What is the data for patiromer (Veltassa) in acute hyperkalemia treatment, and what doses are recommended?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Clinical data evaluating patiromer (Veltassa) in the management of acute hyperkalemia are currently limited to low-quality retrospective studies that show conflicting findings. While some individual studies have found patiromer to effectively reduce potassium levels in the acute setting, comparative studies have found no benefit associated with patiromer when compared to other agents, including insulin, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), and sodium polystyrene sulfonate. Available guidelines recommend that gastrointestinal excretion of potassium in the setting of hyperkalemia be promoted via oral binders such as patiromer and SZC, but caution that these agents require a functioning GI tract and have a delayed onset of action, limiting their reliability to emergently reduce potassium in patients with arrhythmias. There is a lack of standardized dosing in acute hyperkalemias, but studies typically administered one or multiple doses of 8.4 g, 16.8 g, or 25.2 g until hyperkalemia resolves.

Background

An international multidisciplinary consensus guideline from the Emergency Medicine Cardiac Research and Education Group (EMCREG) on the management of hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease and heart failure notes that the primary focus of emergency department (ED) management of hyperkalemia is the prevention of cardiac complications of hyperkalemia. In addition to promoting potassium shift from the extracellular to intracellular fluid space, it is necessary to increase urinary or gastrointestinal (GI) potassium excretion. Gastrointestinal excretion can be promoted via oral binders such as patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC). However, these agents require a functioning GI tract and have a delayed onset of action; they should not be relied on to emergently reduce potassium in patients with arrhythmias. The guidelines note that SZC likely provides the more rapid and safest benefit as it binds potassium in the small bowel, while patiromer acts only in the colon. The recommended dose of patiromer for moderate hyperkalemia (5.6 to 5.9 mmol/L) is 8.4 g once daily or 8.4 g once daily titrated to a maximum dose of 25.2 g daily, until serum potassium is <5.1 mmol/L. Dosing recommendations for patiromer in severe hyperkalemia are not provided. [1]

An expert panel review published in 2025 on hyperkalemia management states that novel oral potassium binders can be used to help eliminate excess serum potassium in the setting of acute hyperkalemia. However, the definitive efficacy of potassium binders in acute hyperkalemia is still being investigated, and formal studies on patiromer in the emergency setting have been lacking. Despite the lack of data, a pilot investigation targeting severe and acute hyperkalemia patients revealed that a single oral dose of 25.2 g of patiromer led to a statistically significant reduction in serum potassium within 2 hours, indicating a potential role in acute hyperkalemia management (see Table 1). Similarly, another retrospective cohort study evaluating patiromer therapy for hyperkalemia in an acute care setting observed a mean potassium reduction of 0.50 mmol/L (p<0.001) within 0 to 6 hours following a single dose of patiromer administration (see Table 2). [2], [3], [4]

A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and side effect profile of two novel agents, patiromer and SZC, for the treatment of hyperkalemia. The analysis incorporated data from a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, focusing on studies that compared these agents with placebo or other standard care options. The odds ratio (OR) was utilized for outcome estimation, allowing the authors to quantify differences in hyperkalemia incidence and adverse effect occurrence between the treatment and control groups. The results demonstrated that patiromer significantly reduced hyperkalemia rates compared to standard care, with an OR of 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22 to 0.89), indicating a promising therapeutic profile for patients with chronic hyperkalemia. Conversely, while SZC showed no significant differences in hyperkalemia incidence during treatment, it was associated with a higher incidence of edema, likely due to increased sodium absorption. This finding is particularly relevant for patients with concurrent conditions like chronic kidney disease or heart failure. Conclusions of the review indicate SZC may be preferable for acute hyperkalemia due to its rapid potassium-lowering effects, whereas patiromer, with its favorable safety profile and lower risk of edema, may be more suitable for chronic management. The study emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment decisions based on patient-specific factors and the safety profiles of these agents. [5]

References:

