A 2021 review discussed microbiological and clinical aspects of Raoultella spp., which was first identified in 2001 and had been found to share many ecological, biochemical, clinical, and microbiological features with Klebsiella spp. Similar to Klebsiella spp., Raoultella spp. are also ubiquitous in nature and present in plants, water and soil, and are known to colonize humans and animals. Both genera are facultative anaerobe Gram-negative bacilli, which belong to the family of Enterobacteriaceae, and overlap in several biochemical characteristics, such as production of catalase, the absence of oxidase, the fermentation of glucose, lactose, sorbose and the reduction of nitrates. Nevertheless, certain metabolic characteristics, including indole-test, growth at 10°C, the production of histamine, D-melezitose test, and the metabolism of ornithine, may help differentiate various species. [1]
As described in observational studies and case reports, clinical manifestations associated with R. ornithinolytica varied, including but not limited to urinary tract infections, pneumonia, and bacteremia. Due to the expression of a broad-spectrum β-lactamase, Raoultella spp. are intrinsically resistant to penicillins. Similar to K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca, wildtype isolates of Raoultella spp. are susceptible to antimicrobials commonly used for the treatment of infections caused by Enterobacterales, such as β-lactams (except penicillins), quinolones, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, and polymyxins. As with other Klebsiella species, the concern has been raised for antibiotic resistance to environmental and clinical isolates of Raoultella spp. In one referenced study published in 2020, antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance determinants were evaluated 79 clinical isolates of R. ornithinolytica, and 26 of R. planticola collected from 65 patients from a university hospital in Poland. Overall, susceptibility to all tested antimicrobials was high (≥81.9%), except for amoxicillin/clavulanate (9.5% susceptible; 59.1% intermediate). For β-lactams, the highest susceptibility was observed for imipenem (99%), followed by meropenem (98.1%), and cefepime (88.6%). Regarding non-β-lactams, the highest susceptibility was observed for gentamicin (93.3%) and ciprofloxacin (92.4%). Fourteen isolates (nine R. ornithinolytica and five R. planticola) harbored extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Additionally, the study reported unexpectedly high non-susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanate, given that Raoultella β-lactamases are known to be inhibited by clavulanate. Without high-quality clinical data, therapeutic approaches to patients with Raoultella-associated infections should be similar to patients with infections caused by Klebsiella spp., considering individual clinical and pharmacological aspects of the patient, as well as the local epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance. [1], [2]
In a 2014 Korea-based retrospective review, 16 patients were diagnosed with R. ornithinolytica bacteremia over the course of ten years. Universal susceptibility was shown by all isolates to a combination of piperacillin and tazobactam, as well as imipenem. Good susceptibility was shown to cephalosporins, with lower susceptibility shown to cefoxitin overall out of the cephalosporins class, and resistance to multiple cephalosporins, including cefepime, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime, shown in one single case. The most recent six cases were susceptible to meropenem; no cases showed susceptibility to ampicillin. All cases resulted in the patient expiring from septic shock, although it should be noted that fifteen out of the sixteen cases had underlying advanced-stage malignancies. The authors also caution a potential concern for overestimation of R. ornithinolytica strains within this study due to the use of a sensitive identification system and warn of poor prognoses for patients with underlying malignant conditions, regardless of treatment conducted with antibiotics showing susceptibility in vitro. In general, mortality rates were higher in patients with R. ornithinolytica bacteremia (43.8%; 7/16) compared to patients with other types of R. ornithinolytica-infections (8%; 9/112) among evaluated trials. [1], [2], [3]