What is the most current literature available regarding flat dosing of Kcentra for warfarin and DOAC reversal?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Please refer to Table 1 for the literature from 2021-2022 investigating the efficacy of fixed vs. weight-based dosing of Kcentra (4F-PCC). Similar to older studies (Tables 2-12), the most recent literature is primarily limited to retrospective trials. The majority of trials demonstrated favorable outcomes with use of fixed 4F-PCC dosing compared to weight-based dosing. Two recent randomized trials, however, failed to demonstrate equivalent outcomes with fixed dosing.
Background

According to the 2019 Anticoagulation Forum guidance on direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) reversal, for patients with rivaroxaban- or apixaban-associated major bleeding, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) 2,000 unit as a flat dose should be considered if andexanet alfa is not available; for edoxaban- or betrixaban-associated major bleeding, off-label treatment with either andexanet alfa or four-factor PCC 2,000 units is suggested. Flat dosing strategy is also recommended in patients on factor Xa inhibitors who require an invasive procedure. [1]

A 2018 review discusses a fixed-dose protocol infusion for Kcentra (four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate [4F-PCC]). Benefits of a fixed-dose strategy include improved time-to-drug administration and a decreased cost of pharmaceutical goods. However, a comparison of available studies is difficult due to heterogeneity in the patient population, bleed type, intervention utilized, administration of other blood products, severity of illness, and differences in time to therapy. An optimum fixed dose for efficacy, safety, and cost has not yet been established with reported fixed-doses ranging from 200 to 1,500 IU. Efficacy endpoints also vary from INRs less than 1.5 to 2.0. The authors conclude that due to a paucity of evaluable literature, further studies that aim to resolve the discrepancies are warranted. [2]

Another 2019 systematic review found low fixed-doses of 4F-PCC (<1,000 IU) are unlikely to be successful for vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal, but increased fixed doses of 1,000 to 1,500 IU have found some degree of success and may be considered for VKA reversal. Most data is limited to retrospective studies, which tend to be underpowered. Additionally, many studies do not favor fixed-dose 4F-PCC reversal in patients with high baseline INRs or intracranial hemorrhage. [3]

A 2021 meta-analysis observed the efficacy and safety of fixed-dosed versus variable-dose 4F-PCC specifically for vitamin K antagonist reversal (e.g., warfarin). Their search consisted of studies up to December 2020 that were comparative between the two dosing strategies and reported at least one clinical outcome. From 10 included studies (N= 988) with negligible heterogeneity (I2= 0.0%), the rates of mortality were significantly lower in the fixed-dose group compared to the variable-dose group (12.6% versus 19.6%; risk ratio [RR] 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47 to 0.9; p= 0.009). Subgroup analysis of indication for reversal were also lower for fixed-dose compared to variable-dose (RR= 0.56; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.90; p= 0.019) along with non-intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) patients (RR= 0.55; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.95; p= 0.032). Yet when analyzing patients with ICH, the difference was not significant (RR= 1.22). Thromboembolic events were also similar between groups (RR= 1.10) but the fixed-dose group was associated with reaching lower INR goals (RR= 0.87; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96; p= 0.007). While the results seem to favor fixed-dose 4F-PCC, the majority of studies were retrospective or prospective cohorts that did not account for differences between groups. Studies also differed in outcome goals that are considered treatment responsive. [4]

References:

[1] Cuker A, Burnett A, Triller D, et al. Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: Guidance from the Anticoagulation Forum. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(6):697-709. doi:10.1002/ajh.25475
[2] Hall ST, Molina KC. Fixed-dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate: we don't know where we're going if we don't know how to get there. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018;46(1):50-57.
[3] Schwebach AA, Waybright RA, Johnson TJ. Fixed-Dose Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Vitamin K Antagonist Reversal: Does One Dose Fit All?. Pharmacotherapy. 2019;39(5):599-608. doi:10.1002/phar.2261
[4] Mohammadi K, Yaribash S, Sani MA, Talasaz AH. Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed-Dose Versus Variable-Dose of 4-PCC for Vitamin K Antagonist Reversal: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022;36(3):533-546. doi:10.1007/s10557-021-07192-0

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 12 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the most current literature available regarding flat dosing of Kcentra for warfarin and DOAC reversal?

Level of evidence

B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-12 for your response.


Additional Recent Studies Observing Fixed-Dosed 4F-PCC (2021-2022)
Reference Study Design Patient Population Dose of 4F-PCC Outcome Author's Conclusion
Abdoellakhan et al. [1]

Open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial

Reversal of vitamin K antagonists

N= 159

Fixed-dose (n= 79)

Variable dose (n= 79)

4F-PCC 1,000 IU

vs

4F-PCC variable dose

Effective hemostasis:

87.3% in the fixed-dose group versus 89.9% in the variable group (risk difference 2.5%; 95% CI -13.3% to 7.9%; p= 0.27)

Median door-to-needle time:

109 min in the fixed-dose group versus 142 min in the variable group (p= 0.027)

The large majority of patients had good clinical outcome after 4F-PCC use; however, noninferiority of the fixed dose could not be demonstrated because the design assumed the fixed dose would be 4% superior. Door-to-needle time was shortened with the fixed dose, and INR reduction was similar in both dosing regimens.

Bajdas et al. [2]

Retrospective study

Reversal of vitamin K antagonist (warfarin)

N= 265

Fixed-dose (n= 90)

Variable-dose (n= 175)

4F-PCC 1,000 IU

vs

4F-PCC variable dose

Effective hemostasis:

37.8% in the fixed-dose group versus 21.7% in the variable group (p= 0.005)

INR ≤ 1.5:

62.5% in the fixed-dose group versus 69.4% in the variable group (p= 0.26)

In-hospital mortality: no difference

Time to administration was 20 minutes faster and cost was reduced using fixed-dosing

Fixed-dose 4F-PCC is associated with a higher likelihood of achieving hemostatic efficacy, quicker time to administration, and reduced cost compared to variable-dose 4F-PCC for warfarin reversal.
Compton et al. [3]

Retrospective study


Reversal of vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) with intracranial hemorrhage

N= 31

Low fixed-dose (n= 15)

High fixed-dose (n= 16)

4F-PCC 2,000 IU

vs

4F-PCC 4,000 IU

Improved or stable brain imaging:

80% in the low fixed-dose group versus 88% in the high fixed-dose group

There was no significant difference between the INR correction and the brain imaging changes in patients with an ICH who received either the high or the low fixed-dose 4F-PCC for warfarin reversal.

