What is the data on safety and efficacy of using finasteride (topical and oral) versus dutasteride (topical and oral) for hair loss?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Evidence assessing the safety and efficacy of finasteride versus dutasteride for the management of hair loss yields mixed findings. While some data suggest no statistically significant difference between both drugs and that neither agent significantly increases the risk of sexual adverse events, other findings indicate that dutasteride may potentially be more effective than finasteride and may result in a lower occurrence of overall adverse events in male patients with androgenetic alopecia. However, due to the relatively short treatment durations in most studies, the long-term efficacy and safety of these treatments remain uncertain. Of note, available data did not explicitly specify the formulations of the treatments used.

Background

A 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dutasteride and finasteride in treating men with androgenic alopecia (AGA) over a 24-week treatment cycle. A total of 3 randomized control trials were included involving 576 patients. Results found that dutasteride showed a significant increase in total hair count over finasteride (mean difference [MD] 28.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18.75 to 38.39; p<0.00001). Based on the investigator’s assessment of global photographs, dutasteride demonstrated superior hair growth in both the vertex (MD 0.68; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.23; p= 0.02) and frontal areas (MD 0.63; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.13; p= 0.01). Additionally, the panel's global photographic assessment confirmed the superior efficacy of dutasteride in the vertex (MD 0.17; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.24; p<0.00001) and frontal scalp areas (MD 0.25; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.31; p<0.00001). Furthermore, safety outcomes were assessed and neither dutasteride nor finasteride showed a significant difference in causing greater incidence of altered libido, erectile dysfunction, or ejaculation disorders in comparison to each other with similar rates of adverse reactions. Overall, these results suggest that dutasteride may offer superior efficacy over finasteride in managing AGA; however, drawing definitive conclusions on its long-term safety and tolerability remains challenging. [1]

A 2014 network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the efficacy and safety of finasteride and dutasteride for AGA. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the use of finasteride 1 mg (n= 2,164), 5 mg (n= 188), and dutasteride 0.5 mg (n= 325) were included. The analysis revealed that for the outcome of the global photographic assessment, finasteride 1 mg, finasteride 5 mg, and dutasteride 0.5 mg were all significantly superior to placebo, but no significant difference was found between the active treatments themselves. For patient self-assessment, there was no significant difference between the active treatments and only finasteride 1 mg was significantly more effective than placebo. Additionally, there was no significant difference between any active treatment or placebo for the adverse event outcome of global sexual disturbance. Rankings based on a benefit-risk assessment suggested finasteride 5 mg as the most favorable option, followed by dutasteride 0.5 mg, finasteride 1 mg, and then placebo; however, these rankings were considered arbitrary due to the lack of significant differences between treatments. Based on the overall findings, it was suggested that finasteride and dutasteride are equally effective and safe for the treatment of AGA. [2]

A 2022 NMA aimed to determine the relative efficacies of non-surgical AGA monotherapies for men and women. A total of 40 studies were included, with 30 assessing male AGA and 10 assessing female AGA. Of note, comparator agents for female AGA did not include finasteride and dutasteride. For male AGA, comparator agents included minoxidil, low-level laser therapy, dutasteride 0.5 mg, finasteride 1 mg, platelet-rich plasma, and bimatoprost. The analysis for male AGA revealed that all treatments were more effective than placebo, with pooled mean differences in hair count per square centimeter of 15.90 (95% CI 11.23 to 20.57) for finasteride 1 mg and 17.55 (95% CI 7.95 to 27.15; I2= 92%) for dutasteride 0.5 mg. When assessing the relative effects of AGA treatments in men, the analysis showed that dutasteride 0.5 mg was more effective than finasteride 1 mg, with a pooled mean difference of 2.297 (95% CI -5.703 to 9.915) in terms of hair count per square centimeter; however, it was noted that this difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, the surface under the cumulative ranking ranking values were 69.68% for dutasteride 0.5 mg and 58.24% for finasteride 1 mg. Overall, it was suggested that further research is warranted to determine the comparative effectiveness of AGA treatments. [3]

