What is the evidence for using gabapentin in non-neuropathic pain?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

The evidence supporting gabapentin for non-neuropathic pain is mixed and context-dependent. Some small RCTs and observational studies suggest modest benefit in functional dyspepsia, perioperative pain, or opioid-sparing effects, while others show no significant analgesic advantages (e.g., rib fractures, burns, arthroscopic surgery) and highlight risks such as sedations, dizziness, and delirium in older adults. Guidelines and more recent meta-analyses suggest that gabapentin may be considered as part of a multimodal pain management approach in the perioperative setting, particularly to reduce the acute postoperative pain and opioid requirements.

Background

The American Pain Society (APA) guidelines on the management of postoperative pain suggest components of multimodal pain regimen for commonly performed surgeries (e.g., thoracotomy, open laparotomy, total hip replacement, total knee replacement, spinal fusion, cesarean section, CABG) which largely consists of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or acetaminophen, gabapentin or pregabalin, and intravenous (IV) ketamine. The guidelines did not provide the protocol, given that the exact components of multimodal pain regimens depend on the individuals and surgical procedures involved. [1]

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting strongly recommend around-the-clock acetaminophen, COX-2 selective NSAIDs, or nonselective NSAIDs for postoperative multimodal pain management. Regional blockade with local anesthetics and calcium channel alpha-2 antagonists (i.e., gabapentin and pregabalin) is suggested as part of the postoperative management as well. This guideline considers acute pain as pain that is present in a surgical patient after a procedure that may be the result of trauma from the procedure or procedure-related complications. [2]

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Guideline for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery has identified gabapentin as an option for reducing postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and side effects. However, there is no established optimal dose or frequency of administration for gabapentin as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. [3]

A 2023 meta-analysis examined the efficacy of gabapentin on postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A total of 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,068 patients were evaluated. Patients were 18-60 years old and underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gabapentin was given 1 or 2 hours before the surgery, with doses varying across the studies. The primary outcome was assessed based on data from 7 RCTs (n= 382 patients), finding cumulative pain scores in the first 24 hours was significantly lower in patients treated with gabapentin compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] -1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.39 to 0.99; p<0.00011; I2 = 96%). Secondary outcomes assessed included opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), incidence of sedation, and incidence of somnolence. Gabepentin reduced postoperative opioid consumption by an average of 3.51 mg (MD -3.51; 95% CI -4.67 to -2.35; p<0.00001; 9 RCTs; n= 1,096). The time to first analgesia rescue was significantly longer with gabapentin compared to placebo (210.9 minutes longer for time to first rescue; MD 210.9; 95% CI 76.90 to 344.91; p= 0.002; 5 RCTs, n= 330). The incidence of PONV was lower in gabapentin compared to placebo (35% vs. 55%; risk ratio [RR] 0.64; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.78; p<0.00001; 4 RCTs; n= 507). There was no difference in the incidence of sedation (RR 1.70; 95% CI 0.62 to 4.65; p= 0.31) or incidence of somnolence (RR 1.26; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.74; p= 0.16) between gabapentin and placebo. Lastly, no difference was seen in the incidence of respiratory depression (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.007 to 2.84; p= 0.38). This pooled evidence indicates that gabapentin can significantly reduce postoperative pain in the first 24 hours after surgery, lower the overall opioid consumption, and reduce the incidence of PONV. There were little or no effects on the incidence of sedation, somnolence, and respiratory depression. Gabapentin may be considered as a component of multimodal management of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. [4]

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of preoperative gabapentin in bariatric surgical patients. Four articles were included, with a total of 283 participants who completed surgery via a laparoscopic approach; all patients had a body mass index >35 kg/m2. Studies varied in the type of bariatric surgery (e.g., sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass), dose of gabapentin (e.g., 100 or 1,200 mg), and timing of gabapentin administration (2 hours before surgery, immediately before surgery, or during surgery). Gabapentin use significantly reduced the cumulative pain score (0-10 pain scale) within the first 24 hours post-surgery by an average of 1.04 (MD -1.04; 95% CI -1.45 to 0.63; p<0.00001; I2= 90%); however, there was notable heterogeneity that did not resolve after a subgroup and sensitivity analysis. There was a reduction in overall morphine equivalent use by 7.89 mg (MD -7.89; 95% CI 13.56 to 2.2; p= 0.006; I2= 97%). Gabapentin use was not found to impact the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38 to 1.00; p= 0.05; I2= 3%), dizziness (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.40 to 2.54; p= 0.99; I2= 0%), or headache (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.25 to 2.30; p= 0.62; I2= 0%). Incidence of sedation could not be evaluated due to variable data. This study was limited in that it had high levels of heterogeneity, imprecision of the effect size, and potential publication bias. This study found gabapentin to be beneficial in the management of postoperative bariatric surgery; however, additional studies with homogeneity and larger sample sizes would help to support this study’s results. [5]

A 2020 review on pain management in plastic surgery suggests gabapentin can be given the night before an operation (usually 600 mg) and as a preoperative dose (300 mg) to reduce total opioid use and pain scores within the first 24 postoperative hours. Options for postoperative use include 300 mg TID in patients younger than 65 years (or BID if older than 65 years), but there is a lack of evidence on post-surgery gabapentin dosing and/or effectiveness. [6]

Another 2020 meta-analysis on managing acute postoperative pain suggests there is no clinically significant analgesic effect for the perioperative use of gabapentinoids, nor was there any effect on preventing postoperative chronic pain. This analysis included 281 RCTs (N = 24,682 participants) comparing gabapentinoids to controls for postoperative surgical pain. The studies initiated either gabapentin or pregabalin between 1 week before surgery to 12 hours postoperation. Results found that gabapentinoid administration resulted in slightly lower postoperative pain scores up to 48 hours after surgery, but not at 72 hours. The authors deemed this to not be clinically significant, as the results ranged below the minimally important difference (10 points out of 100) for each time point. Gabapentinoid use also lowered postoperative nausea and vomiting, but was associated with more dizziness and visual disturbance. The authors conclude that results do not support the routine use of pregabalin or gabapentin for the management of postoperative pain in adult patients. The results of this analysis come with high heterogeneity, owing to the diversity of surgery types, differences in dosage/timing of gabapentinoid use, and the variety of comparators (placebo, active controls, and standard of care). [7]

