A 2021 review discussed the relationship between metabolic syndrome and supplementation with vitamin B complex, particularly folic acid (B9) and vitamin B12. Existing literature reports a positive association with folic acid and B12 for reduction of cardiovascular disease and insulin resistance. The involvement of these two B vitamins on metabolic processes is based on their role in mitochondrial pathways, and deficiencies in their levels may have downstream metabolic implications. While some studies have supported folate supplementation for reduction in insulin resistance, results may be inconsistent, and definitive dosing related information has not been established. Most relevant studies used to support the role of either of these B vitamins in metabolic syndrome are based on studies assessing dietary intake or baseline low serum levels. In addition to reduction of insulin resistance, such studies have observed low levels of folate and/or B12 are associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and atherosclerosis. Still, further clinical studies must be conducted to explore dosing recommendations for these vitamins, as well as risk of adverse effects associated with their use. [1]
A 2023 prospective cohort study assessed the association between the incidence of metabolic syndrome and folate, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 serum levels. Black and White young adults (n= 1240) across the United States were enrolled from 1985-1986 and followed up until 2015-2016. Follow-up exams were conducted at years 2, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 years. Incidence of metabolic syndrome was evaluated by collecting waist circumference, blood pressure (BP) and serum concentrations of folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, homocysteine (Hyc), triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and fasting plasma glucose. Additionally, physical activity and vitamin B dietary and supplemental intake was assessed. Multiple sensitivity analyses were carried out to reduce potential confounding factors. Of 1240 participants, individuals with characteristics that predisposed to higher consumption of vitamin B include females, caucasians, the higher educated, never-smokers, and those with reduced alcohol intake. These individuals were associated with lower BMI, systolic BP, waist circumference, triglycerides (folate and vitamin B12), serum Hyc, and higher HDL-C at baseline. Compared to the lowest quintile of each energy-adjusted vitamin B intake, incidence of metabolic syndrome in the highest quintile was lower by 61% in those with folate intake (hazards ratio [HR] 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.49; p< 0.001), 39% with vitamin B6 intake (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.46-0.81; p< 0.002), and 26% for vitamin B12 (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.58-0.95; p< 0.008). Metabolic syndrome was inversely associated with serum concentrations of all vitamins, including folate (HR 0.23; 95% CI 0.17-0.33; p<0.001), B6 (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34-0.67; p<0.001) and B12 (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.51-0.96; p= 0.01). For vitamin B12, the inverse association with metabolic syndrome was only observed in those who were taking supplements. Strengths of this study included longitudinal follow-up, balanced baseline characteristics, and comprehensive analysis of dietary and supplemental vitamin intake along with physical activity. Limitations included the observational nature of this study (unable to conclude causal inference) and exclusion of evaluating for genetic risk factors that could influence vitamin B metabolism and incidence of metabolic syndrome. This study concluded that intake of vitamin B may be recommended for the prevention of metabolic syndrome, however further larger, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and establish causal inference. [2]
A 2020 database analysis investigated the relationship between dietary vitamin B1, B2, niacin, B6, B12, and dietary folate equivalents and incidence of metabolic syndrome. The study compiled data using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), encompassing a total of 8,077 patients. The NHANES collected measurements for weight, height, and waist circumference based on National Institute of Health guidelines; the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome was based on patients meeting one of three following thresholds: (1) elevated blood pressure; (2) high triglyceride; (3) reduced HDL cholesterol; (4) elevated fasting glucose and (5) abdominal obesity. Assessment of dietary B vitamin intake was based on 24-hour recall reviews, one conducted in person and the second via telephone over the following days; results of these two assessments were averaged. Patients were then identified based on those with metabolic syndrome and those without. Overall, approximately 39% of included patients were documented to have metabolic syndrome; when comparing baseline characteristics, significant differences were observed between patients with and without metabolic syndrome based on age, race, education level, annual household income, smoking status, drinking status, dietary energy intake, and level of physical activity. Based on multivariate analysis, higher intake of vitamin B1, B2, niacin, B6, and folate were all associated with reduced risk of metabolic syndrome. For vitamin B1, significantly reduced risk was associated with dosing ≥ 2.79 mg/day; B2, ≥ 2.26 mg/day; niacin ≥ 40.25 mg/day; B6 ≥ 4.09 mg/day; and folate ≥ 1,057 mg/day. Overall, moderate intake levels of B1, B12, and higher intake levels of B2 and B3 were inversely associated with triglyceride levels. Similarly, higher intakes of B1, B2, and B6 were related with high HDL cholesterol levels, and moderate niacin was inversely associated with elevated fasting glucose. Higher intakes of vitamin B1, B2, niacin, B6, and folate were also all inversely associated with abdominal obesity. While the current study demonstrates decreased risk of many aspects of metabolic syndrome associated with several B vitamins, the derived association may not be considered casual due to the study design. Furthermore, the data were limited to dietary intake of B vitamins, with no consideration of supplements or proposed dosages for supplementation, whether in regard to beneficial effects or undesired side effects. [3]
Hypervitaminosis with B vitamins has not been attributed to worsening tremors or muscle weakness. However, hypervitaminosis with vitamin B9 (folic acid) has been associated with tonic convulsions in the gastric muscles. Prolonged use of vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) supplements at a dose of 300 to 500 mg/day has been reported to cause severe and progressive sensory neuropathy with ataxia based on case reports, as well as painful skin rashes, photosensitivity, nausea, and heartburn. The severity of symptoms is thought to be dose-dependent. Excessive doses are suggested to cause damage to sensory neurons resulting in paresthesia in the hands and feet, difficulty in walking, tiredness, and reduced sensation to touch. Additional morbidity includes dermatoses, photosensitivity, dizziness, and nausea with long-term intake of dosages above 250 mg/day, as well as ataxia and dysesthesias. [4], [5]
A 2019 review notes that sustained very high doses of pyridoxine can cause a severe toxic sensory ataxic neuropathy (ganglionopathy). Limited data have observed doses exceeding 200 mg daily, and probably much higher in most cases, seem to be required for toxicity. There is little evidence to suggest, however, that pyridoxine intoxication causes predominantly sensory or sensorimotor axonal polyneuropathy. [6]
The effects of Metanx, a prescription medical food containing active folate, vitamin B6, and B12, were assessed in a 2016 pre-post survey study (N= 544). Adult patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy naive to Metanx were enrolled in the study, with surveys conducted prior to initiation and 12 weeks after Metanx use. Patients' neuropathic symptoms were assessed using a modified 6-item Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (NTSS-6) questionnaire; pain rating and quality of life were assessed using a 0 to 10 scale, with 0 indicating no pain or no life disruption and 10 indicating the worst possible pain or complete life disruption. Metanx use was associated with significant reduction in NTSS-6 score (reduced deep aching pain, burning pain, prickling feeling, numbness, lancinating pain, and allodynia), pain severity, and quality of life disruption (p<0.05). There were no reports of increasing neurologic symptoms such as tremors or muscle weakness. The study is inherently limited by its design and patients were allowed to use other medications concomitantly for their neuropathy, which could also be a confounding factor. [7]