Dietrich et al. [4]

Retrospective study

Reversal of vitamin K antagonist (warfarin)

N= 154

Fixed-dose activated 4F-PCC (n= 29)

Fixed-dose 4F-PCC (n= 53)

Standard dose 4F-PCC (n= 72)

Activated 4F-PCC 500 IU if INR < 5 and 1000 IU if INR ≥ 5

vs

4F-PCC 1,500 to 2,000 IU

vs

4F-PCC standard dose per the package insert

Achievement of target INR ≤ 1.4:

58.6% in the activated group versus 69.8% in the fixed-dose group versus 79.2% in the standard dose group (p= 0.103)

There was no difference in the ability to achieve a post-PCC INR of ≤ 1.4 between 3 different PCC regimens for warfarin reversal. Additional research is warranted to determine the ideal dose and PCC agent for warfarin reversal.
McMahon et al. [5]

Retrospective study

Reversal of vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) in three different bleeding indications

N= 54

CNS bleeds regardless of INR (n= 54)

Non-CNS bleeds with an initial INR ≤ 6 (n= 153)

Non-CNS bleeds with an initial INR ≥ 6.1 (n= 19)

4F-PCC 2,000 IU (1,000 IU if INR ≤ 6)

vs

Weight-based 4F-PCC dosing

Achievement of target INR:

CNS bleeds: 70.0% in the fixed-dose group vs 79.4% in the weight-based group (p= 0.52)

Non-CNS bleeds with initial INR ≥ 6: 70% in the fixed-dose group vs 100% in the weight-based group (p= 0.21)

Non-CNS bleeds with initial INR ≤ 6.1: 57.5% in the fixed-dose group vs 86.4% in the weight-based group (p= 0.0002)

A fixed-dose strategy of 2000 units for warfarin reversal for CNS bleeds or INR ≥6.1 was comparable to weight-based dosing. The FD strategy of 1000 units for INR ≤ 6 achieved target INR less often than weight-based dosing. Application of findings suggest that higher doses may be needed to achieve target INR.
Elsamadisi et al. [6]

Retrospective study

Reversal of vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) in obese patients (≥ 100 kg)

N= 44

Fixed-dose (n= 19)

Weight-based dose (n= 25)

4F-PCC 2,000 IU

vs

Weight-based 4F-PCC dosing

Achievement of target INR < 2 (< 1.5 INR for intracranial hemorrhage):

90% in the fixed-dose group versus 84% in the weight-based group (p= 0.68)

Median post-treatment INR:

1.6 (IQR 1.5 to 1.9) in the fixed-dose group vs 1.3 (IQR 1.2 to 1.5) in the weight-based group (p< 0.01)

Findings suggest that a fixed-dose regimen of 2000 units in obese patients weighing ≥ 100 kg is adequate to achieve INR goals.
Dietrich et al. [7]

Retrospective, observational study

Reversal of vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) with intracranial hemorrhage

N= 90

Fixed-dose (n= 42)

Standard-dose (n= 48)

4F-PCC 2,000 IU

vs

Standard dose 4F-PCC ranging from 25 to 50 units/kg based on total body weight

Achievement of target INR ≤ 1.4:

81.5% in the fixed-dose group versus 82.6% in the standard-dose group (p= 0.14)

A fixed-dose 4F-PCC regimen of 2000 units among patients with ICH was as effective as standard-dose
4F-PCC for INR reversal among patients with ICH. However, fixed-doses of 2000 units at times exceeded standard
4F-PCC doses which may be contradictory to the goals of fixed-dose 4F-PCC for warfarin reversal.

Sobrino et al. [8]

Retrospective, single-arm study

Reversal of vitamin K antagonist 

N= 145

Fixed-dose (N= 145)

4F-PCC 1,000 IU with an additional 500 IU on a case-by-case basis

Achievement of target INR ≤ 1.5:

70.3% achieved target INR (p< 0.0001)

One patient experienced thromboembolic complication possibly related to 4F-PCC

After 4F-PCC, the majority of patients achieved the target INR, meaning 4F-PCC is a useful modality for rapid INR reduction. The safety profile may be considered acceptable. Fixed-dose 4F-PCC was able to restore hemostasis rapidly while minimizing the risk of adverse events and optimizing available resources.
Bizzell et al. [9]

Retrospective, single-arm study

Reversal of vitamin K antagonist

N= 113

Fixed-dose (n= 63)

Variable-dose (n= 50)

4F-PCC 2,000 or 2,500 IU (some received 1,000 IU based on the original recommendations)

vs

Variable-dose 4F-PCC

Achievement of target INR < 1.5:

43% in the fixed-dose group versus 46% in the variable-dose group (p= 0.83)

The rate of INR reversal did not differ significantly between groups, but the fixed-dose group used less PCCs and had lower treatment costs.
Stoecker et al. [10]

Prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial

Reversal of vitamin K antagonist (warfarin)

N= 71

Fixed-dose (n= 34)

Variable dose (n= 37)

Fixed-dose 4F-PCC 1,500 IU

vs

Variable-dose 4F-PCC

Achievement of target INR ≤ 1.5:

61.8% in the fixed-dose group versus 89.2% in the variable-dose group (p= 0.011)

The results of this study provide evidence that fixed dosing results in lower reversal success rates as compared to variable dosing of 4FPCC for warfarin-induced anticoagulation.

CI, confidence interval; INR, international normalized ratio; CNS, central nervous system; IQR, interquartile range 

References:

[1] Abdoellakhan RA, Khorsand N, Ter Avest E, et al. Fixed Versus Variable Dosing of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Bleeding Complications of Vitamin K Antagonists-The PROPER3 Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2022;79(1):20-30. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.06.016
[2] Bajdas H, Handzel M, Uttaro E, Jones CMC, Kokanovich K, Acquisto NM. Evaluation of fixed-dose versus variable-dose prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal. Thromb Res. 2022;214:76-81. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2022.04.015
[3] Compton F, Hall J, De Simone N, Usmani A, Sarode R, Burner J. High versus low fixed-dose four factor-prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal in patients with intracranial hemorrhage [published online ahead of print, 2022 Apr 6]. Transfus Apher Sci. 2022;103444. doi:10.1016/j.transci.2022.103444
[4] Dietrich SK, Rowe S, Cocchio CA, Harmon AJ, Nerenberg SF, Blankenship PS. Comparison of 3 Different Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Regimens for Emergent Warfarin Reversal: PCCWaR Study. Ann Pharmacother. 2021;55(8):980-987. doi:10.1177/1060028020978568
[5] McMahon C, Halfpap J, Zhao Q, Bienvenida A, Rose AE. Evaluation of a Fixed-Dose Regimen of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Warfarin Reversal. Ann Pharmacother. 2021;55(10):1230-1235. doi:10.1177/1060028021992142
[6] Elsamadisi P, Cepeda MAG, Yankama T, Wong A, Tran Q, Eche IM. Weight-Based Dosing Versus a Fixed-Dose Regimen of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Obese Patients Requiring Vitamin K Antagonist Reversal. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021;21(3):355-361. doi:10.1007/s40256-020-00442-w
[7] Dietrich SK, Mixon MA, Rech MA. Fixed-dose prothrombin complex concentrate for emergent warfarin reversal among patients with intracranial hemorrhage. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;49:326-330. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.06.032
[8] Sobrino Jiménez C, Romero-Garrido JA, García-Martín Á, et al. Safety and effectiveness of a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for vitamin K antagonist reversal following a fixed-dose strategy. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021;28(Suppl 2):e66-e71. doi:10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002114
[9] Bizzell AC, Mousavi MK, Yin E. Fixed- versus variable-dose prothrombin complex concentrate protocol for vitamin K antagonist reversal. Int J Hematol. 2021;114(3):334-341. doi:10.1007/s12185-021-03176-w
[10] Stoecker Z, Van Amber B, Woster C, et al. Evaluation of fixed versus variable dosing of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for emergent warfarin reversal. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;48:282-287. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.023

