What is the comparative clinical data between Synagis (palivizumab) and Beyfortus (nirsevimab)?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Comparative clinical data is limited to a preliminary Phase II/III analysis where nirsevimab and palivizumab demonstrated similar tolerability profiles during the first respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season. Further comparative data is lacking and there have been no attempts to access the efficacy between products.

Background

A 2022 review discusses the use of monoclonal antibodies (mABs) for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants and young children. These include the use of palivizumab, an established treatment option for prophylaxis in neonates, and the newly approved agent, nirsevimab. However, at the time of publication, nirsevimab was still under development. Comparisons between palivizumab and nirsevimab are limited to a single phase II/III study (MEDLEY) that has, so far, demonstrated similar safety and tolerability results for the first RSV season (see Table 1). The results of the second and combined RSV season will be published at a later date. The other study (MELODY) compared nirsevimab to placebo and excluded patients if they were eligible for commercial palivizumab treatment. [1]

References:

[1] Esposito S, Abu Raya B, Baraldi E, et al. RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy?. Front Immunol. 2022;13:880368. Published 2022 Apr 28. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.880368

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

What is the comparative clinical data between Synagis (palivizumab) and Beyfortus (nirsevimab)?

Level of evidence

D - Case reports or unreliable data  Read more→



Please see Table 1 for your response.


 

Safety of Nirsevimab for RSV in Infants with Heart or Lung Disease or Prematurity

Design

Preliminary results of an ongoing Phase 2/3 randomized, double-blind, controlled study

N= 925

Objective

To report the safety and pharmacokinetics of nirsevimab through the first respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season in a study spanning two RSV seasons in preterm and chronic lung disease (CLD)-congenital heart disease (CHD) cohorts

Study Groups

Preterm cohort (n= 615)

Pavilizumab (n= 206)

Nirsevimab (n= 406)

CHD-CLD cohort (n= 310)

Pavilizumab (n= 98)

Nirsevimab (n= 208)

Inclusion Criteria

Preterm: first year of life and born 35 weeks or less; uncomplicated small atrial or ventricular septal defects or patent ductus arteriosus; or aortic stenosis, pulmonic stenosis, or coarctation of the aorta alone

CHD-CLD cohort: infants in their first year of life and documented, hemodynamically significant CHD or infants in their first year of life and a diagnosis of CLD of prematurity requiring medical intervention/management

Entering first RSV season at time of screening

Exclusion Criteria

Fever, acute illness, or hospitalization within 7 days of study; history or active of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI); history or active RSV infection; renal/hepatic impairment; any condition that might interfere with study evaulation

Methods

Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either single fixed intramuscular (IM) dose of nirsevimab, followed by 4 once-monthly IM dose of placebo one IM injection of nirsevimab 50 mg g (if< 5 kg) or 100 mg (if≥ 5 kg) or placebo; or pavilizumab 5 once-monthly IM dose of 15 mg/kg.

Duration

1 year

Outcome Measures

Adverse events

Baseline Characteristics

 

Pavilizumab (n= 309)

Nirsevimab (n= 616)

   

Age group

≤ 3 months

> 3 to ≤ 6 months

> 6 months

 

46.6%

32.7%

20.7%

 

44.5%

34.1%

21.4%

   

Female

43.0% 48.2%    

Weight group, day 1

< 5 kg

≥ 5 kg

 

57.2%

42.8%

 

56.1%

43.9%

   

Gestational age, group

≥ 29 to < 32 weeks

≥ 32 to < 35 weeks

≥ 35 weeks

 

23.0%

40.8%

13.6%

 

20.8%

42.5%

15.6%

   

Results

Endpoint

Preterm cohort (n= 615)

CHD-CLD cohort (n= 310)

 

Pavilizumab (n= 206)

Nirsevimab (n= 406)

Pavilizumab (n= 98)

Nirsevimab (n= 208)
≥ 1 adverse events

134 (65.0%)

268 (66.0%)

72 (73.5%)

148 (71.2%)
≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse events

4 (1.9%)

6 (1.5%)

2 (2.0%)

4 (1.9%)

≥ 1 adverse event of grade ≥ 3 severity

7 (3.4%) 14 (3.4%) 13 (13.3%) 30 (14.4%)

≥1 Treatment-related adverse event of grade ≥3 severity

0 0 0 0

Any adverse event with outcome of death*

0 2 (0.5%) 1 (1.0%) 3 (1.4%)

≥ 1 serious adverse event

11 (5.3%) 28 (6.9%) 20 (20.4%) 40 (19.2%)

≥ 1 serious adverse event, grade ≥ 3 adverse event, or both

11 (5.3%) 28 (6.9%) 21 (21.4%) 45 (21.6%)

≥ 1 treatment-related serious adverse event

0 0 0 0

≥ 1 Adverse event of special interest**

0 1 (0.2%) 0 1 (0.5%)
≥ 1 Covid-19–related adverse event

1 (0.5%)

8 (2.0%)

1 (1.0%)

2 (1.0%)

*All deaths were deemed unrelated to treatment by the investigator

**Includes hypersensitivity, immune complex disease, and thrombocytopenia

Adverse Events

Most common adverse events are infection and infestations, gastrointestinal disorders, administration site disorders

Study Author Conclusions

N/A

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This is a preliminary report of an ongoing two RSV season trial. The significance of the findings are to be confirmed once the full study is available.



References:

Domachowske J, Madhi SA, Simões EAF, et al. Safety of Nirsevimab for RSV in Infants with Heart or Lung Disease or Prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(9):892-894. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2112186