What nicotine replacement therapy dosing strategies and formulations are recommended for patients who use high‑nicotine e‑cigarettes or vaping systems to prevent withdrawal?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Available literature describing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) dosing strategies for individuals using high-nicotine e-cigarettes or vaping systems is limited, and most recommendations are extrapolated from traditional smoking cessation guidance. In general, combination NRT is commonly suggested, consisting of a transdermal nicotine patch to provide baseline nicotine exposure with a rapid-acting formulation (eg, gum, lozenge, oral spray, or inhaler) used for breakthrough cravings and withdrawal symptoms. Suggested starting regimens often include a 21 mg/day nicotine patch for adults with moderate to high nicotine exposure (or 14 mg/day for lower exposure), with short-acting NRT used as needed; in individuals with very high nicotine intake, higher total patch doses (e.g., up to approximately 42 mg/day) or multiple patches may be considered, along with rapid-acting NRT for cravings. Nicotine delivery from electronic nicotine delivery systems varies substantially across devices and patterns of use; therefore, regimens are typically individualized and require reassessment and dose titration based on withdrawal symptoms and craving control, often in combination with behavioral counseling.

A targeted literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar using combinations of the terms “electronic cigarette,” “vaping,” “e-cigarette,” “nicotine replacement therapy,” “NRT,” “dosing,” and “cessation.” Additional relevant guidelines and review articles were identified through reference list screening and targeted searches for vaping cessation pharmacotherapy and NRT dosing strategies, with emphasis on studies describing NRT use among e-cigarette users.

Background

A 2025 position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand on the management of electronic cigarette use recommends nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) strategies that substitute the high-peak nicotine delivery of vaping with slower, sustained nicotine exposure to mitigate withdrawal symptoms. Combination NRT is emphasized as a preferred approach, typically consisting of a transdermal nicotine patch combined with a faster-acting buccal formulation such as nicotine gum, lozenge, or oral spray. The patch provides continuous baseline nicotine delivery, while rapid-acting formulations can be used as needed to control cravings and withdrawal. Suggested dosing examples include a 21 mg transdermal patch for adults (or 14 mg for individuals <45 kg) together with rapid-acting NRT used liberally for breakthrough cravings. Treatment selection and dosing should be individualized according to the patient’s level of nicotine dependence, with clinicians encouraged to assess dependence features such as time to first vape, frequency of use, cravings, and withdrawal symptoms. The guidance notes that NRT is commonly underdosed and recommends reassessment within 1 to 2 weeks to evaluate symptom control and adjust dosing or frequency of rapid-acting products if cravings or withdrawal persist. Combination NRT may be used in adolescents aged ≥12 years and adults when clinically appropriate, alongside counseling and behavioral support, with the aim of attenuating withdrawal, allowing gradual neuroreceptor down-regulation, and supporting sustained cessation of vaping. [1]

According to the TRC Pharmacist’s Letter, evidence-based pharmacologic strategies for vaping cessation are limited; therefore, treatment approaches are generally extrapolated from traditional smoking cessation. NRT is suggested as an initial pharmacologic option for adults who regularly use e-cigarettes, particularly those with nicotine dependence. Combination NRT (a long-acting patch with a short-acting product such as gum or lozenges) may be considered to address baseline cravings and breakthrough symptoms. Suggested starting doses may be estimated from nicotine exposure (Table 3); for example, adults using more than approximately 20 mg of nicotine per day may start with a 21 mg/day patch, while those using less may start with a 14 mg/day patch. Doses may be adjusted based on withdrawal symptoms, and tapering should follow product labeling. If NRT is insufficient or only partially effective, other smoking cessation medications such as varenicline or sustained-release bupropion may be considered alone or in combination with NRT, particularly for users with depression, with therapy initiated prior to the quit date. The guidance notes that dosing recommendations for vaping cessation are based on assumptions derived from cigarette smoking equivalency, and additional data are needed to define optimal pharmacotherapy and dosing for patients who use e-cigarettes. [2]