Based on a review article, animal data illustrate inhibition of visceral nociception and gastrointestinal (GI) function by gabapentin; however, limited clinical human data are available to support the findings in such animal studies. A study showed that despite no significant reduction in the baseline average daily pain scores between the placebo and gabapentin groups in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients, gabapentin significantly increased sensory thresholds for pain (p=0.048). The authors call for larger clinical studies to be conducted to establish its benefits in alleviating visceral pain. [8]

A 2022 RCT evaluated the efficacy of gabapentin and duloxetine in patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study included 150 patients who were randomized to receive gabapentin (300-600 mg/day), duloxetine (30-60 mg/day), or acetaminophen (1000-2000 mg/day) over three months. Both gabapentin and duloxetine significantly reduced pain severity scores, measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), compared to acetaminophen at one month and three months (p<0.001), with no significant difference between gabapentin and duloxetine. Functional status scores, measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), decreased significantly more with gabapentin and duloxetine than with acetaminophen by three months (p<0.001), with gabapentin reaching maximal effect by three months. Early improvements in pain and function were faster with duloxetine. Adverse events occurred in 9/50 (18%) of gabapentin patients (dry mouth, drowsiness, fatigue) and 8/50 of duloxetine patients, with none in the acetaminophen group. Overall, these findings indicate that gabapentin can provide significant pain relief and functional improvement in knee OA, with a delayed onset of effect relative to duloxetine. [9]

References:

[1] Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, et al. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council [published correction appears in J Pain. 2016 Apr;17(4):508-10. Dosage error in article text]. J Pain. 2016;17(2):131-157. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008
[2] American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):248-273. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1030
[3] Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations--Part II. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140(2):323-332. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.019
[4] Froehlich KA, Deleon ZG, Tubog TD. Effects of Gabapentin on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Perianesth Nurs. 2024;39(1):132-141. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2023.06.005
[5] Tubog TD, Harmer CM, Bramble RS, Bayaua NE, Mijares M. Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin on Postoperative Pain Management After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Perianesth Nurs. 2023;38(2):322-330. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2022.04.017
[6] Schoenbrunner AR, Janis JE. Pain management in plastic surgery. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 2020;47(2):191-201. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2019.12.001
[7] Verret M, Lauzier F, Zarychanski R, et al. Perioperative Use of Gabapentinoids for the Management of Postoperative Acute Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [published correction appears in Anesthesiology. 2020 Aug 21;:null]. Anesthesiology. 2020;133(2):265-279. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003428
[8] Gale JD, Houghton LA. Alpha 2 delta (α(2)δ) ligands, gabapentin and pregabalin: what is the evidence for potential use of these ligands in irritable bowel syndrome. Front Pharmacol. 2011;2:28. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2011.00028.
[9] Enteshari-Moghaddam A, Azami A, Isazadehfar K, Mohebbi H, Habibzadeh A, Jahanpanah P. Efficacy of duloxetine and gabapentin in pain reduction in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(10):2873-2880. doi:10.1007/s10067-019-04573-7

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 10 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the evidence for using gabapentin in non-neuropathic pain?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-10 for your response.


Evaluating the Effect of Oral Gabapentin on the Improvement of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia Resistant to Conventional Treatments

Design

Randomized, double-blinded clinical trial

N=126

Objective

To evaluate the effect of oral gabapentin on the improvement of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) resistant to conventional treatments.

Study Groups

Omeprazole (n=63)

Omeprazole + Gabapentin (n=63)

Inclusion Criteria

Adults aged 40–60 years, diagnosed with FD based on the Rome IV criteria, satisfied to participate in the present study.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with sensitivity to gabapentin or serious side effects from gabapentin usage.

Methods

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to either receive omeprazole 20 mg PO once daily plus gabapentin 300 mg PO BID or omeprazole 20 mg PO once daily plus placebo PO twice daily for 4 weeks. Patients' GI symptoms and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaires were evaluated baseline and at the end of an intervention. 

Duration

Enrollment period: 2017 to 2018

Intervention period: 4 weeks

Outcome Measures

Outcome measures: Mean severity reduction in the total GSRS score, mean GI symptom scores obtained from GSRS questionnaire.

Baseline Characteristics

 

Omeprazole

(n=61)

Omeprazole + Gabapentin

(n=56)

p-value

Age, years

47.13±8.31 45.84±8.95 p=0.661

Men

46 (75.4%) 45 (80.4%) p=0.665

Two groups were matched in terms of the severity of GI symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain, constipation, indigestion, reflux).

Results

Endpoint

Omeprazole

(n=61)

Omeprazole + Gabapentin

(n=56)

p-value

Mean severity reduction in the total GSRS score

5.09±4.54

9.05 ± 5.89

p<0.001

GSRS questionnaire

Abdominal pain

Before

After

p-value

 

 

4.81±3.08

3.48±2.37

p<0.001

 

 

5.62±2.69

2.62±1.70

p<0.001

 

 

p=0.118

p=0.022

Study Author Conclusions

Gabapentin as an adjunctive drug could be more effective in reducing the severity of GI symptoms in patients with dyspepsia, especially neurological symptoms (such as pain, reflux, and indigestion).

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Both control and intervention groups showed a significant reduction in the total GSRS score and improvement in the abdominal pain; however, the improvement rate and severity reduction of symptoms in the gabapentin group were significantly higher than those of the control. 

