How does sotagliflozin differ from empagliflozin? What are the pros and cons of each?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Direct comparative data between sotagliflozin and empagliflozin is currently limited to a single phase 2a study in patients with type 2 diabetes that observed no differences between the two agents in glycemic, metabolic, urinary, and intestinal parameters (see Table 1). Indirect comparative data from meta-analyses have consistently found no significant differences between sotagliflozin and empagliflozin in cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. The dual mechanism of action of sotagliflozin may lead to a numerical improvement in cardiovascular outcomes compared to SGLT2 inhibitors, such as empagliflozin, but clinical data have yet to observe a significant difference. SGLT2 inhibitors appear to achieve superior glycemic control, evidenced by a greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, despite the potential superior cardiovascular protection offered by SGLT1/2 inhibitors. Notably, empagliflozin demonstrates a lower risk of acute kidney injury compared to sotagliflozin.

Background

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) published a 2024 expert consensus statement for optimization of heart failure treatment. While direct conversion between sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and sotagliflozin) is not discussed, the article does provide a comparison of starting and target doses for heart failure. Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin both are recommended to have a starting and target dose of 10 mg daily, but sotagliflozin has a starting dose of 200 mg daily that may be doubled to 400 mg daily. However, there remains a lack of direct clinical comparison data between the agents. The setting of impaired kidney function further complicates dosing, as dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin are contraindicated in patients with an eGFR of 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 or lower, while empagliflozin has no lower bound cutoff. How different renal statuses might affect the conversion between SGLT2 inhibitors largely remains unexplored. [1]

A 2024 network meta-analysis synthesized data from 21 randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving 96,196 participants to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety profiles of five SGLT2 inhibitors: empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, sotagliflozin, and ertugliflozin. Trials included in this meta-analysis enrolled adult patients across a range of clinical backgrounds, including those with heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and diabetes, and featured a minimum study duration of 3 months and at least 500 participants per trial. The primary endpoint evaluated was the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), while secondary endpoints comprised individual assessments of HHF, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, kidney disease progression, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Safety evaluations included risk estimates for limb amputation, fractures, orthostatic hypotension, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia, and genitourinary infections. Statistical estimates were predominantly expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) using random-effects models, with subgroup stratification based on diabetes status, renal function, and HF phenotype. Results from the overall cohort demonstrated no statistically significant differences among the five SGLT2 inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular death or HHF. However, empagliflozin (HR 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.92) and dapagliflozin (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.56–0.96) demonstrated a lower risk of AKI compared to sotagliflozin. Among patients without CKD, empagliflozin was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome compared to ertugliflozin (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60–0.98), as well as lower risks of all-cause death when compared to dapagliflozin (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52–0.99) and cardiovascular death compared to both dapagliflozin and canagliflozin. In patients with diabetes or CKD, no significant inter-agent differences in cardiovascular or renal outcomes were observed. Safety comparisons revealed no consistent differences in the risk of limb amputation, fractures, infections, or diabetic ketoacidosis; however, empagliflozin and ertugliflozin were associated with elevated risks of orthostatic hypotension in comparison to canagliflozin. These findings suggest comparable overall efficacy across SGLT2 inhibitors, with potential preference for empagliflozin in select populations without renal impairment. [2]

A 2023 network meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 20,438 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and HF systematically evaluated the collective and comparative cardiovascular benefits of five SGLT2 inhibitors: canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and sotagliflozin. The analysis incorporated data from trials with diverse populations, ranging from HF-specific cohorts, such as those in DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-reduced, to subgroup and post-hoc analyses of cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) in broader T2D populations, such as CANVAS and DECLARE-TIMI 58. The primary outcomes of interest were composite cardiovascular (CV) death/heart failure hospitalization (HFH), CV death, HFH, and all-cause mortality, while adverse events were also rigorously assessed. Inclusion criteria were strict, ensuring all trials involved SGLT2 inhibitors compared with standard of care (SoC) and reported at least one outcome of interest. Outcomes were pooled through pairwise and network approaches, with rankings generated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The analysis demonstrated that all SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced HFH compared to SoC, with canagliflozin (95.5% SUCRA), sotagliflozin (66.0% SUCRA), and empagliflozin (57.2% SUCRA) ranking as the top agents for HFH reduction. For composite CV death/HFH, canagliflozin (95.9%) and sotagliflozin (77.4%) emerged as the most effective treatments, bolstered by significant relative reductions compared to SoC. Head-to-head indirect comparisons revealed that canagliflozin significantly outperformed dapagliflozin in reducing composite CV death/HFH. Although all SGLT2 inhibitors trended toward reducing CV death, none reached statistical significance individually, while dapagliflozin showed the most consistent impact on all-cause mortality. Safety analyses revealed no significant differences in serious adverse events across agents, yet canagliflozin exhibited a higher likelihood of any adverse event compared to both SoC and other SGLT inhibitors. Sensitivity analyses focused on HF-specific trials further corroborated the findings, identifying sotagliflozin as the most probable agent to favorably impact composite CV death/HFH outcomes. [3]

A 2023 meta-analysis evaluated the relative efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure. The meta-analysis, involving five randomized controlled trials and 21,927 participants, indirectly compared dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and sotagliflozin, with placebo-controlled arms serving as a reference. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, along with secondary endpoints such as all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for heart failure. Bayesian methods were applied to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI for each indirect comparison, alongside ranking probabilities across treatments based on efficacy. For sotagliflozin, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome compared to dapagliflozin (OR 1.54; 95% CI 0.91 to 2.65) or empagliflozin (OR 1.53; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.69). There was also no difference in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, or hospitalization for heart failure. However, there was a trend suggesting that sotagliflozin may be associated with the lowest risk of the composite primary outcome when ranked against the other agents. Further studies are necessary to confirm this finding. [4]

