zheng H, Guo X, Huang X, et al. Effect of magnesium sulfate on cerebral vasospasm in the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1249369. Published 2023 Nov 10. doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1249369
[3] Chen T, Carter BS. Role of magnesium sulfate in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage management: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Asian J Neurosurg. 2011;6(1):26-31. doi:10.4103/1793-5482.85632
[4] Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Wong GK, et al. Early Magnesium Treatment After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2015;46(11):3190-3193. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010575

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 5 studies investigating the researchable question:

Should magnesium sulfate continuous infusion be used for the treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage?

Level of evidence

A - Multiple high-quality studies with consistent results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-5 for your response.


 

Magnesium for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (MASH-2): a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Design

Phase 3 randomised, placebo-controlled trial

N=1204

Objective

To test whether magnesium therapy improves outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Study Groups

Magnesium group (n=606)

Placebo group (n=597)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged 18 years or older with an aneurysmal pattern of subarachnoid hemorrhage on brain imaging, admitted to hospital within 4 days of hemorrhage

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with renal failure or bodyweight lower than 50 kg

Methods

Participants in the study received a fixed daily dose of 64 mmol magnesium sulphate, reconstituted in 0.9% saline, or a placebo, administered as soon as possible after obtaining consent. The study medication was delivered continuously via intravenous infusion, continuing for 20 days following hemorrhage onset, or until the patient was discharged from the hospital or passed away, if either occurred sooner. To prevent symptomatic hypermagnesemia, renal function was monitored by investigators at least every two days.

Duration

April 2004 to September 2011

Outcome Measures

Primary: Poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 4 or 5) or death 3 months after hemorrhage

Secondary: No symptoms (modified Rankin Scale score of 0) 3 months after hemorrhage, difference between distribution of all scores on the modified Rankin Scale

Baseline Characteristics

Characteristics

Magnesium group (n=606) Placebo group (n=597)

Mean age (SD; years)

57 (13) 57 (12)

Female (%)

422 (70%) 416 (70%)

World Federation of Neurological Surgeons subarachnoid hemorrhage grade >4

144 (24%) 130 (22%)

Aneurysm treatment - Coiling

344 (57%) 324 (54%)

Aneurysm treatment - Clipping

197 (33%) 195 (33%)

Aneurysm treatment - None

65 (11%) 76 (13%)

Aneurysm treatment - Unknown

0 (0%) 2 (<1%)

Median time to received study medication from symptom onset (IQR; h)

33 (21–60) 41 (23–59)
Results Outcome Magnesium group (n=604) Placebo group (n=596) p-value

Poor outcome (mRS 4-5 or death)

158 (26.2%) 151 (25.3%) 0.95

No symptoms (mRS 0)

46 (7.6%) 46 (7.7%) 0.99
Adverse Events

Study treatment was stopped for one patient due to asymptomatic hypocalcemia, for two patients due to asymptomatic hypermagnesemia, and for one patient due to suspected symptomatic hypermagnesemia, all in the magnesium group.

Study Author Conclusions

Intravenous magnesium sulphate does not improve clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, therefore routine administration of magnesium cannot be recommended.

Critique

The study was well-designed with a large sample size and high follow-up rate, enhancing its reliability. However, it did not include detailed assessments of quality of life or cognitive outcomes, which could have provided additional insights. The study's pragmatic design focused on clinical outcomes, potentially overlooking other relevant measures such as delayed cerebral ischemia.

References:

Mees SMD, Algra A, Vandertop WP, et al. Magnesium for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (MASH-2): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2012;380(9836):44-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60724-7

 

Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (IMASH)

Design

Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

N= 327

Objective

To compare intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion with placebo in patients with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and assess its impact on neurological outcomes

Study Groups

Magnesium sulfate group (n= 169)

Placebo  group (n= 158)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients ≥18 years with onset and radiological diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) secondary to intracranial aneurysm within 48 hours prior to the study

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with anticipated death within 48 hours, major hepatic, pulmonary, or cardiac disease, recent myocardial infarct, significant renal impairment, pre-existing neurological disability, women of childbearing potential or with a positive urine pregnancy test

Methods

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) infusion titrated to twice the baseline serum concentration or placebo (saline) for 10 to 14 days.

The regimen for MgSO4 infusion was 20 mmol over 30 minutes followed by 80 mmol per day. Patients were also given 60 mg of oral nimodipine every 4 hours, if blood pressure remained stable, for 14 days.