Vaping cessation is an emerging clinical challenge requiring structured behavioral and pharmacologic strategies tailored to the patterns of electronic cigarette (EC) use. ECs deliver nicotine through various devices and e-liquids containing propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings, and often highly concentrated nicotine formulations such as nicotine salts or synthetic nicotine. These products are frequently marketed as safer alternatives to combustible cigarettes, yet they expose users to toxic substances and promote strong nicotine dependence. Dual use of ECs and conventional cigarettes is common and is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, COPD, and lung cancer. Because vaping patterns differ from traditional smoking and often involve continuous “grazing” throughout the day, cessation strategies must account for variability in nicotine exposure and patterns of use. [3]

Behavioral treatment forms the foundation of vaping cessation. Motivational interviewing is emphasized as an effective patient-centered counseling approach that uses open-ended questioning, active listening, affirmation, and summarization to encourage patients to articulate their own motivations for quitting. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is often combined with this approach and focuses on identifying and modifying maladaptive beliefs about nicotine use while helping patients develop coping strategies, problem-solving skills, and relapse prevention techniques. Structured therapy sessions typically include mood assessment, agenda setting, psychoeducation, collaborative planning, and feedback. Behavioral counseling also supports medication adherence and improves overall cessation outcomes. Digital interventions such as text-message–based support programs may supplement counseling by providing coping strategies, information about risks and benefits of quitting, and reminders; in one randomized trial among young adults, such a program increased 30-day abstinence rates at seven months to 24.1% compared with 18.6% in controls, although the overall certainty of evidence for these digital interventions remains limited. [3]

Pharmacologic treatment is considered when patients demonstrate moderate to severe nicotine dependence, have experienced unsuccessful quit attempts, or develop significant withdrawal symptoms. Because specific guidelines for vaping cessation remain limited, clinicians typically extrapolate treatment approaches from established smoking cessation protocols. First-line pharmacologic options include nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and non-nicotine medications, and these treatments are most effective when combined with behavioral support. [3]

Nicotine replacement therapy is used to reduce withdrawal symptoms and gradually taper nicotine exposure. Two main categories are used: slow-release transdermal patches and rapid-acting formulations such as gum, lozenges, sprays, or inhalers. Patches typically provide continuous nicotine delivery in doses of 21 mg, 14 mg, or 7 mg per day. Initial therapy often begins with higher doses (for example, a 21-mg patch) during the early cessation phase, followed by stepwise dose reductions during the maintenance phase. After approximately 6–12 weeks, clinicians generally taper the dose from 21 mg to 14 mg and then to 7 mg before discontinuation. The overall tapering process usually occurs over 8–12 weeks, though individual adjustments may be required depending on nicotine dependence. Maximum recommended dosing for patches is typically about 42 mg/day. Rapid-acting NRT formulations may be used concurrently for breakthrough cravings, with typical limits of approximately 15–20 gums or lozenges per day. During treatment, clinicians should monitor for nicotine toxicity symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, tachycardia, or dizziness and adjust dosing accordingly. [3]

A key challenge in vaping cessation is determining the appropriate NRT dose because EC nicotine delivery varies widely across devices and user behaviors. To estimate nicotine intake, clinicians are advised to collect detailed information about device characteristics (e.g., device type, brand, and capacity), e-liquid characteristics (nicotine type, concentration in mg/mL or percentage, and tank volume), and usage patterns (frequency of refills, amount of liquid consumed, and dual use with cigarettes). Nicotine intake can then be approximated by converting nicotine concentration percentages to mg/mL, multiplying by the volume of e-liquid consumed, and calculating the total nicotine exposure over time. This estimate can be converted into cigarette equivalents using the approximation that one cigarette delivers about 1 mg of nicotine, which helps guide NRT dosing decisions. For example, a patient using a 2% nicotine salt solution (20 mg/mL) who consumes 10 mL of e-liquid over four days would ingest approximately 200 mg of nicotine, corresponding to roughly 50 cigarette equivalents per day. In such cases, high-dose NRT such as two 21-mg patches per day (total 42 mg) may be considered, with optional short-acting NRT for cravings. [3]

