What is the evidence of using bicarbonate in AKI?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

The evidence regarding sodium bicarbonate use in acute kidney injury (AKI) is mixed, with findings suggesting potential benefits in specific contexts but lacking consistency across broader applications. For the prevention of contrast-induced AKI, sodium bicarbonate may reduce its incidence, particularly in high-risk patients undergoing emergency or coronary procedures, though variability in study quality and publication bias limit definitive conclusions. In cardiac surgery-associated AKI, routine use of sodium carbonate has not demonstrated clear benefits. In severe metabolic acidosis associated with AKI, sodium bicarbonate has demonstrated reduced renal replacement therapy requirements and improved survival in specific subgroups but is associated with risks such as metabolic alkalosis and electrolyte imbalances. Overall, while sodium bicarbonate may have a role in targeted scenarios, its routine use for AKI prevention or treatment requires further high-quality evidence.

Background

A 2010 meta-analysis evaluated the use of intravenous sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), analyzing 18 studies with a total of 3,055 patients. The included studies reported a CI-AKI incidence of 11.6%, which was reduced to 9.6% in the sodium bicarbonate group compared to 13.5% in the control group (p= 0.001). The pooled risk ratio (RR) for CI-AKI prevention using sodium bicarbonate was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.95), suggesting a preventive effect. The effect was more prominent in coronary procedures, particularly in emergency settings, and in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In contrast, studies including both coronary and non-coronary procedures did not demonstrate a significant benefit (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.70). Among the studies, six prospective trials demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in CI-AKI with sodium bicarbonate administration. Additionally, sodium bicarbonate use was associated with a lower trend in renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement (0.9% vs. 1.5%; p= 0.259), though the difference was not statistically significant. In-hospital mortality was reported in five trials, with no significant reduction observed (1.7% for sodium bicarbonate vs. 2.1% in controls; p= 0.793). The included studies varied in quality, with only 33% reporting adequate allocation concealment and 61% reporting blinding. Furthermore, there was evidence of publication bias, with full-text manuscripts showing significant effects (n= 1,945 patients; RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.00) compared to abstracts (n= 1,110 patients; RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.39). Subgroup analyses showed no significant effect in diabetic patients (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.24 to 2.69) or in studies that did not include CKD patients (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.17 to 1.72; p= 0.29). While the studies demonstrated variability in baseline characteristics, such as serum creatinine levels and contrast type, sodium bicarbonate use was consistently linked to urinary alkalinization. Overall, these findings highlight the need for larger, high-quality trials to clarify the role of sodium bicarbonate in CI-AKI prevention and to explore its impact on RRT and mortality. [1]

A 2012 meta-analysis reviewed data from 19 randomized controlled trials (N= 3,609) to evaluate the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate in preventing CI-AKI. CI-AKI, a common complication defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 25% or at least 0.5 mg/dL within 48 hours of contrast exposure, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Clinical studies were included if they compared sodium bicarbonate hydration to sodium chloride (normal saline). Hydration with sodium bicarbonate demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of CI-AKI compared to sodium chloride (odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.86; p= 0.008). Subgroup analysis indicated enhanced efficacy in trials using low-osmolar contrast media (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.71, p= 0.002) and in emergency procedural settings (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.35, p<0.001). Additionally, sodium bicarbonate was associated with significant changes in serum bicarbonate (weighted mean difference [WMD] 2.63; 95% CI 1.72 to 3.55; p<0.001) and serum potassium levels (WMD −0.09, 95% CI −0.17 to −0.01, p= 0.03), though no significant differences were observed in post-procedural dialysis requirement (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.91, p= 0.56) or mortality (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.04, p= 0.06). While the findings support sodium bicarbonate as an effective prophylactic option for high-risk patients undergoing contrast exposure, the analysis highlights important variability across studies and underscores the need for adequately powered trials to confirm its role in improving clinically relevant outcomes. [2]