A 2022 network meta-analysis of 111 RCTs involving 103,922 patients evaluated the efficacy and safety outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors versus combined SGLT1/2 inhibitors in patients with T2DM and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The trials included well-established SGLT2 inhibitors such as dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and others, as well as dual SGLT1/2 inhibitors like sotagliflozin and licogliflozin. In T2DM patients, the meta-analysis demonstrated that SGLT1/2 inhibitors resulted in a significant reduction in the hazard rate for myocardial infarction (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.98) and stroke (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.92) compared to SGLT2 inhibitors. However, SGLT2 inhibitors achieved superior glycemic control, evidenced by a greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (mean difference [MD] 0.21%; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.35). Despite the superior cardiovascular protection offered by SGLT1/2 inhibitors, the combined agents were associated with an increased risk of adverse events, including diarrhea (risk ratio [RR] 1.42; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.88) and severe hypoglycemia (RR 5.89; 95% CI 1.41 to 24.57). The comparison yielded no significant difference in overall metabolic or renal outcomes between the two classes, except for a modest increase in serum creatinine in patients treated with SGLT1/2 inhibitors. No substantial differences in outcomes were observed between SGLT1/2 and SGLT2 inhibitors in T1DM patients. These findings suggest that while SGLT1/2 inhibitors offer a promising cardioprotective edge for T2DM patients, their higher adverse event profile needs careful consideration in clinical decision-making. [5]

A 2021 network meta-analysis utilized a Bayesian framework to compare the efficacy of five SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiorenal outcomes, incorporating data from ten large CVOTs. The results suggest that all five SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced HHF, with sotagliflozin (HR 0.66) demonstrating strong efficacy. However, none of the SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated statistically significant reductions in myocardial infarction or stroke. Canagliflozin ranked highest in reducing MACE, stroke, and HHF, whereas empagliflozin was most effective in reducing CVD, CVD or HHF, kidney function progression, and all-cause death. Compared with ertugliflozin, both empagliflozin and dapagliflozin provided superior outcomes for kidney function progression, highlighting the nuanced efficacy differences among these agents for various cardiorenal outcomes. Yet direct comparisons between sotagliflozin and other SGLT2 inhibitors remain limited. [6]

A 2021 NMA evaluated the comparative efficacy of five SGLT2 inhibitors and seven glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in reducing cardiorenal events in patients with type 2 diabetes. The analysis incorporated data from 14 CVOTs published between 2015 and 2021. The findings revealed that sotagliflozin (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.94), subcutaneous semaglutide, and albiglutide were among the most effective interventions in reducing major adverse cardiac events (MACE), while sotagliflozin (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.89), canagliflozin, and empagliflozin significantly lowered the risk of HHF. Sotagliflozin also significantly reduced the risk of MI and stroke, ranking as one of the most effective agents in preventing these outcomes. These findings suggest that sotagliflozin may be the most effective drug for lowering myocardial infarction, stroke, MACE, and HHF. However, the analysis was based on indirect comparisons as all included studies were placebo-controlled trials. [7]

References:

[1] Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, Allen LA, et al. 2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(15):1444-1488. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.024
[2] Kani R, Watanabe A, Miyamoto Y, et al. Comparison of Effectiveness Among Different Sodium-Glucose Cotransoporter-2 Inhibitors According to Underlying Conditions: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [published correction appears in J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e027762. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.027762.]. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(3):e031805. doi:10.1161/JAHA.123.031805
[3] Kongmalai T, Hadnorntun P, Leelahavarong P, et al. Comparative cardiovascular benefits of individual SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes and heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1216160. Published 2023 Dec 20. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1216160
[4] Chen HB, Yang YL, Meng RS, Liu XW. Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods. ESC Heart Fail. 2023;10(2):1231-1241. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14297
[5] Teo YN, Ting AZH, Teo YH, et al. Effects of Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors and Combined SGLT1/2 Inhibitors on Cardiovascular, Metabolic, Renal, and Safety Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis of 111 Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022;22(3):299-323. doi:10.1007/s40256-022-00528-7
[6] Qiu M, Ding LL, Zhou HR. Comparative Efficacy of Five SGLT2i on Cardiorenal Events: A Network Meta-analysis Based on Ten CVOTs. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022;22(1):69-81. doi:10.1007/s40256-021-00484-8
[7] Duan XY, Liu SY, Yin DG. Comparative efficacy of 5 sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and 7 glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists interventions on cardiorenal outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients: A network meta-analysis based on cardiovascular or renal outcome trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(30):e26431. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000026431

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 9 studies investigating the researchable question:

How does sotagliflozin differ from empagliflozin? What are the pros and cons of each?

Level of evidence

A - Multiple high-quality studies with consistent results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-9 for your response.


 

Metabolic, Intestinal, and Cardiovascular Effects of Sotagliflozin Compared With Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Design

Exploratory phase 2a, single-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, parallel-group study

N= 41

Objective

To compare sotagliflozin with empagliflozin, the sodium–glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitor most selective for SGLT2, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension to assess changes in multiple intestinal, metabolic, and cardiovascular parameters

Study Groups

Empagliflozin (n= 20)

Sotagliflozin (n= 21)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients ages 18-74 with T2D, body mass index (BMI) 18.0-38.0 kg/m2, hypertension grades 1 or 2 by European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (BP 140/90 - 179/109 mmHg), HbA1c  6.5% - 11.0% , eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, currently on a stable dose of metformin, and monotherapy with either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)

Exclusion Criteria

Severe anemia, cardiovascular disease, stage 3 or higher chronic kidney disease, New York Heart Association stage III or IV heart failure, or a myocardial infarction within the past 12 months

Methods

After screening and a washout period, all patients were confined at a study unit for 6 days at baseline at week 8. Ambulatory BP monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring were recorded throughout both periods; 48 h feces and 24 h urine samples were collected twice at the end of each period; and transthoracic echocardiograms and pulse wave velocity were evaluated once each during the periods. Timed blood samples were obtained for the measurement of plasma glucose, insulin, intact proinsulin, C-peptide, glucagon, active GLP-1 (aGLP-1), total GLP-1 (tGLP-1), PYY, and GIP. 

Subjects were randomly assigned to sotagliflozin 400 mg (given as two 200-mg tablets) or empagliflozin 25 mg, taken once daily at 8:00 a.m. for 8 weeks.