Prospective Evaluation of a Fixed-Dose 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Protocol for Urgent Vitamin K Antagonist Reversal

Design

Multicenter, interventional, quasi-experimental (pre-post), noninferiority, cohort study

N=54

Objective

To compare a fixed-dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) protocol to weight-based dosing at a single center

Study Groups

Weight-based (n=30)

Fixed-dose (n=24)

Inclusion Criteria

>18 years old; were given 4F-PCC for rapid reversal of warfarin because of severe bleeding or the need for an invasive surgery or procedure

Exclusion Criteria

Received 4F-PCC for reversal of a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or parenteral anticoagulant (e.g., heparin); received 4F-PCC for reversal of a coagulopathy not caused by an anticoagulant

Methods

This was a pre-post study that compared a prospective fixed-dose 4F-PCC protocol to a historical (retrospective) cohort who received weight-based 4F-PCC. 

The retrospective cohort was administered 4F-PCC with weight-based dosing that is dependent on initial INR per the package insert (25 units/kg if the baseline INR was 1.5–3.9, 35 units/kg if the baseline INR was 4–6, or 50 units/kg if the baseline INR was >6).

The prospective cohort was administered a fixed dose of 4F-PCC 1,500 IU over 25 minutes. The dose could be given without first assessing the patient's INR or weight. If baseline INR or weight information was already available and the subject weighed >100 kg or had an INR >7.5, the fixed-dose was increased to 4F-PCC 2,000 IU over 25 min.

All prospective subjects received IV vitamin K 10 mg, and a post-infusion INR was collected 1 h after the 4F-PCC infusion was completed.

Duration

Weight-based (historical cohort): October 2017 to June 2018

Outcome Measures

Primary: achievement of a post-infusion INR <2

Secondary: achievement of a post-infusion INR <1.5; 7-day mortality; 7-day venous thromboembolic events (VTEs)

Baseline Characteristics

 

Weight-based (n=30)

Fixed-dose (n=24)

 

Age, years

74 77  

Female

11 (36.7%) 13 (54.2%)  

Weight, kg

87.9 80.2  

Baseline INR

3.83 4.58  

Within the fixed-dose group, 6 (25%) subjects received the 2,000 IU dose because of baseline weight or INR.

Results

 

Weight-based (n=30)

Fixed-dose (n=24)

P-value for noninferiority

Mean post-infusion INR

After 24 hours

1.33

1.32

1.38

1.31

N/A

Post-infusion INR <2.0

Post-infusion INR <1.5

29 (96.7%)

27 (90%)

23 (95.8%)

18 (75%)

0.0035

>0.45

7-day mortality

4 (13.3%)

2 (8.3%)

0.009

 

Adverse Events

No patients experienced VTE within 7 days of 4F-PCC administration.

Study Author Conclusions

The use of a fixed-dose 4F-PCC protocol is safe and effective for the rapid reversal of vitamin K antagonist-associated anticoagulation.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This study included a retrospective cohort which may be subject to incomplete or inaccurate documentation. Although this study compared two dosing schemes, it was not a randomized study. Additionally, this study was conducted at a single center in North Carolina.

The noninferiority margin of 15% was chosen at the investigators’ discretion and driven by the use of an INR-based endpoint as the primary outcome measure, which does not always accurately reflect hemostasis and clinical outcomes.

References:

Bitonti MT, Rumbarger RL, Absher RK, Curran LM. Prospective Evaluation of a Fixed-Dose 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Protocol for Urgent Vitamin K Antagonist Reversal. J Emerg Med. 2020;58(2):324-329. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.10.013

Emergent warfarin reversal with fixed-dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate

Design

Retrospective, multicenter, chart review

N=64

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-savings of a fixed-dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) protocol

Study Groups

Fixed-dose 4F-PCC (N=64)

Inclusion Criteria

Age ≥18 years; received a fixed-dose 4F-PCC for urgent warfarin reversal; had a baseline and repeat INR within 8 hours

Exclusion Criteria

Baseline INR < 2; pregnant; 4F-PCC used for DOAC reversal; 

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of patients who fixed-dose 4F-PCC for urgent warfarin reversal in five hospitals (two health systems) in the United States. All patients received a 4F-PCC 1500 Units and had a repeat INR drawn within 8 hours of 4F-PCC administration. 

Duration

September 2018 to April 2019

Outcome Measures

Co-primary: patients who achieved a post-administration INR ≤1.5 and ≤2.0

Secondary: thrombotic events within 7 days of 4F-PCC; survival to discharge; hospital length of stay

Baseline Characteristics

 

Fixed-dose 4F-PCC (N=64)

Age, years (interquartile range)

75 (70-84)

Male

43 (67.2%)

Weight, kg (interquartile range)

BMI, kg/m2 (interquartile range)

83.9 (68.0-99.9)

27.1 (24.2-31.3)

Concomitant antiplatelet use

26 (40.6%)

Additional therapies

Fresh frozen plasma

Vitamin K

 

11 (17.2%)

57 (89.1%)

Results

 

Fixed-dose 4F-PCC (N=64)

INR (interquartile range)

Baseline

Post-treatment

 

3.0 (2.4-3.9)

1.4 (1.3-1.6)

Target INR achieved

≤1.5

≤2.0

 

44 (68.8%)

61 (95.3%)

Required repeat 4F-PCC dose

5 (7.8%)

Survival to discharge

55 (85.9%)

Length of hospital stay, days (interquartile range)

5.8 (2.9-13.1)

Cost analysis

Dose if weight-based, units (interquartile range)

Difference between fixed- and weight-based dose, units (interquartile range)

Cost avoidance per treatment*, $

 

2,350 (1,762-2,500)

850 (263-1,000)

$1,199 ($370-$1,410)

The median time between INR after 4F-PCC administration was 1.3 hours.

*Based on an average wholesale price (AWP) of $1.41/unit

Adverse Events

There were no thrombotic events seen within 7 days of 4F-PCC administration.