Non-nicotine medications can also be incorporated into cessation strategies, typically alongside counseling and NRT when appropriate. Bupropion is commonly initiated 1–2 weeks before the target quit date. A typical regimen begins with 150 mg once daily for the first three days, followed by 150 mg twice daily (or 300 mg extended-release once daily). Treatment generally continues for 6–12 weeks, although longer durations may be used depending on response. Varenicline is also started prior to the quit date and titrated over the first week: 0.5 mg once daily for days 1–3, 0.5 mg twice daily for days 4–7, and then 1 mg twice daily beginning on day 8. Treatment is usually continued for 3–6 months. Clinical trials of varenicline combined with counseling in EC users have demonstrated higher abstinence rates compared with placebo, including approximately 40% vs 20% abstinence at 12 weeks and sustained benefits through 24 weeks. Cytisinicline represents another pharmacologic option and can be used either as a structured tapering regimen (initially frequent dosing followed by gradual reduction over approximately 25 days) or as a simplified regimen of 3 mg three times daily for 6–12 weeks. Some treatment protocols support gradual nicotine reduction strategies during therapy, such as reducing consumption by approximately 50% by week 4 and 25% by week 8 before complete cessation by week 12. [3]

Overall, the review emphasizes that successful vaping cessation requires individualized treatment planning that combines behavioral counseling with carefully titrated pharmacotherapy. Because nicotine exposure from ECs can vary dramatically between individuals, clinicians must estimate nicotine intake and adjust NRT dosing accordingly while supporting patients through gradual tapering strategies and relapse-prevention counseling. The authors highlight the need for further research and formal guidelines to optimize dosing strategies and treatment protocols for EC dependence. [3]

A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of electronic nicotine device systems (ENDS) compared to traditional nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) for smoking cessation. The research synthesized data from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving traditional cigarette users, examining outcomes such as smoking cessation rates, smoking reduction, and associated harms. The primary outcome assessed was smoking cessation, defined as abstinence from traditional cigarette smoking for any period, reported either through self-reports or biochemical validation. Secondary outcomes included smoking reduction, adverse events, withdrawal symptoms, and participants' acceptance of therapy. The results indicated no significant difference in smoking cessation rates between users of e-cigarettes and NRT, with a pooled rate ratio (RR) of 1.42 (95% CI 0.97 to 2.09). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the proportion of participants reducing smoking consumption or in the mean reduction of cigarettes smoked per day. The assessment of harms revealed no serious adverse events related to either e-cigarettes or NRT; however, the quality of evidence was deemed low due to the high risk of bias in the included studies and considerable methodological heterogeneity. The study concluded that more research is needed to establish the effectiveness and long-term safety of ENDS as smoking cessation aids compared to NRT. [4]

A 2016 case report describes the first published example of successful e-cigarette cessation using evidence-based tobacco dependence treatments (Table 4). The authors noted that no validated tool comparable to the Fagerström scale exists to assess dependence in e-cigarette or dual users, which complicates clinical evaluation as dual use becomes more common. They also described challenges in using NRT for e-cigarette cessation, particularly estimating appropriate dosing, because nicotine exposure from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) can be difficult to quantify due to variable labeling, refill practices, and potentially inaccurate patient-reported use. Clinicians may therefore need to monitor both NRT use and continued ENDS use to adjust treatment. The authors also noted that matching NRT flavor with a preferred e-cigarette flavor, such as cinnamon-flavored nicotine gum in this case, may influence treatment acceptance and dosing. Additional research and clearer clinical guidelines are needed to improve assessment of dependence and guide treatment strategies for individuals seeking to discontinue ENDS use, including NRT, other pharmacologic therapies, and behavioral interventions. [5]