[1] Kreitzer N, Albert NM, Amin AN, et al. EMCREG-International Multidisciplinary Consensus Panel on Management of Hyperkalemia in Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure. Cardiorenal Med. 2025;15(1):133-152. doi:10.1159/000543385
[2] Fonseca C, Garagarza C, Silva G, et al. Hyperkalemia management: a multidisciplinary expert panel's perspective on the role of new potassium binders. Heart Fail Rev. 2025;30(2):271-286. doi:10.1007/s10741-024-10461-3
[3] Rafique Z, Liu M, Staggers KA, Minard CG, Peacock WF. Patiromer for Treatment of Hyperkalemia in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(1):54-60. doi:10.1111/acem.13868
[4] Di Palo KE, Sinnett MJ, Goriacko P. Assessment of Patiromer Monotherapy for Hyperkalemia in an Acute Care Setting. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(1):e2145236. Published 2022 Jan 4. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45236
[5] Shrestha DB, Budhathoki P, Sedhai YR, et al. Patiromer and Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate in Treatment of Hyperkalemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2021;95:100635. Published 2021 Jul 5. doi:10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100635

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 5 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the data for patiromer (Veltassa) in acute hyperkalemia treatment, and what doses are recommended?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-5 for your response.


Patiromer for Treatment of Hyperkalemia in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study

Design

Single-center, randomized, open-label convenience sample pilot study

N= 30

Objective

To investigate the potential efficacy and safety of oral patiromer in treating acute hyperkalemia in the emergency department (ED)

Study Groups

Standard of care (n= 15)

Patiromer (n= 15)

Inclusion Criteria

Age ≥ 18, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), serum potassium ≥ 6.0 mEq/L, anticipated to wait for hemodialysis for at least 4 hours

Exclusion Criteria

Significant arrhythmia on electrocardiogram (ECG), known allergy to patiromer, administration of any potassium binder other than study drug, pregnancy

Methods

Patients were randomized to standard of care (SOC) or a single-dose of 25.2 g oral patiromer (PAT) plus standard of care. Patients were observed for up to 10 hours or until hemodialysis. 

Duration

Observation: up to 10 hours

Outcome Measures

Primary: difference in adjusted mean serum potassium between SOC and PAT groups at 6 hours

Secondary: differences between groups in the amount and number of dosages of insulin and albuterol given over 2, 4, and 6 hours

Baseline Characteristics

 

Standard of care (n= 15)

Patiromer (n= 15)

 

Age, years (interquartile range [IQR])

48 (39.0-52.0)

n= 15

41 (36.0-50.0) 

n= 15  

Female

8 (53.3%)

n= 15

5 (33.3%)

n= 15

 

Potassium, mEq/L (standard deviation [SD])

6.7 (± 0.5)  n= 15

6.4 (± 0.5)

n= 15

 

Magnesium, mg/dL (IQR)

2.8 (2.8-3.4)

n= 12

3.1 (2.7-3.4)

n= 13

 

Glucose, mmol/L (IQR)

101 (92.0-112.0)

n= 15

116 (88.0-216.0)

n= 15

 

Results

Endpoint

Standard of care (n= 15)

Patiromer (n= 15)

p-Value

Difference in serum potassium at 6 hours, mEq/L*

6.32   5.81   0.155

Insulin given, IU (IQR)

2 hours

4 hours

6 hours

 

0 (0.0-5.0)

5 (0.0-5.0)

5 (0.0-10.0) 

 

n= 15

n= 15

n= 10

 

0 (0.0-5.0)

0 (0.0-5.0)

5 (0.0-7.0)

 

n= 15

n= 15

n= 9

 

0.622

0.340

0.667

Albuterol given, mg (IQR)

2 hours

4 hours

6 hours

 

 0 (0.0-2.5)

2.5 (0.0-15.0)

12.5 (0.0-17.5)

 

 n= 15

n= 15

n= 10

 

0 (0.0-0.0)

0 (0.0-2.5)

0 (0.0-10.0)

 

 n= 15

n= 15

n= 9

 

0.654

0.141

0.097

Number of interventions (IQR)

2 hours

4 hours

6 hours

 

0 (0.0-1.0)

1 (0.0-2.0)

2 (1.0-3.0)

 

n= 15

n= 15

n= 10

 

0 (0.0-1.0)

0 (0.0-2.0)

1 (0.0-2.0)

 

n= 15

n= 15

n= 9

 

1.000

0.232

0.237

*Difference in serum potassium was significant at 2 hours, with mean serum potassium 6.51 mEq/L in SOC group versus 5.90 mEq/L in PAT group (p= 0.009). 

