What is the correlation between amiodarone dose and incidence of development of hypotension/shock?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

There is scant data to support a correlation between amiodarone dose and incidence of development of hypotension/shock, with contradictory evidence regarding the existence of a dose-dependent relationship. These findings are further obscured due to the hemodynamic instability of the patient population utilizing amiodarone.

Background

Multisociety guidelines published in 2018 on antiarrhythmic drugs provide an overview of clinical pharmacology and recommended monitoring parameters. Co-administration of amiodarone with digoxin, beta-blockers, verapamil, or diltiazem should be closely monitored due to increased risk of bradycardia, atrioventricular (AV) block, and hypotension; however, data supporting a dose-dependent relationship between amiodarone and hypotension or shock were not described in the guidelines. [1]

Due to administration of amiodarone in critically ill patients who were already hemodynamically unstable, an exact correlation between incidence of hypotension and amiodarone administration was difficult to discern. Thus, one 2003 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the acute cardiovascular effects of an intravenous (IV) loading dose of amiodarone in 30 adult patients undergoing non-emergent coronary artery bypass grafting. Participants were stratified based on their preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) into those with LVEF ≤30% or >30% and were randomly assigned to receive either 150 mg of intravenous amiodarone diluted in 100 mL of normal saline or an equivalent placebo over 10 minutes following sternal closure. Notably, hypotension requiring intervention occurred in 3 patients (20%) of the amiodarone cohort versus 0 of placebo (p= 0.22); hypotension episodes in the amiodarone arm were transient and resolved without significant hemodynamic compromise. [2]

A 2010 animal study investigated whether the hypotensive effect of intravenous (IV) amiodarone persists beyond the loading dose and into the maintenance infusion period, as well as whether hypotension occurs with maintenance-level dosing alone. In this study, anesthetized beagle dogs were administered a human-equivalent dosing regimen of IV amiodarone (n= 7 dogs; loading dose followed by maintenance infusion) or control (n= 7 dogs; 5% dextrose in water). Hemodynamic parameters, including mean aortic pressure, cardiac output, and the maximum rate of change of left ventricular pressure, were monitored for six hours. The control group showed no hemodynamic changes during the study. However, the amiodarone-treated group experienced rapid and significant reductions in hemodynamic parameters, which persisted throughout the maintenance infusion period. When amiodarone was administered at the maintenance dose alone, similar hemodynamic effects were observed, although their onset was delayed by approximately 60 minutes. Importantly, dosing with a cosolvent-free formulation of amiodarone (PM101) caused no hypotension or other hemodynamic changes, indicating that the cardiodepressant effects were attributable to the cosolvents in the standard formulation. These findings suggest that sustained hypotension during prolonged infusion may be a potential consequence of intravenous amiodarone. However, due to the use of an animal model, caution is warranted in the interpretation of these results. [3]

Other studies have further sought to elucidate the relationship between amiodarone dose and hypotension. In one 2008 study utilizing bolus dose IV amiodarone 300 mg for stable ventricular tachycardia, incidence of hypotension that required emergency direct current (DC) cardioversion was reportedly higher (17%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8% to 32%) than historic trends observed with amiodarone 150 mg doses (6%; 95% CI 1% to 20%). In another 2017 study (PROCAMIO), use of 5 mg/kg IV bolus amiodarone for treatment of tolerated wide QRS complex tachycardia resulted in an approximate 43% rate of cardiac adverse events (15 patients) in the subsequent 40-minute follow-up; of these cases, five were hypotension. Still, more data is required to determine the exact correlation between amiodarone dose and hypotension/shock. [4], [5]

References:

[1] Dan GA, Martinez-Rubio A, Agewall S, et al. Antiarrhythmic drugs-clinical use and clinical decision making: a consensus document from the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacology, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and International Society of Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (ISCP) [published correction appears in Europace. 2018 May 1;20(5):738. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy119]. Europace. 2018;20(5):731-732an. doi:10.1093/europace/eux373
[2] Cheung AT, Weiss SJ, Savino JS, et al. Acute circulatory actions of intravenous amiodarone loading in cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(2):535-541. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00509-5
[3] Cushing DJ, Cooper WD, Gralinski MR, Lipicky RJ. The hypotensive effect of intravenous amiodarone is sustained throughout the maintenance infusion period. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;37(3):358-361. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05303.x
[4] Tomlinson DR, Cherian P, Betts TR, Bashir Y. Intravenous amiodarone for the pharmacological termination of haemodynamically-tolerated sustained ventricular tachycardia: is bolus dose amiodarone an appropriate first-line treatment?. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(1):15-18. doi:10.1136/emj.2007.051086
[5] Ortiz M, Martín A, Arribas F, et al. Randomized comparison of intravenous procainamide vs. intravenous amiodarone for the acute treatment of tolerated wide QRS tachycardia: the PROCAMIO study. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(17):1329-1335. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw230

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

What is the correlation between amiodarone dose and incidence of development of hypotension/shock?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Table 1 for your response.


