Is there data supporting rectal administration of phenobarbital for palliative sedation?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

There is limited data on rectal administration of phenobarbital for palliative sedation. One study compared mircoenema suspensions to suppositories and found that microenemas achieved higher plasma concentrations more rapidly and with less discomfort (Table 1). Another study focused on phenobarbital suppositories for palliative sedation in home setting as primarily indicated for agitated delirium, providing an alternative for individuals who desire to avoid hospitalization (Table 2). While a dated pharmacokinetic study indicated effective rectal absorption of phenobarbital, its relevance to palliative sedation remains unclear. Further research is needed to establish the broader safety and efficacy of rectal phenobarbital administration.

Background

The 2014 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) clinical practice guidelines for the management of refractory symptoms, including use of palliative sedation, indicate that the use of sedation should be tailored to the patient's preference, condition, and current therapy. Current sedative options include phenobarbital, among other medications, although the guidelines do not discuss rectal administration. [1]

One dated pharmacokinetic study aimed to determine the relative bioavailability and time course of absorption of the commercially available parenteral phenobarbital sodium solution administered rectally in comparison with the same preparation given intramuscularly. Seven healthy adult male volunteers were given 5 mg/kg dose of phenobarbital on two separate occasions five weeks apart. One dose was administered intramuscularly into the lateral aspect of the gluteus maximus, and the other was given rectally. The rectal dose was prepared in a 3 mL syringe, administered undiluted into the rectal vault, and retained for a minimum of four hours. Eighteen blood samples were drawn over 288 hours. The pharmacokinetic parameters after intramuscular and rectal administration were as follows: the area under the curve (AUC) reached 5,916 vs. 5,253 micromol*h/L; half-life (T1/2) was 112 vs. 113 hours; time to peak concentration (Tmax) occurred at 2.1 vs. 4.4 hours; and maximum serum concentration (Cmax) was 36.2 vs. 31.4 micromol/L. One participant experienced a significant reduction in absorption after rectal administration compared to the other six participants. Aside from mild drowsiness, there were no reports of subjective toxicity. With a mean relative bioavailability for rectal phenobarbital of 90%, findings suggest that the parenteral phenobarbital sodium solution given rectally is well absorbed and provides a useful alternative route of administration. These findings may not be applicable to palliative sedation scenarios, as the study was conducted on healthy volunteers and may lack generalizability to that specific context. [2]

References:

[1] Cherny NI; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of refractory symptoms at the end of life and the use of palliative sedation. Ann Oncol. 2014;25 Suppl 3:iii143-iii152. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu238
[2] Graves NM, Holmes GB, Kriel RL, Jones-Saete C, Ong B, Ehresman DJ. Relative bioavailability of rectally administered phenobarbital sodium parenteral solution. DICP. 1989;23(7-8):565-568. doi:10.1177/1060028089023007-806

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

Is there data supporting rectal administration of phenobarbital for palliative sedation?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-2 for your response.


 

Pharmacokinetics of Phenobarbital in Microenema Via Macy Catheter Versus Suppository

Design

Randomized, open-label, crossover study

N= 9

Objective

To characterize the early absorption profile, variability, and comfort of phenobarbital given in microenema suspensions delivered via the Macy Catheter® (MC) vs. the same dose given via suppository

Study Groups

Suppository (n= 9)

MC 6 mL (n= 9)

MC 20 mL (n= 7)

Inclusion Criteria

Healthy adult subjects

Exclusion Criteria

N/A

Methods

The study investigated three different methods of phenobarbital administration:

Suppository phenobarbital was prepared by crushing two hundred 97.2 mg phenobarbital tablets and mixing with 180 grams polyethylene glycol and 7.67 grams polysorbate base to make two batches of 100 of 194.4 mg suppositories.

MC 6 mL suspension prepared by crushing 194.4 mg phenobarbital in 6 mL of tap water

MC 20 mL suspension prepared by crushing 194.4 mg phenobarbital in 20 mL of tap water

Subjects spent the night in the research facility in the evening before randomization. On the morning of the study day, subjects were randomized to receive either the suppository, MC 6 mL, or MC 20 mL phenobarbital. Blood samples were obtained up to 12 hours after administration. Subjects returned after a 1-month washout period to receive the other drugs in a crossover manner.

Nine subjects completed at least two phases of treatment (two only completed the suppository and MC 6 mL treatments). Seven patients completed all three.

Duration

3 months

Outcome Measures

Mean plasma phenobarbital concentrations

Baseline Characteristics

 

Study patients (N= 9)

 

 

Age range, years

22 to 32    

Female

4    

Weight range, kg

59.8 to 93.1    

Results

Endpoint

Suppository (n= 9)

MC 6 mL (n= 9)

MC 20 mL (n= 7)

Mean plasma phenobarbital concentrations at 10 minutes

baseline

8x higher

12x higher

The average phenobarbital concentration was consistently higher with the MC formulation compared to the suppository throughout the 12-hour period. Furthermore, the MC 20 formulation resulted in higher concentrations than the MC-6 formulation at all sampling time points

Adverse Events

None reported

Study Author Conclusions

These results suggest phenobarbital oral tablets crushed and suspended in water and administered via the MC is superior to suppository in delivering the medication reliably and rapidly.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The findings from healthy young volunteers may not be generalizable to older and critically ill patients.