Eligible patients had GI symptoms for the last 3 months at least and non-responsive to conventional treatments. Gabapentin was studied as an adjunctive drug only on top of the proton pump inhibitor. A small sample size study originated from Iran. 

 

 
References:

Shafigh-Ardestani MH, Karami-Horestani M, Emami B, et al. Evaluating the effect of oral gabapentin on the improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia resistant to conventional treatments. Adv Biomed Res. 2019;8:53. doi:10.4103/abr.abr_234_18.

Multimodal Analgesia Bundle and Postoperative Opioid Use Among Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery

Design

Retrospective, observational cohort study

N= 842

Objective

To evaluate the association of the implementation of a care bundle of 3 opioid-sparing interventions with the amount of opioids consumed postoperatively among patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and to examine the respective associations of the 3 components

Study Groups

Study patients (N= 842)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients undergoing colorectal surgery via laparoscopy or laparotomy

Exclusion Criteria

Surgery via parastomal incision

Methods

The multimodal care analgesic bundle consists of replacing an older order set with a new order set consisting of:

Oral oxycodone at 5 mg on demand, given until satisfactory pain relief (pain score ≤ 4 on a scale from 0 to 10).

Oral gabapentin 300 mg twice on the day of surgery followed by 300 mg 3 times daily from day 1 until 7 to 10 days after surgery.

Clonidine rescue analgesia at 75 mg administered intravenously on-demand for rescue pain relief, instead of opioids being used as initial rescue pain relief.

Duration

Data collection period: January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019

Outcome Measures

Primary: Cumulative amount of opioids administered orally or intravenously during the day of and 5 days post-operative (converted to morphine millligam equivalents [MME])

Secondary: Received less than 45 MME, multivariate analysis for association of opioid consumption

Baseline Characteristics

 

Study patients (N= 842)

Age, years

64.6

Female

50%

Body mass index, kg/m2

25.3

American Society of Anesthesiologists score

I

II

III

IV

 

12%

65%

23%

0.12%

Diagnosis

Malignant disease

Inflammatory bowel disease

Diverticular disease

Other benign disease

 

60%

15%

10%

14%

Magnitude of surgery

Abdominal

Abdomino-pelvic

 

71%

29%

Regional analgesia

Epidural

Spinal

No block

 

72%

27%

1%

Surgical approach

Minimally invasive surgery

Open surgery

 

72%

28%

Individualized opioid treatment

Yes

No

 

63%

37%

Gabapentin

Treated

Untreated

 

79%

21%

Clonidine

Treated

Untreated

 

29%

71%

Results

Endpoint

Study patients (N= 842)

Median opioid use, MME (range)

2016

2019

p-value

 

75 (0 to 796)

22 (0 to 362)

< 0.001

Received less than 45 MME

2016

2019

p-value

 

35%

66%

p< 0.001

A multivariate analysis found that an individualized opioid strategy, use of gabapentin, and increasing age were associated with lower opioid consumption, whereas use of clonidine was linked to higher intake (p< 0.001). Specifically, an individualized opioid approach was associated with 11.6 fewer daily opioid pills (p= 0.003), gabapentin use with 39.1 fewer pills (p< 0.001), and each additional year of age with 1.0 fewer pills (p< 0.001). Use of clonidine correlated with 11.6 more daily opioid pills (p= 0.001).

Adverse Events

Treatment was discontinued in 15 patients due to sedation (6 patients), confusion (5 patients), visual disturbances (3 patients), and unsteadiness (5 patients).

Study Author Conclusions

In this cohort study of 842 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, a care bundle consisting of an individualized opioid regimen, regular gabapentin, and clonidine as a rescue analgesic was found to be associated with a significant decrease in opioids consumed postoperatively. Regular gabapentin and an individualized opioid regimen were particularly strongly associated with this decrease and should be further evaluated as components of multimodal, opioid-free postoperative analgesia.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Uneven distribution over time in implementing individual components of the care bundle prevented a direct before-after comparison. The retrospective design precludes conclusions about causality. Additionally, unmeasured changes in opioid prescribing attitudes may have contributed to decreased usage over the study period. Opioid usage after discharge was not assessed, possibly underestimating total consumption.
 
References:

Gedda C, Nygren J, Garpenbeck A, Hoffström L, Thorell A, Soop M. Multimodal Analgesia Bundle and Postoperative Opioid Use Among Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(9):e2332408. Published 2023 Sep 5. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32408

Analysis of adverse effects of multimodal gabapentin in abdominal wall reconstruction

Design

Single-center retrospective cohort study

N= 213

Objective

To study the prevalence of gabapentin adverse effects in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction

Study Groups

Postoperative gabapentin (n= 138)

No postoperative gabapentin (n= 75)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction

Exclusion Criteria

Prescribed gabapentin or pregabalin preoperatively, completed an additional operation requiring general anesthesia during post-surgery admission, or remained intubated/re-intubated after surgery

Methods

Institution protocol for gabapentin administration was as follows: 300 mg orally 2 hours before surgery and 300 mg three times daily for 14 days postoperatively in patients younger than 65 years, and twice daily if aged 65 years or older; avoidance of gabapentin in patients with a history of obstructive sleep apnea on continuous positive airway pressure or if allergic.

Data was collected from electronic medical records. The Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale was used and designed as an objective measure of sedation and agitation in intensive care unit patients. Negative scores range from -1 (drowsy) to -5 (unarousable) and represent a spectrum of sedation. Hypotension was defined as <80% of the patient's baseline mean arterial pressure.

