Is there data supporting the use of a 2nd dose of glucarpidase for elevated methotrexate levels?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Available data regarding the use of a 2nd dose of glucarpidase for elevated methotrexate levels suggest variable effects on serum methotrexate concentration. Glucarpidase has shown effectiveness in rapidly reducing methotrexate levels, achieving reductions of >95% in most cases following initial dosing. Repeat dosing may be considered in certain circumstances, but should be given at least 48 hours after the initial dose due to continued activity on circulated methotrexate during that time frame. Findings in studies evaluating a second dose have been inconsistent, with additional reductions in methotrexate levels observed in some, but not all, cases. A potential concern with repeat glucarpidase doses is immunogenicity through the formation of antibodies. Repeated doses of glucarpidase appear to be safe based on available studies including a case report of a patient receiving glucarpidase after high-dose MTX in two different cycles without any adverse effects (see Table 1). Overall, while a second dose of glucarpidase has been administered in specific situations, evidence supporting its consistent efficacy appears limited.

Background

A 2017 guideline from an expert consensus group provides recommendations for use of glucarpidase in patients who develop high‐dose methotrexate (HDMTX)‐induced nephrotoxicity and delayed methotrexate excretion. The activity of glucarpidase on circulating MTX persists for 48 hours. However, rebound of plasma MTX can occur as the activity wanes and MTX redistributes to circulation from tissues. Therefore, if a second dose is considered, the guidelines recommend that glucarpidase should not be repeated within 48 hours of the first dose due to decreased efficacy. If urgent treatment is still needed, leucovorin rescue may be considered after 2 hours of the first glucarpidase dose. [1]

A 2014 pooled analysis of four compassionate-use trials evaluated glucarpidase in 476 patients with delayed methotrexate elimination due to acute kidney injury, of whom 169 were included in the efficacy analysis. Among these, 118 (69.8%) received a single dose of glucarpidase, 45 (26.6%) received a second dose, and 6 (3.6%) received a third dose. Median pre-glucarpidase plasma methotrexate concentration was 11.7 µmol/L, with a ≥95% reduction achieved in 136 (87%) of 156 patients at a median of 15 minutes post-glucarpidase. The median methotrexate concentration at each subsequent time point (15 minutes to day 8) was <0.54 µmol/L, corresponding to a ≥97% reduction. Rapid and sustained clinically important reduction (RSCIR) to ≤1 µmol/L was achieved in 83 of 140 patients (59%), with patients starting at concentrations ≥50 µmol/L less likely to achieve RSCIR. A second glucarpidase dose ≥48 hours after the first dose reduced methotrexate levels further in 8 patients, with reductions widely ranging from 8% to 97%. Additionally, renal recovery was assessed in 436 patients, with serum creatinine concentrations rising from a mean of 0.79 mg/dL pre-methotrexate to 2.79 mg/dL pre-glucarpidase and declining to a mean of 1.27 mg/dL by day 22 (n= 148). Furthermore, of 410 patients with CTCAE grade ≥2 renal impairment, 262 (63.9%) recovered to grade 0 or 1, with a median recovery time of 12.5 days. Overall, these data may indicate the potential for additional glucarpidase doses to contribute to methotrexate clearance in select cases, despite diminishing returns. [2]

A 2014 review assessed the effectiveness and safety of glucarpidase in managing delayed methotrexate clearance due to renal dysfunction in patients receiving high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX). The evaluation encompassed five non-randomized, prospective trials and one retrospective study and included patients with a serum creatinine increase of ≥50% from baseline or a creatinine clearance <60 mL/min. Overall, glucarpidase, administered as a single dose of 50 units/kg, demonstrated a >97% reduction in serum methotrexate concentrations (sMTX) within 15 minutes of administration across studies, as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Yet this did not always translate to clinically meaningful outcomes as the results were inconsistently reported. One study reported glucarpidase doses given every 4 hours for 3 doses in the first 6 patients enrolled. It was discovered that there was no additional sMTX reduction with repeated doses so subsequent patients were defaulted to one dose of glucarpidase with the option of a second dose at least 24 hours after the first if sMTX levels were still elevated. Two patients received second doses of glucarpidase 4 and 5 days after the first dose. One had a reduction of sMTX from 4.2 to 1.6 μmol/L while the other had no reduction in sMTX. Overall, while glucarpidase is effective in drastically reducing sMTX in renal dysfunction, further randomized trials are warranted to assess its impact on long-term clinical benefits. [3]

A 2012 review of glucarpidase examined its use in patients with delayed methotrexate elimination due to renal dysfunction, including cases involving second doses. Across studies, patients with plasma methotrexate concentrations exceeding specific thresholds (e.g., >100 mcmol/L) were eligible for glucarpidase administration. In one single-arm, open-label study of 22 patients, 45% (95% confidence interval 27% to 65%) of patients achieved RSCIR in plasma methotrexate levels to ≤1 µmol/L after one dose. A second dose was given to patients with initial concentrations >100 µmol/L, but no additional patients achieved RSCIR. In another retrospective review of 1,141 patients, 22 required glucarpidase, with second doses administered to 28 patients due to persistently elevated levels, though further reductions were not observed. Similarly, in another trial involving 82 patients, 9 received a second dose, and one received a third, with methotrexate concentrations reduced by approximately 97% after the initial dose but limited additional reductions after subsequent doses. Overall, the findings suggested that the benefits of additional dosing were variable, with limited efficacy demonstrated beyond the first dose. [4]

