What is the treatment for severe hypercalcemia?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Evidence guiding the optimal treatment strategy for severe hypercalcemia is limited, as most literature focuses specifically on hypercalcemia of malignancy. Current guidance for severe disease (serum calcium >14 mg/dL) suggests initial management with aggressive IV isotonic saline hydration followed by antiresorptive therapy, using an IV bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid preferred) or denosumab, with or without short-term calcitonin. Calcitonin may provide rapid but transient calcium reduction, while antiresorptive agents are the mainstay for sustained control, and glucocorticoids may be used as adjunctive therapy in select etiologies or refractory cases. Treatment should be individualized based on severity, renal function, and underlying etiology.

"severe hypercalcemia"; severe hypercalcemia NOT malignancy; treatment, guidelines

Background

The 2023 Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of hypercalcemia in malignancy (HCM) define severe HCM as serum calcium (SCa) >14 mg/dL (3.5 mmol/L). For these patients, it is suggested using a combination of calcitonin and an intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate or denosumab as initial treatment, rather than using an IV bisphosphonate or denosumab alone. This recommendation is based on a retrospective study involving 140 patients treated with a bisphosphonate and/or calcitonin for moderate to severe HCM (see Table 1; corrected SCa >13 mg/dL or ionized calcium >1.5 mmol/L). Additionally, the guidelines provide an alternative definition of hypercalcemia severity from the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. [1]

A 2022 review addressed the management of severe cancer-associated hypercalcemia, defined by corrected calcium levels >13 mg/dL, rapid rises in calcium, or neurologic symptoms. The authors emphasized aggressive intravenous isotonic saline hydration as initial therapy to correct volume depletion and promote calciuresis, followed by antiresorptive therapy as the cornerstone of treatment. Intravenous zoledronic acid was identified as the preferred agent, normalizing calcium levels in most patients within 48-72 hours, while calcitonin was recommended as a short-term adjunct for rapid but transient calcium reduction. Denosumab was supported as an effective alternative in patients with renal impairment or bisphosphonate-refractory disease, with glucocorticoids and dialysis reserved for select etiologies or life-threatening cases. The authors concluded that prompt hydration, early antiresorptive therapy, and treatment of the underlying malignancy are essential for sustained control of severe hypercalcemia. [2]

Severe hypercalcemia is defined as total calcium of 14 mg/dL or greater (>3.5 mmol/L) or ionized calcium of 10 mg/dL or greater (≥2.5 mmol/L). Treatment should be prompt, involving isotonic saline (200-300 mL/h) with IV bisphosphonates with or without calcitonin (depending on renal function). Intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg over 15 min should be started soon after hydration initiation; slower infusion rates (over 30-60 min) or lower doses of zoledronic acid or denosumab (not renally cleared) may be considered if serum creatinine is elevated. Glucocorticoids may be used as initial adjunctive therapy in patients with known or suspected vitamin D-related hypercalcemia; steroids can also be used adjunctively in refractory life-threatening hypercalcemia of any cause. The therapy approach should be modified based on clinical factors and etiology; hydration alone may be sufficient in certain cases with a known readily-reversable etiology (i.e., milk-alkali syndrome). See Table 2 for specific options. [3]

References: [1] Fuleihan GEH, Clines GA, Hu MI, et al. Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(3):507-528. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac621
[2] Guise TA, Wysolmerski JJ. Cancer-Associated Hypercalcemia. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(15):1443-1451. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp2113128
[3] Walker MD, Shane E. Hypercalcemia: A Review. JAMA. 2022;328(16):1624-1636. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.18331
Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the treatment for severe hypercalcemia?

Level of evidence

B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-3 for your response.


 

Bisphosphonate Versus Bisphosphonate and Calcitonin for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Hypercalcemia of Malignancy

Design

Retrospective cohort study

N= 140

Objective

To compare the use of bisphosphonate versus bisphosphonate with calcitonin for moderate to severe hypercalcemia of malignancy

Study Groups

Intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (n= 94)

IV bisphosphonate + IV calcitonin (n= 46)

Inclusion Criteria

Aged ≥ 18 years; received IV bisphosphonates (pamidronate or zoledronic acid) alone or with calcitonin; ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for hypercalcemia of malignancy; serum calcium concentration > 13 mg/dL and/or ionized calcium > 1.5 mmol/L

Exclusion Criteria

History of chronic kidney disease stage IV/V or end-stage renal disease; received renal replacement therapy within 48 hours of diagnosis; received a steroid equivalent to prednisone 10 mg daily, cinacalcet, calcitonin, or bisphosphonate in the prior 4 weeks of diagnosis

Methods

A single investigator retrospectively extrapolated relevant patient data and dosing information from the electronic medical record. Eligible patients were categorized into those who received routine, supportive care plus either (1) IV bisphosphonate (bisphosphonate group) or (2) IV bisphosphonate in combination with IV calcitonin (combination group). Treatment with calcitonin was required to be initiated within 24 hours of bisphosphonate therapy in the combination group. There was a lack of institutional guidelines to aid in the decision to add calcitonin therapy, and dosing was at the provider's discretion. A cost avoidance study was also conducted. 