Outcome measures were assessed at 3 and 6 months post-randomization using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Barthel Index score, and adverse events by a data monitoring and safety committee.

Duration

June 1, 2002, to December 31, 2008

Outcome Measures

Primary: Favorable outcome (GOSE score 5 to 8) at 6 months

Secondary: Clinical vasospasm (within 2 weeks), and mRS, Barthel Index (at least 85), and Short Form-36 at 6 months

Baseline Characteristics

 

MgSO4 (n= 169)

Placebo (n= 158)

 

Age, years

57.0 ± 12.5 57.0 ± 12.5  

Female

108 (64%) 100 (63%)  

Admission WFNS

5

4

3

2

1

 

20 (12%)

42 (25%)

17 (10%)

40 (24%)

50 (30%)

 

17 (11%)

39 (25%)

14 (9%)

43 (27%)

45 (29%)

 

Fisher CT grade

1

2

3

4

 

1 (1%)

8 (5%) 

141 (83%) 

19 (11%) 

 

1 (1%)

16 (10%)

121 (77%)

20 (13%)

 

Aneurysm location

ICA

ACA

MCA

PC

 

59 (35%)

53 (31%)

31 (20%)

16 (10%) 

 

57 (36%)

43 (27%)

33 (21%)

15 (10%)

 

Aneurysm treatment

Coiling

Clipping

No treatment

 

85 (50%)

72 (43%)

11 (7%) 

 

72 (46%)

69 (44%)

17 (11%) 

 

Abbreviations: MgSO4 = Magnesium sulfate. WFNS = World Federation of Neurological Surgeons. CT = Computed tomography. ICA = Internal carotid artery. ACA = Anterior cerebral artery. MCA = Middle cerebral artery. PC = Posterior circulation.

Results

Endpoint

MgSO4 (n= 169)

Placebo (n= 158)

95% CI

Favorable outcome

108 (64%) 100 (63%) OR 1.0: 95% CI (0.7 to 1.6)

Clinical vasospasm

42 (25%) 29 (18%) OR 1.5: 95% CI (0.9 to 2.5)

mRS score

Good outcome (0-2)

Excellent outcome (0-1)

 

97 (57%)

77 (46%)

 

91 (58%)

71 (45%)

 

OR 1.0: 95% CI (0.6 to 1.5)

OR 1.0: 95% CI (0.7 to 1.6)

Barthel Index

97 (57%) 96 (61%) OR 0.9: 95% CI (0.6 to 1.4)

Short Form-36

Physical health

Mental health

 

67.3 ± 26.1*

65.4 ± 22.0* 

 

65.5 ± 25.3**

64.5 ± 24.1**

 

MD 3.8: 95% CI (-5.6 to 9.2)

MD 3.4: 95% CI (-5.7 to 7.6)

*n= 99

**n= 90

Abbreviations: MgSO4 = Magnesium sulfate. CI = Confidence interval. mRS = modified Rankin Scale. OR = Odds ratio. MD = Mean difference.

Adverse Events

Hypotension occurred in 15% of the MgSO4 group and 13% of the placebo group (p= 0.590).

There was no significant difference in the incidence of cardiac failure, acute renal failure, pneumonia, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, or gastrointestinal bleeding between the groups.

Study Author Conclusions

Our results do not support a significant clinical benefit of IV magnesium sulfate infusion over placebo infusion in patients with acute aneurysmal SAH.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The study's lack of significant findings may be due to low cerebrospinal fluid penetration of magnesium sulfate or the timing of administration.

The study was limited by the lack of on-site trial monitoring and the use of the last observation carried forward method, which could introduce bias. Additionally, the study did not incorporate daily blood pressure data, which could have impacted outcomes.



References:

Wong GK, Poon WS, Chan MT, et al. Intravenous magnesium sulphate for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (IMASH): a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial. Stroke. 2010;41(5):921-926. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571125

 

Magnesium Sulfate in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial

N= 283

Objective

To assess whether intravenous magnesium sulfate reduces the frequency of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)

Study Groups

Magnesium treatment group (n= 139)

Placebo group (n= 144)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients randomized within 4 days after aneurysmal SAH; diagnosis based on positive CT scan or xanthochromia of cerebrospinal fluid; aneurysm confirmed by angiography or typical pattern on CT

Exclusion Criteria

Nonaneurysmal causes for SAH, renal failure (serum creatinine >150 µmol/L), age <18 years, no informed consent, or imminent death

Methods

Patients received a continuous intravenous dose of 64 mmol/L magnesium sulfate per day, starting within 4 days after SAH and continuing until 14 days after aneurysm occlusion or a maximum of 18 days after SAH onset. The placebo was 50 mL of normal saline. 