A 2024 multicenter, open-label, phase II trial evaluated the use of glucarpidase for patients experiencing delayed MTX elimination after high-dose MTX therapy. This investigation comprised two studies: the CPG2-PII study and the OP-07-001 study. Glucarpidase was administered at a dose of 50 U/kg for 15 and 4 patients, respectively, in the two studies. In the CPG2-PII trial, patients with an MTX concentration ≥1 µmol/L, according to local laboratory results at 48 h after the first dose, could receive a second dose of 50 U/kg glucarpidase, whereas the OP-07-001 only allowed a single dose. The OP-07-001 study employed citric acid-treated blood samples to ensure the inactivation of glucarpidase during measurement, thus addressing potential overestimation artifacts noted in earlier trials. Results demonstrated that the rate of CIR, defined as plasma MTX levels below 1 µmol/L maintained for at least 5 days, was 76.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 46.2 to 95.0%) in the CPG2-PII study. The median reduction rate of plasma MTX was 98.83% in the OP-07-001 study. Despite rebound MTX concentrations observed after 48 hours, levels remained substantially lower than pretreatment values in most cases, confirming glucarpidase’s efficacy and tolerability for managing MTX toxicity in Japanese patients with delayed clearance. Of note, among four out of 13 patients in the CPG2-PII study administered a second dose, two achieved CIR (50.0%; 95%CI 6.8 to 93.2). The authors noted that while a second dose of glucarpidase may have clinical significance depending on initial MTX levels, its use should be carefully considered in light of drug costs, with popPK analysis and Bayesian MTX rebound estimation potentially aiding early decision-making. [5]

References:

[1] Ramsey LB, Balis FM, O'Brien MM, et al. Consensus Guideline for Use of Glucarpidase in Patients with High-Dose Methotrexate Induced Acute Kidney Injury and Delayed Methotrexate Clearance. Oncologist. 2018;23(1):52-61. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0243
[2] Widemann BC, Schwartz S, Jayaprakash N, et al. Efficacy of glucarpidase (carboxypeptidase g2) in patients with acute kidney injury after high-dose methotrexate therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34(5):427-439. doi:10.1002/phar.1360
[3] Cavone JL, Yang D, Wang A. Glucarpidase Intervention for Delayed Methotrexate Clearance. Ann Pharmacother. 2014;48(7):897-907. doi:10.1177/1060028014526159
[4] Cada DJ, Demaris K, Levien TL, Baker DE. Glucarpidase. Hosp Pharm. 2012;47(6):463-470. doi:10.1310/hpj4706-463
[5] Ogawa A, Kawamoto H, Hara J, et al. Phase 2 study of glucarpidase in patients with delayed methotrexate elimination after high-dose methotrexate therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2024;94(1):89-101. doi:10.1007/s00280-024-04664-6

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

Is there data supporting the use of a 2nd dose of glucarpidase for elevated methotrexate levels?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Table 1 for your response.


 

A Second Administration of Glucarpidase in a Different Cycle of High-Dose Methotrexate: Is it Safe and Effective in Adults?

Design

Case report

Case presentation

A 30-year-old male with acute lymphoblastic T-cell lymphoma received high-dose methotrexate therapy during two separate treatment cycles, both complicated by delayed methotrexate elimination and nephrotoxicity. During the first consolidation cycle, he received methotrexate 5 g/m² IV, along with Vincristine and pegylated L-Asparaginase (L-ASA), which resulted in acute pancreatitis, a 30 cm pancreatic collection, and mild renal impairment with slow methotrexate elimination.

Renal function recovered following increased leucovorin dosing and supportive care. During the third consolidation cycle, the patient received methotrexate 3 g/m² IV, leading to slow methotrexate elimination (48-hour methotrexate concentration: 5 µmol/L), increased serum creatinine (from 0.6 to 1.2 mg/dL), hepatic toxicity, and myelosuppression. Glucarpidase (2000 IU) was administered, reducing methotrexate levels from 0.2 to 0.04 µmol/L within one hour, though levels rebounded to 0.11 µmol/L after 48 hours before progressively decreasing.

Sixty days after salvage therapy for relapse, the patient received methotrexate 3.5 g/m² IV and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), which resulted in elevated methotrexate levels (200 µmol/L at 24 hours, 100 µmol/L at 36 hours) and increased serum creatinine (from 0.53 to 1.89 mg/dL). Ara-C was discontinued, and a second dose of glucarpidase (2000 IU) was administered. Methotrexate levels decreased to 9 µmol/L at 48 hours, and renal function improved progressively, normalizing over three weeks.

No adverse events were noted following either glucarpidase administration. Of note, this case included detailed methotrexate measurements and treatment protocols, providing data on glucarpidase use in two separate cycles of methotrexate therapy without observed complications.

Study Author Conclusions

Methotrexate nephrotoxicity is a rare but severe complication of high-dose methotrexate therapy and even nowadays it can be life-threatening. Supportive measures include leucovorin therapy together with urine alkalization and intensive hydration. Glucarpidase is a relatively new agent that can quickly reduce extracellular high-dose methotrexate to safe levels. Although in recent years observational studies have shown that, if administered early, glucarpidase reduces the development of severe toxicity, it still carries a significant financial burden and there are no randomized clinical data to support its use.

Moreover, the effectiveness and safety of the use of glucarpidase in different episodes of nephrotoxicity remain an unknown area, and the rate and consequences of AGA formation remain poorly understood. We think that this case brings interesting and original information about the safety and efficacy of a second glucarpidase administration in two different high-dose methotrexate cycles in adult patients.

References:

Domingo-González A, Osorio S, Landete E, Monsalvo S, Díez-Martín JL. A second administration of glucarpidase in a different cycle of high-dose methotrexate: Is it safe and effective in adults?. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021;27(3):734-738. doi:10.1177/1078155220946464