A 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis examined the risk of adverse sexual effects linked to the treatment of AGA in male patients using finasteride (1 mg/day) or dutasteride (0.5 mg/day). A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,495 patients were included. Ten studies specifically investigated the use of finasteride while four assessed dutasteride. Notably, the findings revealed that the overall use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) was associated with a 1.57-fold increased risk of any adverse sexual effects (95% CI 1.19 to 2.08). The relative risk was 1.66 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.30) for finasteride and 1.37 (95% CI 0.81 to 2.32) for dutasteride, with the latter agent lacking statistical significance. When analyzing specific adverse sexual events, the use of 5-ARIs posed a 1.53-fold increased risk of decreased libido, and was linked to a higher risk of erectile dysfunction, and difficulty in ejaculation; however, these findings were not statistically significant. Overall, the authors concluded that it is essential for physicians and patients to be aware of the potential adverse effects associated with both treatment regimens. [4]

References:

[1] Zhou Z, Song S, Gao Z, Wu J, Ma J, Cui Y. The efficacy and safety of dutasteride compared with finasteride in treating men with androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:399-406. Published 2019 Feb 20. doi:10.2147/CIA.S192435
[2] Gupta AK, Charrette A. The efficacy and safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors in androgenetic alopecia: a network meta-analysis and benefit-risk assessment of finasteride and dutasteride. J Dermatolog Treat. 2014;25(2):156-161. doi:10.3109/09546634.2013.813011
[3] Gupta AK, Bamimore MA, Foley KA. Efficacy of non-surgical treatments for androgenetic alopecia in men and women: a systematic review with network meta-analyses, and an assessment of evidence quality. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(1):62-72. doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1749547
[4] Lee S, Lee YB, Choe SJ, Lee WS. Adverse Sexual Effects of Treatment with Finasteride or Dutasteride for Male Androgenetic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(1):12-17. doi:10.2340/00015555-3035

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the data on safety and efficacy of using finasteride (topical and oral) versus dutasteride (topical and oral) for hair loss?

Level of evidence

B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-4 for your response.


 

Superiority of Dutasteride Over Finasteride in Hair Regrowth and Reversal of Miniaturization in Men with Androgenetic Alopecia: A Randomized Controlled Open-label, Evaluator-blinded Study

Design

Prospective, parallel, randomized, open-label superiority study

N= 72

Objective

To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dutasteride and finasteride in men with androgenetic alopecia (AGA)

Study Groups

Dutasteride (n= 35)

Finasteride (n= 37)

Inclusion Criteria

Aged 18 to 40 years with AGA classified as Grade III vertex, IV, or V (excluding types IV and V anterior)

Exclusion Criteria

Patients using minoxidil, anti-androgenic drugs causing hypertrichosis (phenytoin, acetazolamide, cyclosporine, diazoxide, psoralens, penicillamine, streptomycin and cortisone); or hypotrichosis within ≤ 6 months; systemic illness; smokers or tobacco chewers; history of breast or prostate cancer; first degree relative with prostate cancer before the age of 50

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.5 mg dutasteride or 1 mg finasteride daily for a period of 24 weeks. Clinical assessment was performed by blinded and unblinded dermatologists using standardized photographs of the vertex scalp taken by placing the head on a stereotactic positioning device.

