Is there any literature on the treatment of systemic infection caused by Cupriavidus pauculus?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Cupriavidus pauculus (C. pauculus) is a gram-negative, aerobic, motile bacilli commonly found in soil and water. Like other ubiquitous opportunistic infections, C. pauculus infections are usually rare but can manifest as varied clinical conditions. An in vitro susceptibility study from France suggests that minocycline and cefepime are the most effective agents, however, scarce data prevents a formal analysis on antibiotic susceptibility and most case reports performed local testing to determine the best course of antibiotics. As with most rare opportunistic infections, antibiotic susceptibility testing is crucial to determine appropriate treatment.

Background

Cupriavidus pauculus (C. pauculus) is a gram-negative, aerobic, non-lactose-fermenting, motile bacilli with flagella commonly found in environmental samples from the soil and water, including human samples. C. pauculus was formerly known as Ralstonia paucula. Due to the rarity of infection, there is limited understanding of its pathogenesis, but they seem to follow similar trends of other rare opportunistic bacterial infections. Cupriavidus gilardii, Cupriavidus pauculus and Cupriavidus metallidurans have all been implicated in human infections and manifest into a variety of community and nosocomial infections including respiratory infections, meningitis, tenosynovitis, cellulitis, septic arthritis, peritonitis, and sepsis. C. pauculus has the greatest link to opportunistic infection and outbreaks and has been identified in all patients, with most severe cases linked to newborns and the immunocompromised. As such, data for determining antibiotic susceptibility is limited to case reports which typically start with empiric treatment, followed by susceptibility testing to optimize treatment. [1], [2], [3]

A 2020 in vitro study in France performed a test to determine the minimum inhibitory capacity (MIC) of 20 antibiotics for a panel of Cupriavidus clinical strains, mainly from respiratory samples of patients with cystic fibrosis. The experimental panel consisted of 18 strains, including 5 C. pauculus strains. As the C. pauculus and C. metallidurans exhibit similar susceptibility profiles, they were included in the final analysis as a single group. Based on the results, minocycline was the most active antibiotic with very low MICs and 100% susceptibility rate. Cefepime was also highly effective and exhibited similar susceptible and resistant breakpoints. Aminoglycosides were poorly active against Cupriavidus strains and while fluoroquinolones were active against over 80% of Cuprivadus strains, susceptibility was not great for C. pauculus and C. metallidurans. While the findings support use of minocycline and cefepime, clinical data is needed to confirm the optimal treatment of Cupriavidus infections. See Table 1 for reported MICs of C. pauculus and C. metallidurans strains. [1], [2], [3]

References:

[1] Massip C, Coullaud-Gamel M, Gaudru C, et al. In vitro activity of 20 antibiotics against Cupriavidus clinical strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(6):1654-1658. doi:10.1093/jac/dkaa066
[2] Miftode E, Onofrei MI, Miftode L, Pleşca CE, Pasare A, Dorneanu O. Rare Case of Polymicrobial Sepsis with Cupravidus Pauculus in a Sclerodermic Patient. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res. 2022;46(3). doi:10.26717/BJSTR.2022.46.007343
[3] Valdés-Corona LF, Maulen-Radovan I, Videgaray-Ortega F. Cupriavidus pauculus bacteremia related to parenteral nutrition. Case series report. IDCases. 2021;24:e01072. Published 2021 Mar 10. doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01072

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

Is there any literature on the treatment of systemic infection caused by Cupriavidus pauculus?

Level of evidence

D - Case reports or unreliable data  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-2 for your response.


MICs of antibiotics against Cupriavidus pauculus and metallidurans clinical strains, determined by the broth microdilution method

Bacteria Antibiotic Minimum inhibitory capacity (MIC; mg/L) Percentage susceptible (breakpoint, mg/L) Percentage resistant (breakpoint, mg/L)
MIC50 MIC90
C. pauculus and C. metallidurans Amikacin 8 128 56 (≤8) 33 (>16)
Amoxicillin 256 512 0 (≤2) 78(>8)

Amoxicillin/clavulanate

128 256 11 (≤2) 78(>8)
Aztreonam 256 512 0 (≤4) 100 (>8)
Cefepime 0.5 1 100 (≤4) 0 (>8)
Cefotaxime 1 2 67 (≤1) 11 (>2)
Ceftazidime 8 16 33 (≤4) 44 (>8)
Ceftazidime/avibactam 8 16 78 (≤8) 22 (>8)
Ceftolozane/tazobactam 2 4 100 (≤4) 0 (>4)
Ceftriazone 1 2 78 (≤1) 0 (>2)
Ciprofloxacin 0.5 1 44 (≤0.25) 44 (>0.5)
Colistin 16 32 0 (≤2) 100 (>2)
Co-trimoxazole 16 256 22 (≤2) 78 (>2)
Imipenem 0.25 2 100 (≤2) 0 (>4)
Levofloxacin 1 2 44 (≤0.5) 44 (>1)
Meropenem 16 64 11 (≤2) 67 (>8)
Minocycline 0.25 0.5 100 (≤4) 0 (>8)
Piperacillin/tazobactam 2 32 67 (≤4) 22 (>16)
Temocillin 256 512 0 (≤16) 100 (>16)
Tobramycin 64 128 44 (≤4) 56 (>4)