Duration

March 2018 - April 2019

Treatment was given for 8 weeks

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: Change from baseline in laboratory values from urine, fecal, and mixed-meal tolerance tests (MMTT) collections

Secondary outcome: Change in baseline from cardiovascular and renal parameters

Baseline Characteristics

 

Sotagliflozin (n= 21)

Empagliflozin (n= 20)

 

Age, years

61.0 ± 8.4 61.3 ± 8.1  

Female

4

4  

HbA1c, %

7.7 ± 0.8

7.4 ± 0.8

 

BMI, kg

30.3 ± 3.1

28.9 ± 3.9

 

Total daily dose of metformin, mg

1645 ± 533

1435 ± 584

 

ACEi use

11 (55.0%)

14 (66.7%)

 

ARB use

9 (45.0%)

7 (33.3%)

 

Results

 

Sotagliflozin (n= 21)

Empagliflozin (n= 20)

LS mean difference, sotagliflozin vs. empagliflozin (95% CI); p-value

Glucose, h·mmol/L

p-Value

−4.0 (−5.5 to −2.3)

<0.0001

−2.5 (−4.0 to −0.9)

0.0028

−1.5 (−3.7 to 0.8); NS

Insulin, h·pmol/L

p-Value

−533 (−666 to −399)

<0.0001 

−280 (−414 to −147)

0.0002 

−252 (−443 to −62); 0.0109

Proinsulin, h·pmol/L

p-Value

−18 (−27 to −8)

0.0008

−8 (−17 to 1)

NS

−9 (−23 to 4); NS

C-peptide, h·nmol/L

p-Value

−1.5 (−2.1 to −0.9)

<0.0001 

−0.5 (−1.1 to 0.1)

NS

−1.0 (−1.9 to −0.2); 0.0220

aGLP-1, h·ng/L

p-Value

16 (9–23)

<0.0001

−6 (−13 to 1)

NS

22 (12–32); <0.0001 

tGLP-1, h·ng/L

p-Value

87 (56–117)

<0.0001 

−15 (−45 to 15)

NS 

102 (59–145); <0.0001

PYY, h·ng/L

p-Value

96 (30 to 163)

0.0057

33 (−35 to 102)

NS

63 (−32 to 158); NS

GIP, h·ng/L

p-Value

−336 (−444 to −229)

<0.0001 

−173 (−280 to −65)

0.0025 

−164 (−317 to −11); 0.0368

All results are presented as least squares (LS) mean change from baseline at the 0-5 hour time interval (95% CI), unless otherwise specified.

CI = confidence interval, NS = not significant

Results for other parameters were primarily displayed as a graph. There were no differences between treatments for HBa1c values and most cardiovascular parameters (hemoglobin, baseline blood pressure). Most urine parameters showed no significant difference between the treatment groups, besides an decreased albumin excretion rate for empagliflozin and increased magnesium and calcium excretion rate for sotagliflozin. No signifcant changed were obeserved from fecal samples. 

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: Sotagliflozin: Genital fungal infection (10%), Urinary tract infection (5%)

Gastrointestinal disorders: Sotagliflozin (20%), Empagliflozin (14.3%)

Hypoglycemia: Empagliflozin (4.8%)

Serious Adverse Events: None

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: None

Study Author Conclusions

Sotagliflozin and empagliflozin did not show any major differences in overall glycemic and BP control or in selected metabolic, urinary, and intestinal parameters.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Most of the results presented from this study differed from previously conducted studies, therefore being classfied as small and clinically uncertain results. This study had a small sample size and urine samples were not be adequately analuzed due to laboratory failure, which could have also affected the results. 



References:

Posch MG, Walther N, Ferrannini E, et al. Metabolic, Intestinal, and Cardiovascular Effects of Sotagliflozin Compared With Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(9):2118-2126. doi:10.2337/dc21-2166

 

Efficacy And Safety Of Sotagliflozin In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes And Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease

Design

Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

N= 787

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin, a dual inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporters 1 and 2, in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD3)

Study Groups

Placebo (n= 260)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n= 263)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n= 264)

Inclusion Criteria

Age ≥ 18 years old with T2D, HbA1C ≥ 7% and < 11%, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 and < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2

Exclusion Criteria

Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 20 kg/m2 or > 45 kg/m2, systolic blood pressure (SBP) of more than 180 mmhg or diastolic blood pressure of more than 100 or without any antihypertensive therapy, history of diabetic ketoacidodis within 12 weeks before screening

Methods

After a run-in period in which patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive placebo, sotagliflozin 200 mg or sotagliflozin 400 mg administered as two tablets once daily before breakfast with concomitant antihyperglycemic treatment for 52 weeks. 

Duration

Enrollment: September 2017 to October 2019

Intervention: 52 weeks

Follow-up: 52 weeks

Outcome Measures

Primary: superiority of week 26 HbA1c reductions

Secondary: change from baseline to week 26 in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and body weight; change from baseline to week 12 in in patients with SBP of ≥ 130 mmHg; urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) in patients with baseline UACR of > 3.4 mg/mmol at week 26; and the proportions of patients with an HbA1c of ≤ 6.5% and of ≤7.0% at week 26. Other endpoints included change from baseline to weeks 26 and 52 in SBP and change from baseline to week 52 in HbA1c, FPG, body weight and eGFR.

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo (n260)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n263)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n264)

Age, years

 69.3 ± 8.1  69.6 ± 7.5  69.5 ± 8.2

Female

 111 (42.7%)  120 (45.6%)  112 (42.4%)

White

 220 (84.6%)  231 (87.8%)  215 (81.4%)

Duration of diabetes, units

17.7 ± 9.5   17.2 ± 9.3  16.3 ± 8.2

HbA1c, %

 8.3 ± 1.0   8.3 ± 0.9  8.3 ± 0.9

SBP, mmHg

 140.6 ± 14.6  140.3 ± 15.2  141.7 ± 15.0

BMI, units

 32.5 ± 5.2  32.3 ± 5.7  32.4 ± 5.2

eGFR, units

 44.8 ± 8.4  45.2 ± 8.1  45.1 ± 7.9

UACR, mg/mmol (IQR)

3.5 (1.2 to 17.2) 4.6 (1.1 to 23.8) 3.2 (1.1 to 25.6)

Antihyperglycemic medications

Insulin

Sulfonylurea

Metformin

Other oral agent

GLP-1RA

 

170 (65.4)

83 (32.4)

134 (52.3)

55 (21.5)

18 (7.0)

 

170 (64.6) 

94 (36.7)

138 (53.9)

47 (18.4)

27 (10.5)

 

166 (62.9) 

93 (37.1)

138 (55.0)

50 (19.9)

19 (7.6)

