What RSV vaccines are currently FDA-approved, and what are the advantages and disadvantages of each?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

The three currently FDA-approved RSV vaccines are Arexvy, Abrysvo™, and mRESVIA. Arexvy and Abrysvo™, approved in 2023, have more available data and early safety surveillance than mRESVIA, approved in 2024. Both Arexvy and Abrysvo™ have been reported as efficacious and safe based on clinical trials, though the rates of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) were more common than expected. Injection and systemic reactions were also more frequently reported for Arexvy. The landmark trial for mRESVIA reported lower rates of RSV-associated disease compared to placebo but has not yet been compared with the other two vaccines. Arexvy may uniquely be administered in patients aged 50 to 59 years with increased risk for lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD), while Abrysvo™ has been approved for use in pregnant patients at 32-36 weeks of gestational age to protect infants from LRTD caused by RSV.

Background

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that adults aged 60 years and older consider receiving a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, using shared clinical decision-making to assess the patient's risk for severe RSV-associated disease. The panel states that both Arexvy and Abrysvo™ have demonstrated moderate to high efficacy in preventing symptomatic RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in adults aged ≥ 60 years and recommends administering either vaccine. The evaluated efficacy evidence for the GSK RSV vaccine (Arexvy) is based on data from an ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, including 24,973 immunocompetent participants aged ≥ 60 years. In this trial, participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either 1 dose of the vaccine or a saline placebo (see Table 2). The efficacy of 1 dose of the Arexy vaccine in preventing symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed RSV-associated LRTD was found to be 82.6% (96.95 confidence interval [CI] of 57.9% to 94.1%) during the first RSV season and 56.1% (95% CI of 28.2% to 74.4%) during the second season. The overall efficacy of one dose over two seasons was 74.5% (97.5% CI of 60.0% to 84.5%) in preventing RSV-associated LRTD and 77.5% (95% CI of 57.9% to 89.0%) in preventing medically attended RSV-associated LRTD. [1]

The efficacy of Pfizer's Abrysvo™ vaccine was evaluated also based on data from an ongoing, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial. The trial included 36,862 immunocompetent participants aged ≥ 60 years who were randomized (1:1) to receive either one dose of the vaccine or a placebo (see Table 3). During the first RSV season, the efficacy of a single dose of the Pfizer vaccine in preventing symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed RSV-associated LRTD was 88.9% (95% CI 53.6% to 98.7%). However, in the partial second RSV season, the efficacy of a single dose decreased to 78.6% (95% CI 23.2% to 96.1%) in preventing symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed RSV-associated LRTD. Looking at the cumulative efficacy over two seasons, the vaccine demonstrated an efficacy of 84.4% (95% CI 59.6% to 95.2%) in preventing RSV-associated LRTD. Furthermore, it showed an efficacy of 81% (95% CI 43.5% to 95.2%) in preventing medically attended RSV-associated LRTD over the same period. [1]

Early safety findings from the V-safe and VAERS surveillance systems regarding the Arexvy and Abrysvo™ vaccines in adults aged 60 years and older were reported in a recent Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) publication. Reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) after RSV vaccination were more common than expected based on background rates from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Findings from V-safe were generally consistent with clinical trial data, with injection site and systemic reactions more frequently reported for Arexvy. Reports of common post-vaccination reactions were most frequent in VAERS. The estimated GBS reporting rates per million doses were 4.4 for Abrysvo™ and 1.8 for Arexvy. While the benefits of RSV vaccination outweigh the risks according to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the CDC and FDA are conducting additional safety studies to further evaluate the risks of GBS and other adverse events to guide future recommendations. [2]

Pfizer’s Abrysvo™ was also approved by the FDA for use in pregnant patients at 32-36 weeks’ gestation using seasonal administration (September to January in most of the United States) to prevent RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection in infants aged <6 months. The Pfizer maternal RSV vaccine demonstrated 51% to 57% efficacy against RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infections and 56% to 48% efficacy against RSV-associated hospitalization in infants up to 6 months of age. Safety data from phase 2b and 3 trials showed the most common side effects were mild (pain, headache, muscle pain, nausea). Limiting vaccination to 32 to 36 weeks' gestation reduced the potential risk of preterm birth compared to the full trial dosing interval of 24 to 36 weeks. No cases of GBS or other neurological issues were reported in pregnant women in the clinical trials, though these were seen rarely in older adults who received the same vaccine. [3]

References:

[1] Melgar M, Britton A, Roper LE, et al. Use of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines in Older Adults: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72(29):793-801. Published 2023 Jul 21. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7229a4
[2] Hause AM, Moro PL, Baggs J, et al. Early Safety Findings Among Persons Aged ≥60 Years Who Received a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine - United States, May 3, 2023-April 14, 2024 [published correction appears in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024 Jul 11;73(27):612. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7327a4]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024;73(21):489-494. Published 2024 May 30. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7321a3
[3] Fleming-Dutra KE, Jones JM, Roper LE, et al. Use of the Pfizer Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine During Pregnancy for the Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Disease in Infants: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72(41):1115-1122. Published 2023 Oct 13. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7241e1

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 5 studies investigating the researchable question:

What RSV vaccines are currently FDA approved, what are the advantages and disadvantages of each?

Level of evidence

B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-5 for your response.


  Abrysvo®1 Arexvy2 MRESVIA®3
Manufacturer Pfizer

GlaxoSmithKline

Moderna
FDA approved use

Active immunization of pregnant individuals at 32 through 36 weeks gestational age for the prevention of lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) and severe LRTD caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants from birth through 6 months of age

Active immunization for the prevention of LRTD caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in individuals 60 years of age and older

Active immunization for the prevention of LRTD caused by RSV in individuals 60 years of age and older

Active immunization for the prevention of LRTD caused by RSV in individuals 50 through 59 years of age who are at increased risk for LRTD caused by RSV

Active immunization for the prevention of LRTD caused by RSV in individuals 60 years of age and older
Dosing

Single dose (0.5 mL) as an intramuscular injection

Administration

After reconstitution, administer immediately or store at room temperature (15°C to 30°C [59°F to 86°F]) and use within 4 hours; discard constituted vaccine if not used within 4 hours

After reconstitution, administer immediately or store protected from light in the refrigerator between 2°C and 8°C (36°F to 46°F) or at room temperature (up to 25°C [77°F]) and use within 4 hours; discard reconstituted vaccine if not used within 4 hours​

Supplied as a pre-filled syringe that contains a frozen suspension that must be thawed prior to administration.

Carton of one pre-filled syringe in single blister pack:

If thawed in refrigerator, thaw between 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) for 60 minutes. Let each pre‑filled syringe stand at room temperature for between 10 and 20 minutes before administering the vaccine.

If thawed at room temperature, thaw between 15°C to 25°C (59°F to 77°F) for 45 minutes. If thawed at room temperature, the vaccine is ready to be administered.

Carton of 10 pre-filled syringes in blister packs:

If thawed in refrigerator, thaw between 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) for 155 minutes. Let each pre‑filled syringe stand at room temperature for between 10 and 20 minutes before administering the vaccine.

If thawed at room temperature, thaw between 15°C to 25°C (59°F to 77°F) for 140 minutes. If thawed at room temperature, the vaccine is ready to be administered. 

Pre-filled syringes may be stored at 8°C to 25°C (46°F to 77°F) for a total of 24 hours after removal from refrigerated conditions. Discard the thawed pre-filled syringe if not used within this time.

Concomitant Administration 

A placebo-controlled, phase 2 randomized, observer-blind study (NCT04071158) was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of ABRYSVO (at dose levels 120 mcg and 240 mcg, with or without Al[OH]3) when administered concomitantly with Tdap in non-pregnant women 18 through 49 years of age.

Antibody responses to antigens contained in ABRYSVO and tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) were assessed 1 month after vaccination in non-pregnant adult individuals. The lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals for the geometric mean antibody concentrations (GMCs) ratios were 0.64 for pertussis toxin, 0.50 for filamentous hemagglutinin, and 0.48 for pertactin, which did not meet the pre-specified non-inferiority criterion (lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the GMC ratio is >0.67). The clinical relevance of this finding is unknown. The noninferiority criteria for tetanus, diphtheria, and RSV vaccine antigens were met.

In an open-label, Phase 3, clinical study (NCT04841577) conducted in New Zealand, Panama, and South Africa, participants 60 years of age and older received 1 dose of Arexvy and Fluarix Quadrivalent at Month 0 (n= 442) or 1 dose of Fluarix Quadrivalent at Month 0 followed by a dose of Arexvy at Month 1 (n= 443).

There was no evidence for interference in the immune response to any of the antigens contained in both concomitantly administered vaccines.

Data is not available for concomitant administration with other vaccines.