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal discomfort) reported in 2 patients in SOC and 1 in PAT; hypoglycemia (blood glucose < 70 mg/dL) reported in 3 patients in SOC and 3 in PAT

Serious Adverse Events: N/A

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: N/A

Study Author Conclusions

In this pilot study on the management of ED patients with acute severe hyperkalemia, a single dose of 25.2 g oral patiromer lowered the serum potassium within 2 hours but did not have a sustained effect at 6 hours compared to standard care. Our results are encouraging and support the need for a larger, definitive, multi-center study to establish the role of patiromer in the acute management of hyperkalemia.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This was a small study with limited sample size, lack of blinding, and no power analysis. This is merely a hypothesis-generating pilot study. 

References:

Rafique Z, Liu M, Staggers KA, Minard CG, Peacock WF. Patiromer for Treatment of Hyperkalemia in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(1):54-60. doi:10.1111/acem.13868

 

Assessment of Patiromer Monotherapy for Hyperkalemia in an Acute Care Setting

Design

Retrospective, cohort study

N= 881

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes associated with patiromer as monotherapy in patients with acute hyperkalemia in an acute care setting

Study Groups

Encounters (N= 881)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged 18 years or older who received at least 1 dose of patiromer (8.4 g, 16.8 g, or 25.2 g) for the treatment of an acute non–non-life-threatening hyperkalemia episode defined as a serum potassium level greater than 5.0 mEq/L

Exclusion Criteria

Received a potassium binder for chronic hyperkalemia, indicated by evidence of previous therapy with patiromer, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) documented within the electronic health record in the year before the hospital admission or emergency department visit; received regular insulin in combination with dextrose 3 hours before or after patiromer administration or patients who received patiromer coadministered with furosemide or albuterol; received another dose within 3 hours of any potassium binder

Methods

This study identified electronic health record data from an institution. Hospital and emergency department encounters that contained at least 1 medication order for oral patiromer were evaluated. The dose of oral patiromer was given as one of the following: 8.4 grams, 16.8 grams, or 25.2 grams.

Duration

Encounters: January 30, 2018 to December 30, 2019

Data analysis: June 2020 to February 2021

Outcome Measures

Primary: mean absolute reduction in serum potassium level from baseline at 3 distinct time intervals after patiromer administration (0 to 6 hours, greater than 6 to 12 hours, and greater than 12 to 24 hours)

Secondary: time to second potassium binder, time to insulin dose, incidence of hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia

Baseline Characteristics

 

Encounters (N= 881)

 

Age, years

67.4 ± 14.4  

Male

463 (52.6%)  

Race and Ethnicity

Asian

Hispanic/Latinx

Black

White

 

15 (1.7%)

334 (37.9%)

338 (38.4%)

114 (12.9%)

 

Chronic kidney disease stage

1

3

4

5

 

44 (5.0%)

168 (19.1%)

318 (36.1%)

210 (23.8%)

137 (15.6%) 

 

Hyperkalemia severity (serum potassium level, mEq/L)

Mild (5.1-5.5)

Moderate (5.6-6.4)

Severe (≥6.5)

 

450 (51.0%)

412 (46.8%)

19 (2.2%) 

 

Potassium level, mEq/L

5.6 ± 0.35

 

 Initial patiromer dose, g

 8.4

16.8

25.2

721 (81.8%)

154 (17.5%)

6 (0.7%)

 

Results

Endpoint

Encounters (N= 881)

p-value

Reduction in potassium levels, mEq/L

0 to 6 hours

greater than 6 to 12 hours

greater than 12 to 24 hours

 

0.50 ± 0.56

0.46 ± 0.60 

0.52 ± 0.64

 

< 0.001

<0.001

<0.001

Subsequent potassium binder doses

0

1

2

3

 

725 (82.3%)

137 (15.5%)

13 (1.5%)

6 (0.7%)

-

Time to second potassium binder dose, hours

14.8 ± 5.7

-

Time to first insulin dose, hours

13.5 ± 6.7

-

Hypokalemia 24 hours after first dose

2 (0.2%)

-

Hypomagnesemia 24 hours after first dose

68 (10%) -

There appeared to be a numerically greater reduction in potassium levels associated with patiromer doses of 16.8 g or more compared with 8.4 g at greater than 12 to 24 hours.

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: Not disclosed

Serious Adverse Events: Not disclosed

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: Not disclosed

Study Author Conclusions

These findings suggest that institutional administration of patiromer monotherapy is associated with a significant reduction in potassium levels and a low risk of hypokalemia.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

A key limitation of this study is the lack of a control group; therefore, it is difficult to conclude if observed reductions in potassium levels were associated with patiromer alone. 