 FPG, mmol/L  9.2 ± 3.3  9.1 ± 2.7  9.0 ± 2.9

GLPA-1RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist

Results

Endpoint

Placebo (n260)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n263)

 Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n264)

Least squares mean change in HbA1C, %

Difference vs. placebo, % (95% CI); p-value

-0.22 ± 0.06

N/A

-0.32 ± 0.06

-0.10 (-0.25 to 0.05); 0.2095

-0.46 ± 0.06

-0.24 (-0.39 to 0.09); 0.0021

 Number of patients (%) achieving HbA1c < 6.5%

      Difference from placebo, % (95% CI);              P value

11 (4.2)

 N/A

15 (5.7) 

1.5 (–2.2 to 5.2); 0.433

15 (5.7)

 1.5 (–2.2 to 5.2); 0.433

 Number of patients (%) achieving HbA1c < 7.0%

     Difference from placebo, % (95% CI);              P value

35 (13.5)

N/A 

51 (19.4)

6.0 (–0.2 to 12.2); 0.0614 

55 (20.8)

7.4 (1.1 to 13.7); 0.0230

 

 FPG, mmol/L

     Difference from placebo, week 26 (95% CI); P value

 9.2 ± 3.3

N/A

 9.1 ± 2.7

0.6 (-1.1 to -0.1); 0.0144

 9.0 ± 2.9

-0.5 (-0.9 to -0.01); 0.0436

 Body weight (kg)

    Difference from placebo, week 26 (95% CI); P value

 89.1 ± 16.6

N/A

 89.8 ± 18.0

1.3 (-1.9 to -0.6); P < 0.0001

 89.5 ± 18.1

-0.8 (-1.5 to -0.2); 0.0155

CI, confidence interval

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: hypoglycemia (38.1% vs. 41.9% vs. 35.4%), urinary tract infections (% vs. % vs. %), diarrhea ( )

Serious Adverse Events: cardiovascular events (3.5% vs.3.4% vs. 3.5%), bone fractures (2.3% vs. 0.7% vs. 1.9%)

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: 5% vs. 6.7% vs. 11.9%

Study Author Conclusions

After 26 weeks, HbA1c was significantly reduced with sotagliflozin 400 but not 200 mg compared with placebo in this CKD3 cohort. UACR in patients with at least A2 albuminuria was reduced with each of the two doses at 26 weeks, but changes were not sustained at week 52.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The study did not compare Sotagliflozin to other medication in the class of SGLT2 inhibitor, most participants were white and study should have been variety of races.

 

References:

Cherney DZI, Ferrannini E, Umpierrez GE, et al. Efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(6):1646-1657. doi:10.1111/dom.15019

 

Sotagliflozin In Patients With Diabetes And Chronic Kidney Disease

Design

Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 

N= 10,584

Objective

To examine whether sotagliflozin would reduce the total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalizations for heart failure, and urgent visits for heart failure in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, regardless of the degree of albuminuria 

Study Groups

Sotagliflozin (n=5292)

Placebo (n=5292)

Inclusion Criteria

Pateints ≥18 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus with a glycated hemoglobin level of 7% or higher, chronic kidney disease (eGFR, 25 to 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m² of body surface area)

Exclusion Criteria

To start an SGLT2 inhibitor during the trial

Methods

Patients were randomized with type 2 diabetes mellitus (glycated hemoglobin level, ≥7%), chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 25 to 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area), and risks for cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sotagliflozin or placebo

Duration

Enrollment: November 16, 2020

Outcome Measures

Primary: composite of the total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalizations for heart failure, and urgent visits for heart failure

Secondary: Total number of hospitalizations for heart failure and urgent visits for heart failure; deaths from cardiovascular causes; the total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes, death from any cause, and total no. of deaths from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and nonfatal strokes

Baseline Characteristics

 

Sotagliflozin (N=5292)

Placebo (N=5292)

   

Age, years

 69 (63–74)  69 (63–74)    

Female

 2347 (44.3)  2407 (45.5)    

White

4402 (83.2)   4347 (82.1)    

Hemoglobin

 8.3 (7.6–9.3) 8.3 (7.6–9.4)     

BMI

 31.9 (28.1–36.2)  31.7 (28.0–36.1)    

eGFR

 44.4 (37.0–51.3) 44.7 (37.0–51.5)     

MI

 1051 (19.9)  1057 (20.0)    

Glucose lowering medication

 5111 (96.6)  5136 (97.1)    

Ejection Fraction

 60 (51–64)  60 (51–65)    

 

Results

Endpoint

Sotagliflozin
(N=5292)

Placebo
(N=5292)

Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)

p-Value

Primary end point: total no. of deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalizations for HF, and urgent visits for HF

5.6 (400)  7.5 (530)   0.74 (0.63–0.88) <0.001 
 Total no. or hospitalizations for HF and urgent visits for HF  3.5 (245)  5.1 (360)  0.67 (0.55–0.82)  
 Deaths from cardiovascular causes  2.2 (155)  2.4 (170)  0.90 (0.73–1.12)  
 Deaths from any cause  3.5 (246)  3.5 (246)  0.99 (0.83–1.18)  
 Total no. of deaths from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and nonfatal strokes  4.8 (343)  6.3 (442) 0.77 (0.65–0.91)   
 

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: diarrhea, diabetic ketoacidosis, and volume depletion

Serious Adverse Events: N/A

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: N/A

Study Author Conclusions

In patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease, with or without albuminuria, sotagliflozin resulted in a lower risk of the composite of deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalizations for heart failure, and urgent visits for heart failure than placebo but was associated with adverse events.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Loss of funding is a major risk factor and it can led to inability to complete the intended duration of follow up. 