Duration

Between August 1, 2012 and July 31, 2019

Follow-up: up to discharge 

Outcome Measures

Primary: change in corrected calcium from baseline to 48 hours after treatment initiation

Secondary: peak corrected calcium levels every 24 hours postintervention (up to 168 hours), incidence of normocalcemia (a corrected calcium between 8.7 and 10.7 mg/dL) and hypocalcemia (corrected calcium < 8.7 mg/dL) within 168 hours, time from treatment initiation to normocalcemia, hospital length of stay, inpatient mortality, disposition at discharge

Baseline Characteristics

  IV bisphosphonate (n= 94)

IV bisphosphonate + IV calcitonin (n= 46)

 

Age, years (IQR)

62 (54-72) 58 (46-73)  

Male

44% 54%  

Body mass index, kg/m(IQR)

24 (21-30) 27 (21-36)  

Cancer type 

Solid tumor 

Hematological 

Unclear 

Both 

 

84%

14%

1%

1%

 

67%

29%

4%

0

 

Unit at time of treatment 

Emergency department 

Intensive care unit

General medicine

Oncology

 

12%

17%

39%

32%

 

13%

30%

33%

24%

 

Serum levels 

Calcium, mg/dL (IQR)

Corrected calcium, mg/dL (IQR)

Ionized calcium, mmol/L (IQR)

 

12.6 (11.9-13.7)

13.9 (13.2-14.8)

1.66 (1.59-1.79)

 

13.9 (12.8-15.5)

14.9 (13.9-16.6)

1.73 (1.53-1.90)

 

Creatinine clearance, mL/min (IQR)

60 (43-89) 52 (33-108)  

Symptom severity*

Moderate

Moderate to severe 

Severe 

 

57%

18%

25%

 

47%

17%

36%

 

Pamidronate

Zoledronic acid

74%

26%

100%

0

 

Total daily calcitonin dose, IU/kg (IQR)

- 7.7 (6.4-8.1)  

Duration of calcitonin therapy, hours 

< 24 hours 

24-48 hours 

60-84 hours 

> 96 hours 

-

 

7

12

21

5

 

Total number of calcitonin doses within 7 days (IQR)

5 (2-6)  

Other treatments

Renal replacement therapy within 7 days 

Steroids within 14 days

Diuretic within 72 hours 

Diuretic within 14 days

 

4%

38%

38%

45%

 

7%

48%

63%

70%

 

IQR: interquartile range

*Moderate symptoms were defined as nausea, vomiting, constipation, fatigue, and increased thirst. Severe symptoms were defined as altered mental status, coma, arrhythmia, electrocardiogram change, or acute renal failure (increase in serum creatinine > 3-fold from baseline and/or serum creatinine > 4 mg/dL, with an acute increase of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL). Moderate to severe symptoms were defined as having at least 1 sign or symptom from both moderate and severe symptom classifications. 

Results

Endpoint

IV bisphosphonate (n= 94)

IV bisphosphonate + IV calcitonin
(n= 46)

p-value; median difference (95% confidence interval)

Decrease in corrected calcium 48 hours after start of treatment, mg/dL (IQR)

2.4 (1.6-3.4) 3.9 (2.5-5.3) < 0.001; 1.4 (0.8-2)

Percentage decrease in corrected calcium 48 hours after start of treatment (IQR)

18% (12-23) 26% (17-33) < 0.001; 8% (4-11%) 

Incidence of normocalcemia 

69 (73%) 28 (61%) 0.131 

Time from first therapy to normocalcemia, days (IQR) 

2.6 (2-3.5) 2.5 (1.8-3.3)  0.537 

Incidence of hypocalcemia

5 (5%)  1 (2%)  0.388

Hospital length of stay, days

10.9 ± 8.1 10.6 ± 7.3   0.803

Inpatient mortality 

12 (12%)  13 (28%) 0.034

Unit at discharge

Home

Skilled nursing facility 

Outside hospital 

 

41 (50%)

26 (32%)

15 (18%)

 

16 (49%)

12 (36%)

5 (15%)

0.861 

Average cost avoidance with bisphosphonate monotherapy was $11,248 per patient and $291,448 per year.