 

Mechanism of action

Active immunization: Induces an immune response against RSV pre-F that protects against lower respiratory tract disease caused by RSV

Passive immunization: Antibodies to RSV antigens from individuals vaccinated in pregnancy are transferred transplacentally to protect infants younger than 6 months of age against LRTD and severe LRTD caused by RSV

Induces an immune response against RSV pre-F3 that protects against LRTD caused by RSV​ Induces an immune response against RSV pre-F protein that protects against LRTD caused by RSV

Contraindications

​History of severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the vaccine
Warning and precautions

Preventing and Managing Allergic Vaccine Reactions: Appropriate medical treatment and supervision must be available to manage possible anaphylactic reactions following administration. ​

Syncope: Fainting may occur in association with administration of injectable vaccines, including Abrysvo, Arexvy, and mRESVIA. Procedures should be in place to avoid injury from fainting. ​

Altered Immunocompetence: Immunocompromised persons, including those receiving immunosuppressive therapy, may have a diminished immune response to Abrysvo, Arexvy, and mRESVIA.

Potential Risk of Preterm Birth: A numerical imbalance in preterm births in Abrysvo recipients was observed compared to placebo recipients in two clinical studies. Available data are insufficient to establish or exclude a causal relationship between preterm birth and Abrysvo. To avoid the potential risk of preterm birth with use of Abrysvo before 32 weeks of gestation, administer Abrysvo as indicated in pregnant individuals at 32 through 36 weeks gestational age. Pregnant individuals who were at increased risk of preterm birth were generally excluded from clinical studies of Abrysvo.

Limitations of Vaccine Effectiveness: vaccination with Abrysvo may not protect all vaccine recipients.

-- --

Adverse events (≥10%)​ age ≥60 years

Injection site pain

Fatigue

Myalgia/muscle pain

Headache

Arthralgia

Axillary swelling or tenderness

Chills

 

10.5%

15.5%

10.1%

12.8%

--

--

--

 

60.9%

33.6%

28.9%

27.2%

18.1%

--

--

 

55.9%

30.8%

25.6%

26.7%

21.7%

15.2%

11.6%

Adverse events (≥10%)​ age 50-59 years

Injection site pain

Fatigue

Myalgia/muscle pain

Headache

Arthralgia

Erythema

Swelling

--

 

75.8%

39.8%

35.6%

31.7%

23.4%

13.2%

10.4%

--

Adverse events (≥10%)​ pregnant patients

Injection site pain

Myalgia/muscle pain

Headache

Nausea

 

40.6%

26.5%

31.0%

20.0%

-- --
Pregnancy

Data from a clinical trial that pregnant individuals who received Abrysvo at 24 through 36 weeks' gestation revealed no evidence for vaccine-associated increase in the risk of congenital anomalies or fetal deaths. In this study, there was a numerical imbalance in preterm births, with more preterm infants born to individuals in the Abrysvo group compared to individuals in the placebo group.​

Abrysvo has not been studied in pregnant individuals less than 24 weeks gestational age, and those at increased risk for preterm birth.

In a clinical study that enrolled pregnant individuals who received an investigational unadjuvanted RSV vaccine that contained the same RSVPreF3 antigen as Arexvy, an increase in preterm births was observed compared to pregnant individuals who received placebo (sucrose reconstituted with saline).

Arevxy is not approved for use in persons <50 years of age.

There is no human data to establish whether there is a vaccine-associated risk with use of MRESVIA in pregnancy.

MRESVIA is not approved for use in persons <60 years of age.

Lactation

It is not known if the vaccines are excreted in human milk; data are not available to assess the effects of vaccines on the breastfed infant or on milk production/excretion

Pediatric

Safety and effectiveness in infants born to individuals vaccinated at younger than 10 years of age and non-pregnant individuals younger than 18 years of age via active immunization have not been established

Evidence from an animal model strongly suggests that Arexvy would be unsafe in individuals younger than 2 years of age because of an increased risk of enhanced respiratory disease; safety and effectiveness in individuals 2 years through 17 years of age have not been established

Safety and effectiveness in individuals younger than 18 years of age have not been established
Geriatric

In Study 3 (NCT05035212), of the 17,215 recipients who received Abrysvo, 62% (n= 10,756) were aged 60-69 years of age, 32% (n= 5,488) were 70-79 years of age, and 6% (n= 970) were ≥80 years of age

Of the total number of participants (N= 24,966) who received Arexvy or placebo in Study 1 (NCT04886596), 13,943 (55.8%) were 60 to 69 years of age, 8,978 (36%) were 70 to 79 years of age, and 2,045 (8.2%) were 80 years of age and older

Of the total number of participants
(N= 36,412) who received MRESVIA or placebo in Study 1 (NCT05127434), 22,554 (61.9%) were 60 to 69 years of age, 10,972 (30.1%) were 70 to 79 years of age, and 2,886 (7.9%) were 80 years of age and
older
Storage

Store refrigerated at 2°C and 8°C (36°F and 46°F) in the original carton. Do not freeze. Discard if the carton has been frozen.