References:

Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Pitt B, et al. Sotagliflozin in Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(2):129-139. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2030186

 

Effects of sotagliflozin added to insulin patients with type 1 diabetes

Design

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

N= 1,402

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sotagliflozin, an oral inhibitor of sodium–glucose cotransporters (SGLTI) 1 and 2, in combination with insulin treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes

Study Groups

Placebo (n= 703)

Sotagliflozin (n= 699)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged ≥18 years with T1D for ≥1 year, stable basal insulin dose (±20%) for ≥2 weeks before screening visit, glycated hemoglobin 7.0% - 11.0%, body mass index (BMI) ≥18.5 kg/m2 , able to self-monitor blood glucose (SMBG) and complete study diary

Exclusion Criteria

Any antidiabetic therapy other than insulin or insulin analogs or SGLT inhibitor use within 8 weeks prior to screening, prior exposure to sotagliflozin, type 2 diabetes or severely uncontrolled type 1 diabetes, severe hypoglycemia within 1 month prior to screening, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or nonketotic hyperosmolar state within 1 month or ≥ 2 diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar state events within 6 months of screening, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2

Methods

After a 2-week, single-blind run-in period where all patients received placebo, patients were randomized 1:1 ratio to either sotagliflozin or placebo for 24 weeks. Efficacy and safety were assessed at prespecified times during the treatment period, and a final safety assessment was performed 30 days after the last dose of the trial regimen was administered.

The sotagliflozin group received 400-mg dose of sotagliflozin daily, as two 200-mg oral tablets taken before the first meal of the day.

The placebo group took two matching placebo tablets in the same manner.

Patients' existing regimens with any approved insulin were continued. Insulin doses were individualized and adjusted to meet target blood glucose levels during self-monitoring.

Duration

October 2015 - April 2017

Interventions were given for 24 weeks

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: Percentage of patietns with glycated hemoglobin level > 7.0% at week 24 and no severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis

Secondary: mean change in the glycated hemoglobin level, weight, and daily bolus insulin from baseline to week 24, and systolic blood pressure from baseline to week 16

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo (n= 703)

Sotagliflozin (n= 699)

   

Age, years

42.4 ± 14.0 43.3 ± 14.2    

Female

368 (51.8%) 341 (48.8%)    

White

621 (88.3%) 619 (88.6%)    

Glycated hemoglobin, %

8.21 ± 0.92 8.26 ± 0.96    

BMI, kg

28.10 ± 5.18 28.29 ± 5.13    

Basal insulin dose, IU/day

29.63 ± 15.54 29.54 ± 16.29    

Results

 

Placebo (n= 703)

Sotagliflozin (n= 699)

Difference (95% CI)

p-Value

Patients with glycated hemoglobin <7.0% and no severe
hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis

107 (15.2%) 200 (28.6%) 13.4 (9.0 to 17.8) <0.001

Patients with glycated hemoglobin ≥ 7.0%

≥ 1 episode of severe hypoglycemia

≥ 1 episode of diabetic ketoacidosis

 

13 (1.8%)

4 (0.6%)

 

16 (2.3%)

18 (2.6%)

 

0.4 (-1.0 to 1.9)

2.0 (0.7 to 3.3)

 

0.56

0.003 

Week 24 change from baseline

Glycated hemoglobin

Weight, kg

Systolic blood pressure in patients with SBP ≥130*, mmHg

Daily bolus insulin dose, IU/day

 

-0.33 ± 0.03

0.77 ± 0.12

-5.7 ± 0.90

-1.09 ± 0.47

 
 

-0.79 ± 0.03

-2.21 ± 0.12

-9.2 ± 0.92

-3.93 ± 0.47

 

-0.54 to -0.38

-3.31 to -2.66

-5.7 to -1.3

-4.05 to -1.64

 

<0.001

<0.001

0.002

<0.001

*Systolic blood pressure values are reported as a change at 16 weeks

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: Severe hypoglycemia (3.0% vs 2.4%), diarrhea (4.1% vs 2.3%), urinary tract infections (3.6% vs 3.8%), general mycotic infections (6.4% vs 2.1%)

Serious Adverse Events: Sotagliflozin (6.9%), Placebo (3.3%)

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: Sotagliflozin (6.3%), Placebo (2.3%)

Study Author Conclusions

The proportion of patients who achieved a glycated hemoglobin level lower than 7.0% and had no severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis was larger in the group that received sotagliflozin than in the placebo group. However, the rates of diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia were higher among patients who received sotagliflozin but did not achieve the target glycated hemoglobin level than among those who received placebo. The use of sotagliflozin was also associated with significant decreases in glycated hemoglobin level, fasting plasma glucose level, insulin dose, weight, and systolic blood pressure.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The interventions of this study were given for 24 weeks, which is not long enough to establish long term saftey and efficacy results. The design of this study also used more stringent protocol to reduce the risk of DKA, which may have affected the number of patients who could have potentially developed DKA. The study collected the patient's SGBM values but they were not included within the results of this study.



References:

Garg SK, Henry RR, Banks P, et al. Effects of Sotagliflozin Added to Insulin in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(24):2337-2348. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1708337

 

Sotagliflozin in combination with optimized insulin therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes: the North American inTandem1 study

Design

Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

N= 793

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the dual sodium–glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) and SGLT2 inhibitor sotagliflozin in combination with optimized insulin in type 1 diabetes (T1D)

Study Groups

Placebo (n= 268)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n= 263)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n= 262)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with T1D using either multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) for insulin delivery, HbA1c 7.0–11.0% at screening

Exclusion Criteria

β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) levels > 0.6 mmol/L, use of SGTIs or antidiabetic agent other than insulin or insulin analog at the time of screening, chronic systemic corticosteroid use, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), or severely uncontrolled T1D 

Methods

There were two double-blind periods: a 24-week treatment period, followed by a 28-week double-blind extension. 6 weeks before randomization, insulin therapy was optimized by adjusting basal and bolus doses to maintain fasting or preprandial blood glucose between 4.4 and 7.2 mmol/L (80 and 130 mg/dL) and 1- to 2-h postprandial glucose < 10 mmol/L (< 180 mg/dL)

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to sotagliflozin 200 mg, sotagliflozin 400 mg, or placebo once daily before the first meal of the day. Insulin doses were adjusted according to self-monitoring bllod glucose (SMBG) data to meet study targets. 