A 2015 meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of perioperative sodium bicarbonate administration in preventing cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI). Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs; N= 1,092) included cardiac surgery patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and who were randomized to receive either sodium bicarbonate infusions or sodium chloride (control group). Occurrence of CSA-AKI was defined as increases in serum creatinine of at least 25% or 0.5 mg/dL within five postoperative days. The results demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the rates of CSA-AKI between the sodium bicarbonate and control groups (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.22; p > 0.05). Mortality outcomes (RR 1.44; 95% CI 0.76 to 2.72) and the requirement for renal replacement therapy (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.60) similarly showed no significant differences. Parameters measuring intensive care unit stay duration (WMD 2.17 hours; 95% CI −1.15 to 5.49) and mechanical ventilation time (WMD 0.34 hours; 95% CI −0.80 to 1.48) also revealed no meaningful benefits associated with sodium bicarbonate administration. The heterogeneity across studies was moderate for some endpoints, particularly CSA-AKI definitions, but remained low for secondary measures. These findings highlight that the routine use of perioperative sodium bicarbonate for CSA-AKI prevention may lack clinical value and warrant reconsideration. [3]

A 2019 systematic review examined the use of sodium bicarbonate for the treatment and prevention of AKI, with a focus on its role in metabolic acidosis correction. Sodium bicarbonate increases the strong ion difference (SID), simulating renal bicarbonate generation and chloride excretion. Evidence from the BICAR-ICU trial, involving 389 critically ill patients with severe metabolic acidosis (pH <7.2), showed no significant difference in the primary composite outcome of 28-day survival and organ failure (Table 3). However, in patients with moderate to severe AKI (AKI Network stages 2 and 3), sodium bicarbonate reduced the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) from 52% to 35% (p= 0.0009) and delayed its initiation by approximately 12 hours (p<0.0001). Adverse effects noted in the bicarbonate group included metabolic alkalosis, hypernatremia, and hypocalcemia. A retrospective analysis from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database evaluated bicarbonate's effects in septic patients. Among 251 individuals with AKI stages 2 and 3, bicarbonate therapy improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.86; p= 0.021). Despite these findings, the routine use of sodium bicarbonate remains debated due to inconsistent outcomes across studies and concerns about adverse events. The review concluded with a call for larger randomized trials to clarify bicarbonate's role in treating severe acidosis and AKI while addressing its safety and efficacy in various clinical scenarios. [4]

A 2016 meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate compared to sodium chloride in preventing CI-AKI following coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. The study analyzed data from 16 RCTs involving 3,537 patients, with 1,768 allocated to the sodium bicarbonate group and 1,769 to the sodium chloride group. The pooled analysis indicated that sodium bicarbonate significantly reduced the incidence of CI-AKI (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; p= 0.029). Subgroup analyses revealed superior effects of sodium bicarbonate in patients undergoing emergency procedures (RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.60) and with low-osmolar contrast media (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.84). However, no significant differences were observed for secondary outcomes, including the requirement for dialysis (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.60 to 2.07; p= 0.729), mortality (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.21; p= 0.204), or length of hospital stay (mean difference: -1.47 days; 95% CI -4.14 to 1.20; p= 0.279). Sodium bicarbonate also significantly reduced serum creatinine change (mean difference [MD] -0.33; 95% CI -0.55 to -0.12; p= 0.003) and improved urine pH (MD 0.67; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.01; p<0.001). The trial sequential analysis revealed that the required information size (6,614 participants for CI-AKI, 170,510 for dialysis, and 19,516 for mortality) was not achieved. This indicated that the existing data are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions, emphasizing the need for larger, well-designed RCTs to confirm the findings. [5]

A 2012 Cochrane systematic review sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium bicarbonate administration for the treatment of AKI. This review sought to examine RCTs that investigated sodium bicarbonate use, delivered via any route, among adult patients hospitalized with AKI. AKI was defined using standardized criteria, including acute rises in serum creatinine or reductions in urine output, consistent with the first stage of the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) definition. Despite identifying 25 potential reports, none met the inclusion criteria due to inappropriate study designs, populations, or interventions. As a result, no eligible studies were available for analysis and the study was unable to draw conclusions regarding the benefits or harms of sodium bicarbonate for AKI treatment. The authors underscored an urgent need for high-quality large scale studies to address the persisting clinical uncertainty surrounding this intervention. [6], [7]