Adjuvant suspension component vials and lyophilized antigen component vials: store refrigerated between 2°C and 8°C (36°F and 46°F); store in the original package in order to protect vials from light. Do not freeze. Discard if the adjuvant suspension component or antigen component have been frozen.

Store frozen between -40°C to ‑15°C (-40°F to 5°F).

Storage after thawing:

Pre-filled plastic syringes may be stored refrigerated between 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) for up to 30 days prior to use.

Pre-filled plastic syringes may be stored between 8°C to 25°C (46°F to 77°F) for a total of 24 hours after removal from refrigerated conditions; discard the pre-filled syringe if not used within this time. Syringes should not be returned to the refrigerator after being thawed at room temperature. Do not refreeze once thawed. Do not shake.

Abbreviations: LRTD= lower respiratory tract disease; preF= perfusion F protein; RSV= Respiratory Syncytial Virus; GMC= Geometric Mean Antibody Concentrations; Tdap= Tetanus, Diphtheria and Acellular Pertussis vaccine 

References:

[1] Abrysvo (respiratory syncytial virus vaccine kit). Prescribing information. Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc; 2024.
[2] AREXVY ( respiratory syncytial virus vaccine recombinant). Prescribing information. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; 2024.
[3] MRESVIA (respiratory syncytial virus vaccine). Prescribing information. Moderna US, INC.; 2024.

 

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine in Older Adults

Design

Ongoing, international, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

N= 24,966

Objective

To show vaccine efficacy of one dose of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine against RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease, confirmed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), during one RSV season

Study Groups

AS01E-adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein-based candidate vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA, Arexvy; n= 12,467)

Placebo (n= 12,499)

Inclusion Criteria

Adults 60 years of age or older who had not previously been enrolled in or were not currently enrolled in another RSV vaccine trial; individuals who were medically stable in the opinion of the investigator at the time of first vaccination

Exclusion Criteria

Any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition resulting from disease or immunosuppressive/cytotoxic therapy based on medical history and physical examination; history of any reaction or hypersensitivity likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine; hypersensitivity to latex; serious or unstable chronic illness; history of dementia or any medical condition that moderately or severely impaired cognition; recurrent or uncontrolled neurological disorders or seizures; Planned or actual administration of a vaccine not foreseen by the study protocol in the period starting 30 days before each dose and ending 30 days after each dose of study vaccine administration, with the exception of inactivated and subunit influenza vaccines, which could be administered up to 14 days before or from 14 days after each study vaccination; previous vaccination with an RSV vaccine

Methods

Before the RSV season began, participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine or placebo. Surveillance for acute respiratory infection was done by means of spontaneous reporting by participants and actively by means of scheduled contact with participants. During the assessment visit, nasal and throat swabs were obtained by trial personnel if the presence of acute respiratory infection was confirmed. Swabs were tested for RSV A and B subtypes by quantitative RT-PCR.

RSV seasons are from October 1 to April 30 in the northern hemisphere and from March 1 to September 30 in the southern hemisphere.

Duration

Enrollment: May 25, 2021, to January 31, 2022

Follow-up: median of 6.7 months, maximum of 10.1 months

Outcome Measures

Primary: vaccine efficacy against RT-PCR-confirmed RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) during one season

Secondary: vaccine efficacy against severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease, RSV-related acute respiratory infection, and RSV A and B subtypes

Baseline Characteristics

 

RSVPreF3 OA
(n= 12,467)

Placebo
(n= 12,499)

         

Age, years

≥ 80 yr

69.5±6.5

8.2%

69.6±6.4

8.2%

         

Female

52% 51.4%          

Race

White

Black

 

79.3%

8.5%

 

79.5%

8.8%

         

Geographic region*

Northern Hemisphere

Southern Hemisphere

 

92.2% 

7.8%

 

92.2% 

7.8%

         