Duration

Enrollment: January 2013 to May 2014

Intervention: 24 weeks

Follow-up: N/A

Outcome Measures

Primary: Hair counts (thick and thin) in the target area from modified phototrichograms; global photography evaluation

Secondary: Subjective assessment using a preset questionnaire

Baseline Characteristics

 

Dutasteride

(n= 35)

Finasteride

(n= 37)

 

Age, years (mean)

27.6 28.1  

Total hair count

222.83 ± 50.68 226.78 ± 48.80  

Thin hair count

64.57 ± 26.89 67.32 ± 29.87  

Thick hair count

158.26 ± 49.91 159.46 ± 42.27  

Results

Endpoint

Dutasteride (n=35)

Finasteride (n=37)

p-Value

Change in hair counts in target area

Total hair count

Thin hair count

Thick hair count

 

23.14 ± 8.44

7.37 ± 11.99

30.51 ± 12.86

 

4.30 ± 12.46

1.27 ± 15.03

5.57 ± 12.97

 

<0.001

0.0156

<0.001

Global photography evaluation (change from baseline) 

Hair loss from top of scalp (decreased, same, increased)

Bitemporal recession (decreased, same, increased)

 

33, 2, 0

5, 30, 0

 

27, 9, 1

0, 37, 0

 

0.035

0.023

Subjective assessment using a preset questionnaire

0

1

2

3

4

 

5.7%

2.9%

17.1%

51.4%

22.9%

 

5.4%

24.3%

37.8%

29.7%

2.7%

 0.00159

Adverse Events

Most adverse events reported post-randomization were mild to moderate (dutasteride group, n = 8; finasteride group, n = 7). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups. Erectile dysfunction and loss of libido was seen in 3 and 4 patients in the dutasteride group as compared to 1 and 3 patients in the finasteride group, respectively but this was not statistically significant.

Study Author Conclusions

In our study, dutasteride 0.5 mg was found to be significantly more effective than finasteride 1 mg in men aged 18–40 years with androgenetic alopecia as assessed by hair counts, subject self-assessment and blinded and non-blinded evaluation of global photographs.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The study included a short duration, small sample size, and open-label design, which may affect the generalizability and robustness of the results. Notably, the observed variation in finasteride's effectiveness might be influenced by genetic polymorphisms, highlighting the need for personalized approaches in treatment.



References:

Shanshanwal SJ, Dhurat RS. Superiority of dutasteride over finasteride in hair regrowth and reversal of miniaturization in men with androgenetic alopecia: A randomized controlled open-label, evaluator-blinded study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2017;83(1):47-54. doi:10.4103/0378-6323.188652

 

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Dutasteride versus Finasteride in Patients with Male Androgenic Alopecia in South Korea: A Multicentre Chart Review Study

Design

Retrospective, observational, multi-center chart review

N= 600

Objective

To describe baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and long-term safety and effectiveness of dutasteride versus finasteride

Study Groups

Dutasteride (n= 295)

Finasteride (n= 305)

Inclusion Criteria

Aged ≥ 18 years; male patients with confirmed androgenic alopecia (AGA) with ≥ 1 prescription for either treatment; ≥ 3 years of available medical charts during the observation period while receiving the treatment prescribed on the index date

Exclusion Criteria

Received any prescription of dutasteride ≤ 12 weeks before finasteride initiation or any prescription of finasteride ≤ 8 weeks before dutasteride initiation; prior surgical correction of scalp hair loss; history of malignancy other than non-melanotic cancers; systemic cytotoxic therapy; diagnosis of global hair thinning; scarring of the scalp; hair loss not caused by AGA; any other condition of the scalp or hair

Methods

A pilot study with 50 patients assessed the quality of data needed to populate the case report form for the full study. The index date was defined as the first prescription of dutasteride or finasteride for patients with confirmed AGA and data was collected retrospectively from medical charts and entered into an electronic CRF by clinical staff.

Patients were retrospectively assessed for the safety and efficacy of either dutasteride (0.5 mg/day) or finasteride (1 mg/day) using the basic and specific (BASP) classification of AGA. Effectiveness and safety data were extracted from patient charts at the index date and at each patient visit during the observation period.