References: [1] Marshall H, Vandeleur M, Dean E, et al. Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) Guidance for the Management of Electronic Cigarette Use (Vaping) in Adolescents and Adults. Respirology. 2025;30(7):605-622. doi:10.1111/resp.70066
[2] Therapeutic Research Center. Vaping cessation guide for pharmacists. Pharmacist’s Letter. December 2019. Accessed March 13, 2026. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/CTCB/CDPH%20Document%20Library/Community/CessationServicesandResources/VapingCessationGuideforPharmacists2019TRC.pdf
[3] Martins SR, Corrêa PCRP, Costa C, Sousa MG, Tourinho CAP, Borges VLG. Vaping cessation: how to treat nicotine dependence and tailor the nicotine replacement dose. A narrative review. J Bras Pneumol. 2025;51(4):e20250061. Published 2025 Oct 27. doi:10.36416/1806-3756/e20250061
[4] Pound CM, Zhang JZ, Kodua AT, Sampson M. Smoking cessation in individuals who use vaping as compared with traditional nicotine replacement therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e044222. Published 2021 Feb 22. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044222
[5] Silver B, Ripley-Moffitt C, Greyber J, Goldstein AO. Successful use of nicotine replacement therapy to quit e-cigarettes: lack of treatment protocol highlights need for guidelines. Clin Case Rep. 2016;4(4):409-411. Published 2016 Mar 11. doi:10.1002/ccr3.477
Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

What nicotine replacement therapy dosing strategies and formulations are recommended for patients who use high‑nicotine e‑cigarettes or vaping systems to prevent withdrawal?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-4 for your response.


Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Vaping Cessation Among Mono and Dual Users: A Mixed Methods Preliminary Study

Design

Mixed methods preliminary study

N= 30

Objective

To evaluate reasons for quitting e-cigarettes in treatment-seeking adults and to assess the feasibility and acceptability of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for e-cigarette cessation

Study Groups

NRT (n= 18)

Quitline referral (n= 12)

Inclusion Criteria

Age >18 years; daily nicotine-containing e-cigarette use (25+ days per month); vaping 5+ times/day; vaping ≥ 1 year; interest in quitting vaping within the next month; willingness to try NRT; able to receive text messages and complete interviews; live in South Carolina

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnant or not using contraception, cognitively impaired, household members of study participants, used any other non-cigarette tobacco product or cessation medication, or endorsed a current medical condition contraindicated for NRT use

Methods

The study enrolled 30 participants, including 15 e-cigarette–only users (mono-vapers) and 15 dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes, who were subsequently randomized to an intervention group (n= 18) or control group (n= 12). The intervention group selected a quit date within one week and received a 28-day supply of nicotine replacement therapy (21 mg patches and 4 mg lozenges), a cognitive-behavioral therapy–based cessation booklet tailored to e-cigarette or dual use, supportive text messaging, and daily text-based surveys for 28 days to report product use and NRT adherence. The control group was provided information for the state quitline and encouraged to enroll in available cessation services. Outcomes were assessed via text-based surveys at baseline, end of treatment (day 28), and follow-up (day 56).

Duration

June through December 2021

Outcome Measures

Primary: Feasibility (number who enrolled) and acceptability (NRT use, adverse side effects)

Other: Abstinence (7-day point-prevalence) at end of treatment

Baseline Characteristics  

All participants (N= 30)

Average age, years

32

Male

50%

Vaping continuously all day

76.6%

Nicotine content 50mg/ml/5% or higher

66.6%

History of regular cigarette smoking among mono users

53.3%

Current dual users smoking 10 cigarettes or less per day

80%

Mean Brief WISDM total score

48.06

Mean ECDI score

13.83

Abbreviations: ECDI, Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Inventory; WISDM, Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives.

Results

Qualitative interviews (n= 28) identified several themes related to interest in quitting, including health concerns, cost, disapproval from friends or family, perceived dependence, and stigma associated with vaping. Participants also described mixed experiences discussing e-cigarette use with healthcare providers. Reported challenges to quitting included habitual use and sensorimotor behaviors, social environments where others vape, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, mood changes, and the convenience and accessibility of e-cigarettes.

Within the intervention group, participants completed a mean of 19.61 daily surveys during the 28-day treatment period. Reported NRT use averaged 12.78 days overall (patch mean 10.89 days; lozenge mean 6.39 days), and participants reported a mean of 2.67 days with adverse effects. Eighty percent of participants completed the end-of-treatment assessment and 66.6% completed the follow-up assessment.