A 2023 narrative review synthesized findings from 27 original research studies and four meta-analyses between 1990 and 2022 to evaluate the role of sodium bicarbonate in various nontoxicologic causes of metabolic acidosis. Comprehensive literature analysis highlighted clinical scenarios such as lactic acidosis, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), cardiac arrest, rhabdomyolysis, and non-anion gap metabolic acidosis. The analysis also integrated subgroup data for patients with concomitant AKI, providing nuanced insights into sodium bicarbonate’s effects on outcomes like mortality, hemodynamic stability, and organ support requirements. [8]

Key conclusions from the 2023 review indicate that routine sodium bicarbonate administration does not confer substantial benefits in conditions such as lactic acidosis, where clinical trials like the BICAR-ICU (Table 3) demonstrated no mortality advantage aside from decreased renal replacement therapy in AKI subsets. Ultimately, it was suggested that there may be a role for an infusion of sodium bicarbonate after initial resuscitation in patients with AKI and pH <7.2, although data are limited, and that the emphasis should be placed on treatment of underlying cause of acidosis. [8]

References:

[1] Hoste EA, De Waele JJ, Gevaert SA, Uchino S, Kellum JA. Sodium bicarbonate for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(3):747-758. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp389
[2] Jang JS, Jin HY, Seo JS, et al. Sodium bicarbonate therapy for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury – a systematic review and meta-analysis –. Circ J. 2012;76(9):2255-2265. doi:10.1253/circj.cj-12-0096
[3] Kim JH, Kim HJ, Kim JY, et al. Meta-Analysis of Sodium Bicarbonate Therapy for Prevention of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(5):1248-1256. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2015.03.007
[4] Haines RW, Kirwan CJ, Prowle JR. Managing Chloride and Bicarbonate in the Prevention and Treatment of Acute Kidney Injury. Semin Nephrol. 2019;39(5):473-483. doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2019.06.007
[5] Dong Y, Zhang B, Liang L, et al. How Strong Is the Evidence for Sodium Bicarbonate to Prevent Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(7):e2715. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002715
[6] Hewitt J, Uniacke M, Hansi NK, Venkat-Raman G, McCarthy K. Sodium bicarbonate supplements for treating acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(6):CD009204. Published 2012 Jun 13. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009204.pub2
[7] Uniacke MD, Koyner JL, McCullough PA. Sodium bicarbonate use in acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(3):523-526.
[8] Wardi G, Holgren S, Gupta A, et al. A Review of Bicarbonate Use in Common Clinical Scenarios. J Emerg Med. 2023;65(2):e71-e80. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.04.012

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the evidence of using bicarbonate in AKI?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-3 for your response.


 

Effect of sodium bicarbonate infusion on hospital mortality in acute kidney injury patients with metabolic acidosis
Design

Retrospective observational study

N= 1,853 participants

Objective

To assess the effect of sodium bicarbonate (SB) infusion on hospital mortality in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients with metabolic acidosis

Study Groups

SB infusion group (n= 614)

Non-SB infusion group (n= 1,239)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients diagnosed with AKI, metabolic acidosis with pH < 7.3 and bicarbonate < 20 mmol/L, no respiratory acidosis (PaCO2 < 50 mmHg)

Exclusion Criteria

Patients aged <18 years, discharged or died within 48h after ICU admission

Methods

Patients with AKI complicated by metabolic acidosis were identified from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care Database IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Propensity score analysis (PSA) was applied to reduce baseline differences in the likelihood of receiving SB. The marginal structural Cox model (MSCM) was used to account for both baseline and time-varying confounders.