Duration

September 2013 to February 2020

Outcome Measures

Primary outcomes: inpatient falls or falls within 30 days of discharge and negative Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores during postoperative days 1 to 2

Secondary outcomes: dizziness, lightheadedness, altered mental status, hypotension, and daily oral morphine equivalents (OME) administered during admission

Baseline Characteristics

 

Postoperative gabapentin (n= 138)

No postoperative gabapentin (n= 75)*

p-Value

Age, years

55 ± 20 57 ± 17  0.941

Body mass index, kg/m2

33 ± 8 32 ± 10   0.489

Hypertension

38% 45% 0.326

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

4% 9% 0.118

Diabetes mellitus

23% 19% 0.517

Narcotic use

33% 28% 0.487

Mean arterial pressure, mmHg

91 ± 15 92 ± 16 0.840

Hemoglobin, g/dL

13.5 ± 2.1 13.6 ± 2.4 0.769

Mean baseline creatinine, mg/dL

0.9 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.3 0.723

Kanters Modified Hernia Grading Scale

1

2

3

 

17%

66%

17%

 

19%

51%

31%

0.053

Mesh type

Biologic

Synthetic

 

20%

76%

 

44%

51%

0.001

*Reasons for not receiving gabapentin postoperatively included prescription for gabapentin preoperatively (n= 53), history of obstructive sleep apnea on continuous positive airway pressure (n= 16), allergy (n= 4), and postoperative acute kidney injury with worsening renal function (n= 2)

Results

Endpoint

Postoperative gabapentin (n= 138)

No postoperative gabapentin (n= 75)

p-value

Median daily OME, mg (interquartile range [IQR])

 

28 (48)

65 (76)

<0.001

Median length of stay, days (IQR)

5 (2)

5 (3)

0.107

Negative RASS

16%

24%

0.147

Hypotension

68%

59%

0.168

Reported dizziness, lightheadedness, altered mental status

20% 20% 0.960

Inpatient falls or falls within 30 days of discharge

3% 0% 0.300

A subgroup analysis was performed for patients 65 years and older and did not find statistically significant differences in rates of dizziness, lightheadedness, altered mental status, symptomatic hypotension, or RASS negative scores. None of these patients experienced falls postoperatively.

Analgesic medications administered within 8 hours prior to negative RASS scores included acetaminophen (42%), ibuprofen (4%), celecoxib (8%), opioid (65%), and gabapentin (18%). 

Adverse Events

See results section.

Study Author Conclusions

In patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction, postoperative gabapentin administration was not associated with an increase in adverse effects. Further prospective analysis may better allow the characterization of the adverse effects of perioperative gabapentin. Limitations include retrospective study design, all patients operated under one physician limiting generalizability, absence of gabapentin levels, and lack of assessment of pain scores.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Gabapentin use prior to and post-procedure resulted in statistically significant decreased morphine requirements. When considering adding gabapentin to a multimodal pain management plan for surgical patients, this can be beneficial as decreased morphine use can potentially reduce opioid dependency and opioid-associated adverse effects.

 
References:

Sarac BA, Schoenbrunner AR, Brower KI, Joshi GP, Janis JE. Analysis of Adverse Effects of Multimodal Gabapentin in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(3):733-739. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000008836

Perioperative Gabapentin Use and In-Hospital Adverse Clinical Events Among Older Adults After Major Surgery

Design

Retrospective cohort study

N= 967,547

Objective

To examine in-hospital adverse clinical events associated with perioperative gabapentin use among older patients undergoing major surgery

Study Groups

Gabapentin use (n= 119,087)

No gabapentin use (n = 848,460)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged ≥ 65 years; underwent major surgery at US hospitals within 7 days of hospital admission; did not use gabapentin before surgery

Exclusion Criteria

Patients who died or were discharged before or on postoperative day 2; had a diagnosis for psychosis; received antipsychotics before or on postoperative day 2; received gabapentin before the day of surgery; had a diagnosis for other potential indications for gabapentin; received critical care, mechanical ventilation, or a feeding tube before or on postoperative day 2 

Methods

Perioperative gabapentin use was defined via charge codes for services on the day of surgery or postoperative days 1 or 2, calculating the total daily dose. Patient characteristics were collected, including age, sex, race, admission type and source, surgery type, comorbidity index, and comorbidity diagnoses. Medication use, including analgesics and opioid doses in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), was also collected. To account for changes in gabapentin-prescribing patterns and surgical outcomes over time, the calendar year of the hospital admission was noted.  

Duration

January 1, 2009, to March 31, 2018

Outcome Measures

Primary: Delirium 

Secondary: New antipsychotic use, pneumonia, and in-hospital death between postoperative day 3 and hospital discharge

Baseline Characteristics

 

Gabapentin use

(n= 119,087)

No gabapentin use

(n= 848, 460)

 

Age, years

74.5 ± 6.7 76.4 ± 7.5  

Female

74,627 (62.7%) 501,934 (59.2%)  

Race

Black

White

Other

 

9,231 (7.8%)

98,562 (82.8%)

11,294 (9.5%)

 

62,406 (7.4%)

697,010 (82.2%)

89,044 (10.5%)

 

Surgery type

Cardiac

Gastrointestinal

Genitourinary

Neurological

Orthopedic

Thoracic

Vascular

 

624 (0.5%)

15,866 (13.3%)

2,523 (2.1%)

3,096 (2.6%)

91,014 (76.4%)

1,549 (1.3%)

4,415 (3.7%) 

 

16,391 (1.9%)

195,395 (23.0%)

48,933 (5.8%)

12,085 (1.4%)

498,258 (58.7%)

20,288 (2.4%)

57,110 (6.7%)

 

CCI score

1.2 ± 2.2

1.8 ± 2.6

 

Analgesic drugs

Acetaminophen

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor

NSAID

Opioid

 

102,013 (85.7%)

24,837 (20.9%)

26,822 (22.5%)

109,389 (91.9%)

 

598,803 (70.6%)

65,370 (7.7%)

124,966 (14.7%)

686,293 (80.9%) 

 

Opioid dose, MME/d

7.6 ± 6.1

5.8 ± 5.6  

Psychoactive drugs

Alzheimer disease agents

Antidepressants

Anxiolytics

Sedatives

 

2,943 (2.5%)

29,772 (25.0%)

84,529 (71.0%)

7805 (6.6%) 

 

29,494 (3.5%)

141,942 (16.7%) 

525,736 (62.0%)

42,346 (5.0%)

 

Abbreviations: CCI, combined comorbidity index; MME, morphine milligram equivalent; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

Baseline characteristics provided are prior to propensity score matching. 