Duration

March 2015 - February 2017

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: Placebo adjusted change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24

Secondary outcomes: A composite of the proportion of patients with HbA1c <7.0% and no severe hypoglycemia or DKA at week 24, change from baseline to week 24 in body weight, bolus insulin dose, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and scores on the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) and the 2-item Diabetes Distress Screening Scale (DDS2) 

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo (n= 268)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n= 263)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n= 262)

Age, years

45.2 ± 12.72 46.6 ± 13.48 46.4 ± 13.12

Female

131 (48.9%) 137 (52.1%) 142 (54.2%)

White

244 (91.0%) 241 (91.6%) 246 (93.9%)

Hemoglobin A1c, %

7.54 ± 0.712 7.61 ± 0.735 7.56 ± 0.724

Body weight, kg

87.30 ± 17.709 86.96 ± 18.539 86.50 ± 18.004

Baseline total daily insulin dose, IU/kg

0.74 ± 0.357 0.72 ± 0.386 0.72 ± 0.335

Results

 

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n= 263)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n= 262)

Placebo (n= 268)

A1c, %

95% CI

p-Value

-0.36

-0.45 to -0.27

<0.001

-0.41 

-0.50 to -0.32

<0.001

 

Body weight, kg 

95% CI

p-Value

-3.35

-2.85 to -1.85

<0.001

-3.45 

-3.95 to -2.94

<0.001

 

Total daily insulin dose, %

95% CI

p-Value

-6.16 

-9.01 to -3.32

<0.001

-9.70 

-12.54 to -6.85

<0.001

 

Patients with HbA1c <7.0% and no severe hypoglycemia or DKA at week 24

33.5% 43.5% 21.6%

All end points are given as the change in least square means (LSM) from baseline at week 24 from placebo

CI = confidence interval

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events:

Hypoglycemia: Placebo (9.7%), Sotagliflozin(6.5% for both groups)

General mycotic infections: Placebo (3.4%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (9.1%), Sotagliflozin 400 mg (13.0%)

Diarrhea: Placebo(6.7%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (8.4%), Sotagliflozin 400 mg (10.3%)

Serious Adverse Events: Placebo (7.46%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (10.27%) , Sotagliflozin 400 mg (11.07%)

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: Placebo (4.1%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (4.9%), Sotagliflozin 400 mg (6.5%) 

Study Author Conclusions

In a 1-year T1D study, sotagliflozin combined with optimized insulin therapy was associated with sustained HbA1c reduction, weight loss, lower insulin dose, fewer episodes of severe hypoglycemia, improved patient-reported outcomes, and more DKA relative to placebo.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The rate of DKA was higher in the sotagliflozin group but still typical of those with type 1 diabetes. The results of the study may have been affected by the more frequent monitoring of blood glucose levels and insulin adjusments made by the patients and researchers. Overall, the adverse events associated with the treatment group were not as serious, and therapy was resumed shortly after. 



References:

Buse JB, Garg SK, Rosenstock J, et al. Sotagliflozin in Combination With Optimized Insulin Therapy in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The North American inTandem1 Study. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(9):1970-1980. doi:10.2337/dc18-0343

 

HbA1c and hypoglycemia reductions at 24 and 52 weeks with sotagliflozin in combination with insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes: the European inTandem2 study

Design

Phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

N= 782

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the dual SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibitor sotagliflozin compared with placebo when combined with optimized insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D)

Study Groups

Placebo (n = 258)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n = 261)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n = 263)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with T1D using either multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) for insulin delivery, HbA1c 7.0–11.0% at screening

Exclusion Criteria

β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) levels > 0.6 mmol/L

Methods

After a 2-week placebo run-in, patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with sotagliflozin 400 or 200 mg, or placebo, for 52 weeks. Insulin therapy was optimized for 6 weeks before randomization and optimized insulin continued until the study concluded at week 52. Bolus insulin was reduced by 30% for the first meal after the first dose of study medication on day 1 only. After that, investigators adjusted insulin doses according to SMBG results. In addition to premeal testing to determine bolus insulin doses, patients tested blood glucose before breakfast, before and 2 hours after lunch, and before dinner and bedtime at least three times a week before a clinic visit. Safety was monitored for 30 days after the last dose of study medication.

Duration

May 2015 - June 2017

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: Placebo adjusted change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24

Secondary outcomes: A composite of the proportion of patients with HbA1c <7.0% and no severe hypoglycemia or DKA at week 24, change from baseline to week 24 in body weight, bolus insulin dose, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and scores on the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) and the 2-item Diabetes Distress Screening Scale (DDS2) 

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo (n= 258)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n= 261)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n= 263)

Age, years

39.7 ± 13.42 42.3 ± 13.59 41.7 ± 13.23

Female

124 (48.1%)

122 (46.7%)

130 (49.4%)

White

250 (96.9%)

252 (96.6%) 

250 (95.1%)

Hemoglobin A1c, %

7.79 ± 0.881

7.74 ± 0.806

7.71 ± 0.819

Body weight, kg

81.08 ± 16.857

81.93 ± 17.386

81.97 ± 17.963

Baseline total daily insulin dose, IU/kg

0.75 ± 0.295

0.73 ± 0.277

0.74 ± 0.267

Results

 

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n= 261)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n= 263)

 

A1c, %

95% CI

p-Value

-0.37 

-0.48 to -0.25

<0.001

-0.35 

-0.47 to -0.24

<0.001

 

Body weight, kg 

95% CI

p-Value

 

-1.98 

-2.53 to -1.44

<0.001

 

-2.58

-3.12 to -2.04

<0.001

 

Total daily insulin dose, %

95% CI

p-Value

-8.23

-11.68 to -4.79

<0.001

-9.47 

-12.90 to -6.04

<0.001

 

All end points are given as the change in least square means (LSM) from baseline at week 24 

CI = confidence interval

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: 

Hypoglycemia: Placebo (5.0%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (5.0%), Sotagliflozin 400 mg (2.3%)

General mycotic infections: Placebo (2.3%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (9.2%), Sotagliflozin 400 mg (11.0%)

Diarrhea: Placebo(3.5%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (4.6%), Sotagliflozin 400 mg (7.2%)

Urinary tract infections: Placebo(5.0%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (4.2%), Sotagliflozin 400 mg (6.8%)

Serious Adverse Events: Placebo (6.6%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (10.0%), Sotagliflozin 400 mg (8.0%)

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: Placebo (3.5%), Sotagliflozin 200 mg (3.8%), Sotagliflozin 400 mg (6.8%)

Study Author Conclusions

In a 1-year study, sotagliflozin was associated with statistically significant HbA1c reductions. More episodes of DKA and fewer episodes of documented and severe hypoglycemia were observed in patients using sotagliflozin relative to those receiving placebo.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The results of this study are similar to the other inTandem trials that have been conducted. There was no incidence of DKA in placebo compared to the sotagliflozin groups. The more frequent glucose checks and insulin adjusments, compared to actual clinical practive, may also have affected the results of this study. 