Duration

Enrollment: January 2010 to December 2019

Intervention: Index date until death, loss to follow-up, or data cut off

Follow-up: Three years post-index

Outcome Measures

BASP classifications of AGA; adverse events (common and serious)

Baseline Characteristics

 

Dutasteride (n= 295)

Finasteride (n= 305)

 

Age, years

41.7 ± 10.6 36.8 ± 11.2  

Smoking status

Never (<100 cigarettes during lifetime)

Former

Current

n= 91

43 (47.3%)

18 (19.8%)

30 (33.0%)

n= 32

14 (43.8%)

5 (15.6%)

13 (40.6%)

 

Alcohol consumption

No alcohol consumption

Light to moderate (≤14 drinks/wk)

Heavy (>14 drinks/wk)

n= 8

1 (12.5%)

2 (25.0%)

5 (62.5%)

n= 5

1 (20%)

3 (60%)

1 (20%)

 

Family history of AGA

Yes

No

n= 213

163 (76.5%)

50 (23.5%)

n= 140

108 (77.1%)

32 (22.9%)

 

Recent hair loss

Yes

No

n= 255

86 (33.7%)

169 (66.3%)

n= 195

103 (52.8%)

92 (47.2%)

 

Age at which hair loss was first observed, years

40.3 ± 15.3 35.2 ± 20.3  

Baseline BASP classification

101 (34.2%) 94 (30.8%)  

BASP severity

Mild (M1-2, C1, V1-2, F1-3)

Moderate (M3, C2, V3)

Severe (C3, U1-3)

 

75 (74.3%)

24 (23.8%)

2 (2.0%)

 

85 (90.4%)

9 (9.6%)

 

BASP basic type

L

M

M0

M1

M2

M3

C

U

 

0

93 (92.1%)

17 (16.8%)

29 (28.7%)

33 (32.7%)

14 (13.9%)

7 (6.9%)

1 (1.0%)

 

4 (4.3%)

87 (92.6%)

11 (11.7%)

33 (35.1%)

40 (42.6%)

3 (3.2%)

3 (3.2%)

0

 

BASP specific type

V

F

 

80 (79.2%)

81 (80.2%)

 

48 (51.1%)

46 (48.9%)

 

Use of treatments related to AGA

Any

Topical minoxidil

263 (89.2%)

210 (79.8%)

207 (78.7%)

222 (72.8%)

131 (59.0%)

129 (58.1%)

 

† Severity was determined by the more severe of basic type or specific type. For example, if a patient had M1 (mild) as the basic type and V3 (moderate) as the specific type, they would be classified as moderate.

For patients with available BASP measurements at index, most exhibited basic M type hair loss. Comorbidities were significantly higher among dutasteride-treated patients versus dinasteride, and more dutasteride patients were receiving a form of AGA treatment at baseline.

Results

BASP classifications of AGA*

Dutasteride (n= 295)

Finasteride (n= 305)

IRR (95% CI; p-value)

BASP basic type

Patients with improvement in BASP basic type

IR of improvement in BASP basic type, 100 PPPY

51

44 (86.3%)

79.09

57

26 (45.6%)

23.27

2.03 (1.08 to 3.82; 0.029)

Basic M type

Patients with improvement in basic M type

IR of improvement in basic M type, 100 PPPY

50

43 (86%)

80.40

55

25 (45.5%)

23.21

2.06 (1.08 to 3.95; 0.029)

BASP specific V type

Patients with improvement in V type

IR of improvement in V type, 100 PPPY

55

49 (89.1%)

89.70

33

21 (63.6%)

37.38

1.44 (0.76 to 2.73; 0.268)

BASP specific F type

Patients with improvement in F type

IR of improvement in F type

56

48 (85.7%)

75.80

36

19 (52.8%)

29.88

1.50 (0.76 to 2.95; 0.240)

Adverse events

Dutasteride (n= 250)

Finasteride (n= 285)

Equivalence**

Any adverse event

19 (7.6%)

30 (10.5%)

No

Any adverse event of special interest

Sexual adverse events

Decreased libido

Impotence/erectile dysfunction

4 (1.6%)