Results

Endpoint

Gabapentin use (n= 119,087)

No gabapentin use (n= 848,460)

RR (95% CI)

Delirium diagnosis

4,051 (3.4%) 34,342 (4.0%)  0.84 (0.81 to 0.87)

New antipsychotic use

945 (0.8%) 9,877 (1.2%) 0.68 (0.64 to 0.73)

Pneumonia

1,522 (1.3%) 19,902 (2.3%) 0.54 (0.52 to 0.57)

In-hospital death

363 (0.3%) 6,360 (0.7%) 0.41 (0.37 to 0.45)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio

Results provided are prior to propensity score matching

Adverse Events

See results 

Study Author Conclusions

In this cohort study, perioperative gabapentin use was associated with increased risk of delirium, new antipsychotic use, and pneumonia among older patients after major surgery. These results suggest careful risk-benefit assessment before prescribing gabapentin for perioperative pain management.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The study suggests that perioperative gabapentin use may be linked to a higher risk of delirium, new antipsychotic use, and pneumonia in older patients after major surgery. However, it's important to note limitations such as the retrospective design, which may carry inherent biases. Additionally, it was noted that some patients may have already had delirium or pneumonia before surgery, which may have confounded the results.

 
References:

Park CM, Inouye SK, Marcantonio ER, et al. Perioperative Gabapentin Use and In-Hospital Adverse Clinical Events Among Older Adults After Major Surgery. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(11):1117-1127. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.3680

The Use Of Gabapentin For Post-operative and Post-traumatic Pain In Thoracic Surgery Patients

Design

Prospective observational trial

N= 60

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of persistent pain following thoracic surgery or trauma

Study Groups

Followed-up patients (n= 45)

Inclusion Criteria

Any major general thoracic surgical procedure or required initial in-patient treatment for blunt thoracic trauma, presented to the clinic four weeks or more after the initial operation or trauma with persistent chest wall pain or paresthesia which was refractory to conventional analgesics

Exclusion Criteria

Initial pathology which invaded or involved the chest wall, surgery involving extensive parietal pleural trauma, post-operative complications which may affect the pain experience, history of analgesic dependence or abuse, history of epilepsy or any neurological condition for which the drug treatment may be affected by gabapentin, any known contraindications for gabapentin use, any previous allergy or adverse effect from gabapentin,

Methods

Each patient was commenced on regular oral gabapentin at 300 mg daily at bedtime. The dose of gabapentin was titrated up to 300 mg twice daily on Day 4, and 300 mg three times daily on Day 7 if the pain relief was inadequate and no adverse effect from the gabapentin was noted. All other analgesics were stopped, but paracetamol/dextropropoxyphene 650/65 mg preparation was taken for breakthrough pain. 

Duration

Enrollment: January 1, 2003 - April 30, 2004 

Intervention: median 21 months (range 12-28 months) 

Outcome Measures

Pain and paresthesia (assessed by 10-point analog scale), adverse effects

Baseline Characteristics

 

Followed-up patients (n= 45)

 

Age, years

51.6  

Female, n

17  

Duration of chest wall pain, months (range)

5.76 (1 to 62)  

Chest wall paresthesia distinct from sharp wound pain

32 (71.1%)  

Duration of gabapentin, weeks (range)

21.9 (1 to 68)  

Operation/trauma for patients with pain, n

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)

Thoracotomy

Median sternotomy

Blunt chest trauma


22

8

3

12

 

Initial pain severity, n

Mild (1-3)

Moderate (4-6)

Severe (7-10)


9

12

24

 

Final titrated dose of gabapentin for patients with pain, n

300 mg at bedtime

300 mg twice daily

300 mg three times daily


21

10

14

 

Operation/trauma for patients with paresthesia, n

VATS

Thoracotomy

Sternotomy

Blunt trauma


15

8

2

7

 

Initial paresthesia severity, n

Mild (1-3)

Moderate (4-6)

Severe (7-10)


5

9

18

 

Final titrated dose of gabapentin for patients with paresthesia, n

300 mg at bedtime

300 mg twice daily

300 mg three times daily


14

6

12

 

Results

Pain improved

Followed-up patients (n= 45)

p-value

Operation/trauma

VATS

Thoracotomy

Sternotomy

Blunt trauma


14/22 (63.6%)

7/8 (87.5%)

3/3 (100%)

9/12 (75%)

Not significant (NS)

Initial pain severity

Mild

Moderate

Severe


3/9 (33.3%)

9/12 (75%)

21/24 (87.5%)

0.009

Final titrated dose of gabapentin

300 mg at bedtime

300 mg twice daily

300 mg three times daily


16/21 (76.2%)

7/10 (70%)

10/14 (71.4%)

NS

Paresthesia improved

Followed-up patients (n= 45)

p-value

Operation/trauma

VATS

Thoracotomy

Sternotomy

Blunt trauma


9/15 (60%)

7/8 (87.5%)

1/2 (50%)

6/7 (85.7%)

NS

Initial pain severity

Mild

Moderate

Severe


3/5 (60%)

5/9 (55.6%)

16/18 (88.9%)

NS

Final titrated dose of gabapentin

300 mg at bedtime

300 mg twice daily

300 mg three times daily


9/14 (64.3%)

6/6 (100%)

9/12 (75%)

NS

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: somnolence (24.4%), dizziness (6.7%)

Serious Adverse Events: None

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: No patients died or had any major adverse events as a result of gabapentin use. Three patients (6.7%) discontinued use of gabapentin due to intolerance of side effects (dizziness in two patients and diarrhea in one patient).