Duration

November 2000 to January 2004

Outcome Measures

Primary: Occurrence of DCI within 3 months after SAH

Secondary: Any new hypodensity on brain CT, poor outcome (Rankin score ≥4), nonexcellent outcome (Rankin score ≥1)

Baseline Characteristics

Characteristics

Magnesium (n= 139) Placebo (n= 144)

Mean age

54.8 54.4

Women (%)

63% 67%

WFNS I (%)

50% 44%

WFNS II (%)

22% 26%

WFNS III (%)

5% 4%

WFNS IV (%)

15% 15%

WFNS V (%)

9% 10%

WFNS ≥4 (%)

24% 25%

Cisternal blood above median (%)

59% 62%

Ventricular blood above median (%)

35% 32%

Intracranial hematoma amount (%)

5% 5%

Surgery (%)

52% 58%

Endovascular treatment (%)

28% 24%
Results

Outcome

Magnesium (n= 139) Placebo (n= 144) Risk Ratio (95% CI)

DCI (%)

16% 24% 0.66 (0.38–1.14)

New hypodensities on CT (%)

45% 47% 1.04 (0.79–1.37)

Poor outcome, Rankin ≥3 (%)

27% 35% 0.77 (0.54–1.09)

Excellent outcome, Rankin 0 (%)

13% 4% 3.4 (1.3–8.9)
Adverse Events

No major side effects occurred. Discontinuation reasons included hypotension, phlebitis, bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, hypermagnesemia, and renal failure.

Study Author Conclusions

This study suggests that magnesium reduces DCI and subsequent poor outcome in patients with SAH, but the results are not yet definitive. A phase III trial is needed to confirm the beneficial effect of magnesium therapy, with poor outcome as the primary outcome.

Critique

The study was well-designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which strengthens the validity of the findings. However, the study was underpowered due to the lower than expected frequency of the primary outcome in the control group, which may limit the conclusiveness of the results. Additionally, the study did not include silent infarctions in the primary outcome measure, which could have provided a more comprehensive assessment of magnesium's effects. A larger phase III trial is necessary to confirm these findings and establish magnesium's role in clinical practice.

References:

Van den Bergh WM, Algra A, van Kooten F, et al. Magnesium sulfate in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2005;36(5):1011-1015. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000160801.96998.57

 

The Safety and Feasibility of Continuous Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate for Prevention of Cerebral Vasospasm in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Design

Prospective, single-cohort, pilot study

N= 19

Objective

To study the safety and feasibility of a continuous, high-dose intravenous (IV) infusion of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) in conjunction with standard subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) management for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm and ischemic cerebral injury in patients with aneurysmal SAH

Study Groups

All patients (n= 19)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients ≥18 years with aneurysmal SAH documented by a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) head scan and a cerebral angiogram obtained within 72 hours of ictus

Exclusion Criteria

Patient with known chronic renal impairment (serum creatinine >2.0 mM/L), intracerebral pathological condition (e.g., intracranial abscess), brain tumor, pregnancy

Methods

Patients received a continuous IV infusion of 12 g of MgSO4 in a 500-mL solution of 0.9% NaCl administered at a rate of 4.06 mM (0.5 g) every hour over a 24-hour period for 10 days.

Standard SAH management consisted of IV normal saline, IV phenytoin, drainage of cerebrospinal fluid, and early surgery or coiling.

The effect of MgSO4 on clinical examination, heart rate, and blood pressure was measured every 2 hours, and serum glucose and phenytoin levels were monitored daily.

Duration

June 2001 to October 2002

Outcome Measures

Primary: Evidence of vasospasm on clinical examination

Secondary: Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score assessment and CT scan evidence of ischemic infarction at 30 days

Baseline Characteristics

 

All patients (n= 19)

Age, mean (range), years

55 (39-84)

Female

8

Fisher Grade, mean

3

 

Hunt & Hess Grade

Grade II

Grade III

Grade IV

 

12

2

5

Hemorrhage

Intraventricular

Intracranial

 

8

1

Ventriculostomy

8

MgSO4 level, mean, mM/L

1.6 ± 0.30

Abbreviations: MgSO4 = Magnesium sulfate. 

