A 2021 review on transplant stewardship discusses rATG dose rounding and capping as cost-reduction strategies that, despite being relatively common in practice, carry limited supporting evidence and are not endorsed by FDA labeling. Two retrospective studies were highlighted. The first examined 242 adult kidney transplant recipients undergoing early steroid withdrawal who received four doses of rATG 1.5 mg/kg (total body weight), rounded to the nearest 25 mg vial and capped at a single dose of 150 mg; patients with cumulative doses ≥6 mg/kg had significantly lower biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) compared to those receiving <6 mg/kg (11% vs. 21.2%, p <0.042), but no differences in patient/graft survival, renal function, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia were observed. The second study involved 261 recipients with continued steroids, targeting a total cumulative dose of 5 mg/kg but capped at 500 mg, and found no difference in BPAR (8.9% vs. 8.7%) or other clinical endpoints between those receiving <5 mg/kg and ≥5 mg/kg, concluding that modest cumulative dose variations due to capping did not compromise efficacy in the context of triple immunosuppression, though cost savings were not directly measured. Additional published studies note that rounding to the nearest 25 mg is common practice to minimize waste, and the review suggests that rounding and capping can likely be implemented safely, with caution warranted for individuals with higher body weights. Importantly, there is no evidence supporting a maximum lifetime cumulative dose, and because dose capping has not been specifically studied for rejection treatment, the review recommends excluding those patients from capping protocols. [1]