Type of residence

Community

Long-term care facility

 

98.7%

1.3%

 

98.8%

1.2%

         

Frailty status

Frail

Prefrail

Fit

Unknown

 

1.5%

38.4%

59.9%

0.2%

 

1.4%

38.3%

60.2%

0.2%

         

Charlson comorbidity index

3.2±1.2

3.2±1.2

         

Coexisting conditions of interest

Any preexisting condition

Cardiorespiratory preexisting condition

Endocrine or metabolic preexisting condition

 

39.6%

20.0%

25.7%

 

38.9%

19.4%

25.9%

         

* Northern Hemisphere countries that were included in the trial were Belgium, Canada, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Spain, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Southern Hemisphere countries were Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa.

Results

Endpoint

RSVPreF3 OA

Placebo Vaccine Efficacy % (95% CI)† 
 

No. of Participants/No. of Events

Follow-up

participant-yr

Incidence Rate

no. of events/1000 participant-yr

No. of Participants/No. of Events

Follow-up

participant-yr

Incidence Rate

no. of events/1000 participant-yr

%
RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease

Overall

Severe‡

12,466/ 7

12,466/ 1

6,865.9

6,867.9

1.0

0.1

12,494/ 40

12,494/ 17

6,857.3

6,867.7 

5.8

2.5 

82.6 (57.9 to 94.1)

94.1 (62.4 to 99.9) 

According to RSV subtype§

RSV A

RSV B

 

12,466/ 2

12,466/ 5

 

6,867.4

6,866.7

 

0.3

0.7

 

12,494/ 13

12,494/ 26

 

6,868.9

6,862.3

 

1.9

3.8

84.6 (32.1 to 98.3)

80.9 (49.4 to 94.3) 

RSV-related acute respiratory infection

Overall

12,466/ 27 6,858.7 3.9 12,494/ 95 6,837.8 13.9 71.7 (56.2 to 82.3) 

According to RSV subtype§

RSV A

RSV B

 

12,466/ 9

12,466/ 18

 

6,865.2

6,861.7 

 

1.3

2.6

 

12,494/ 32

12,494/ 61

 

6,862.3

6,849.4

 

4.7

8.9

71.9 (39.7 to 88.2)

70.6 (49.6 to 83.7)

Solicited and Unsolicited Adverse Events after Receipt of a Single Dose of the RSVPreF3 OA Vaccine or Placebo *
Event RSVPreF3 OA Group Placebo Group
  Participants no. Incidence (95% CI) Participants no. Incidence (95% CI)

Solicited reactions

Any solicited reaction

Any grade 3 solicited reaction

Pain

Erythema

Swelling

Fever

Headache

Fatigue

Myalgia

Arthralgia

 

632

36

535

66

48

18

239

295

254

159

 

71.9 (68.8–74.9)

4.1 (2.9–5.6)

60.9 (57.5–64.1)

7.5 (5.9–9.5)

5.5 (4.1–7.2)

2.0 (1.2–3.2)

27.2 (24.3–30.3)

33.6 (30.4–36.8)

28.9 (25.9–32.0)

18.1 (15.6–20.8)

 

245

8

81

7

5

3

111

141

72

56

 

27.9 (25.0–31.0)

0.9 (0.4–1.8)

9.3 (7.4–11.4)

0.8 (0.3–1.6)

0.6 (0.2–1.3)

0.3 (0.1–1.0)

12.6 (10.5–15.0)

16.1 (13.7–18.7)

8.2 (6.5–10.2)

6.4 (4.9–8.2)

Serious adverse events

Any serious adverse event

Serious adverse events related to vaccine or placebo

Fatal serious adverse event

Fatal serious adverse event related to vaccine or placebo

 

522

10

49

 

4.2 (3.8–4.6)

0.1 (0.0–0.1)

0.4 (0.3–0.5)

-- 

 

506

7

58

 

4.0 (3.7–4.4)

0.1 (0.0–0.1)

0.5 (0.4–0.6)

-- 

Unsolicited adverse events

Any unsolicited adverse event

Grade 3 unsolicited adverse event

 

131

12

 

14.9 (12.6–17.4)

1.4 (0.7–2.4)

 

128

12

 

14.6 (12.3–17.1)

1.4 (0.7–2.4)

Potential immune-mediated disease

Any potential immune-mediated disease

Potential immune-mediated disease related to vaccine or placebo

 

40

7

 

0.3 (0.2–0.4)

0.1 (0.0–0.1) 

 

34

5

 

0.3 (0.2–0.4)

<0.1 (0.0–0.1) 

† Vaccine efficacy was estimated with the use of the Poisson method, with adjustment for age and geographic region, except for the analysis according to age, which was adjusted only for geographic region. A 96.95% confidence interval was used for the analysis of the primary end point (overall RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease), and a 95% confidence interval was used for all other end points. There was no adjustment for multiplicity, and the 95% confidence intervals should, therefore, not be used in place of hypothesis testing.

