What is the harm (from a drug-drug interaction standpoint) in patients who choose to take either LSD, Psilocybin, or MDMA alongside their antidepressant or antipsychotic medication?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Literature on the concomitant use of psychedelics (such as LSD, psilocybin, and MDMA) and antidepressants or antipsychotics is limited to pharmacokinetic trials and systematic reviews, mostly based on clinical trials with healthy patients or case reports. MDMA imparts its effect on serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine, while psilocybin and LSD impact serotonergic neurotransmission, resulting in the potential for serotonin syndrome when these agents are coadministered with antidepressants.

Background

Mechanistically, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is described as an amphetamine derivative, operating in 2 different mechanisms to increase the central nervous system's serotonin concentration. At a typical dose of 1.7 mg/kg, MDMA promotes serotonin neuronal efflux by altering the chemical gradient that moves serotonin away from the intercellular space and influences the same reuptake transporter used by serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Additionally, MDMA is metabolized by and can inhibit CYP2D6 which allows some SSRIs to have the potential to inhibit MDMA metabolism. However, there is a lack of data investigating the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between SSRIs and MDMA given the potential of both drugs to raise synaptic cleft serotonin levels and the potential pharmacokinetic interaction if the SSRI is a potent CYP450 2D6 inhibitor. It has been proposed that many of the symptoms of MDMA toxicity may overlap with serotonin syndrome. This may result in some cases of serotonin syndrome being missed, and subsequently underrepresented, warranting caution in prescribing SSRIs to MDMA users. [1]

A 2022 systematic review investigated DDIs between MDMA, psilocybin, and psychiatric medications, including adrenergic agents, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, mood stabilizers, NMDA antagonists, psychostimulants, and various antidepressants. Data were evaluated from 40 studies, including 26 randomized controlled trials and 11 case reports. MDMA exerts its effect via the reversal of monoamine transporters, including serotonin transporter (SERT), norepinephrine transporter (NET), and dopamine transporter (DAT), resulting in increased concentrations of intrasynaptic monoamines; the effects primarily impact serotonin (5-HT), followed by norepinephrine, and lastly dopamine. Similarly, psilocybin and LSD impact serotonin neurotransmission via 5-HT2a agonism, suggesting both psychedelic agents confer potential for DDI with many classes of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications. Interactions may result in an increased risk of serotonin syndrome or attenuation of MDMA’s effects. All studies, however, included relatively small sample sizes of healthy adult patients. Only one study was included that studied concurrent use of MDMA and an antipsychotic, haloperidol, finding the combination resulted in reduced well-being, higher rate of state anxiety, and reduced perception of a sensation denoted as “oceanic boundlessness.” Some studies assessing interactions between MDMA and individual antidepressants were also evaluated, generally noting attenuation of some of MDMA’s effects when taken with bupropion and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g., bupropion, citalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine, and duloxetine). [2]

Studies comparing combination use with psilocybin, however, demonstrated more mixed results. For example, chlorpromazine attenuated psilocybin-induced mydriasis and visual perceptual changes, while haloperidol had no effects on psilocybin-induced perceptual changes, although it did increase a parameter denoted as “dread of ego dissolution.” Risperidone resulted in attenuation of psilocybin-induced alterations in consciousness, including a reduction in dread of ego dissolution. One study investigated combination use of a serotonin reuptake inhibitor (escitalopram) and psilocybin, finding escitalopram pretreatment did not significantly attenuate ratings of altered states of consciousness due to psilocybin but did result in significant reductions in several other subjective ratings. Generalizability of this data is limited, as all the included studies were based on younger, healthy adult patients receiving limited duration of psychiatric medications, generally only once. [2]