Results

Endpoint

All patients (n= 19)

Vasospasm

Symptomatic

Asymptomatic

 

2 (11%)

7 (37%)

MgSO4 level, mean, mM/L

2.7 ± 0.37

GOS score at 30 days*

5

4

 

10

8

There was no CT evidence of cerebral ischemic infarction, and no deaths occurred.

*GOS score 4 and 5 represent "good outcomes".

Abbreviations: TCD = Transcranial Doppler. GOS = Glasgow Outcome Scale. CT = Computed tomography.

Adverse Events

No clinical adverse effects, hemodynamic changes, or fluctuations in serum glucose or phenytoin levels were observed.

Study Author Conclusions

Our study confirmed the safety and feasibility of a continuous infusion of high-dose intravenous MgSO4 in patients with aneurysmal SAH.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The study was a prospective pilot study without a control group, which limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions about the efficacy of MgSO4. The small sample size further limits the generalizability of the findings. However, the study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the treatment, providing a basis for future randomized controlled trials.



References:

Yahia AM, Kirmani JF, Qureshi AI, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. The safety and feasibility of continuous intravenous magnesium sulfate for prevention of cerebral vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2005;3(1):16-23. doi:10.1385/NCC:3:1:016

 

Magnesium Sulfate in the Management of Patients with Fisher Grade 3 Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Pilot Study

Design

Single-cohort, pilot study

N= 10

Objective

To evaluate the effect of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) on the clinical course of patients with severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)

Study Groups

All patients (n= 10)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients ≥18 years with aneurysmal SAH demonstrated by angiography and computed tomography (CT) scan features consistent with Fisher Grade 3 criteria, within 5 days of ictus

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with known renal impairment, major cardiac, pulmonary, or hepatic disease, moribund condition at admission, pregnancy

Methods

Patients received a bolus (20 mmol over 20 minutes) and constant infusion (80 mmol every 24 hours) of intravenous (IV) MgSO4 in 0.9% saline, with incremental increases of 10 to 20 mmol daily as required after correlation with the daily serum magnesium levels. Goal serum level during continuous infusion was twice the baseline or a level ranging from 2 to 2.5 mmol/L.

Upon angiographic confirmation of the aneurysm, surgical clipping or endovascular coiling of the lesion was performed. Additionally, patients received nimodipine and hypervolemic therapy after the aneurysm had been secured.

Baseline and daily metabolic panel and transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography were assessed.

Duration

Treatment: Up to 10 days post-ictus

Follow-up: 3 months 

Outcome Measures

Primary: Achievement of goal serum magnesium levels

Secondary: Evidence of vasospasm on TCD ultrasonography, clinical evidence of vasospasm, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 3 months

Baseline Characteristics

 

All patients (n= 10)

Age, mean, years

53.9 (40-71)

Female

WFNS score

Grade I

Grade II

Grade V

 

8

1

1

Time to MgSO4 initiation post-hemorrhage, mean, days

2.6 

Dose of MgSO4 continuous infusion, mmol/day

84.7

Abbreviations: WFNS = World Federation of Neurological Surgeons. MgSO4 = Magnesium sulfate.

Results

Endpoint

All patients (n= 10)

At goal serum MgSO4 levels

8

Evidence of Vasospasm

On TCD ultrasonography

Clinical

 

5

3

GOS score

5

3

 

8

2

Severe vasospasm occurred in 3 patients (velocities, >200 cm/s).

Abbreviations: MgSO4 = Magnesium sulfate. TCD = transcranial Doppler. GOS = Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Adverse Events

No adverse effects were noted during the infusions. No deaths occurred.

Study Author Conclusions

This pilot study on the effect of MgSO4 on vasospasm after aneurysmal SAH demonstrates that it can be used safely in this group of neurosurgical patients.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This study's small sample size and lack of a control group limit the ability to draw definitive conclusions about its efficacy in reducing vasospasm.



References:

Boet R, Mee E. Magnesium sulfate in the management of patients with Fisher Grade 3 subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(3):602-607. doi:10.1097/00006123-200009000-00014