 

References:

Di Palo KE, Sinnett MJ, Goriacko P. Assessment of Patiromer Monotherapy for Hyperkalemia in an Acute Care Setting. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(1):e2145236. Published 2022 Jan 4. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45236

 

A Retrospective Study of Patiromer as Adjunct to Insulin Therapy for Acute Hyperkalemia in the Emergency Department

Design

Retrospective, observational cohort study

N= 266

Objective

To assess whether co-administering patiromer with insulin for the management of episodic hyperkalemia in the emgerncy department (ED) enhances potassium reduction during the 4–12 hours following administration.

Study Groups

Patiromer and insulin (n= 133)

Insulin (n= 133)

Inclusion Criteria

Hyperkalemic and treated with at least one intravenous dose of regular insulin (5-12 units)

Exclusion Criteria

Chronic use of potassium binders (outpatient prescription within past 6 months), co-administration of potassium binders in ED, and other forms of insulin therapy administered in the ED

Methods

Patients who received doses of 8.4 g, 16.8 g, or 25.2 g within one hour before or after their insulin dose were categorized as the intervention group. Those without an order for patiromer in the EHR were assigned to the control group. Matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio between groups. 

Duration

July 2018 to July 2023

Outcome Measures

 

Primary: mean change in potassium levels from baseline to the latest value within the 4–12 hour interval

Secondary: adjunct interventions for potassium lowering within the 12 hours following insulin administration, group-level net clinical benefit marker (defined as the mean difference in the number of interventions minus the change in serum potassium), and incidence of hypokalemia

Baseline Characteristics

 

Insulin (n= 133)

Insulin and Patiromer (n= 133)

 

Age, years

 70.89 ± 13.66  70.81 ± 14.28  

Male

 76 (57.1%)  75 (56.4%)  

EGFR

<15 mL/min

15 to 29 mL/min

30 to 45 mL/min

45 to 60 mL/min

>60 mL/min

 34.20 ± 28.47

 45 (33.8%)

 24 (18.0%)

 32 (24.1%)

 10 (7.5%)

 22 (16.5%)

 33.87 ± 28.59

 44 (33.1%)

 25 (18.8%)

 32 (24.1%)

 14 (10.5%)

 18 (13.5%)

 

Dialysis-dependent ESKD

 18 (13.5%)

 18 (13.5%)

 

Hemodialysis order at baseline

 10 (7.5%)

 10 (7.5%)

 

Diabetes mellitus

 56 (42.1%)  63 (47.4%)  

Heart failure

 37 (27.8%)  41 (30.8%)  

Previous RAASi therapy

 19 (14.3%)  19 (14.3%)  

Baseline potassium, mEq/L

  6.19 ± 0.52  6.20 ± 0.53  

Initial insulin dose of 5 units

 64 (48.1%)  64 (48.1%)  

Initial insulin dose of 8-12 units

 69 (51.9%)  69 (51.9%)  

Coadministration of albuterol

 49 (36.8%)  53 (39.8%)  

Coadministration of calcium

 74 (55.6%)  71 (53.4%)  

ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; RAASi, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor

The most common patiromer dose was 8.4 g (66.2%), with some patients receiving 16.8 g (27.8%) or 25.2 g (6.0%), primarily administered orally.

Results

Endpoint

Insulin (n= 133)

Insulin and Patiromer (n= 133)

p-value

Change in potassium at 12 hours, mEq/L

 -0.98 ± 0.75  -0.90 ± 0.85  0.508

Adjunctive interventions

Additional insulin doses

Additional albuterol doses

Additional hemodialysis orders

Additional potassium binder doses

 

 0.53 ± 0.91

 0.27 ± 0.66

 11 (8.3%)

 0.20 ± 0.48

 

 0.35 ± 0.58

 0.20 ± 0.52

 13 (9.8%)

 0.15 ± 0.36

 

 0.066

 0.355

 0.831

 0.389

Net clinical benefit

 0.30 ± 1.84

 0.05 ± 1.47

 0.344

Hypokalemia incidence

At 12 hours

At 24 hours

 

 0 (0%)

 1 (1.0%)

 

 1 (1.3%)

 1 (0.9%)

 

 1

 0.902

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: Author did not include hypoglycemia as a potential adverse event due to limitations in study design. See above for hypokalemia.