Another comprehensive overview of DDIs was conducted more recently between classic psychedelics and other drugs in humans, deriving results from 52 studies (32 lysergic acid diethylamide [LSD] studies; 10 psilocybin; 4 mescaline; 3 dimethyltryptamine [DMT]; 2 5-MeO-DMT; 1 ayahuasca). DDIs discussed antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers. Potent 5-HT2a antagonists (i.e., risperidone, olanzapine, pipamperone, mirtazapine, mianserin, etoperidone) are anticipated to diminish psychedelic effects. Risperidone and chlorpromazine were effective in attenuating the effects of LSD and psilocybin, with risperidone’s effect being dose-dependent. Buspirone, a 5-HT1a receptor agonist, reduced psilocybin-induced visual hallucinations, which was not seen with ergotamine. This effect may be due to the more effective inhibitory impact of buspirone over psilocybin on pyramidal neurons. Dopamine receptor antagonists, such as haloperidol, displayed no impact on psilocybin-induced hallucinations and increased anxiety but diminished the feelings of oceanic boundlessness and derealisation. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine, showed reduced effects of LSD in one study. Fluoxetine also delayed LSD onset in half of the participants, showing decreased LSD sensitivity. As certain SSRIs, like fluoxetine, are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6 enzymes, the expectation is a stronger, prolonged LSD effect. However, due to various molecular actions, the opposite is true. Alternatively, escitalopram only reduced ego disintegration and anxiety, with no effect on psilocybin-induced positive mood or mind-altering effects. [3]

Trazodone, a serotonin receptor antagonist and reuptake inhibitor (SARI), was shown to reduce the psychological and hallucinogenic effects of LSD and potentially desensitize 5-HT2a receptors, reducing the cell’s psychedelic response. While one small study showed no serious treatment-emergent adverse events with concomitant synthetic psilocybin and SSRI treatment (i.e., sertraline, escitalopram, fluoxetine, vilazodone, paroxetine, citalopram), another reported weakened psilocybin effects with SSRI/ serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) concomitant use, suggesting 5-HT2a receptor downregulation. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs; i.e., phenelzine, isocarboxazide) showed attenuated or locked effects of LSD. In contrast, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs; i.e., desipramine, imipramine, clomipramine) showed increased psychological effects of LSD, potentially due to noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake mechanisms. Chronic administration of TCAs, such as desipramine, can increase neuron sensitivity to LSD, suggesting a postsynaptic serotonin receipt sensitization to LSD. Findings may be affected by the inclusion of trials from 1950-1970 providing limited or incomplete data. In addition, DDIs were specific to other drugs’s effects on psychedelics but did not mention the effects these psychedelics may have on antidepressant or antipsychotic therapies. [3]

An older review from 2007 provided a hierarchy of risk for serotonin syndrome; substances that inhibit serotonin reuptake are at the least amount of risk to increase serotonin to life-threatening levels when combined with ecstasy, while agents at high risk of serotonin syndrome may lead to serious increases in serotonin when combined with ecstasy. Some agents, like herbal supplements or agents with uncertain mechanisms of action, provide an unknown amount of risk when combined with ecstasy. See Table 1 for a summary of agents with risk when combined with MDMA. [4]

References:

[1] Dobry Y, Rice T, Sher L. Ecstasy use and serotonin syndrome: a neglected danger to adolescents and young adults prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2013;25(3):193-199. doi:10.1515/ijamh-2013-0052
[2] Sarparast A, Thomas K, Malcolm B, Stauffer CS. Drug-drug interactions between psychiatric medications and MDMA or psilocybin: a systematic review. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022;239(6):1945-1976. doi:10.1007/s00213-022-06083-y
[3] Halman A, Kong G, Sarris J, Perkins D. Drug-drug interactions involving classic psychedelics: A systematic review. J Psychopharmacol. 2024;38(1):3-18. doi:10.1177/02698811231211219
[4] Silins E, Copeland J, Dillon P. Qualitative review of serotonin syndrome, ecstasy (MDMA) and the use of other serotonergic substances: hierarchy of risk. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007;41(8):649-655. doi:10.1080/00048670701449237

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the harm (from a drug-drug interaction standpoint) in patients who choose to take either LSD, Psilocybin, or MDMA alongside their antidepressant or antipsychotic medication?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-3 for your response.