 

References:

Lam YW, Lam A, Macy B. Pharmacokinetics of Phenobarbital in Microenema Via Macy Catheter Versus Suppository. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016;51(6):994-1001. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.339

 

Home Palliative Sedation Using Phenobarbital Suppositories: Time to Death, Patient Characteristics, and Administration Protocol

Design

Retrospective case series chart review

N= 31

Objective

To describe patient characteristics in whom phenobarbital suppositories were placed in the home for potential use and of those who actually used them, to determine time to death after initiation of the suppositories as a measure of observation time, and to augment the present palliative sedation protocol that includes the use of phenobarbital suppositories at Hospice of Central New York (HCNY)

Study Groups

All subjects (n= 31)

Inclusion Criteria

All HCNY patients who received phenobarbital suppositories over an 18-month period

Exclusion Criteria

Suppositories used for seizure prophylaxis

Methods

Charts collected from the Suncoast electronic medical record were reviewed by a team of 2 hospice physicians and a hospice nurse to determine age, gender, terminal diagnosis, total length of stay (LOS), symptom leading to the order to place suppositories in the home for potential use, other related medications, phenobarbital order if used, and time to death after initiation of phenobarbital.

The process to consider and initiate palliative sedation begins with assessment by the hospice team of whether patients and their families opt for sedation if other treatments prove ineffective. Oral or sublingual lorazepam is the preferred choice for managing anxiety or sedation. However, tolerance can develop rapidly, often within a few days. If concerns arise regarding the diminishing effectiveness of lorazepam, the patient and caregivers' willingness to consider rectal suppositories is assessed. If there is agreement between the patient and family, the delivery of phenobarbital suppositories to the home, with the order pending approval from the Hospice physician, is arranged. If necessary, these medications are kept in the patient's home refrigerator and replaced when they reach their 6-month expiration. In cases where suppositories are urgently required, a local pharmacy prepares a small supply for immediate use until a larger quantity is delivered by the pharmacy the following day.

The phenobarbital suppositories are compounded by pharmacy from phenobarbital powder and a blended suppository base using a formula provided by a recognized industry reference source. The suppositories are available in 30, 60, 100, and 200 mg strengths. The 200 mg size is primarily used by HCNY, as it delivers approximately 100 mg oral equivalent. Due to the slow absorption of the suppositories, it requires 6 to 12 hours to achieve adequate sedation.

Duration

January 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016

Outcome Measures

Time to death after initiation of the suppositories 

Baseline Characteristics

 

All subjects (n =31)

 

 

Age, years

<65

65-80

>80

 

29%

42%

29%

   

Female

42%    

Cancer

Lung

GI

74%

26%

29% 

   

Noncancer

Cardiac

26%

13%

   

Symptoms for which suppositories were delivered and used

Delirium

Pain

Dyspnea

 

31

1

0

   

Results

Time to death stratified by age, gender, and cancer status

Endpoint

Age < 65 65 < Age < 80  Age > 80 

Time to Death

n

Mean

Median

Min, Max

 

34.8 ± 19.17

33.5

2.5, 71

 

13 

43.4 ± 23.73

39.5

11, 80

 

36.2 ± 24.16

35.5

1, 70.5

  Male  Female  

Time to Death

n

Mean

Median

Min, Max

 

18

37.7 ± 23.95 

33

1, 80

 

13

40.3 ± 20.50 

39.5

9,70.5

 
 

Non-cancer

Cancer

 

Time to Death

n

Mean

Median

Min, Max

 

8

26.3 ± 21.60

22.25 

1,66

 

23

43.2 ± 21.19 

40

2.5, 80

 

The overall mean of time to death: 38.8 hrs.

The overall median of time to death: 35.5 hrs.

Adverse Events

Not disclosed

Study Author Conclusions

The use of compounded phenobarbital suppositories for the purpose of palliative sedation is an alternative for patients and families who desire to remain home despite refractory symptoms.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The study has strengths in exploring the use of phenobarbital suppositories for palliative sedation in patients who prefer home care despite refractory symptoms. However, limitations include a small sample size, a retrospective design, limited generalizability (focused on one hospice organization in New York State, primarily cancer patients), the absence of a control group, and vague dosing and titration information. 



References:

Setla J, Pasniciuc SV. Home Palliative Sedation Using Phenobarbital Suppositories: Time to Death, Patient Characteristics, and Administration Protocol. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019;36(10):871-876. doi:10.1177/1049909119839695