Study Author Conclusions

Gabapentin appears safe and well tolerated when used for persistent post-operative and post-traumatic pain in thoracic surgery patients, although minor side effects do occur. Gabapentin may relieve refractory chest wall pain in some of these patients, particularly those with more severe pain. Further studies are warranted to define the role of gabapentin in cardiothoracic surgical practice.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Despite the safety results, drawing overly strong conclusions or recommendations regarding the analgesic properties of gabapentin in thoracic surgery patients at this stage is discouraged given the limitations of the current study, and a further trial investigating the analgesic efficacy of the drug in treating post-thoracotomy pain is warranted. 

 

 
References:

Sihoe AD, Lee TW, Wan IY, Thung KH, Yim AP. The use of gabapentin for post-operative and post-traumatic pain in thoracic surgery patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29(5):795-799. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.02.020

Comparison of analgesic effects of Gabapentin and Paracetamol post-operatively in patients with hand injury

Design

Single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

N= 50

Objective

To compare the analgesic effects of gabapentin and paracetamol post-operatively in patients with hand injury

Study Groups

Gabapentin (n= 25)

Paracetamol (n= 25)

Inclusion Criteria

Aged 18 to 60 years with hand injury

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnant women, presenting with signs of arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, drug abuse, taking any anti-epileptic drug, severe and multiple injuries

Methods

Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive gabapentin 600 mg or paracetamol 1,000 mg once the nil-per-oral (NPO) period was concluded after hand surgery. Surgery was done under general anesthesia.

Duration

Study period: March to August 2019

Follow-up: after 6 hours of drug administration

Outcome Measures

Pain intensity assessed by 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS)

Baseline Characteristics

 

Gabapentin (n= 25)

Paracetamol (n= 25)

Age, years

28.24 29.04

Female

16% 20%

Source of injury

Road accident

Sudden fall

Machinery

Glass/knife cut

Other


8%

4%

28%

52%

8%


0

0

8%

68%

24%

VAS score before drug intake

5.68 ± 1.108

5.15 ± 1.650

Results

Endpoint

Gabapentin (n= 25)

Paracetamol (n= 25)

VAS score six hours after drug intake

p-value vs. baseline

1.60 ± 1.55

0.197

1.80 ± 1.528

0.604

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: dizziness (36% vs. 16%), nausea (44% vs. 36%), vomiting (20% vs. 8%), increased sleep (28% vs. 16%), anxiety (20% vs. 28%)

Serious Adverse Events: Not disclosed

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: N/A

Study Author Conclusions

Both gabapentin and paracetamol were found to be effective in pain management, but the latter had slightly better pain control with relatively less side-effects.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Statistical analyses comparing the gabapentin and paracetamol group were not conducted. Therefore, it is unknown how gabapentin compares to paracetamol for postoperative analgesia following hand injury aside from the descriptive statistics provided. This study is further limited by its small sample size and single-center nature.

 

 
References:

Ali H; Naveed, Perveen B. Comparison of analgesic effects of Gabapentin and Paracetamol post-operatively in patients with hand injury. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(11):2501-2505. doi:10.47391/JPMA.359

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of gabapentin vs. placebo for acute pain management in critically ill patients with rib fractures

Design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

N= 40

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin in the acute setting for analgesia in patients with rib fractures

Study Groups

Gabapentin (n= 20)

Placebo (n= 20)

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients with ≥ 1 rib fractures requiring hospital admission, study enrollment within 24 hours of initial injury

Exclusion Criteria

Intubated, age > 65 years, inability to tolerate oral medication, renal or hepatic impairment, traumatic brain injury, pregnant, hypersensitivity to gabapentin

Methods

Patients were randomized 1:1 to gabapentin 300 mg or placebo TID for 30 days following injury. All patients were prescribed additional non-narcotic analgesia per institutional guidelines, including acetaminophen 650 mg and ibuprofen 600 mg orally every 6 hours. 

Daily average numeric pain score (NPS; range 0-10) was obtained by averaging hourly scores recorded by nursing staff over 24 hour period x 7 days or until discharge, whichever came first. 

Duration

Trial: November 2016 to November 2017

Intervention: 30 days

Outcome Measures

Primary: daily average NPS

Secondary: opioid consumption, oxygen requirement, respiratory rate, best incentive spirometry recording

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo (n= 20)

Gabapentin (n= 20)

Age, years

41 48

Male

70% 90%

Body mass index, kg/m2

26 26 

Injury severity 

Injury severity score (ISS)

Total rib fractures

Solid organ injury

Surgery during index admission

 

16

5

25%

40%

 

12

7

10%

55%

Doses received as inpatient out of total possible

89% 91%

Length of stay

Hospital

Intensive care unit

 

8

3

 

8

3

Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between groups. 

Results

Data were primarily presented as graphs. No significant difference was reported in any primary or secondary endpoint between groups. No differences were noted in additional pain modalities utilized during index admission between the two groups. 

Adverse Events

No serious adverse events were determined to be related to the study drug. There were no instances of pneumonia, respiratory failure, or mortality in either group.

Study Author Conclusions

The authors did not observe any benefit to adding gabapentin to a multi-modal analgesic regimen for rib fractures, using a dose of 300 mg thrice daily for 30 days. Although these data do not support the routine use of gabapentin for this indication, there may be specific patients for whom it is effective, and there may be unappreciated benefit at both higher doses and for longer courses of therapy. 