Duration

48 hours after ICU admission

Outcome Measures

Hospital mortality

Baseline Characteristics

Characteristics

Non-SB (n= 1239) SB (n= 614)

Age

66.66 64.62

Female

45.1% 48.7%

SOFA score

7.0 9.0

Mechanical ventilation

81.8% 78.5%

Vasopressor

17.1% 36.5%

Urine output, mL

1000.00 684.00

AKI stage

1

2

3

 

19.6%

41.5%

38.9%

 

11.7%

26.7%

61.6%

Fluid input, mL

2300.00

3825.00

pH

7.26 7.19

Bicarbonate

15.96

12.36

Creatinine, mg/dL

1.60

2.60

Results

Relation of SB use and hospital mortality in the overall and subgroups

Groups

HR (95% CI) p-value

Overall population

0.85 (0.71 to 1.00) 0.056

AKI stage 1 (n= 104)

0.71 (0.44 to 1.14) 0.159

AKI stage 2 (n= 267)

1.05 (0.80 to 1.39) 0.725

AKI stage 3 (n= 409)

0.79 (0.61 to 1.02) 0.065

Anion gap >18 (n= 529)

0.76 (0.61 to 0.94) 0.012

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio

Adverse Events Not reported
Study Author Conclusions

We found that SB infusion in AKI patients with metabolic acidosis is not beneficial for hospital mortality. However, SB infusion for AKI patients and high AG metabolic acidosis significantly improved hospital mortality. Further larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Critique

This single-center observational study, based on retrospective EHR data, has limitations, including potential residual confounding from uncaptured variables and limited generalizability to other settings. While PSA and MSCM were employed to balance confounders, residual confounding cannot be excluded. Future prospective and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

References:

Wang Y, Chen L, Guo G, Gao Y, Gan H. Effect of sodium bicarbonate infusion on hospital mortality in acute kidney injury patients with metabolic acidosis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1268252. Published 2023 Oct 12. doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1268252

 

Bicarbonate-Based Solution for the Management of Established Acute Kidney Injury: A Pilot Open-Label Observation Study

Design

Open-label, observational pilot study

N= 59

Objective

To evaluate whether the use of a bicarbonate-based intravenous (IV) solution with low chloride content compared to bicarbonate-free solutions with high chloride content could result in early renal recovery in patients with established acute kidney injury (AKI)

Study Groups

Bicarbonate-Based Solution (n= 29)

Bicarbonate-Free Solution (n= 30)

Inclusion Criteria

Hospitalized patients who developed AKI, defined as rise in serum creatinine (sCr) by ≥ 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or an increase of  > 1.5 times the reference sCr per Kidney Disease Improvement Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 and 5 defined by the CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation; presence of kidney allograft; received any type of renal replacement therapy (RRT)

Methods

The study employed a structured protocol for intravenous (IV) fluid interventions tailored to different phases of fluid resuscitation for patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Patients received either bicarbonate-based solutions with low chloride content or bicarbonate-free solutions with high chloride content, selected based on clinical evaluation by the treating physician. The bicarbonate-based solution consisted of 80 mEq/L of sodium bicarbonate mixed with 77 mEq/L of sodium, 77 mEq/L of chloride, and 25 g/L of glucose, serving as an alternative to commercially available balanced solutions.

Bicarbonate-free solutions included normal saline (0.9%), half saline (0.45%), normal Ringer, and succinylated gelatin preparations. Interventions were aligned with the conceptual model of fluid resuscitation, including rapid boluses (≥500 mL over 15 minutes) in the rescue phase, 100 to 200 mL boluses with reassessment during the optimization phase, and minimal maintenance infusions (1 to 2 mL/kg/h) during stabilization. The volume and rate of fluid administration were determined dynamically, emphasizing patient-specific needs and clinical signs to ensure optimal kidney support and recovery.