At end of treatment, 6 of 18 participants (33.3%) in the intervention group reported abstinence from vaping compared with 0 of 12 in the control group (p= 0.057). At follow-up, 5 of 18 participants (27.7%) in the intervention group and 2 of 12 (16.7%) in the control group reported abstinence. Among those who continued vaping, 5 of 12 participants (41.7%) in the intervention group and 4 of 12 (33.3%) in the control group reported reduced e-cigarette use. No participants reported cigarette abstinence among dual users. Participants who achieved vaping abstinence reported significantly more days attempting to quit and more days using NRT compared with those who did not quit.

Adverse Events

See above.

Study Author Conclusions

Recruitment for the present study supports that many adults are interested in e-cigarette or dual use cessation. Participants reported experiencing negative consequences from vaping that motivated them to quit but received minimal support for overcoming challenges associated with quitting. This preliminary trial of NRT + a self-help booklet for e-cigarette cessation showed encouraging evidence of effectiveness for those who use e-cigarettes only. Future research should confirm these results through larger, more rigorous trials, and explore ways to improve outcomes for dual users. Effective interventions should be rapidly disseminated to treatment providers to assist the growing number of e-cigarette users who wish to quit.

Critique

The study provides valuable preliminary data on the feasibility and acceptability of NRT for vaping cessation, but its small sample size and short-term follow-up limit generalizability. The lack of tailored NRT dosing and evaluation of engagement with supportive materials are notable limitations. Future studies should include more rigorous feasibility assessments and explore effective interventions for dual users.

References:
[1] [1] Palmer AM, Carpenter MJ, Rojewski AM, Haire K, Baker NL, Toll BA. Nicotine replacement therapy for vaping cessation among mono and dual users: A mixed methods preliminary study. Addict Behav. 2023;139:107579. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107579

Augmented Doses of Nicotine Replacement Therapy: Feasibility for Dual Cigarette and E-Cigarette Cessation
Design

Pilot feasibility trial

N=46

Objective To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of augmented doses of nicotine replacement therapy for dual cessation of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes
Study Groups

Standard (21 mg patch daily plus 4 mg lozenge PRN;) n=16) 

Mid (21 mg patch + 14 mg patch + 4 mg lozenge; n=15) 

High (2 x 21 mg patches + 4 mg lozenges; n=15)

Inclusion Criteria Aged 18+ years; nicotine-containing EC use for 25+ days per month (5+ times/day) for ≥1 year; smoking ≥1 CC on >4 days per week for ≥1 month; interest in quitting CCs and ECs within the next month
Exclusion Criteria Contraindications to NRT, use of other nicotine, tobacco, or cessation products, or vaping non-nicotine substances
Methods

Participants were randomly assigned to one of 3 doses of nicotine replacement therapy: Standard (21mg patch, qd + 4mg lozenge prn [5-20/day]), Mid (21mg patch + 14mg patch + 4mg lozenge [5-30/day]), or High (2 x 21mg patches + 4mg lozenges [5-40/day]).

Participants reported cigarette and e-cigarette use daily throughout treatment and 1-month follow-up.

Duration December 2023 to September 2024
Outcome Measures

Primary: 7-day point-prevalence dual abstinence at end of treatment and follow-up

Secondary: Likelihood of abstinence on a given day

Baseline Characteristics   All participants (n=46)
Age, mean years 37.8
White 82.2%
Non-Hispanic 93.3%
Household income < $50,000 58.7%
Daily smoking, mean CCs/day 11.8
Daily vaping, mean sessions/day 38.9
Results   Standard (n=16) Mid (n=15) High (n=15)
7-day point-prevalence abstinence at Day 28 6% 13% 13%
7-day point-prevalence abstinence at Day 56 0% 33% 33%
Adverse Events 56% of participants in Standard, 87% in Mid, and 67% in High endorsed a side effect during treatment, most of which were not severe and none required medical intervention
Study Author Conclusions Augmented doses of nicotine replacement therapy are a feasible, promising treatment for dual cessation of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Future research should evaluate this approach in a more rigorous, fully powered trial
Critique The study provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility of augmented NRT doses for dual cessation, but is limited by its small sample size and short treatment timeframe, which restricts the ability to draw strong conclusions about outcomes. The conservative approach to missing data may bias treatment effects downward
References:
[1] Palmer AM, DeMass R, Rojewski AM, et al. Augmented doses of nicotine replacement therapy: feasibility for dual cigarette and e-cigarette cessation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2025;69(2):107664. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107664

Vaping Cessation Guide

Level of Nicotine Nicotine content (mg)

Example Products (nicotine content/pod)

Cigarette Equivalency
None 0

Halo 0 mg, Jam Monster 0 mg, Naked 0 mg

 

 

 

 

 

 

One JUULpod 5%, contains approximately 40 mg of nicotine. This is considered to be equivalent to smoking about 20 combustible tobacco cigarettes.      