 

Dose-Ranging Study of Intravenous Amiodarone in Patients With Life-Threatening Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Design

Randomized, double-blind trial

N= 342

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous (IV) amiodarone in patients with refractory, recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) by determining a dose-response among three regimens

Study Groups

125 mg (n= 117)

500 mg (n= 119)

1,000 mg (n= 106)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with incessant (recurrent, despite attempted cardioversion) hemodynamically destabilizing VT, or at least two episodes of hemodynamically destabilizing VT or VF within the 24 hours before enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with drug- and/or electrolyte-induced arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock not related to the ventricular arrhythmia, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg during sinus rhythm, treatment with amiodarone within 6 months of entry into the study, or a QT interval ≥0.55 seconds

Methods

Patients received IV amiodarone according to one of three dosage regimens during the 48-hour study period:

  • 125 mg/24 h: Initial rapid infusion (18.75 mg over 10 min), loading infusion (0.125 mg/min for 0-6 h), and maintenance infusion (0.065 mg/min for 6-24 h).
  • 500 mg/24 h: Initial rapid infusion (75 mg over 10 min), loading infusion (0.50 mg/min for 0-6 h), and maintenance infusion (0.25 mg/min for 6-24 h).
  • 1,000 mg/24 h: Initial rapid infusion (150 mg over 10 min), loading infusion (1.0 mg/min for 0-6 h), and maintenance infusion (0.5 mg/min for 6-24 h).

After the initial infusion, open-label supplemental infusions of 150 mg could be given for breakthrough episodes of hemodynamically destabilizing VT or VF. If events persisted despite these doses, the double-blind phase could be ended. Therapy could also be temporarily slowed or stopped for severe adverse events. All medications for ventricular arrhythmias were discontinued before starting amiodarone therapy, but other necessary treatments like beta-adrenergic antagonists could continue. Temporary ventricular pacing was allowed.

Duration

Between February 19, 1990, and September 14, 1991

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: The VT/VF event rate

Secondary outcome: The time to the first hemodynamically destabilizing VT or VF event.

Baseline Characteristics

 

125 mg (n= 117)

500 mg (n= 119)

1,000 mg (n= 106)  

Age, years

64 ± 11 61 ± 13  64 ± 12   

Male

94 (80%) 85 (71%) 83 (78%)  

Race

White

Black

Other

 

105 (90%)

8 (7%)

4 (3%)

 

108 (91%)

5 (4%)

6 (5%)

 

91 (86%) 

7 (7%)

8 (8%)

 

Primary diagnosis

HDVT

VF

Incessant VT

 

68 (58%)

12 (10%)

37 (32%)

 

62 (52%)

14 (12%)

43 (36%)

 

64 (60%)

13 (12%)

29 (27%)

 

Ejection fraction

Patients <30%

Patients ≥30%

 

48 (53%)

43 (47%)

 

51 (60%)

34 (40%)

 

42 (50%)

42 (50%)

 

Total supplemental amiodarone infusions

2.44 ± 3.10

2.49 ± 3.95

1.75 ± 2.59

 

Abbreviations: HDVT= indicates hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular tachycardia; VF= ventricular fibrillation; MI= myocardial infarction

Results

Endpoint

125 mg (n= 117)

500 mg (n= 119)

1,000 mg (n= 106)

p-Value

Median VT/VF event rates per 24 hours 

1.68 0.96 0.48 0.067

Cardiovascular treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Hypotension

Bradycardia

EMD/asystole

Congestive heart failure

Shock

Proarrhythmia

 

28 (24%)

5 (4%)

4 (3%)

4 (3%)

4 (3%)

0 (0%) 

 

32 (27%)

7 (6%)

2 (2%)

2 (2%)

3 (3%) 

2 (2%)

 

28 (26%)

5 (5%) 

6 (6%)

4 (4%)

2 (2%)

1 (1%)

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

There was a significant dose-related increase in the time to first event (p= 0.025). A difference was observed between the 125 mg and 1,000 mg dose groups (p<0.030), but not between the 125 mg and 500 mg (p= 0.100) or 500 mg and 1,000 mg (p= 0.500) groups.

Adverse Events

See results; hypotension was the most common (26%) treatment-emergent adverse event during IV amiodarone therapy; there was no dose-response relationship. 

Study Author Conclusions

Intravenous amiodarone is effective for the treatment of recurrent, life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

One major limitation of this study is the inclusion of patients with hemodynamically destabilizing VT, as the associated hypotension complicates outcome interpretations. Additonally, the study's dated publication may limit the applicability of its findings, as treatment practices have evolved. Furthermore, the allowance of 150 mg supplemental IV amiodarone infusions to manage recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias may have confounded the interpretation of the dose-response relationship for event rates.



References:

Scheinman MM, Levine JH, Cannom DS, et al. Dose-ranging study of intravenous amiodarone in patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The Intravenous Amiodarone Multicenter Investigators Group. Circulation. 1995;92(11):3264-3272. doi:10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3264