Duration

Enrollment: 6 months

Intervention: Patients received IV fluid interventions as part of their AKI management until renal recovery

Follow-up: Kidney recovery was assessed at day 7 post-AKI diagnosis

Outcome Measures

Time to baseline serum creatinine (sCr) level; change in sCr per day (delta sCr); total volume of IV fluids administered; length of hospital stay; in-hospital mortality

Baseline Characteristics

 

Bicarbonate-based solution (n= 29)

Bicarbonate-free solution (n= 30)

 

Age, years (IQR)

64 (37 to 85) 67 (37 to 97)  

Male

21 (72%) 14 (47%)  

Physiological variables

Mean arterial pressure, mmHg

Heart rate, bpm

Respiratory rpm

Urine output, ml/hr

 

83

77

20

66

 

84

76

19

58

 

Comorbidities

Diabetes

Hypertension

Cardiac failure

Liver disease

CKD stages 1 to 3

Obesity

Obstructive uropathy

 

9 (31%)

8 (28%)

9 (31%)

2 (7%)

13 (45%)

2 (7%)

1 (3%)

 

11 (37%)

9 (30%)

9 (30%)

2 (7%)

10 (33%)

2 (7%)

2 (7%)

 

Comorbid burden

0

1

2

≥3

 

9 (31%)

6 (21%)

6 (21%)

8 (28%)

 

6 (20%)

8 (27%)

9 (30%)

7 (23%)

 

AKI Etiology

Pre-renal

Obstructive nephropathy

Sepsis

CRS

HRS

Rhabdomyolysis

Multifactorial

 

6 (21%)

1 (3%)

16 (55%)

3 (10%)

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

 

5 (17%)

1 (3%)

16 (53%)

3 (10%)

0

1 (3%)

4 (13%)

 

eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m2

MDRD

CKD-EPI

 

27

26

 

33

31

 

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; CRS, cardiorenal syndrome; HRS, hepatorenal syndrome; MDRD, modification of diet in renal disease

Results

Endpoint

Bicarbonate-based solution (n= 29)

Bicarbonate-free solution (n= 30)

P-value

Baseline sCr, mg/dL before AKI (IQR)

1.12 (0.9 to 1.3) 1.08 (0.9 to 1.23) < 0.001

Peak AKI sCr, mg/dL

3.09 ± 1.33 1.96 ± 0.38 < 0.001

Delta sCr, mg/dL

- 0.29 ± 0.47 - 0.07 ± 0.42 0.007

Urine output, mL (IQR)

1592 (1409 to 1905) 1647 (1296 to 2192) 0.29

Volume of solutions used, mL/per day (IQR)

1000 (500 to 2000) 1000 (1000 to 2000) 0.90
Time to return to baseline value, days 5.6 ± 2.1 7.6 ± 2.8 < 0.001
Duration of hospital stay, days 7.65 (4 to 12) 9.4 (4 to 14) < 0.001
In-hospital mortality 1 (3.4%) 4 (13.3%) < 0.001

Adverse Events

Not disclosed.

Study Author Conclusions

We observed faster renal recovery in patients with established AKI who received the bicarbonate-based solution with low chloride content. Our study findings require confirmation in larger cohorts.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This study provides pilot data suggesting potential benefits of bicarbonate-based IV fluids in accelerating renal recovery among AKI patients. However, the non-randomized design and small sample size may limit generalizability, and future randomized controlled trials are essential to validate these findings.



References:

Claure-Del Granado R, Prudencio-Ribera VC, Gupta V, Yang J, Kashani K, Malhotra R. Bicarbonate-Based Solution for the Management of Established Acute Kidney Injury: A Pilot Open-Label Observation Study. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42127. Published 2023 Jul 19. doi:10.7759/cureus.42127

 

Sodium bicarbonate therapy for patients with severe metabolic acidaemia in the intensive care unit (BICAR-ICU): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial
Design

Multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial

N= 389

Objective

To evaluate whether sodium bicarbonate infusion improves clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with severe metabolic acidaemia

Study Groups

No sodium bicarbonate (n= 194)

Bicarbonate infusion (n= 195)