Note: bacterial strains were collected from French institutions, which may not reflect susceptibility patterns seen in the United States

 

References:

Adapted from: Massip C, Coullaud-Gamel M, Gaudru C, et al. In vitro activity of 20 antibiotics against Cupriavidus clinical strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(6):1654-1658. doi:10.1093/jac/dkaa066

 

Case reports demonstrating treatment of systemic infection due to Cupriavidus Pauculus

Citation

Antibiotic(s) used Case presentation

Miftode et al., 2022

Levofloxacin 750 mg/day and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 4 tab/daily

A 41-year-old female patient presented with scleroderma after travel to Thailand. The patient was admitted for sepsis due to Streptococcus pneumonia, with a respiratory infection caused by multi-drug resistant Psuedomonas aeroginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Sepsis was improved with empiric antibiotic treatment, initially cefotaxime and doxycycline, modifed to vancomycin and imipenem based on susceptibility tests. However, a sudden aggravation in respiratory status was observed, including high fever, severe productive cough, and vomica on the 6th day of hospitalization. The patient was continued on ampicillin 10 g/day and levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole x 14 days. Sputum samples eventually identified C. pauculus, and patient was continued on 7-day course of levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, which was effective. Symptoms improved and biological markers and imaging tests demonstrated regression. 

Tian et al., 2022

Meropenem 1000 mg, 3 times daily

A 38-year-old male patient presented with intermittent fever x 8 days. He was diagnosed with Graves hyperthyroidism 3 months earlier, and was treated with oral methimazole tablets, invoking suspicion of secondary infection caused by leucopenia induced by methimazole. Patient was empirically started on ceftazidime tazobactam sodium (2.4 g, twice a day) and levofloxacin lactate (0.6 g, once a day) for anti-infection therapy. Bone marrow culture identified C. pauculus and antibiotic treatment was upgraded to meropenem (1000 mg, 3 times daily). After 3 days of treatment anti-inflammatory index decreased but patient was still febrile, suggesting additional underlying cause. Pathological examination of swollen lymph node revealed histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis, successfully treated with steroids. 

Gomes et al., 2021

Minocycline

A 90-year-old male patient presented to the emergency room with septic shock and diagnosed with urinary tract infection. The patient was initially treated for multiresistant Kelbsiella pneumonia in the urine with amikacin and fosfomycin, however, his clinical status deteriorated during the hospital stay. When his condition got worse, flucloxacillin was added for suspected Staphylococcus aureus infection. Three days later, C. pauculus blood cultures were obtained with susceptibility only to minocycline, which was added to treatment. Unfortunately, the patient's status continued to deteriorate and he ended up dying.

Valdes-Corona et al., 2021

 

 

Case 1: amikacin and piperacillin/tazobactam

A preterm male neonate was admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) due to hydrocephalus and hyaline membrane disease (HMD). The patient required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), surfactant administration, nasogastric tube placement, and both umbilical and percutaneous catheter insertion. Extubation was successfully achieved within the first 72 hours. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was initiated, and the neonate subsequently developed bacteremia, characterized by chills and fever. Blood cultures isolated C. pauculus as the causative agent. The patient was treated with a combination of piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin, resulting in a favorable clinical outcome. The neonate was discharged from the NICU three weeks later.

Case 2: piperacillin/tazobactam

A female preterm neonate was admitted to the NICU due to respiratory failure and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The patient required IMV, nasogastric tube placement, and umbilical catheter insertion. TPN was initiated, and the neonate developed fever and chills within the subsequent 24 hours. Blood cultures isolated C. pauculus as the causative agent. Despite treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam, the patient unfortunately succumbed to her condition 48 hours later.

Case 3: levofloxacine, vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam

A 2-year and 9-month-old male was admitted for empyema management. The patient underwent pleural decortication, with subsequent placement of a chest tube and central venous catheter (CVC). TPN was initiated, and within the first 24 hours, the patient developed a fever. Blood cultures identified C. pauculus as the causative agent. The patient was initially treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin, resulting in a favorable clinical outcome. The patient was discharged on an oral treatment regimen of levofloxacin.