Study Author Conclusions

A fixed-dose of 1500 units of 4F-PCC successfully achieved a target INR of ≤1.5 in the majority of patients and resulted in no thrombotic events. This study adds to the data evaluating alternative 4F-PCC dosing regimens in comparison to package insert recommended dosing.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This study is limited by its retrospective and small, single-cohort nature. The pricing data is also an extrapolation based on AWP and did not account for patients who required repeat dosing. Additionally, other baseline characteristics (e.g., CHA2DS2VASc, HAS-BLED) were not collected. 

References:

Jansma B, Montgomery J, Dietrich S, Mixon MA, Peksa GD, Faine B. Emergent warfarin reversal with fixed-dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate. Ann Pharmacother. 2020;54(11):1090-1095. doi:10.1177/1060028020920855

Multi-centered evaluation of a novel fixed-dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate protocol for warfarin reversal

Design

Multi-center, observational, pre-post comparison

N=191

Objective

To validate the efficacy of a novel fixed-dose 4PCC protocol for warfarin reversal.

Study Groups

Standard-dose (n=116)

Fixed-dose (n=75)

Inclusion Criteria

Age > 18 years, received 4PCC warfarin reversal, INR result 12 hours prior to receipt of 4PCC, repeat INR drawn within 24 hours of 4PCC administration.

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnancy, received fresh frozen plasma (FFP) within 6 hours prior to 4PCC, arrived to hospital with trauma-team activation, baseline INR < 2, received massive transfusion protocol within six hours of 4PCC (> 4 units of packed red blood cells infused within one hour), FFP after 4PCC but prior to first post-4PCC INR result, received 4PCC for non-warfarin reversal indications, received additional 4PCC dose prior to first post-4PCC INR result, received incorrect 4PCC dose in either group.

Methods

Patients between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017 received standard dose of 4PCC (25 to 50 units/kg; dose-capped at maximum TBW of 100 kg). Patients between September 1, 2017 to August 31, 2018 received fixed-dose of 1500 units or 2000 units depending on if baseline INR is > 7.5, TBW is > 100 kg, or for neurological bleeding indications.

Duration

July 1, 2016 to August 31, 2018

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: Achievement of target INR < 1.4 on first post-4PCC INR result

Secondary outcomes: Achievement of target INR < 1.4 in subgroup of patients, patients who achieved target INR within 4 hours of PCC administration, patients with post-4PCC INR < 2, patients requiring additional doses within 12 hours, mean cost of therapy, thromboembolic complications observed, 30-day in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay.

Baseline Characteristics

 

Standard dose (n=116)

Fixed-dose (n=75)

p-value

Age, years

72.1 67.3 0.07 

Male

59 (51%) 37 (49%) 0.99

Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation

Peripheral edema/deep vein thrombosis

Mechanical heart valve

Other

 

59%

28%

4%

14%

 

48%

29%

19%

4%

 

0.63

0.98

0.002

0.05

4PCC indication

Intracranial hemorrhage

Gastrointestinal bleeding

Intra-abdominal hemorrhage/intra-thoracic hemorrhage

Surgical

Other

 

32%

14%

1%

25%

28%

 

11%

21%

11%

31%

25%

 

0.002

0.36

0.005

0.37

0.86

Baseline INR

3.5

4.3

0.04

4PCC dose, units FIX

2174

1772

<0.0001

4PCC units FIX/kg

27.4

21.3

<0.0001

Vitamin K received

83%

73%

0.17

Vitamin K dose, mg

9.21

9

NS

Results

Endpoint

Standard dose (n=116)

Fixed-dose (n=75)

p-Value

Primary outcome, INR results (standard deviation or percentage)

Post-4PCC INR < 1.4

Mean post-4PCC INR levels

Time from 4PCC to first INR, hours

Change in INR 

 

76 (65%)

1.38 (0.33)

4.81 (3.94)

2.12 (2.02)

 

43 (57%)

1.5 (0.63)

5.9 (5.8)

2.8 (2.9)

 

0.32

0.09

0.12

0.06

Post-4PCC INR < 1.4 in subgroup population:

Baseline INR > 7.5

TBW > 100 kg

Intracranial hemorrhage

 

50% (3/6)

72% (13/18)

90% (36/40)

 

25% (2/8)

50% (5/10)

88% (7/8)

 

0.68

0.44

0.83

Target INR < 1.4 within 4 hours of PCC

40 (34%) 21 (28%) 0.44

Post-4PCC INR < 2

110 (94.8%) 65 (86.7%) 0.06

Additional doses of 4PCC within 12 hours

1 (1%) 3 (4%) NS

Cost of 4PCC therapy

$2914 (1019.4) $2275 (297) <0.0001

Thromboembolic complications

2 (1.7%) 0 NS

30-day in-hospital mortality

19 (16.4%) 7 (9%) 0.24

Hospital length of stay, days

6.85 (6.9) 9.1 (10.5) 0.08

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: N/A

Study Author Conclusions

A fixed-dose 4PCC regimen for warfarin reversal of 1500 units, with an increased dose of 2000 units for select patients, is as effective as standard-dose 4PCC for INR reversal.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This is a retrospective study and should be interpreted as plausible data. This study specifically observed warfarin patients with a robust exclusion criteria with the possibility of patients receiving up to 2000 IU fixed dose of 4PCC. The authors could not evaluate patients who strictly received the 2000 units due to lack of patients. Additional therapies possibly used (e.g. vitamin K) were uncontrolled.
References:

Dietrich SK, Mixon M, Holowatyj M, et al. Multi-centered evaluation of a novel fixed-dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate protocol for warfarin reversal. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(10):2096-2100. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.017

Comparison of Hemostatic Outcomes in Patients Receiving Fixed-Dose vs. Weight-Based 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate

Design

Single-center, retrospective, cohort study

N=72

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4F-PCC administration using a fixed dose of approximately 2000 factor IX units to achieve hemostasis in anticoagulated patients, compared with weight-based therapy.

Study Groups

Weight-based dosing (n=38)

Fixed-dosing (n=34)

Inclusion Criteria

Age > 18 years, on warfarin or direct factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban), in need of emergent hemostasis or anticoagulation reversal, administered 4F-PCC.

Exclusion Criteria

On direct thrombin inhibitor (e.g. dabigatran), history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, history of disseminated intravascular coagulation, death within 24 hours of hospitalization, included in a vulnerable population.

Methods

Before January 1, 2018, patients received weight-based dosing of 4F-PCC which ranged from 35 to 50 factor IX units/kg. The amount administered depended on bleed severity at the time. After January 1, 2018, the fixed-dosing of 2000 factor IX units of 4F-PCC was adopted. An additional 2000 units was available if deemed appropriate.

Duration

January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: clinically effective hemostasis after administration of 4F-PCC.