Serious Adverse Events: not disclosed

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: not disclosed

Study Author Conclusions

The authors concluded that concurrent administration of patiromer did not result in more sustained potassium reduction compared to insulin alone in the overall cohort. The trend in favor of adjunct patiromer in the subgroup with adequate renal function warrants further investigation.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

A limitation of this study is the inability to distinguish ESKD from acute kidney injury and the exclusion of hypoglycemia as an adverse event.



References:

Goriacko P, Golestaneh L, Di Palo KE. A Retrospective Study of Patiromer as Adjunct to Insulin Therapy for Acute Hyperkalemia in the Emergency Department. Open Access Emerg Med. 2024;16:305-312. Published 2024 Dec 5. doi:10.2147/OAEM.S478693

Comparison of Patiromer to Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate in Acute Hyperkalemia

Design

Retrospective, single-center, quality improvement project

N= 99

Objective

To compare the potassium reduction of patiromer to sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) within 6 to 24 hours following a single dose

Study Groups

Patiromer (n= 49)

SPS (n= 50)

Inclusion Criteria

Received 1 dose of either patiromer or SPS, had second potassium level drawn within 6 to 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria

Received more than 1 dose of study drug within 24 hours, received both study drugs within 24 hours, received fludrocortisone within 24 hours, underwent hemodialysis for hyperkalemia, diagnosis of acute kidney injury 

Methods

Patient data charts were analyzed for inclusion. Renal status was determined by the provider with the presence of acute kidney injury (exclusion criteria) determined by the RIFLE criteria. Doses of patiromer and SPS were categorized as low dose or high dose. Low dose was defined a 8.4 g of patiromer or 15 g of SPS. High dose was defined as 16.8 g of patiromer and 30 g of SPS.

Duration

Data collection period: May 1, 2017 to March 31, 2019

Duration: within 24 hours

Outcome Measures

Primary: average potassium reduction at the time to recheck potassium values in all groups, low dose group, and high dose group

Baseline Characteristics

 

Patiromer (n= 49)

SPS (n= 50)

 p-Value  

Age, years

60 ± 13.5 62 ± 14.8 0.58   

Male

21 (43%) 27 (54%) 0.75   

Body mass index, kg/m2

29.9 ± 8.5 28.9 ± 7.1 0.52   

Comorbidities

Diabetes mellitus

Congestive heart failure

Cirrhosis

 

28 (57%)

9 (18%)

2 (4%)

 

29 (58%)

16 (32%)

3 (6%)

 

0.93

0.12

1.00

 

Serum measurements

Pre-dose K, mg/dL

Pre-dose serum creatining (Scr), mg/dL

Pre-dose Ca, mg/dL

 

5.6

2.6

8.5

 

5.7

2.07

8.6

 

0.08

0.11

0.21

 

Renal status

Normal

CKD

ESRD

Transplant

 

11 (22%)

16 (33%)

15 (31%)

7 (14%)

 

14 (28%)

21 (42%)

9 (18%)

6 (12%)

0.46  

Diet

Regular

Low K/CKD

Tube feeds

Nephro

 

22 (45%)

22 (45%)

4 (8%)

1 (2%)

 

37 (74%)

11 (22%)

0

2 (4%)

<0.05  

Emergency department

0 10 (20%) <0.05  

Time to recheck potassium levels, hours

11.9 (5.0) 14.6 (4.9)    

Results

Endpoint

Patiromer (n= 49)

SPS (n= 50)

Difference (95% Confidence interval [CI])

p-Value

Average potassium reduction in all groups, mEq/L (SD)

0.32 (0.65) 0.76 (0.63) 0.44 (0.18 to 0.69) 0.001

Average potassium reduction in high-dose groups, mEq/L (SD)

n= 18

0.43 (0.62)

n= 31

0.84 (0.71)

0.40 (0 to 0.81)

0.052

Average potassium reduction in low-dose group, mEq/L (SD)

n= 31

0.26 (0.67)

n= 19

0.64 (0.47)

0.26 (0.01 to 0.51) 0.038

Adverse Events

N/A

Study Author Conclusions

This study suggests a clinically significant reduction in potassium with SPS compared to patiromer. Although SPS was successful in demonstrating this outcome, due to well-documented adverse reactions in the literature and a time to onset of 6 hours, it cannot be recommended for use in acute hyperkalemia either.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Baseline potassium levels averaged as 5.6 and 5.7 mEq/L in the patiromer and SPS groups, which may be considered as mild hyperkalemia. Therefore, treatment effect on those with moderate or severe hyperkalemia warrants further investigation. Twenty percent of patients in the SPS group presented in the emergency department versus zero in the patiromer group which could have influenced other factors such as the standard and quality of care the SPS group received. Safety data could not be retrieved and presents a major concern not answered by this study.
References:

Nguyen PT, Kataria VK, Sam TR, Hooper K, Mehta AN. Comparison of patiromer to sodium polystyrene sulfonate in acute hyperkalemia. Hosp Pharm. Published online August 5, 2021:00185787211037552.