4 (1.6%)

3 (1.2%)

1 (0.4%)

3 (1.1%)

3 (1.1%)

2 (0.7%)

0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Any other adverse event

Allergic reactions/face/rash/urticaria

Back pain

Diarrhea

Dyspepsia

Fatigue

Other

Skin disorders

17 (6.8%)

1 (0.4%)

1 (0.4%)

1 (0.4%)

1 (0.4%)

1 (0.4%)

12 (4.8%)

11 (4.4%)

27 (9.5%)

2 (0.7%)

0

2 (0.7%)

1 (0.4%)

0

24 (8.4%)

17 (6.0%)

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Any SAE

Serious cardiovascular event

Other SAE

0

0

0

2 (0.7%)

1 (0.4%)

1 (0.4%)

Yes

Yes

Yes

IRR, incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval; IR, incidence rate; PPPY, per-person per-year; SAE, serious adverse event

* Comparative analysis of effectiveness, as measured by first observed improvement in BASP classification, among patients prescribed the recommended doses of dutasteride (0.5 mg daily) and finasteride (1 mg daily).

** Equivalence was determined from two one-sided tests to determine whether the 90% confidence interval for the differences in proportions were within the equivalence region, defined as ±5%.

Multivariate models were adjusted for age at index date, study site, index year, recent hair loss at baseline, comorbidities at baseline, use of treatment during baseline, and baseline severity of AGA.

Adverse Events

See Results

Study Author Conclusions

Dutasteride showed greater effectiveness than finasteride in improving BASP classification in treating male AGA and had a similar or possibly lower occurrence of overall AEs. Dutasteride may provide an effective and safe treatment option for male patients with AGA.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This study offers real-world evidence supporting the superior efficacy and comparable safety of dutasteride over finasteride for treating male AGA, particularly in patients with M-type hair loss. However, limitations such as data variability and potential confounding should be considered when interpreting the findings.
References:

Choi GS, Sim WY, Kang H, et al. Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Dutasteride versus Finasteride in Patients with Male Androgenic Alopecia in South Korea: A Multicentre Chart Review Study. Ann Dermatol. 2022;34(5):349-359. doi:10.5021/ad.22.027

 

A randomized, active- and placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of different doses of dutasteride versus placebo and finasteride in the treatment of male subjects with androgenetic alopecia

Design

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial 

N= 917

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of dutasteride (type 1 and 2 5-alpha reductase inhibitor) with finasteride (type 2 5-alpha reductase inhibitor) and placebo in men with androgenetic alopecia

Study Groups

Placebo (n= 181)

Dutasteride 0.02 mg (n= 185)

Dutasteride 0.1 mg (n= 188)

Dutasteride 0.5 mg (n= 184)

Finasteride 1 mg (n= 179)

Inclusion Criteria

Men aged 20 to 50 years with androgenetic alopecia classified as type III vertex, IV, or V using the Norwood Hamilton classification

Exclusion Criteria

Men with androgenetic alopecia types IV and V anterior; serum testosterone levels <250 ng/dL; unstable liver disease (except chronic stable hepatitis B and C); history of malignancy within prior 5 years (except basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin), prostate cancer before the age of 50 years in a first-degree relative; breast cancer or clinical breast examination suggestive of malignancy; serum prostate-specific antigen level >2.0 ng/mL

Methods

Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio to receive either dutasteride 0.02, 0.1, or 0.5 mg/day, finasteride 1 mg/day, or a matched placebo for 24 weeks of treatment. Investigators, treating physicians, and patients were blinded to treatment allocation until the study was completed or until a patient withdrew due to a serious adverse event. 