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Patients were administered 300 mg of gabapentin three times daily, which is substantially lower than the maximum dose of 1,200 mg three times daily. However, patients were not titrated, as the trial limited follow-up to one month after surgery. Based on the results of this study, surgeons at this institution suspended use of gabapentin for this indication pending further research. 

 

 
References:

Moskowitz EE, Garabedian L, Hardin K, et al. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of gabapentin vs. placebo for acute pain management in critically ill patients with rib fractures [published correction appears in Injury. 2019 Jul;50(7):1406]. Injury. 2018;49(9):1693-1698. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.002

Arthroscopic Bankart Surgery: Does Gabapentin Reduce Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption

Design

Triple-blind randomized clinical trial 

N=76

Objective

To examine the effects of a preemptive single dose of gabapentin on pain management and opioid consumption in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart surgery

Study Groups

Gabapentin (n=38)

Placebo (n=38)

Inclusion Criteria

Age between 18–75, types I or II in American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status, operation duration time less than one hour, no concomitant lesions, diagnosed during arthroscopy

Exclusion Criteria

The presence of any accompanied cartilage lesions; any known allergy to gabapentin; having previous history of epilepsy, hepatic, renal, or psychological disorders; alcohol and/or drug abuse; daily consumption of analgesics, corticosteroids, or anticonvulsants

Methods

The eligible patients were randomized to receive either gabapentin 600 mg or matching placebo. The capsules were administered randomly two hours prior to the operation.

Duration

Enrollment: May 2011 to May 2013

Follow-up: 6h and 24h follow-up visits

Outcome Measures

Primary: Pain intensity assessed based on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Secondary: Opioid consumption and side effects, dizziness, sedation, nausea, and vomiting at 6 h and 24 h follow-up visits. 

Baseline Characteristics

 

Gabapentin (n=38)

Placebo (n=38)

 

Age, years

30.2 ± 5 28.3 ± 4.4  

Male

27 (71%) 30 (79%)  

Operation time, minutes

46.9 ± 10.7 43.9 ± 9.5  

Weight, kg

68.2 ± 1.8 67.4 ± 11.3  
BMI, kg/m2 23.3 ± 1.8 24.1 ± 3.4  

Results

 

Gabapentin (n=38)

Placebo (n=38)

p-value

Pain score (95% CI)

First postoperative visit (6 h)

Second post-operation visit (24 h)

 

4.9 (4.6-5.3)

4.7 (4.3-5.2)

 

5.4 (5.0-5.7)

5.3 (4.9-5.6)

 

>0.05

>0.05

Dizziness

First postoperative visit (6 h)

Second post-operation visit (24 h)

 

16%

14%

 

24%

9%

 

>0.05

>0.05

Sedation

First postoperative visit (6 h)

Second post-operation visit (24 h)

 

14%

8%

 

12%

6%

 

>0.05

>0.05

Nausea/vomiting

First postoperative visit (6 h)

Second post-operation visit (24 h)

 

3%

3%

 

32%

6%

 

0.001

>0.05

Adverse Events

N/A

Study Author Conclusions

The preemptive single dose of gabapentin 600 mg administered prior to arthroscopic Bankart surgery does not decrease post-operation pain but reduces opioid consumption. Gabapentin restrained postoperative nausea and vomiting for a short while (less than 6 h).

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The dosage of Gabapentin should be further evaluated as it has been argued that gabapentin 600 mg is more effective than gabapentin 300 mg and is as effective as higher doses (900 mg and 1200 mg).

 

 
References:

Mardani-Kivi M, Karimi Mobarakeh M, Keyhani S, Haghighi M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K. Arthroscopic bankart surgery: Does gabapentin reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption? A triple-blinded randomized clinical trial. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2016;102(5):549-553. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.028

Gabapentin is Ineffective as an Analgesic Adjunct in the Immediate Postburn Period

Design

Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study

 

Objective

To determine whether gabapentin would have an impact on patient-reported pain levels and evaluate the presence of neuropathic pain (NP) in acute burn injury

Study Groups

Gabapentin (n= 27)

Placebo (n= 26)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients older than 18 years, with at least a 5% burn injury and an expected length of stay of 48 hours 

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnant, lactating, or had renal insufficiency

Methods

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either gabapentin or placebo. Patients received a loading dose of study drug on day 1 and began dosing per the dose-escalation schedule the day after. Patients were followed up for pain control, opioid consumption, and study drug tolerance while in the hospital. At discharge, patients were given a 3-day taper per the dose de-escalation schedule. Pain was assessed with 11 point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Rest pain, average pain and worst pain were assessed during the preceeding 24 hours.

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: Morphine consumption & NRS pain scores

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo (n=26)

Gabapentin (n= 27)

p-value

Age, years

40.6 ± 14.3 42.9 ± 11.6 0.74

Body Surface Area Burned, %

16.6 ± 8.7 15.1 ± 9.3 0.55 

Male

24 (92.3%) 23 (85.2%) 0.67 

Etiology (flame)

25 (96.2%) 25 (92.6%) 0.49 

Inhalation injury

3 (11.5%) 4 (14.8%) 1.00 

Length of stay, days

12 ± 1.58 10.1 ± 5.92 0.30 

Surgery

22 (84.6) 21 (77.8) 0.29 

Autograft, cm2

1922.2 ± 1752.9 1584 ± 1721.4 0.48 

Include relevant baseline characteristics that will provide a general (big picture) view of the patients in the study.

