A recently published 2025 meta-analysis included 11 trials involving 85,373 participants to evaluate the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). The analysis found the risk of acute pancreatitis to not be significantly increased with the use of GLP-1RAs compared to placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 1.33). Overall, there was no difference in the risk of serious adverse events, including acute pancreatitis and severe hypoglycemia, between GLP-1RAs and placebo (risk ratio [RR] 0.95; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.01). However, it should be noted that treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred more frequently with GLP-1RAs compared to placebo (RR 1.51; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.94). [1]
Another meta-analysis published in 2024 evaluated the safety and efficacy of GLP-1RAs on cardiovascular events in overweight or obese non-diabetic patients. A total of 10 randomized controlled trials, comprising 29,325 patients, were included for analysis (n= 16,900 GLP-1RAs; n= 12,425 placebo). Of note, no significant difference was found between the groups for the odds of acute pancreatitis occurring (odds ratio [OR] 0.87; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.48; p= 0.62). [2]
Based on data from 43 trials reporting use of any GLP-1RA (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, or semaglutide) compared to placebo or any other non-GLP-1RA drug, a 2023 meta-analysis found no association between GLP-1RAs as a whole when evaluating incidence of pancreatitis (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.64; p= 0.13) or pancreatic cancer (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.89; p= 0.20) when compared to placebo or non-GLP-1RA drugs. The authors noted data regarding pancreatic cancer was limited, hindering the formation of a firm conclusion, but suggested no clear evidence of risk for pancreatitis. [3]
In a comprehensive 2025 study, researchers propensity score-matched patients to evaluate the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and the risk of pancreatitis in a comorbidity-free subgroup of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in the United States. The study identified a total of 969,240 patients with T2DM, divided into two cohorts: one group receiving GLP-1 RAs (93,608 patients) and another group not receiving these medications (875,632 patients). Notably, tirzepatide was not included in this analysis. Results of this analysis revealed that the risk of pancreatitis was not statistically different between the cohorts at six months (0.1% for both groups, p = 0.04). Over a more extended follow-up at one, three, and five years, the risk remained comparable but demonstrated a trend toward a lower incidence in the GLP-1 RA group at each time point (one year: 0.1% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.02; three years: 0.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.001; five years: 0.3% vs. 0.4%, p <0.001). Notably, the lifetime risk of pancreatitis was significantly lower in the GLP-1 RA cohort (0.3% vs. 0.4%, p <0.001). The findings suggest that in this specific comorbidity-free U.S. population, GLP-1 RA usage is not associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis. In fact, it correlates with a reduced lifetime risk, offering reassurance regarding the cardiovascular and glycemic benefits of these medications without heightened concern for pancreatitis. [4]