Shenai et al., 2019

Intravenous ceftazidime

A 64-year-old female with history of medically refractory Parkinson's disease underwent magnetic resonance imaging-guided bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS). While surgery was successful, the patient developed signs of generator pocket infection, revealing multispecies growth including C. pauculus. The growth, however, was deemed questionable due to low quantity but was later decided to be clinically significant. The patient was treated with a six-week course of intravenous ceftazidime. Two months later, the patient developed dehiscence and purulence due to non-compliant behavior. Wound cultures were negative and the patient was treated with cefepime for 2 weeks.

Bianco et al., 2018

Ciprofloxacin 400 mg Q12hours

A 48-year-old woman with obesity and hypertension was referred for diagnosis of myelomonocytic leukemia and chemotherapy was initiated. On day 9 of hospitalization, the patient became hypotensive, tachycardic, tachypnoeic, febrile and oligoanuric. Initial treatment consisted of meropenem, vancomycin, and caspofungin until gram-negative rods were identified in blood cultures, leading to discontinuation of vancomycin and caspofungin. Incubation of samples eventually revealed C. pauculus and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility was performed on the isolate. Following the result, ciprofloxacin 400 mg Q12hours was added to meropenem and antimicrobial therapy continued for 10 days. The patient was successfully discharged on day 28.

Uzodi et al., 2014

Cefepime 100 mg/kg/day divided Q12hours, escalated to 150 mg/kg/day divided Q8hours with ciprofloxacin 30 mg/kg/day divided Q8hours

A 15-month-old boy was transferred for a heart transplant. The patient's respiratory status deteriorated due to bacteremia and empiric treatment began with cefepime, vancomycin, and fluconazole. The source of infection was found to be caused by C. pauculus from the thermoregulator reservoir. The organism was identified to be susceptible to cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, quinolones, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Antibiotic treatment was complicated during the course of stay but mainly consisted of cefepime at 100 mg/kg/day divided Q12hours. Ciprofloxacin was added to ensure clearance on day 8 at 30 mg/kg/day, divided Q8hours while the cefepime dose was increased to 150 mg/kg/day divided Q8hours. Ciprofloxacin was discontinued 3 days after the oxygenator change out, and three consecutive negative cultures were documented. Cefepime dose was decreased back down to 100 mg/kg/day divided Q12hours and was eventually used to complete treatment.

Duggal et al., 2013

Ceftazidime 150 mg/kg/day divided in 2 doses

A 6-day old neonate presented with fever, poor feeding, lethargy, and abnormal cry. Examinations revealed motile bacilli which was initially identified as Pseudomonas but was later identified as C. pauculus. The isolate was susceptible to ceftazidime, levofloxacin, co-trimoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, and meropenem; intermediate susceptibility to ciprofloxacin was reported and the isolate was resistant to amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, aztreonam, and tetracycline. The antibiotics regimen was changed to ceftazidime 150 mg/kg/day in two divided doses without steroids and the patient was discharged on week 3 in stable condition.

 

References:

[1] Miftode E, Onofrei MI, Miftode L, Pleşca CE, Pasare A, Dorneanu O. Rare Case of Polymicrobial Sepsis with Cupravidus Pauculus in a Sclerodermic Patient. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res. 2022;46(3). doi:10.26717/BJSTR.2022.46.007343
[2] Tian S, Zhu B, Tian Y, Li J, Peng C. Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis with Cupriavidus Pauculus Infection in a Patient with Graves Hyperthyroidism: A Case Report. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:1019-1025. Published 2022 Mar 10. doi:10.2147/IDR.S349655
[3] Gomes I, Martins Ferreira M, Leitão J, Carvalho A. Multiresistent Cupriavidus pauculus infection in an immunocompromised elderly patient. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(7):e243328. Published 2021 Jul 13. doi:10.1136/bcr-2021-243328
[4] Valdés-Corona LF, Maulen-Radovan I, Videgaray-Ortega F. Cupriavidus pauculus bacteremia related to parenteral nutrition. Case series report. IDCases. 2021;24:e01072. Published 2021 Mar 10. doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01072
[5] Shenai MB, Falconer R, Rogers S. A Cupriavidus Pauculus Infection in a Patient with a Deep Brain Stimulation Implant. Cureus. 2019;11(11):e6104. Published 2019 Nov 8. doi:10.7759/cureus.6104
[6] Bianco G, Boattini M, Audisio E, Cavallo R, Costa C. Septic shock due to meropenem- and colistin-resistant Cupriavidus pauculus. J Hosp Infect. 2018;99(3):364-365. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2018.03.025
[7] Uzodi AS, Schears GJ, Neal JR, Henry NK. Cupriavidus pauculus bacteremia in a child on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2014;60(6):740-741. doi:10.1097/MAT.0000000000000120
[8] Duggal S, Gur R, Nayar R, Rongpharpi SR, Jain D, Gupta RK. Cupriavidus pauculus (Ralstonia paucula) concomitant meningitis and septicemia in a neonate: first case report from India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013;31(4):405-409. doi:10.4103/0255-0857.118871