Adverse Events

See results 

Study Author Conclusions

In the treatment of moderate to severe hypercalcemia of malignancy, IV bisphosphonate in combination with calcitonin resulted in a higher difference in corrected calcium levels at 48 hours compared with bisphosphonate therapy alone. However, corrected calcium levels in the first 72 hours, time to normocalcemia, and clinical outcomes were similar. The addition of calcitonin increases cost without substantial clinical benefit, and providers may consider avoiding calcitonin.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The study is limited due to its retrospective design and differences in the use of concurrent treatments, such as the use of bisphosphonate agent (pamidronate vs zoledronic acid). Reliance on chart reviews is also subject to incomplete reporting or errors. Overall, the better improvement in calcium levels within 48 hours in the combination but not other clinical indicators could have been attributed to the higher baseline corrected calcium level in those receiving concurrent IV calcitonin. 
References:
[1] Khan AA, Gurnani PK, Peksa GD, Whittier WL, DeMott JM. Bisphosphonate Versus Bisphosphonate and Calcitonin for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Hypercalcemia of Malignancy. Ann Pharmacother. 2021;55(3):277-285. doi:10.1177/1060028020957048

 

Medical Treament of Symptomatic Moderate to Severe Hypercalcemia
Agent Adult Dose Adjustment for Renal Dysfunction Onset Efficacy in Hypercalcemia* Comments
Saline (IV hydration) Initially, 200-300 mL/h
Then, titrate to urine output
Reduce infusion rate if volume overload is a concern Immediate 22% -
Loop Diuretics 20-40 mg - Hours - Avoid using unless there is a high risk of fluid overload.
If required, use only after euvolemia is achieved
Calcitonion 4 IU/kg subcutaneously (max 8 IU/kg) None 4-6 h 30.7% -
Glucocorticoids 20-40 mg PO N/A 2-5 d 47& -
Dialysis - - Hours - -
Bisphosphonates
Pamidronate 60-90 mg IV over 2 h Decrease to 30 mg and prolong infusion time to 360 min if mild to moderate renal impairment

Limited data on use in CrCl <30 mL/min
1-2 d 69.7-75.87% -
Zoledronic Acid 4 mg IV over 15 min Consider reducing infusion time to 30-60 min and/or decreasing dose to 2 mg 1-2 d 88.4% -
Ibrandonate 2-6 mg IV over 2 h - - 76.5% Not FDA approved; approved for use in the EU
Denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously 0.3 mg/kg or 60 mg (suggested by expert opinion) 4 d 64% (bisphosphonate-refractory hypercalcemia) No dose is specifically approved for bisphosphonate-naive patients
*Based on calcium response to treatment. Caution should be exercised in interpreting, due to variability in defined criteria and select studies available.

 

References:
[1] Adapted from: Walker MD, Shane E. Hypercalcemia: A Review. JAMA. 2022;328(16):1624-1636. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.18331

 

 

  Summary of Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations Strength of Recommendation Certainty of Evidence
1 Recommend treating HCM with IV BP or Dmab rather than no treatment Strong Very low
2 Suggest treatment of HCM with Dmab over IV BP Conditional Very low
3 Suggest combination of calcitonin and antiresorptive agent (IV BP or Dmab) in treatment of severe HCM Conditional Very low
4 Suggest Dmab in refractory/recurrent HCM already treated with IV bisphosphonate Conditional Very low
5 Suggest adding antiresorptive agent if sCa is inadequately controlled despite glucocorticoids in HCM because of high calcitriol levels Conditional Very low
6 Suggest treatment with either calcimimetic or antiresorptive agent in HCM resulting from parathyroid carcinoma Conditional Very low
7 Suggest adding antiresorptive agent if sCa is inadequately controlled with calcimimetic in HCM resulting from parathyroid carcinoma Conditional Very low
8 Suggest adding calcimimetic if sCa is inadequately controlled with an antiresorptive agent in HCM resulting from parathyroid carcinoma Conditional Very low

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to develop the guideline, including strength of recommendations (weak, strong) and grading the certainty of evidence (good, fair, low, very low).

BP= bisphosphonate; Dmab= denosumab; HCM= hypercalcaemia of malignancy; IV= intravenous; sCa= serum calcium.

 

 

References:
[1] Adapted from: McDonald D, Drake MT, Crowley RK. Treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy in adults. Clin Med (Lond). 2023;23(5):503-507. doi:10.7861/clinmed.2023-0227