Duration

Intervention: 24 weeks

Follow-up: 2 weeks

Outcome Measures

Primary: Change from baseline in hair count within a 2.54-cm diameter circle at the vertex at 24 weeks

Secondary: Change from baseline in hair count within a 2.54-cm diameter circle at 12 weeks; 1.13 cm diameter circle at the vertex at 12 and 24 weeks); hair restoration (change from baseline in hair width and terminal hair [thickness of ≥ 60 μm] count within a 2.54 and 1.13 cm diameter circle at the vertex [12 and 24 weeks])

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo

(n= 181)

Dutasteride 0.02 mg

(n= 185)

Dutasteride 0.1 mg

(n= 188)

Dutasteride 0.5 mg

(n= 184) 

Finasteride 1 mg

(n= 179) 

Age, years

38.7 ± 8.43 38.5 ± 7.72  38.7± 7.44  38.6 ± 7.66  38.0 ± 7.81

Male

181 (100%) 185 (100%) 188 (100%) 184 (100%) 179 (100%)

Race

Asian

Hispanic/Latino

White, not Hispanic

 

100 (55%)

72 (40%)

9 (5%) 

 

103 (56%)

71 (38%)

11 (6%) 

 

103 (55%) 

75 (40%)

10 (5%)

 

101 (55%) 

73 (40%)

10 (5%) 

 

100 (56%)

70 (39%)

9 (5%)

Body mass index, kg/m2

25.4 ± 3.61  25.6 ± 3.47 25.8 ± 4.28  25.1 ± 3.46 25.7 ± 4.01

Smoking status

Current smoker

Former smoker

 

55 (30%) 

26 (14%)

 

70 (38%) 

25 (14%) 

 

70 (37%) 

29 (15%)

 

50 (27%) 

33 (18%)

 

59 (33%)

24 (13%)

Consume alcohol

120 (67%) 

118 (64%) 

119 (63%) 

121 (66%) 

117 (65%)

Age hair loss first noticed, years

29.0 ± 7.84

29.9 ± 8.06 

28.4 ± 6.79 

29.6 ± 7.73 

29.8 ± 7.45

Currently experiencing hair loss

151 (83%) 

152 (82%) 

161 (86%) 

160 (87%) 

154 (86%)

Baseline Norwood Hamilton stage

III Vertex

IV

V

 

 

82 (45%) 

56 (31%)

43 (24%) 

 

 

77 (42%) 

61 (33%)

47 (25%) 

 

 

76 (40%)

65 (35%)

47 (25%) 

 

 

83 (45%) 

58 (32%)

43 (23%) 

 

 

79 (44%)

59 (33%)

41 (23%)

Baseline hair count 2.54 cm diameter

761 ± 227

774 ± 226

721 ± 220 

768 ± 218

764 ± 181

Baseline hair count 1.13 cm diameter

148 ± 45.1  149 ± 45.7  140 ± 44.6 149 ± 44.1 148 ± 37.7

Results

Endpoint

Placebo

(n= 181)

Dutasteride 0.02 mg

(n= 185)

Dutasteride 0.1 mg

(n= 188)

Dutasteride 0.5 mg

(n= 184)

Finasteride 1 mg

(n= 179)

Any drug-related AE

27 (15%)   26 (14%)  39 (21%)   30 (16%)  35 (20%)

Any SAE*

2 (1%)  3 (2%)  1 (<1%) 2 (1%)

Death

0 0 0 0 0

Common AEs**

Nasopharyngitis

Decreased libido 

Headache 

Erectile dysfunction 

Abdominal pain 

Upper respiratory tract infection 

Back pain 

Upper abdominal pain 

Influenza 

Diarrhea 

Allergic rhinitis 

Pharyngitis

 

16 (9%) 

2 (1%) 

16 (9%)

7 (4%)

2 (1%)

9 (5%)

4 (2%)

1 (<1%)

5 (3%)

3 (2%)

1 (<1%)

7 (4%)

 

19 (10%) 

10 (5%) 

8 (4%)

8 (4%)

6 (3%)

5 (3%)

5 (3%)

4 (2%)