Results

Variable

Intention-to-Treat Analysis

Per-protocol Analysis

 

Treatment Effect

p-value

Treatment Effect

Daily Opioid 

   Use (yes or no)

   Dose (mg)

 

3.62

-0.73

 

<0.01

0.80

 

3.81

2.29

NRS

   Rest

   Hydrotherapy

   Intolerable pain rating

 

0.43

0.81

0.96 

 

0.40

0.22

0.80 

 

0.26

0.63

0.84 

NPS

   NPS total score

   NPS-NP

 

-0.86

1.10 

 

0.84

0.81 

 

0.22

1.21 

HADS-anxiety

   Score

   >8

 

-0.98

0.36

 

0.26

0.11

 

-0.83

0.41

Univariate analysis of the effect of treatment on outcome variables

Variable Placebo (n= 26) Gabapentin (n= 27) p-value
In hospital opioid use (ME) 7.0±6.7 8.4±11.6 0.70
NRS rest 4.6±2.8 4.7±2.9 0.61
NRS average 5.5±2.5 5.4±2.5  0.57
NRS hydrotherapy 8.3±2.0 8.9±2.0  0.16 
Pain tolerance 166/193 (86%)  136/170 (80%) 0.13 
Time from discharge to clinical follow-up (days) 21.63±21.71  15.12±7.86  0.18 
Average pain since discharge 3.86±2.10 4.39±3.14  0.53 
Worst pain since discharge 6.00±3.72  5.86±3.37 0.92 
NPS 41.02±19.99 38.51±19.04 0.30 
NPS-NP 53/158 (38%) 47/121 (39%) 0.94 
HADS-anxiety 5.04±4.32 4.23±3.8 0.13 
HADS-anxiety > 8 34/126 (27%) 19/113 (17%) 0.06 

Adverse Events

Not disclosed

Study Author Conclusions

Our study showed that Gp failed to show an opioid-sparing effect in acutely burned patients. We postulate that this is likely because of both a lesser role of NP in acute burn injuries and the ineffectiveness of Gp in the inhibition of sensitization in burn injuries.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Gabapentin is useful for treating neuropathic pain which plays a role in a burn injuries but not enough to have a noticeable effect. It is hard to determine wheter or not gabapentin would be safe as an add-on to opioids because there was no safety data collected. In the future, it would be beneficial to see what adverse effects patients may have experienced to make a well-rounded clinical decision.

 

 
References:

Wibbenmeyer L, Eid A, Liao J, et al. Gabapentin is ineffective as an analgesic adjunct in the immediate postburn period. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35(2):136-142. doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e31828a4828

The Analgesic Effects of Preemptive Gabapentin in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Brachial Plexus Injury—A Preliminary Study

Design

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled

N= 20

Objective

To evaluate gabapentin as a preemptive analgesic for intraoperative period and during the acute postoperative period at rest and during movement

Study Groups

Placebo (n= 10)

Gabapentin (n= 10)

Inclusion Criteria

Aged 18 to 50, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, scheduled for elective brachial plexus exploration

Exclusion Criteria

Epilepsy, chronic pain disorders, drug allergy, psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, impaired liver, or renal functions, pregnancy

Methods

Patients were randomized 1:1 to oral gabapentin 800 mg or placebo capsules 2 hours before surgery. All patients were premedicated with intramuscular glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg 1 hour before surgery. Surgery was done under general anesthesia.

Visual analog scale (VAS; range 0 to 100) was assessed at rest and during movement in the intensive care unit hourly for 24 hours. For data analysis, mean VAS values were obtained at time intervals of 0 to 6 hours, 6 to 12 hours, 12 to 18 hours, and 18 to 24 hours. Patients with VAS scores of > 50 may receive additional pain treatment with ketorolac injection. 

Duration

Follow-up: 24 hours postoperative period

Outcome Measures

Pain score at rest and during movement assessed by VAS  

Baseline Characteristics

 

Placebo (n= 10)

Gabapentin (n= 10)

p-value

Age, years

31 27.5 0.07

Female

10% 0% -
Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, mcg 237.5 200 0.03

Total intraoperative propofol, mg

1,375 1,275 0.82

Total doses of rescue analgesic in 24 h postoperative

2.5  0.004

Results

Endpoint

Placebo (n= 10)

Gabapentin (n= 10)

VAS score at rest#

0 h

6 h

12 h

18 h

24 h

 

46 ± 14.3

47.5 ± 14.4

49 ± 17.3

49 ± 14.5

54 ± 13.5

 

31.5 ± 11.6

37.5 ± 11.1

38 ± 10.3

34.5 ± 4.4* 

38.5 ± 10.0**

VAS score on movement$

0 h

6 h

12 h

18 h

24 h

 

67 ± 15.7

65 ± 19.6

66 ± 17.8

63 ± 12.5

66.5 ± 16.3

 

52 ± 14.8

52.5 ± 10.9

54 ± 11.0

50.5 ± 10.1

54.5 ± 10.1

Patients required rescue analgesia 

9

3; p= 0.02

#p= 0.01 between the 2 groups; $p= 0.04 between 2 groups; *p= 0.007 after post hoc correction; **p= 0.009 after post hoc correction

Adverse Events

Not evaluated 

Study Author Conclusions

The preliminary study with 800 mg single oral dose of gabapentin as a preemptive analgesic in patients undergoing surgery for brachial plexus injury is found to be an effective adjunct to intraoperative and postoperative pain. Pain is reduced not only at rest but also during movement. The dose of gabapentin used did not produce any side effects and was well tolerated by the patients. Further trials may be needed to evaluate the appropriate dose of gabapentin as a preemptive analgesic.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

In this preliminary study, the VAS scores of the gabapentin group were significantly lower compared to the placebo group. Additionally, most of the placebo patients required rescue analgesics compared to gabapentin. With no side effects requiring intervention with the studied dose, additional trials are needed for an appropriate dose of gabapentin. The study is also limited by its small sample size and the preliminary report in nature. 

 

 
References:

Prabhakar H, Arora R, Bithal PK, Rath GP, Dash HH. The analgesic effects of preemptive gabapentin in patients undergoing surgery for brachial plexus injury--a preliminary study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2007;19(4):235-238. doi:10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181271863