Vry Low/Ultra-Light ~3 to 4

Halo 3 mg, Jam Monster 3 mg, Naked 3 mg

Low/Light ~6 to 8

Halo 6 mg, Jam Monster 6 mg, Naked 6 mg

Medium ~11 to 12

Halo 12 mg, Naked 12 mg

High ~16 to 18

Blu 1.2%, Halo 18 mg

Very High//Extra Strength ~24

JUUL 3%, Halo 24 mg, Jam Monster 24 mg

Ultra-High/Very Strong ≥36

JUUL 5%, Blu 2.4%, Jam Monster 48 mg

References:
[1] Adapted from: Therapeutic Research Center. Vaping cessation guide for pharmacists. Pharmacist’s Letter. December 2019. Accessed March 13, 2026. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/CTCB/CDPH%20Document%20Library/Community/CessationServicesandResources/VapingCessationGuideforPharmacists2019TRC.pdf

Successful Use of Nicotine Replacement Therapy to Quit E-Cigarettes: Lack of Treatment Protocol Highlights Need for Guidelines

Design

Case report

Case presentation

A 24-year-old male enrolled in a tobacco treatment program seeking assistance with e-cigarette cessation. He began smoking cigarettes at age 17, smoking 20 cigarettes per day until age 19, when he quit for 1 year. He resumed smoking at age 20, quit again for 1 year at age 22, and restarted smoking at age 23. He had not used tobacco cessation medications during these prior quit attempts. At age 24, he began using e-cigarettes as a step toward quitting smoking and reported that vaping provided hand-to-mouth activity and stress relief similar to cigarettes. He typically began vaping within 30 minutes of waking, vaped up to 10 times per day, and used approximately one 16 mg bottle of liquid nicotine per week. At program entry, he had stopped smoking cigarettes and had been vaping for approximately 7 months.

Using indicators derived from the Fagerström scale for nicotine dependence, including prior cigarette consumption (~20 cigarettes/day), time to first e-cigarette use (30 minutes), and smoking while ill, his e-cigarette dependence was assessed as moderate. Initial treatment included a 14 mg nicotine patch daily plus 4 mg nicotine lozenges, which he used about eight times per day, along with behavioral strategies. After 1 week, he reported reducing e-cigarette use by half but discontinued the patch because he felt he had limited control over dosing. He continued using approximately eight 4 mg lozenges daily and reported two days without vaping during weeks 3 and 4. At 6 weeks, he transitioned to 4 mg nicotine gum (cinnamon flavor), chosen to match his preferred e-cigarette flavor. Before completion of the 12-week program, he stopped using e-cigarettes entirely. He used nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) intermittently for 6 months, then discontinued it. More than one year after cessation, he remained free of e-cigarettes, tobacco, and nicotine.

Study Author Conclusions

We believe this is the first case reported in the literature of successful abstinence from e-cigarette dependence achieved using recommended evidence-based treatment for tobacco use and dependence. As electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and dual use increases, clinicians need clearer guidelines to assist those who wish to quit. These guidelines should include protocols for assessing dependence levels and for recommending treatment options, which could include NRT, other pharmaceutical aids, and behavioral therapy. Such guidelines are necessary to improve outcomes for ENDS and dual users who wish to become nicotine free.

References:
[1] Silver B, Ripley-Moffitt C, Greyber J, Goldstein AO. Successful use of nicotine replacement therapy to quit e-cigarettes: lack of treatment protocol highlights need for guidelines. Clin Case Rep. 2016;4(4):409-411. Published 2016 Mar 11. doi:10.1002/ccr3.477