3 (2%)

2 (1%)

2 (1%)

1 (<1%)

 

15 (8%) 

9 (5%) 

8 (4%)

7 (4%)

7 (4%)

2 (1%)

3 (2%)

1 (<1%)

4 (2%)

7 (4%)

1 (<1%)

2 (1%)

 

23 (13%) 

6 (3%) 

11 (6%)

10 (5%) 

2 (1%)

6 (3%)

3 (2%)

2 (1%)

1 (<1%)

2 (1%)

4 (2%)

3 (2%)

 

14 (8%)

9 (5%)

5 (3%)

10 (6%) 

2 (1%)

1 (<1%)

4 (2%)

5 (3%)

2 (1%)

0

6 (3%)

5 (3%)

Abbreviations: adverse event; SAE, serious adverse event

*SAEs were: syncope and nephrolithiasis in the placebo group; cartilage injury, rectal cancer, increased blood pressure, and metastatic hepatic cancer in the dutasteride 0.1 mg group; parasitic infection, salmonellosis, and gastric ulcer 

**≥3% in any group

At week 24, the increase in baseline hair count was significantly greater in the dutasteride 0.1 mg, dutasteride 0.5 mg, and finasteride groups compared to placebo (all p < 0.001). Dutasteride 0.1 mg and 0.5 mg were non-inferior to finasteride (1-sided 99.165% confidence intervals: -20.1 to 33.1 and 6.1 to 60.0, respectively). However, only dutasteride 0.5 mg was superior to finasteride at both weeks 12 and 24 (both p = 0.003). Findings were provided within the figures.

At week 24, all active treatment groups except dutasteride 0.02 mg were significantly superior to placebo in increasing hair count measured in 1.13 cm diameter areas. (all p < 0.001). Dutasteride 0.5 mg significantly increased hair count compared to finasteride (p = 0.016). Findings were provided within the figures.

For hair restoration, at week 24, dutasteride 0.1 mg, dutasteride 0.5 mg, and finasteride were all significantly more effective than placebo in increasing hair width (2.54 cm diameter) (all p < 0.001). Dutasteride 0.5 mg also significantly increased hair width compared to finasteride (p = 0.004). Findings were provided within figures. 

Adverse Events

See results

Study Author Conclusions

Dutasteride increased hair growth and restoration in men with androgenetic alopecia and was relatively well tolerated.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

While findings suggested that dutasteride 0.5 mg was statistically superior to finasteride 1 mg, the treatment was limited to 24 weeks and follow-up was only 2 weeks post-treatment, making the long-term efficacy and safety of the treatments unclear.



References:

Gubelin Harcha W, Barboza Martínez J, Tsai TF, et al. A randomized, active- and placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of different doses of dutasteride versus placebo and finasteride in the treatment of male subjects with androgenetic alopecia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(3):489-498.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.049

 

The importance of dual 5a-reductase inhibition in the treatment of male pattern hair loss: Results of a randomized placebo-controlled study of dutasteride versus finasteride

Design

Randomized, placebo-controlled study

N= 416

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of the type 1 and 2 5a-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in men with male pattern hair loss (MPHL)

Study Groups

Dutasteride (n= 346)

Finasteride (n= 70)

Inclusion Criteria

Men aged 21 to 45 years old, with mild-to-moderate MPHL, having never used a 5a-reductase inhibitor or any medication for alopecia during the previous 6 months, with no significant health problems and no use of androgenic or antiandrogenic drugs during previous 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

Not specified

Methods

Patients were randomized to treatment with dutasteride (0.05, 0.1, 0.5, or 2.5 mg), finasteride (5 mg), or placebo daily for 24 weeks. Finasteride 5 mg was utilized at the time of the study since 1 mg dose was not commercially available at the time of the study.  Furthermore, the 5-mg dose of finasteride had previously been shown to have efficacy in MPHL at least as great as the 1 mg dose.

