Lipid formulations of amphotericin B demonstrate reduced acute and chronic toxicity compared to conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate. However, in approximately 20% of cases (range, 0%–100%), these formulations can still trigger acute, infusion-related reactions. These reactions include symptoms such as chest pain, dyspnea, hypoxia, severe pain in the abdomen, flank, or legs, flushing, and urticaria. Notably, when compared to infusion reactions associated with conventional amphotericin B, a significant majority (85%) of the reactions to lipid formulations occur within the first five minutes of infusion and can be rapidly resolved by temporarily halting the infusion and administering intravenous diphenhydramine. The data suggested that these reactions were more likely attributed to the liposomal formulation rather than the drug itself, possibly due to complement activation. The practice of premedicating with diphenhydramine has been found effective in reducing the incidence of these acute reactions. The available evidence suggests that while liposomal amphotericin B is a valuable therapeutic option, it is essential to be vigilant for these reactions, particularly during the initial infusion. [1], [2]
A guideline developed by the National Institutes of Health, the HIV Medicine Association, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America discussed the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in adults and adolescents with HIV. The panel states that patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B should be monitored vigilantly for dose-dependent nephrotoxicity, electrolyte disturbances, and infusion-related adverse reactions, which are classified as a strong recommendation with moderate quality evidence (AII). Infusion-related adverse events might be reduced by pre-treatment with acetaminophen or diphenhydramine, although this recommendation carries a weaker evidence base (CIII). To mitigate the risk of glomerular function decline, administering 1 liter of saline an hour before the drug infusion is advised, backed by moderate evidence (BIII). Notably, liposomal or lipid-associated formulations of amphotericin B are associated with a lower incidence of nephrotoxicity compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate. [3]
While the guidelines highlight the need for close monitoring of nephrotoxicity and electrolyte disturbances with all amphotericin B formulations, specific premedication strategies are primarily recommended for traditional amphotericin B in patients with a history of severe infusion-related reactions. These include administering 500–1,000 mL of normal saline before infusion to reduce nephrotoxicity, as well as pre-treatment with acetaminophen (650 mg) and diphenhydramine (25–50 mg) or hydrocortisone (50–100 mg) given 30 minutes before infusion to help mitigate infusion-related adverse effects. Meperidine (25–50 mg), titrated during infusion, is also suggested after the first occurrence of rigors to help prevent recurrence. In contrast, the same premedication recommendations are not explicitly provided for liposomal amphotericin B. [3]
A 2021 narrative review explores the infusion-related adverse effects (IRAEs) associated with amphotericin B, focusing on the utility of pre-medications to prevent such reactions. The review assessed the effects of different formulations, such as amphotericin B deoxycholate and lipid-based formulations, on IRAEs, finding that while pre-medications are common, their routine use may not be warranted as IRAEs occur even among patients receiving these preventive treatments. In comparing amphotericin B deoxycholate to lipid-based formulations, the review noted that the lipid formulations might present a lower or similar risk for IRAEs. The investigation into pre-medications revealed no consistent benefit in preventing these reactions, with instances of IRAEs reported regardless of their use. The review highlighted that different pre-medication regimens (e.g., acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, and corticosteroids) were often employed without a significant reduction in IRAEs. Furthermore, studies comparing infusion rates concluded that shorter infusion times did not significantly escalate the risk of IRAEs but might lead to a swifter onset of such events. Overall, the review suggests reevaluating the necessity of routine pre-medications, given the occurrence of IRAEs across different amphotericin B formulations and treatment protocols. [4]