References:

Danne T, Cariou B, Banks P, et al. HbA1c and Hypoglycemia Reductions at 24 and 52 Weeks With Sotagliflozin in Combination With Insulin in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The European inTandem2 Study. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(9):1981-1990. doi:10.2337/dc18-0342

 

Dose‐dependent glycometabolic effects of sotagliflozin on type 1 diabetes over 12 weeks: The inTandem4 trial

Design

Phase 2b, multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, dose‐ranging study

N= 141

Objective

To assess the dose‐related effects of sotagliflozin, a novel dual inhibitor of sodium‐glucose co‐transporters‐1 and ‐2, in type 1 diabetes (T1D)

Study Groups

Placebo (n = 36)

Sotagliflozin 75 mg (n = 35)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n = 35)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n = 35)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged ≥18 years with T1D whose HbA1c level was 7.0%-10.0%

Exclusion Criteria

Serum beta‐hydroxy‐butyrate (BHB) levels > 0.6 mmol/L, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2

Methods

During a 2‐week placebo run‐in period, patients had to be ≥80% adherence to placebo tablets. After, they were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to placebo or sotagliflozin 75, 200 or 400 mg administered once daily before the first meal of the day, with randomization stratified by mode of insulin administration. During the 12‐week double‐blind period, investigators adjusted insulin regimens, but the total insulin dose could not exceed the total dose at baseline for patients. Postprandial glucose (PPG), body weight, daily urinary glucose excretion (UGE), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, were assessed at each visit.

Duration

July 2015 - August 2016

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: Change in least squares mean (LSM) HbA1c from baseline to week 12

Secondary outcome: Change in least squares mean (LSM) PPG, UGE, and weight from baseline to week 12

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo (n = 36)

Sotagliflozin 75 mg (n = 35)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n = 35) Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n = 35)

Age, years

48.1 ± 11.3  42.4 ± 12.0  47.0 ± 14.0 44.8 ± 15.4

Female

21 (58.3%)  22 (62.9%) 15 (42.9%)  15 (42.9%)

White

34 (94.4%) 31 (88.6%) 31 (88.6%)  35 (100.0%)

Hemoglobin A1c, %

7.95 ± 0.85 8.00 ± 0.84 8.07 ± 0.93 8.05 ± 0.74

Body weight, kg

91.9 ± 19.7 80.0 ± 14.4  82.9 ± 17.1 87.0 ± 20.9

2‐h PPG, mg/dL

215.1 ± 80.1 199.3 ± 80.8  211.8 ± 75.8 208.0 ± 95.2

UGE, g/day

6.87 ± 13.4 15.83 ± 23.3 6.61 ± 11.9  10.00 ± 25.7

Results

 

Sotagliflozin 75 mg (n = 35)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n = 35)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n = 35)

 

A1c, %

95% CI

p-Value

-0.3

-0.5 to -0.02

0.07

-0.5

-0.8 to -0.2

<0.001

-0.4

-0.7 to -0.1

0.006

 

Body weight, kg 

95% CI

p-Value

-1.3

-2.5 to -0.08

0.038

-2.4

-3.6 to -1.2

<0.001

-2.6

-3.8 to -1.4

<0.001 

 

2‐h PPG, mg/dL

95% CI

p-Value

-22.2

-62.7 to 18.2

0.28

-28.7

-69.2 to 11.9

0.16

-50.2

-89.7 to -10.8

0.013

 

UGE, g/day

95% CI

p-Value

41.8

12.0 to 71.5

0.006

57.7

28.3 to 87.2

<0.001

70.5

41.3 to 99.6

<0.001

 

All end points are given as the change in least square means (LSM) from baseline at week 12 from placebo

CI = confidence interval

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: 

Hypoglycemia:  Placebo (97.2%), 75 mg (94.3%), 200 mg (91.4%), 400 mg (97.1%)

Genital mycotic infection: Sotagliflozin all groups (2.9%)

Urinary tract infection: Placebo (5.6%), 400 mg (2.9%)

Diarrhea: Placebo (8.3%); 200, 400 mg (2.9%)

Serious Adverse Events: Placebo (2.8%), Sotagliflozin (2.9%)

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: 4 participants discontinued due to DKA, ketosis, pregnancy, and neurosensory deafness.

Study Author Conclusions

Combined with stable insulin doses, sotagliflozin 200 mg and 400 mg improved glycaemic control and weight in adults with T1D. Sotagliflozin 400 mg reduced PPG levels. UGE increased with all sotagliflozin doses. Rates of severe hypoglycaemia and DKA were low.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This trial has a smaller population size and shorter duration compared to the other inTandem trials; however, its findings are supported by previous studies. The dual SGLT inhibition was effective in improving PPG and UGE values in this population. It is important to note that several of the authors had conflicts of interests with the manufacturing company.



References:

Baker C, Wason S, Banks P, et al. Dose-dependent glycometabolic effects of sotagliflozin on type 1 diabetes over 12 weeks: The inTandem4 trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(11):2440-2449. doi:10.1111/dom.13825

 

Sotagliflozin In Patients With Diabetes And Recent Worsening Heart Failure

Design

Multicenter, double-blind trial

N= 1222

Objective

To hypothesized that sotagliflozin would reduce the risks of death from cardiovascular causes, hospitalization for heart failure, and an urgent visit for heart failure among patients with diabetes mellitus and recent worsening of heart failure with either reduced or preserved ejection fraction when administered soon after an episode of decompensated heart failure

Study Groups

Sotagliflozin (n= 608)

Placebo (n= 614)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged ≥18 to 85 years and had been hospitalized because of the presence of signs and symptoms of heart failure and received treatment with intravenous diuretic therapy and required to have received a previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes before the index admission or to have laboratory evidence to support a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes during the index admission

Exclusion Criteria

End-stage heart failure or recent acute coronary syndrome, stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronaryartery bypass surgery, or an estimated GFR of <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m² of bodysurface area

Methods

Patients who met all eligibility and stability criteria were randomly assigned, either before or within 3 days after hospital discharge, to receive 200 mg of sotagliflozin once daily (with a dose increase to 400 mg, depending on side effects) or placebo. 

Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 2, and 4 weeks, at 4 months, and every 4 months thereafter.

Duration

November 16, 2020

Outcome Measures

Primary: Total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes and hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure 

Secondary: Total number of hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure; the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes; the incidence of death from any cause; the total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalizations for heart failure, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and nonfatal strokes; the total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure, and events of heart failure during hospitalization

Baseline Characteristics

 

Sotagliflozin (N=608)

Placebo (N=614)

   

Age, years (IQR)

 69 (63–76)  70 (64–76)    

Female

 198 (32.6%) 214 (34.9%)     

White

 567 (93.3%)  572 (93.2%)    

Median glycated hemoglobin level (IQR) 

7.1 (6.4–8.3)   7.2 (6.4–8.2)    

Median body-mass index (IQR)

 30.4 (26.3–34.3)  31.1 (27.3–34.5)    

Median estimated GFR (IQR), ml/min/1.73 m²

 49.2 (39.5–61.2) 50.5 (40.5–64.6)     

Results

Endpoint

Sotagliflozin (N=608)

Placebo (N=614)

Hazard Ratio or Difference (95% CI)

p-Value

Hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure

 194 (40.4)  297 (63.9) 0.64 (0.49 to 0.83)   <0.001

 Deaths from cardiovascular causes

 51 (10.6)  58 (12.5)  0.84 (0.58 to 1.22)  0.36

Deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalizations for heart failure, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and nonfatal strokes

247 (51.4)   330 (71.0)  0.72 (0.56 to 0.92)  

Deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure, and events of heart failure during hospitalization

263 (54.7)   375 (80.6)  0.68 (0.54 to 0.86)  

Deaths from any cause

65 (13.5)    76 (16.3)  0.82 (0.59 to 1.14)  

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: hypotension (6.0% vs. 4.6%), urinary tract infection (4.8% vs. 5.1%), and diarrhea (6.1% vs. 3.4%)

Serious Adverse Events: Severe hypoglycemia was more common with sotagliflozin than with placebo (1.5% vs. 0.3%)

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: N/A

Study Author Conclusions

In patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure, sotagliflozin therapy, initiated before or shortly after discharge, resulted in a significantly lower total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes and hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure than placebo

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Loss of funding from the sponsor that led to the trial being stopped before enrollment of the initial planned sample size



 

Efficacy and Safety of Sotagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Severe Renal Impairment

Design

Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, doubl-blind, placebo-controlled trial

N= 277

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin, a dual inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 and 2, in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD4)

Study Groups

Placebo (n= 93)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n= 92)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n= 92)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients ≥18 years of age with diagnosed T2D, HbA1c 7%-11%, eGFR between 15-30 mL/min/1.73 m2

Exclusion Criteria

History of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA, severe hypoglycemia, body mass index (BMI) ≤20 or >45 kg/m2, systolic blood pressure (SBP) <120 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <60 mmHg while taking antihypertensives, renal disease requiring immunosuppressive therapy, or dialysis or previous SGLT2 use within the past 12 months

Methods

There was a 2 week, single-blind run-in phase prior to randomization, a 26 week, double-blind treatment period, a 26 week, double-blind extension period; and a 4 week, post-treatment follow-up period to collect safety information.

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to treatment with placebo, sotagliflozin 200 mg, or sotagliflozin 400 mg, administered as two tablets once a day before breakfast. Patients continued taking prior background antihyperglycemic treatments. HbA1c, SBP, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and urinary glucose excretion (UGE) were measured throughout the study.

Duration

August 2017 - December 2019

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: Least squares mean (LSM) change in HbA1c between baseline and week 26 between sotagliflozin 400 mg and placebo.

Secondary outcome: Least squares mean (LSM) change in HbA1c between baseline and week 26 for sotagliflozin 200 mg and placebo, change from baseline in FPG, body weight, and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) at Week 26 among groups

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo (n= 93)

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n= 92)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n= 92)

Age, years

68.0 (8.3%)

66.8 (10.0%)

67.3 (9.6%)

Female

51 (54.8%)

48 (52.2%)

43 (46.7%)

White

76 (81.7%)

73 (79.3%)

78 (84.8%)

HbA1c, %

 8.4 ± 1.1

8.3 ± 1.0

8.3 ± 0.9

FPG, mmol/L

8.7 ± 3.2

8.8 ± 3.3

8.2 ± 2.6

eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2

24.1 ± 4.4 

23.8 ± 4.8

23.9 ± 4.4

UGE, mmol/L median (min, max)

 850 (50, 71,800)

1750 (50, 135,400)

1500 (50, 87,000)

Results

 

Sotagliflozin 200 mg (n= 92)

Sotagliflozin 400 mg (n= 92)

 

Difference in A1c reduction, %

95% CI

p-Value

0.05 

-0.38 to 0.4

0.812

-0.3

-0.6 to 0.05

0.096

 

Mean change in UGE, mmol/L 

95% CI

p-Value

27.0

14.4 to 39.6

< 0.001 

34.8

22.0 to 47.5

< 0.001

 

Mean change in eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2

95% CI

p-Value

-1.8

-3.2 to -0.3

0.019 

-1.6

-3.0 to -0.1

0.034

 

All values listed are results measured at 26 weeks.

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: 

Hypoglycemia: Placebo (40.9%), 200 mg (40.4%), 400 mg (38.9%)

Renal events: Placebo (10.8%), 200 mg (13.8%), 400 mg (12.2%)

Urinary tract infections: Placebo (19.4%), 200 mg (17.0%), 400 mg (10.0%)

Serious Adverse Events: Placebo (1.1%), 200 mg (2.1%), 400 mg (1.1%)

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: Placebo (12.9%), 200 mg (10.6%), 400 mg (13.3%)

Study Author Conclusions

After 26 weeks, HbA1c reductions with sotagliflozin were not statistically significant vs placebo in adults with T2D and CKD4.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This study was powered around A1c changed and not renal parameters. There was also no control SGLT2 to compare sotagliflozin against for overall efficacy in CKD4. The continued use of other therapies, including insulin, could have affected the results of the study. 



References:

Cherney DZI, Ferrannini E, Umpierrez GE, et al. Efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(12):2632-2642. doi:10.1111/dom.14513