Duration

Treatment: 24 weeks

Outcome Measures

Primary: hair regrowth via target area hair count

Secondary: exploratory assessment of hair count, panel assessment of improvement from baseline, investigators’ assessment of improvement, subjects’ global assessment of improvement (via self-assessment questionnaire at 24 weeks), and stage of MPHL using the modified Hamilton-Norwood classification

Baseline Characteristics

 

All patients (N= 416)

       

 

Age, years

36.4 ± 6.05          
Baseline hair count

938.5 ± 251.7

         

Age at first balding, years

26.1 ± 6.04          

Stage of MPHL

III vertex

IV

IVa

V

 

169 (41%)

131 (31%)

19 (5%)

97 (23%)

         

There were no significant differences in the groups with respect to age, race or degree of baldness.

Results

Endpoint

Placebo

Dutasteride 0.05 mg

Dutasteride 0.1 mg

Dutasteride 0.5 mg

Dutasteride 2.5 mg

Finasteride 5.0 mg

Mean changes in hair count vs. baseline

12 weeks

24 weeks

 

-26.5

-32.3

 

N/A*

N/A** 

 

55**

78.5**

 

71.3**

94.6**

 

99.9**‡

109.6**†

 

52.1**

75.6**

≥ 10% increase in hair counts at 24 weeks

0%  17% 38% 48% 56% 41% 

Expert panel assessment of global photographs at 24 weeks - vertex

No change

Slightly increased

Moderately increased

Greatly increased

 

91%

0

2%

0

 

75%

12%

3%

 

61%

33%

7%

 

37%

40%

21%

2%

 

22%

48%

28%

1% 

 

43%

48%

9%

0

Expert panel assessment of global photographs at 24 weeks - frontal

No change

Slightly increased

Moderately increased

Greatly increased

 

87% 

12%

0

0

 

73%

20% 

2%

0

 

67%

30% 

3%

0

 

52%

30% 

18%

0

 

37%

36% 

25%

0

 

52%

36%

9% 

0

Overall patient satisfaction

42%

58%

57%

56%

72%¥

61%¥

*p≤ 0.5 vs. placebo

**p≤ 0.001 vs. placebo

‡p≤ 0.001 vs. finasteride

†p≤ 0.05 vs. finasteride

¥p< 0.05 vs. placebo

For expert panel global photographs, dutasteride 0.5 mg showed a significantly greater improvement than finasteride at 24 weeks (P p= 0.026), whereas dutasteride 2.5 mg showed significantly greater improvements than finasteride at both 12 and 24 weeks (p< 0.001). 

Adverse Events

No significant differences were reported between groups. A total of 11 subjects withdrew because of adverse events: 3 were in the placebo group (irritable bowel syndrome and impotency), 7 were in the dutasteride 0.1 mg group (decreased libido, malaise and fatigue, mood disorders, skin disorders, injuries caused by trauma, and gastrointestinal- and neurology-related complaints) and 1 in the dutasteride 0.5 mg group (gastrointestinal discomfort and pain).

Study Author Conclusions

In conclusion, 2.5-mg dutasteride, a dual 5a-reductase inhibitor, improved hair growth in balding men more rapidly and to a greater degree than finasteride, a selective type 2 inhibitor. Dutasteride was generally well tolerated. The results of this study demonstrate the significant additive effect of inhibiting both type 1 and type 2 5a-reductase in the treatment of MPHL.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This was a phase II, dose-ranging study, although the study included a large number of subjects. Additionally, the study's duration was restricted to 24 weeks which may not capture long-term effects or trends, potentially affecting the comprehensiveness and applicability of the findings over a longer timeframe.



References:

Olsen EA, Hordinsky M, Whiting D, et al. The importance of dual 5alpha-reductase inhibition in the treatment of male pattern hair loss: results of a randomized placebo-controlled study of dutasteride versus finasteride. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(6):1014-1023. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.05.007