Effective hemostasis is defined as: no further reports of significant bleeding, stabilization of bleeding noted on serial computed tomography scans, no further significant drop in repeat hemoglobin measurements defined as a drop of > 2 g/dL within 2 to 6 hours post PCC administration.

Secondary outcome: Inpatient all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay, need for repeat dose, need for fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or packed red blood cells, safety, acquisition cost savings.

Baseline Characteristics

 

Weight-based (n=38)

Fixed-dose (n=34)

p-value

Age, years

76.9 ± 10.8 71.1 ± 12.5 0.100 

Male

52.6% 52.9% 0.979 

White

92.1% 91.2% 0.887 

Total dose given, units

3452 ± 1265 2336 ± 605 <0.001

Total dose given, units/kg

43.6 ± 11.9 29.8 ± 11.1 <0.001

Comorbidities

Diabetes mellitus

Hypertension

Myocardial infarction

Congestive heart failure

Cerebrovascular accident

Peripheral vascular disease

 

42.1%

97.4%

36.8%

44.7%

42.1%

47.4%

 

44.1%

91.2%

23.5%

52.9%

41.2%

38.2%

 

0.863

0.338

0.221

0.487

0.936

0.435

Charlson Comorbidity Index score

10.7 ± 3.7 9.5 ± 3.8 0.192 

Include relevant baseline characteristics that will provide a general (big picture) view of the patients in the study.

Results

Endpoint

Weight-based (n=38)

Fixed-dose (n=34)

p-value

Effective hemostasis after administration

Subgroup analysis of warfarin patients

Subgroup analysis of factor Xa-inhibitor patients

78.9%

83.3%

76.9%

91.2%

84.6%

95.0%

0.150

0.930

0.091

Mortality

4 (10.5%)

5 (14.7%)

0.592

Hospital length of stay, days

7.8 ± 5.9

8.7 ± 7.8

0.901

Repeat dose given

3 (7.9%)

3 (8.8%)

0.887

Need for fresh frozen plasma

7 (18.4%)

8 (23.5%)

0.594

Need for packed red blood cells

17 (44.7%)

6 (17.6%)

0.014

Total acquisition cost savings were calculated to be $91,029 or approximately $2,677 per patient when switching to a fixed-dose regimen based on cost of one factor IX unit of $1.58

Adverse Events

Fixed-dose group: n=0

Weight-based group: n=2 (5.3%)

Study Author Conclusions

A fixed-dose regimen of approximately 2000 factor IX units of 4F-PCC may be a reasonable approach to achieve hemostasis in patients receiving warfarin or factor Xa inhibitors. Additionally, utilization of a fixed-dose regimen may lead to significant acquisition cost savings for facilities.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This is a retrospective review of a small group of patients. Data is exploratory at best. The goal of 4F-PCC therapy was not to reverse factor Xa inhibitor but to achieve hemostasis. There is a newer reversal agent (andexanet alfa) specific for Xa inhibitors which may override the results. 
References:

Kim C, Cottingham L, Eberwein K, Komyathy K, Ratliff PD. Comparison of Hemostatic Outcomes in Patients Receiving Fixed-Dose vs. Weight-Based 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate. J Emerg Med. 2020;59(1):25-32. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.049

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Major Bleeding on Factor Xa Inhibitors: A Prospective Cohort Study

Design

Prospective observational multicenter cohort study

N= 66

Objective

To evaluate the use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) at a dose of 2,000 units for the management of factor Xa-inhibitor–associated major bleeds

Inclusion Criteria

Received infusion of PCC (2,000 units) for major bleeding while on treatment with rivaroxaban or apixaban and not received other hemostatic agents, including plasma, platelets, activated PCC, or recombinant factor VIIa (antifibrinolytic drugs and local hemostatic agents were permitted) prior to administration of PCC

Exclusion Criteria

Established 'do not resuscitate' (DNR) orders, drop of hemoglobin without evidence of a source of bleeding, acute coronary syndrome, or ischaemic stroke in past 30 days

Methods

Patients were given 2,000 units PCC for reversal of rivaroxaban or apixaban and were followed up after PCC treatment, with information acquired using medical records and from patients directly. Treating physicians assessed the effectiveness of PCC treatment at 24 hours using all lab/testing results and imaging. Rating categories included 'good,' 'moderate,' or 'poor,' with each category having preset criteria.

Good: bleeding stopped ≤ 1-hour post-infusion without an additional coagulation intervention

Moderate: bleeding stopped 1 to 4 hours post-infusion without an additional coagulation intervention

Poor: bleeding stopped > 4 hours post-infusion with an additional coagulation intervention (plasma, whole blood, or coagulation factors)

Duration

Enrollment: July 2014 to July 2017

Follow-up: 30 ± 2 days

Outcome Measures

Primary: proportion of patients with effective PCC (as assessed by physicians)

Secondary: use of other blood products, decrease in hemoglobin from admission, length of stay in intensive care unit/hospital

Safety: thromboembolic events (including symptomatic DVT or pulmonary embolism, ischaemic stroke, heart valve or cardiac chamber thrombosis, symptomatic peripheral arterial thrombosis or myocardial infarction) within 7 days after PCC, 30-day event rate of thromboembolic events, deaths

Baseline Characteristics

 

All patients (N= 66)

Age, years

76.9 ± 10.4

Male

42 (67%)

Weight, kg (interquartile range [IQR])

81 (68 to 90)

Anticoagulant treatment:

 

Patients on rivaroxaban

Daily dose, mg (IQR)

Time from last dose to PCC, hours

37 (56%) 

20 (15 to 20)

18.1 ± 10.3

Patients on apixaban

Daily dose, mg (IQR)

Time from last dose to PCC, hours

29 (44%)

10 (5 to 10)

17.8 (9.3) 

Treatment with PCC:

 

Time from onset of bleed to PCC, hours (IQR)

Time from arrival to PCC, hours (IQR)

First dose of PCC, IU

First dose of PCC, IU/kg

8.6 (4.8 to 18.1)

5.4 (3.3 to 7.8) 

2,072 ± 464

26.4 ± 7.7

Results

Endpoint

All patients (N= 66)

Effectiveness rating:

Good

Moderate

Poor

 

43 (65%)

13 (20%)

10 (15%) 

Use of other blood products:

Second dose of PCC (1,000 U and 2,000 U)

Red cells (1-8 U)

Platelets (1-3 apheresis or pooled U)

Cryoprecipitate

 

2 (3%)

13 (20%)

8 (12%)

1 (2%)

Decrease in hemoglobin from admission after PCC, g/L (IQR)

18 (3 to 34)

Length of stay, days (IQR):

Hospital

Intensive care unit

 

16 (5.3 to 30)

0 (0 to 6) 

Thromboembolic events:

Days 0-7

Days 8-30

 

2 (3%)

3 (5%)

Deaths

9 (14%)

Adverse Events

In addition to adverse events listed in results section above, eight serious adverse events were reported: gastrointestinal bleeding (n= 3), gross hematuria (n= 2), cellulitis (n= 1), infection/hypernatremia/delirium (n= 1), neurological deterioration due to expansion of previously evacuated subdural hematoma (n= 1)

Study Author Conclusions

Management of oral factor Xa-inhibitor–associated major bleeding using PCC to achieve initial hemostasis was assessed by the treating physician as good in 65% of the cases, with 67% for intracranial and 69% for gastrointestinal bleeding. For another 20% of the cases, it was assessed as moderate.