 

Effectiveness of Patiromer Versus Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate for the Management of Acute Hyperkalemia

Design

Single-center, retrospective, observational study

N= 200

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of patiromer versus sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in reducing serum potassium in acute hyperkalemia

Study Groups

Patiromer (n= 110)

SZC (n= 100)

Inclusion Criteria

Adults aged ≥18 years who experienced acute hyperkalemia (serum potassium ≥5.5 mEq/L) at any point during hospitalization and received at least one dose of patiromer or SZC

Exclusion Criteria

Prior treatment with both patiromer or SZC within the same 24-hour period or treatment with sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS); receiving SZC as a home medication or receiving patiromer and SZC at a rehabilitation facility; did not have a follow-up nonhemolyzed potassium level within 24 hours of administration of patiromer or SZC; had ileus or gastrointestinal obstruction; underwent renal replacement therapy (RRT) prior to follow-up potassium levels or within 6 hours of patiromer or SZC administration; potassium levels obtained less than 6 hours after administration of patiromer or SZC

Methods

Data were collected from patient electronic medical records. Electrolytes, including sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium, were collected at baseline and 6 to 24 hours after administration of patiromer or SZC. Concurrent potassium-lowering therapies received within 24 hours of hyperkalemia onset were also collected, including nebulized albuterol, intravenous (IV) loop diuretics, IV fluids, IV sodium bicarbonate, and insulin.

Duration

Electronic medical record screening: May 2020 to December 2022

Outcome Measures

Primary: Reduction in potassium level from baseline to after treatment with patiromer or SZC

Secondary: Mean electrolyte changes per medication, total dosage of patiromer or SZC within 24 hours after hyperkalemia onset

Baseline Characteristics

Characteristic

Patiromer (n= 110)

SZC (n= 100)

 

Age, years

74.4 ± 13.5 73.1 ± 13.2  

Female, n

49 42  

White race, n

86 79  

Length of stay, days

12.5 ± 12.0 12.6 ± 12.7  

Laboratory values

Sodium, mEq/L

Potassium, mEq/L

Magnesium, mEq/L

Calcium, mEq/L

Serum creatinine, mg/dL

 

134.8 ± 6.0

6.4 ± 0.5

2.5 ± 1.0 

8.7 ± 0.8 

2.6 ± 2.0 

 

134.4 ± 5.2

6.0 ± 0.4

2.3 ± 0.4 

8.7 ± 0.8 

3.6 ± 3.5 

 

Patiromer dosage, n

8.4 g

16.8 g

25.2 g

33.6 g

 

54

34

9

3

N/A

 

Results

Endpoint

Patiromer (n= 110)

SZC (n= 100)

p-value

Reduction in potassium from baseline (95% confidence interval [CI])

 -1.2 (-2.3 to -0.2) -0.8 (-1.0 to -0.7)  0.464

Mean electrolyte changes (95% CI)

Sodium (n= 100)

Magnesium (n= 63)

Calcium (n= 84)

 

0.1 (-0.5 to 0.8)

-0.1 (-0.4 to 0.2)

0.1 (-0.1 to 0.1)

 

0.3 (-0.3 to 0.9)

-0.1 (-0.4 to 0.2)

-0.2 (-0.3 to -0.1) 

 ---

Adverse Events

Not disclosed

Study Author Conclusions

This study represents the first head-to-head comparison of patiromer and SZC in the setting of acute hyperkalemia. No difference in effectiveness between patiromer and SZC in reducing serum potassium was seen. Both agents can be considered in acute hyperkalemia management.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

A key limitation of this study was the lack of safety data.



References:

Rydell A, Thackrey C, Molki M, Mullins BP. Effectiveness of Patiromer Versus Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate for the Management of Acute Hyperkalemia. Ann Pharmacother. 2024;58(8):790-795. doi:10.1177/10600280231209968