Efficacy of a Creon Delayed-Release Pancreatic Enzyme Protocol for Clearing Occluded Enteral Feeding Tubes
|
Design
|
Retrospective, quality assurance study
N= 83 (118 clogged tubes)
|
Objective
|
To evaluate the effectiveness of a Creon (pancreatic enzyme delayed-release capsule)-based protocol to clear occluded enteral feeding tubes
|
Study Groups
|
Study participants (N= 83)
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Adult and pediatric patients admitted to the study institution or seen in the emergency department who received Creon delayed-release capsules for an occluded enteral feeding tube |
Exclusion Criteria
|
Not received the prescribed dose of Creon delayed-release capsules (i.e., either the standard 12,000 units lipase or another dose) or received Creon for another indication
|
Methods
|
Given the inaccessibility to previously used Viokase, the institution changed its protocol switching to Creon delayed-release capsules (lipase 12,000 units, protease 38,000 units, and amylase 60,000 units) for clearing occluded enteral feeding tubes. Specific protocol procedures are listed below:
- Thoroughly crush a single sodium bicarbonate 650-mg tablet and dissolve it in 5 to 10 mL sterile water. This will take approximately 3 to 5 minutes. There will be some precipitate in the water, likely from the tablet excipients
- Once dissolved, open 1 Creon capsule and empty the granules into the water/bicarbonate mixture. Allow to dissolve, which will take about 5 minutes or longer. The mixture will turn a light brown color, the same color as the Creon granules
- Once prepared, use this pancreatic enzyme/bicarbonate solution, instilling under light pressure and clamping for 5 to 15 minutes. Then, use warm sterile water to aspirate or flush the tube. A light “back and forth” motion with the syringe plunger is suggested in order to dislodge the clog
The dispensing database was retrospectively reviewed to identify eligible patients and collect relevant demographic and clinical data. Efficacy was defined as documentation in the medical record of tube clearance or resumption of enteral feedings with no note regarding tube replacement. A failure of the protocol was determined if the occluded tube was removed and/or replaced following administration of the pancreatic enzyme solution.
|
Duration
|
Between May 1 and November 30, 2010
|
Outcome Measures
|
Primary: efficacy of the Creon protocol (percentage of occluded tubes successfully cleared), effect of the dose of Creon administered on the outcome
|
Baseline Characteristics
|
|
Study participants (N= 83) |
|
Age, years
|
55 |
|
Female
|
45.8% |
|
Location of administration
Emergency department
Medical services
Surgical services
|
7.2%
39.8%
53%
|
|
Types of feeding tube
Dobhoff
Jejunostomy
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
|
51.8%
18.1%
13.3%
|
|
Causes of enteral feeding tube obstruction
Tube coiling
Kinked tubes
Enteral nutrition
Medications
Nasogastric tube bridle placement issues
Undocumented
|
3 (2.6%)
2 (1.7%)
2 (1.7%)
1 (0.9%)
1 (0.9%)
106 (92.2%)
|
|
Results
|
Endpoint
|
Study participants (n= 80; 115 cases) |
|
Efficacy
|
53/115 (46.1%) |
|
Dose of Creon administered, doses
12,000 lipase units
6,000 lipase units
24,000 lipase units
|
112/121 (92.6%)
6/121 (5%)
3/121 (2.5%)
|
|
Following Creon's failure, the alternative method was also not effective in clearing the obstruction in 10 of 13 (76.9%) cases, and the tube was subsequently removed or replaced. Enteral feeding tube removal or replacement was documented in 11 (17.7%) and 36 (58.1%) of 62 cases, respectively.
|
Adverse Events
|
No adverse effects were attributed to Creon administration. |
Study Author Conclusions
|
An alkalinized Creon pancreatic enzyme protocol was effective in clearing approximately half of the occluded enteral feeding tubes in this retrospective study, an efficacy rate much less than that previously reported in the literature with a Viokase-based protocol.
|
InpharmD Researcher Critique
|
While not specific to Viokase, the study demonstrated the feasibility of a Creon-based protocol when Viokase became unavailable. The retrospective, single-center experience may limit results, potentially confounded by other factors.
|