Despite these ratings, patients still had significant morbidity and mortality, mainly after intracranial bleeding on anticoagulation. The risk of thromboembolism after reversal must be remembered and anticoagulation with at least a prophylactic dose should be started when bleeding has been controlled.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This was a Canadian study done without a control group, making it difficult to assess if the results were clinically significant. Additionally, patients were recruited after PCC treatment had already been administered; selection bias in deciding whether to treat with PCC may have excluded certain groups of patients. 

References:

Schulman S, Gross PL, Ritchie B, et al. Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Major Bleeding on Factor Xa Inhibitors: A Prospective Cohort Study [published correction appears in Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;118(12):2188]. Thromb Haemost. 2018;118(5):842-851. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1636541

Evaluation of Fixed-Dose Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Emergent Warfarin Reversal in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage

Design

Retrospective cohort study

N=61

Objective

To evaluate whether a fixed dose of 1,000 IU of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) achieves International Normalized Ratio (INR) reversal similar to weight-based dosing in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who were anticoagulated with warfarin

Study Groups

Weight-based dosing (n=31)

Fixed dosing (n=30)

Inclusion criteria

Age ≥ 18 years, received 4FPCC for ICH, on chronic warfarin therapy

Exclusion criteria

Baseline INR < 2, lab values unavailable

Methods

This was a historical cohort study of a single institution. Patients prior to April 2015 received weight-based 4FPCC doing, and after April 2015 the protocol changed to give a 1,000 U fixed dose repeated as necessary to reach goal INR.

Outcome Measures

Reached goal INR, total dose received, required repeat dosing, received other reversal therapy

Baseline Characteristics

 

Weight-based dosing (n=31)

Fixed dosing (n=30)

 

Age, years

81 78  

Female

13 (42%) 11 (37%)  

Weight, kg

83 82  

Aspirin use

8 (26%) 5 (17%)  

Baseline INR

2.98 ± 1.25 2.84 ± 1.18  
 

Results

 

Weight-based dosing (n=31)

Fixed dosing (n=30)

p-value

Reached goal INR

INR <1.6

INR <1.5

 

25 (81%)

22 (71%)

 

22 (73%)

16 (53%)

 

0.49

0.15

Required repeat 4FPCC dosing

5 (16%) 5 (17%) 0.95

Total 4FPCC dose received, IU

2,120 ± 732 1,045 ± 750 <0.001

Additional reversal agents given

Vitamin K

Fresh frozen plasma

 

28 (91%)

6 (20%)

 

28 (94%)

2 (7%)

 

0.67

0.14

 

Adverse Events

Not reported

Study Author Conclusions

A fixed dose of 1000 IU of PCC4 did not differ significantly in reaching goal INR in this population. It is likely that the optimal dosing strategy for PCC4 has not yet been elucidated and may involve accounting for both weight and initial INR.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Although this was a retrospective study from a single center, there was a historical comparison group included. However, this study was insufficiently powered to avoid a type II error.

References:

Scott R, Kersten B, Basior J, Nadler M. Evaluation of Fixed-Dose Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Emergent Warfarin Reversal in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(6):861-866.

Fixed dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for the emergent reversal of warfarin: a retrospective analysis

Design

Retrospective chart review

N=37

Objective

To determine the efficacy of fixed-dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC; Kcentra) in reducing the International Normalized Ratio (INR) to ≤1.5 among warfarin patients with the need for urgent or emergent anticoagulation reversal

Study Groups

Fixed-dose 4FPCC (n=37)

Inclusion criteria

Patients on warfarin who received 4FPCC for the reversal of warfarin

Exclusion criteria

Received repeat dosing before INR was drawn, INR drawn >3 hours post-dose

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of patients who received a fixed dose of 1,500 units of 4FPCC for warfarin reversal at a level I academic trauma center over eight months.

Outcome Measures

INR reversal, need for a second dose, additional reversal agents given, mortality

Baseline Characteristics

 

Fixed-dose 4FPCC (n=37)

Age, years

70

Male

20 (54%)

Weight, kg

74.5

Indication for reversal

Intracranial hemorrhage

Gastrointestinal bleed

Urgent surgery

Other

 

17 (46%)

5 (14%)

7 (19%)

8 (21%)

 

Results

 

Fixed-dose 4FPCC (n=37)

INR values (interquartile range)

Initial

Post 4FPCC dose

 

3.06 (2.17-5.21)

1.32 (1.15-1.50)

Additional 4FPCC dose given

1 (3%)

Additional reversal agents given

Vitamin K

Desmopressin

Fresh frozen plasma

 

30 (81.1%)

5 (13.5%)

9 (24.3%)

Died before discharge

9 (24%)
 

Adverse Events

N/A

Study Author Conclusions

Based on this evaluation, the administration of a fixed dose of 1,500 units 4FPCC, was shown to be effective in adequately reversing the INR in the majority of patients with minimal thrombotic risks.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Limitations of this review are related to the retrospective, single-cohort study design. Additionally, all patients received at least one other reversal agent along with 4FPCC. The authors use no comparison group for fixed-dose efficacy, but they conducted a "what-if" cost analysis that favors fixed-dosing by saving $982 a patient versus variable dosing.

References:

Astrup G, Sarangarm P, Burnett A. Fixed dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for the emergent reversal of warfarin: a retrospective analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018;45(2):300-305.

Fixed Versus Variable Dosing of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Vitamin K Antagonist-Related Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis

Design

Single center, retrospective, before-and-after analysis

N=53

Objective

To compare the achievement of target International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤ 1.5 with the fixed dosing strategy versus the variable dosing strategy of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in patients presenting with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)

Study Groups

Variable dosing (n=25)

Fixed dosing (n=28)

Inclusion criteria

Age ≥ 18 years, presented with ICH while on VKA therapy, was given PCC therapy

Exclusion criteria

Treated during the protocol transition month (November 2013)

Methods

Patients treated with PCC prior to November 2013 received variable dosing based on manufacturer recommendations, and after November 2013 received a fixed dose of 1,000 IU factor IX PCC, followed by follow-up INR-assessment (if the target INR of ≤1.5 was not achieved, another 500 IU of PCC was administered).

