A comprehensive review on pharmacotherapy optimization for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the emergency department highlights important considerations regarding weight-based dosing (see Table 1). RSI medications in obese patients are often underdosed, particularly etomidate and succinylcholine, although the clinical consequences of this underdosing remain unclear. Given the critical importance of achieving full induction and paralysis during RSI, underdosing may carry greater risk than overdosing. In emergent settings, total body weight (TBW) can be used for dosing when calculating ideal or adjusted body weight is not feasible, with suggested maximum doses considered to avoid excessive exposure. However, for induction agents that predispose to hypotension, dosing based on adjusted body weight may be appropriate. Additionally, clinicians should anticipate a potentially prolonged duration of paralysis when large doses of neuromuscular blocking agents are required in obese patients. Further studies are needed to define optimal weight-based dosing strategies for RSI medications in this population.[1]
Though not specific to RSI dosing, literature emphasizes midazolam’s lipophilicity, which seems to demonstrate a higher volume of distribution without significant impact on total clearance in obese patients versus non-obese patients. A recent review on the subject describes a pharmacokinetic study from 1984 that reported a prolonged half-life with the use of midazolam in obese versus non-obese patients. (5.94 ± 0.85 versus 2.27 ± 0.3 hours respectively; p<0.001). A second pharmacokinetic study observed an increase in the central and peripheral volume of distribution as the actual body weight increased, but clearance remained unaffected. As the authors have observed a potential risk of accumulation, they recommend ideal or actual body weight for initial dosing and calculating continuous infusions, with small supplemental doses to achieve desired effects. However, caution is warranted when extrapolating these recommendations, as the cited studies provide general guidance and were not conducted in RSI settings. [2], [3], [4]
A 2021 review provides a comprehensive overview of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of etomidate and its analogs, with a focus on ABP-700. The paper highlights the limited recent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on etomidate, necessitated by its decreased popularity due to adrenal suppression concerns. Etomidate is characterized by ultra-rapid hypnotic action and swift recovery. A continuous infusion causes loss of consciousness within 6 minutes. The effect of a single bolus on loss of eyelash reflex and electro-encephalographic activity were noted to be affected regardless of dose. Further discussions are limited. [5]
A 1983 case report describes an incidence of etomidate overdose via continuous infusion in a 67-year-old patient. The patient required intermittent positive pressure ventilation of lungs after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest. She was sedated with etomidate 35 mg/hour, but was inadvertently given 250 mg of etomidate over 43 minutes. The patient was deeply unconscious, but no other complications occurred. The patient responded to painful stimuli after one hour, and was rousable after 5 hours. By 6 hours, she was fully conscious, alert, and able to communicate. [6]
A 1999 study analyzed the clinical manifestations and outcomes of inadvertent ketamine overdoses in children treated in emergency departments. This investigation involved a synthesis of cases identified through electronic mail subscription lists or reported to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. The report meticulously examined cases where children received 5 to 100 times the intended dose of ketamine, with administration occurring via intramuscular or intravenous routes. Each case was scrutinized to detail the clinical manifestations, outcomes, and causes of the overdose, providing insights into the safety margins and potential complications arising from such dosing errors. In the series, nine cases were documented where healthy children experienced prolonged sedation lasting between 3 to 24 hours. Four of these children encountered brief respiratory depression shortly after administration of the drug, necessitating assisted ventilation in two instances. Notably, two of the children without immediate respiratory difficulties were intubated as a precautionary measure by physicians. Despite the significant dosing errors, no adverse neurological outcomes were reported upon discharge or longer-term follow-up where available. The findings suggested a potentially wide margin of safety for ketamine overdoses, although the report emphasized the need for caution as more serious outcomes could not be entirely excluded given the small and self-reported sample size. [7]
A 1992 study provides relevant pharmacokinetic data on propofol that directly inform how body weight and total dose influence duration of action. 12 critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients (predominantly male, mean age 58 years, mean weight 66.9 kg) received propofol by continuous infusion at a mean rate of 2.58 mg/kg/h for an average of 85.6 hours, after which blood concentrations were sampled for up to 42 hours. The results demonstrated that propofol’s elimination follows a triphasic pattern, with mean half‑lives of 1.81 minutes (rapid redistribution), 70.9 minutes (elimination), and 1411 minutes (slow terminal phase). Importantly, the median total body clearance was 2.11 L/min, consistent with shorter infusions, indicating that even after large cumulative doses, clearance mechanisms remain robust and weight‑based dosing remains reliable. The rapid 50% drop in concentration within the first 10 minutes after stopping the infusion explains why a single induction dose (typically 1.5–2.5 mg/kg based on lean body weight) yields a brief duration of hypnosis (5–10 minutes), while the prolonged terminal half‑life becomes clinically relevant only after prolonged administration or very large total doses, emphasizing that both body weight (as a determinant of distribution volume) and cumulative dose are critical factors in predicting propofol’s overall duration of effect. [8]