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted within 48 hours to the ICU with severe acidaemia (pH ≤7.20, PaCO2 ≤45 mm Hg, sodium bicarbonate concentration ≤20 mmol/L) and a SOFA score of 4 or more or an arterial lactate concentration of 2 mmol/L or more

Exclusion Criteria

Respiratory acidosis, digestive or urinary tract loss of sodium bicarbonate, stage IV chronic kidney disease, ketoacidosis, and sodium bicarbonate infusion within 24 hours before screening

Methods

Eligible patients were randomly assigned within 48 hours of ICU admission to receive either no sodium bicarbonate infusion or a 4.2% sodium bicarbonate infusion (bicarbonate group) targeting an arterial pH of 7.30 or higher during the 28-day ICU stay or until discharge. The protocol specified infusion volumes of 125–250 mL over 30 minutes, with a maximum of 1000 mL in 24 hours, and arterial blood gas measurements 1–4 hours post-infusion. 

Duration

May 5, 2015 to May 7, 2017

Outcome Measures

Composite of death by day 28 and presence of at least one organ failure at day 7

Baseline Characteristics Characteristic

No sodium bicarbonate

(n= 194)

Sodium bicarbonate

(n= 195)

Age, years

65 (55–75) 66 (55–75)

Female

71 (37%) 80 (41%)

Body-mass index, kg/m²

27 (23–30) 26 (23–29)

Simplified Acute Physiology Score II

60 (48–73) 59 (49–73)

Sepsis

115 (59%) 123 (63%)

AKIN status

AKIN 0–1

AKIN 2–3

 

104 (54%)

90 (46%)

 

103 (53%)

92 (47%)

Laboratory results

Arterial pH

PaCO2, mmHg

Serum bicarbonate, mmol/L

Serum creatinine, mg/dL

 

7.15

37

13

1.76

 

7.15

38

12

1.67

AKIN, Acute Kidney Injury Network
Results Outcome No sodium bicarbonate (n= 194) Sodium bicarbonate (n= 195) Absolute difference estimate (95% CI) p-value

Composite outcome

Overall population (n= 389)

Patients with AKIN scores of 2–3 (n= 182)

 

138 (71%)

74/90 (82%)

 

128 (66%)

64/92 (70%)

 

–5.5 (–15.2 to 4.2)

−12·3 (−26.0 to −0.1)

 

0.24

0.0462

Day 28 mortality

Overall population (n=389)

Patients with AKIN scores of 2–3 (n=182)

 

104 (54%)

57/90 (63%)

 

87 (45%)

42/92 (46%)

 

–9.0 (–19.4 to 1.4)

−17.7 (−33·0 to −2·3)

 

0.07

0.0166

At least one organ failure at day 7

Overall population (n=389)

Patients with AKIN scores of 2–3 (n=182)

 

134 (69%)

74/90 (82%)

 

121 (62%)

61/92 (66%)

 

−2.8 (−15.4 to 9.8)

−15.9 (−28.4 to −3.4)

 

0.15

0.0142

Use of renal replacement therapy during ICU stay

100 (52%) 68 (35%) –16.7 (–26.4 to –7.0) 0.0009
Adverse Events

Metabolic alkalosis, hypernatraemia, and hypocalcemia were more frequent in the bicarbonate group, with no life-threatening complications reported.

Study Author Conclusions

In patients with severe metabolic acidaemia, sodium bicarbonate had no effect on the primary composite outcome. However, sodium bicarbonate decreased the primary composite outcome and day 28 mortality in the a-priori defined stratum of patients with acute kidney injury.

Critique

The study's strengths include its multicenter design and well-balanced demographic characteristics. Limitations include the open-label design, lack of a specific control solution, and not stratifying patients by acidaemia mechanism.

References:

Jaber S, Paugam C, Futier E, et al. Sodium bicarbonate therapy for patients with severe metabolic acidaemia in the intensive care unit (BICAR-ICU): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial [published correction appears in Lancet. 2018 Dec 8;392(10163):2440. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33040-X]. Lancet. 2018;392(10141):31-40. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31080-8