Duration

January 2013 to 1 August 2014

Outcome Measures

INR after initial PCC dose, need for additional dosing, total PCC dose used, mortality, length of stay

Baseline Characteristics

 

Variable dosing (n=25)

Fixed dosing (n=28)

 

Age, years

77 77  

Female

12 (48%) 14 (50%)  

Weight, kg

79 73  

Baseline INR (range)

3.1 (1.8-9.0) 3.3 (1.7-9.0)  
 

Results

 

Variable dosing (n=25)

Fixed dosing (n=28)

p-value

INR after initial dose (range)

Patients with INR≤1.5 after initial dose

1.3 (1.0-1.9)

24 (96%)

1.4 (1.2-2.0)

19 (68%)

0.001

0.013

Median total PCC dose used, IU (range)

1,750 (1,000-2,500) 1,000 (1,000-3,000) 0.005

Need for additional doses

2 (8%) 9 (32%) 0.043

Mortality

At discharge

At 30-days post-PCC treatment

 

3 (12%)

4 (16%)

 

6 (22%)

7 (25%)

 

0.474

0.509

Duration of hospital stay, days (range)

8 (1-43) 11.5 (1-52) 0.643

Door-to-needle time, mins

81 60 0.420
 

Adverse Events

N/A

Study Author Conclusions

This retrospective study shows that an initial fixed dose of 1000 IU factor IX PCC is inferior in achieving the target INR of ≤1.5 in comparison to the variable dose calculated from bodyweight, baseline INR, and target INR.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

A limitation of this study is the small sample size, which lacks the power to draw conclusions from data of the secondary endpoints. The sample size was, however, sufficient to demonstrate a significant difference in the primary outcome (achievement of target-INR). Another limitation is the retrospective nature of the study, resulting in the absence of parameters necessary for comparison of clinical outcome. A strength is that it used real-world data.

References:

Abdoellakhan RA, Miah IP, Khorsand N, Meijer K, Jellema K. Fixed Versus Variable Dosing of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Vitamin K Antagonist-Related Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2017;26(1):64-69

Management of rivaroxaban- or apixaban-associated major bleeding with prothrombin complex concentrates: a cohort study

Design

Multicenter, prospective study 

N= 84

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban and apixaban

Study Groups

Apixaban (n= 39)

Rivaroxaban (n= 45) 

Inclusion Criteria

Patients on rivaroxaban or apixaban who required a PCC to manage acute and active major bleeding (defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis); administration of the last dose of either rivaroxaban or apixaban was within 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with a drop of hemoglobin without an evident source of bleeding; preoperative reversal of rivaroxaban or apixaban; acute coronary syndrome or ischemic stroke within the past 30 days; received other hemostatic agents

Methods

Patients were recruited from 25 hospitals in Sweden and referred to the Coagulation Unit at Karolinska University Hospital. According to the hospital protocol, a flat dose of 1,500 IU of 4-factor PCCs was given to patients < 65 kg and 2,000 IU to patients ≥ 65 kg. A second dose of a PCC could be administered at the treating physician's discretion if patients were still bleeding. Patients' medical interventions, laboratory results, and outcomes were retrieved from their medical records. 

Two coagulation specialists assessed the effectiveness of bleeding management in each case and reached an agreement by discussion. 

Duration

Study enrollment: January 1, 2014, and October 1, 2016

Follow-up: 30 days post-treatment 

Outcome Measures

Duration of hospital stay, discharge destinations, and effectiveness of bleeding management

For non-intracranial hemorrhage (ICH): changes in the hemoglobin level, transfusion of blood products, intervention or surgery to stop the bleeding, and the administration of other hemostatic agents

For ICH: follow-up computed tomography (CT) within 24 hours, change in neurological status, and surgical intervention

Safety outcome: occurrence of arterial or venous thromboembolism and death

Baseline Characteristics

 

Apixaban (n= 39)

Rivaroxaban (n= 45) 

p-value  

Median age, years (interquartile range [IQR])

77 (7 to 81)

73 (68 to 84) 0.52  

Female

17 (43.4%) 19 (42.2%) 1  

Median body weight, kg

75 (67 to 89)

75 (65 to 80)

0.97  

Indication for anticoagulation

SPAF

VTE

Both

 

34 (87.2%)

2 (5.1%)

3 (7.7%)

 

29 (64.4%)

1 (2.2%)

15 (33.3%)

0.01

--

--

--

 

History of stroke

11 (28.2%)

10 (22.2%) 0.62  

Concomitant medications 

Antiplatelet 

NSAID

 

7 (17.9%)

2 (5.1%)

 

3 (6.7%)

0

 

0.22

0.21

 

Baseline laboratory results

INR 

APTT

Creatinine

 

1.2 (1.1 to 1.3)

35 (32 to 39)

77 (61 to 83)

 

1.3 (1.1 to 1.5)

41 (36 to 49)

79.5 (63.5-99.5)

 

0.04

0.01

0.39

 

Bleeding location

ICH 

GI bleeding 

Visceral 

Genitourinary 

Musculoskeletal 

 

29 (74.4%)

5 (12.8%)

2 (5.1%)

2 (5.1%)

1 (2.6%)

 


30 (66.7%)

8 (17.8%)

3(6.7%)

2 (4.4%)

2 (4.4%)

0.95

--

--

--

--

--

 

SPAF, stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation; VTE, venous thromboembolism; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; INR, international normalized ratio; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; GI, gastrointestinal 

Results

Management given

Apixaban (n= 39)

Rivaroxaban (n= 45) 

p-value

 

Median PCC dose, IU factor IX

Total dose

Dose, IU/kg 

 

2000 (2000 to 2000)

26.7 (22 to 29.9)

 

2000 (1500 to 2000)

26.7 (20.8 to 29.4)

 

0.26

0.62

 

Transfusions given

Red blood cell concentrate

Plasma

Platelete

 

9 (23.1%)

2 (5.1%)

2 (5.1%)

 

11 (24.4%)

8 (17.8%)

8 (17.8%)

 

1

0.1

0.1

 

Outcome of management

 

Apixaban (n= 39) Rivaroxaban (n= 45)
Effective  Ineffective Effective Ineffective

Bleeding location

ICH

GI

Visceral

Genitourinary

Musculoskeletal

 

21 (72.4%)

3 (60%)

1 (50%)

1 (100%)

 

8 (27.6%)

2 (40%)

2 (100%)

1 (50%)

 

22 (73.3%)

5 (62.5%)

1 (33.3%)

2 (100%)

2 (100.0%)

 

8 (26.7%)

3 (37.5%)

2 (66.7%)

Hemoglobin drop  

2 (33.3%)

4 (66.7%)

3 (37.5%)

5 (62.5%)

Any invasive procedure 

None

Craniotomy

Gastroscopy

Embolization

Fasciotomy

Laparotomy

Thoracotomy

 