Serotonergic substances and the risk of serotonin syndrome from concomitant use with ecstasy

Less risk Intermediate risk High risk

Unknown risk

SSRIs (e.g., citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine)

SNRIs (e.g., venlafaxine)

Tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., clomipramine, imipramine)

Opioid analgesics (e.g., tramadol, dextromethorphan)

Antihistamines (e.g., chlorpheniramine, brompheniramine)

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Amphetamine (e.g.,  dexamphetamine,
ethylphenidate)

5-HTP

Amphetamine derivatives (e.g., methamphetamine)

L-tryptophan

Cocaine

Serotonin releasers

Serotonin precursors

MAOIs (e.g., phenelzine, tranylcypromine, nialamide, isoniazid, clorgyline)

RIMAs (e.g., moclobemide)

Inhibitors of serotonin metabolism

Saint John’s wort*

LSD*

Anti-migraine drugs** (e.g. dihydroergotamine, bromocriptine)

Lithium*

5-HTP, 5-hydroxy tryptophan; LSD, lysergic acid; MAOI, monoamine oxidase inhibitor; RIMA, reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase; SNRI, serotonin/noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor

* Mechanism of action not entirely known; **partial serotonin agonist

References:

Adapted from:
Silins E, Copeland J, Dillon P. Qualitative review of serotonin syndrome, ecstasy (MDMA) and the use of other serotonergic substances: hierarchy of risk. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007;41(8):649-655. doi:10.1080/00048670701449237

 

Pharmacological interaction between 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) and paroxetine: pharmacological effects and pharmacokinetics

Design

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

N= 12

Objective

To evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between paroxetine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in humans

Study Groups

MDMA (n= 12)

Placebo (n= 12)

Inclusion Criteria

Healthy adult males

Exclusion Criteria

Daily consumption of more than 20 cigarettes and more than 30 g of ethanol (3 U/day)

Methods

Patients were recruited by word of mouth. Each subject participated in two, 3-day sessions with washout period of 15 days. Patients were randomized to receive either paroxetine (20 mg/day on days 1, 2, and 3) or placebo (on days 1, 2, and 3) and MDMA (100 mg on day 3). MDMA was given approximately 3 hours following paroxetine to achieve maximum plasma concentrations of both drugs at same time. 

Duration

Intervention: 3 days

Outcome Measures

Physiological effects, psychological effects, subjective effects, plasma concentrations

Baseline Characteristics

 

All patients (N= 12)

Age, years

24 years

Male

100%

Weight, kg

71.0

Height, cm 

177.0

Smoker status

Current

Non-smoker

 

8

4

Alcohol consumption, units/week

12

 

Results

Endpoint

Effects described

Physiological

Paroxetine significantly reduced many of the physiological alterations induced by MDMA, including decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. Rise in oral temperature induced by MDMA was significantly decreased.  

Psychomotor

Paroxetine reduced the slight deterioration of psychomotor performance caused by MDMA but without reaching significance in most categories.

Subjective

Pretreatment with paroxetine significantly decreased many of the subjective effects observed after MDMA alone. No differences were observed in some categories. 

Plasma concentration

A 30% increase in MDMA plasma concentration was noted resulting from the metabolic interaction of paroxetine and MDMA

 

Adverse Events

No hallucinations or psychotic symptoms were observed during the experimental sessions. Serious adverse events were not observed.

Study Author Conclusions

In summary, this controlled trial shows that pretreatment with paroxetine significantly attenuates MDMA-related physiological and psychological effects, further supporting the involvement of SERT in the pharmacological actions of MDMA. An MDMA and paroxetine interaction causing important decreases in the euphoric and stimulatory effects of MDMA would make this drug combination less desirable for users. However, marked decrease in the positive effects of MDMA, which in turn are being sought by users, may be responsible for consumption of higher doses of MDMA (e.g., depressive MDMA users under treatment with SSRIs), with implications for the increase of potential life-threatening toxic effects of the drug.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Due to inclusion of only 12, healthy males, results of this study are not readily generalizable to broader populations or patients who utilize paroxetine long term. 