17 (68%)

5 (71.4%)

3 (75.1%)

1 (100%)

 

8 (32%)

2 (28.6%)

1 (25%)

2 (100%)

0

0

0

 

23 (74.2%)

6 (100%)

1 (33.3%)

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

0

 

1 (25%)

2 (66.7%)

1 (50%)

0

1 (50%)

1 (100%)

Median length of hospital stay, days 

7 (3 to 15)

4.5 (2 to 7)

9 (4 to 16)

2.5 (2 to 5)

Discharge destination

Home

Rehabilitation facility

Other hospital

Deceased

 

14 (93.3%)

7 (63.6%)

2 (66.7%)

3 (33.3%)

 

1 (6.7%)

4 (36.4%)

1 (33.3%)

6 (66.7%)

 

10 (90.9%)

13 (92.9%)

1 (100%)

5 (35.7%)

 

1 (9.1%)

1 (7.1%)

9 (64.3%)

PCCs were administered 6 hours after the estimated bleeding time (2 to 10 hours). 

Adverse Events

Occurrence of arterial or venous thromboembolism: ischemic stroke (n= 2) and pulmonary embolism (n= 1)

Study Author Conclusions

The study found that the majority of patients treated with PCCs for the management of major bleeding events (MBEs) on rivaroxaban or apixaban achieved effective bleeding control, with few observed thromboembolic events.

Based on the study results, the authors would suggest giving patients with MBEs on rivaroxaban or apixaban an initial PCC dose of 2000 IU, which may be repeated if the effect is suboptimal. Such an approach seems to be associated with an acceptable balance between efficacy and safety of PCCs.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The use of flat dosing of PCCs in this study led to an overall effective anticoagulant reversal when administered within a couple of hours of bleeding onset with a low risk of thromboembolism. However, the applicability of the study results of using flat doses of PCCs as reversal agents for rivaroxaban or apixaban may be limited by the absence of a control group.

References:

Majeed A, Ågren A, Holmström M, et al. Management of rivaroxaban- or apixaban-associated major bleeding with prothrombin complex concentrates: a cohort study. Blood. 2017;130(15):1706-1712. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-05-782060

Increased risk of volume overload with plasma compared with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for urgent vitamin K antagonist reversal

Design

Post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials

N=388

Objective

To analyze predictors of volume overload based on data collected during two completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) versus plasma in patients requiring urgent VKA reversal for acute major bleeding or before an urgent surgical or invasive procedure

Study Groups

Plasma (n=197)

4FPCC (n=191)

Inclusion criteria

vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-treated patients with major bleeding or requiring an urgent surgical invasion procedure

Exclusion criteria patients with missing values for the potential predictor variables

Methods

The two RCTs evaluated the efficacy of 4FPCC versus plasma in patients requiring urgent VKA reversal for acute major bleeding or before an urgent surgical or invasive procedure. The 4FPCC dose was based on baseline INR and body weight infused at a rate no more than 3 IU/kg/min. The infusion rate of plasma was at the discretion of the clinical team.

Duration

51 Days

Outcome Measures

Fluid overload

Baseline Characteristics

 

4FPCC (n=191)

Plasma (n=197)

Age, years

69.8 68.8

Female

45.5% 45.2%

Male

54.5% 54.8%

White

93.7% 88.8%

History of chonic heart failure

36.7% 41.1%

History of coronary artery disease

50.3% 50.3%

History of renal disease

24.6% 22.8%

Results

 

4FPCC (n=191)

Plasma (n=197)

Volume overload events

9 (4.7%) 25 (12.7%)

The mean 4FPCC infusion rate for patients with volume overload events was 170.0 IU/min versus 143.4 IU/min without volume overload.

Adverse Events

Most common volume overload event

4FPCC group: cardiac failure congestive (54.5%)

Plasma group: acute pulmonary edema (34.5%)

Study Author Conclusions

This study shows that the use of plasma (vs. 4FPCC), history of CHF, and history of renal disease appear to be independently predictive of volume overload. Careful consideration should be given to the use of plasma for urgent VKA reversal and alternative VKA reversal therapies, such as 4FPCC, should be considered.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This was a well-designed post hoc analysis. However, the RCTs analyzed were efficacy trials, not safety. Safety outcomes between groups could not be powered.

References:

Refaai MA, Goldstein JN, Lee ML, Durn BL, Milling TJ, Sarode R. Increased risk of volume overload with plasma compared with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for urgent vitamin K antagonist reversal. Transfusion. 2015;55(11):2722-9.

Evaluation of fixed dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for emergent warfarin reversal

Design

Retrospective chart review

N=39

Objective

To examine a protocol of 1500 IU fixed doses of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC; Kcentra) in the setting of emergent warfarin reversal at a single institution

Study Groups

Fixed-dose 4FPCC (n=39)

Inclusion criteria

Patients who were administered 4FPCC per the fixed dose protocol for the purpose of emergent oral anticoagulation reversal for any clinical indication

Exclusion criteria

No post administration INR available (due to death, transfer, or other reason)

Methods

All patients were administered a fixed dose of 1,500 IU of 4FPCC at a single level I trauma center.

Duration

March 2014 to January 2015

Outcome Measures

INR reversal, need for a second dose, additional reversal agents given, mortality

Baseline Characteristics

 

Fixed-dose 4FPCC (n=39)

Median age, years

70

Weight, kg

79.5

Chronic anticoagulant

Warfarin

Rivaroxaban

 

38 (97%)

1 (3%)

Indication for treatment

Intracranial hemorrhage

Gastrointestinal hemorrhage

Emergency surgery

Other

 

28 (72%)

4 (10%)

2 (5%)

5 (13%)

 

Results

 

Fixed-dose 4FPCC (n=39)

INR values (interquartile range)

Baseline

Aftere a single 4FPCC dose

 

3.3 (2.5-4.0)

1.4 (1.2-1.6)

Successful reversal after a single dose

Target INR <2.0

Target INR ≤1.5

 

36 (92%)

28 (72%)

Additional 4FPCC dose given

1 (3%)

Additional reversal agents given

Vitamin K

Fresh frozen plasma

 

36 (92%)

11 (28%)

Died before discharge

9 (23%)
 

Adverse Events

Two of the three treatment failures (INR >2.0 after a single fixed-dose) presented initially with an INR >10

Study Author Conclusions

These findings suggest good efficacy and safety when utilizing a fixed-dose of 1,500 IU of 4FPCC for emergent warfarin reversal.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This study was limited by the retrospective design, small sample size, and lack of a comparator group. Another important limitation is that several patients who received fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K in addition to the 4FPCC were included.

References:

Klein L, Peters J, Miner J, Gorlin J. Evaluation of fixed dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for emergent warfarin reversal. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(9):1213-8.