References:

Farré M, Abanades S, Roset PN, et al. Pharmacological interaction between 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) and paroxetine: pharmacological effects and pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;323(3):954-962. doi:10.1124/jpet.107.129056

 

Interactions between Bupropion and 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine in Healthy Subjects

Design

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

N= 16

Objective

To evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between bupropion and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in humans

Study Groups

MDMA (n= 16)

Placebo (n= 16)

Inclusion Criteria

18–45 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

Personal or first-degree-relative history of psychiatric disorders; chronic or acute physical illness; tobacco smoking (> 10 cigarettes/day); lifetime history of using illicit drugs more than five times (except past cannabis use); illicit drug use (including cannabis) within the past 2 months or during the study period

Methods

Each subject participated in 4 full-day experimental test sessions (placebo–placebo, bupropion–placebo, placebo–MDMA, and bupropion–MDMA) plus a next day follow up, and end-of-study visit with a 10-day washout period. Patients were randomized to receive bupropion 300 mg or placebo x 7 days prior to test sessions. On test session days, MDMA 125 mg or placebo was administered 2 hours following bupropion. 

Duration

Intervention: 4 days

Outcome Measures

Autonomic effects, endocrine effects, adverse effects, subjective effects, pharmacokinetics

Baseline Characteristics

 

All patients (N= 16)

Age, years

24.3

Female

50%

BMI, kg/m2

22.7

Results

Endpoint

Effect described

Autonomic effects

MDMA increased blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature. Bupropion significantly reduced the MDMA-induced increase in heart rate, but it did not significantly affect the increases in blood pressure or body temperature induced by MDMA. Bupropion did not alter the mydriatic effect of MDMA on pupillary function.

Endocrine effects

MDMA increased plasma concentrations of prolactin, cortisol, oxytocin, epinephrine, and norepinephrine compared with placebo. Bupropion significantly reduced the MDMA-induced increases in the plasma concentrations of norepinephrine but not of other hormones. Plasma levels of dopamine were very low and in 75% of the measurements were below the lower limit of detection (< 0.1 nM). None of the treatments altered DA plasma concentrations.

Subjective effects

MDMA increased visual analog scale (VAS) ratings for “any drug effect,” “good drug effect,” “drug high,” “drug liking,” and “stimulated”. Bupropion enhanced the positive mood effects of MDMA, reflected by a significant increase in AUEC values and a nonsignificant increase in maximal effect ratings and in the bupropion–MDMA condition compared with the placebo–MDMA condition for VAS scales ratings for “any drug effect,” “good drug effect,” “drug high,” and “drug liking”. MDMA-induced increases in “stimulation” were not significantly altered by bupropion.

Pharmacokinetics

Bupropion pretreatment significantly increased the plasma concentration of MDMA (Cmax, p< 0.01; AUC0–8, p< 0.001; AUC0–24, p< 0.001) and prolonged its t1/2 (p< 0.01) but decreased the plasma concentration and prolonged the t1/2 of its metabolites (MDA, HMMA).

MDMA significantly increased the plasma concentration of bupropion (Cmax, p< 0.05; AUC0–8, p< 0.001; AUC0–24, p< 0.01) and slightly increased the Cmax of one of its metabolites (hydrobupropion), but had no effect on the concentration of another metabolite (hydroxybupropion).

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: 

Acute (up to 5 hours) and subacute (up to 24 hours) adverse effects of MDMA were not altered by bupropion. Placebo–MDMA and bupropion–MDMA common AEs: lack of appetite (n=5 for both), perspiration (n= 11 and 12, respectively), tremor (n= 8 and 11), restlessness (n= 10 and 7), dry mouth (n= 14 and 12), and bruxism (n= 13 for both).

Subacute adverse effects included headache (n= 12 and 8), tiredness (n= 9 and 10), lack of appetite (n= 8 and 9), difficulty concentrating (n= 7 and 6), dry mouth (n= 5 and 9), and bruxism (n= 6 and 10). 

Serious Adverse Events: None

Study Author Conclusions

These results also indicate that the use of MDMA during therapy with bupropion may result in higher plasma concentrations of both MDMA and bupropion and enhanced mood effects but also result in lower cardiac stimulation.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Due to inclusion of only 16 healthy subjects, the results of this study are not readily generalizable to a broader population.



References:

Schmid Y, Rickli A, Schaffner A, et al. Interactions between bupropion and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in healthy subjects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015;353(1):102-111. doi:10.1124/jpet.114.222356