‡ Severe disease was determined based on either of two case definitions: on the basis of clinical signs or investigator assessment or on the basis of receipt of supportive therapy. All 18 severe cases met the first case definition. Two of the 18 cases were confirmed by the adjudication committee as also meeting the second case definition (group assignments blinded). In addition to these 2 cases, another 2 participants received supplemental oxygen but did not have cases confirmed by the adjudication committee as meeting the second case definition at the time of the efficacy database-lock point.

§ The RSV subtype was unknown in one case of RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease and in two cases of RSV-related acute respiratory infection. All cases with unknown subtype were in the placebo group.

Vaccine efficacy was also observed among participants with coexisting conditions (94.6%) and among those with prefrail status (92.9%). Among frail participants, efficacy results were inconclusive because only two cases of RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease occurred.

* Solicited reactions were those for which reports were solicited through 4 days after injection. Unsolicited adverse events were included up to 30 days after injection. Serious adverse events and events of potential immune-mediated disease were included up to 6 months after injection, and those that were considered by the investigator to be related to vaccine or placebo were included until the safety database-lock point. Fatal adverse events were included until the safety database-lock point. Grade 3 events of erythema and swelling were defined as erythema or swelling with a diameter of more than 100 mm, and grade 3 fever as a body temperature above 39.0°C. For all other adverse events, grade 3 indicated that normal everyday activities were prevented by the event. Relatedness to the administration of vaccine or placebo was determined by the investigator.

Adverse Events

See result

Study Author Conclusions

A single dose of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine had an acceptable safety profile and prevented RSV-related acute respiratory infection and lower respiratory tract disease and severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease in adults 60 years of age or older, regardless of RSV subtype and the presence of underlying coexisting conditions.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The trial has several limitations, including the relatively small number of participants aged 80 years or older and those who are frail. Additionally, the ability to detect rare side effects among patients was limited. The operational challenges were further compounded by conducting the trial during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic. Furthermore, public health measures implemented to control Covid-19 led to a decrease in RSV transmission and changed the timing of the RSV season. As a result, most RSV-related acute respiratory infection cases occurred earlier in the season than anticipated.

 

References:

Papi A, Ison MG, Langley JM, et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine in Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(7):595-608. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2209604

 

Efficacy and Safety of a Bivalent RSV Prefusion F Vaccine in Older Adults

Design

Ongoing, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

N= 34,284

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the bivalent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based (RSVpreF) vaccine in the first RSV season after injection

Study Groups

RSVPreF vaccine (n= 17,215)

Placebo (n= 17,069)

Inclusion Criteria

≥ 60 years of age at the time of first study intervention administration; healthy with stable preexisting disease 

Exclusion Criteria

Immunocompromised patients (apart from stable human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus infection); bleeding diathesis or condition associated with prolonged bleeding; history of severe adverse reaction associated with a vaccine and/or severe allergic reaction (i.e., anaphylaxis) to any component of the study interventions or any related vaccine

Methods

Eligible individuals were randomized (1:1) to receive one intramuscular injection of unadjuvanted RSVpreF vaccine at a dose of 120 mcg (containing 60 mcg each of RSV A and RSV B antigens) or placebo. To match the appearance of the RSVpreF vaccine, the placebo injection was lyophilized without the addition of active ingredients (i.e., RSV A and RSV B preF antigens, which are based on the currently predominant Ontario and Buenos Aires genotypes, respectively).

For efficacy measurements, RSV infection was confirmed by means of reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay (or by means of nucleic acid amplification test if RT-PCR testing was unavailable) within 7 days after the onset of signs or symptoms.

Duration

Interim analysis data-cutoff date: July 14, 2022

Mean follow-up: 7 months 

Outcome Measures

Primary: vaccine efficacy against seasonal RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness with at least two or at least three signs or symptoms lasting more than one day (i.e., cough, wheezing, sputum production, shortness of breath, or tachypnea)

Relative risk of a first episode of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in the RSVpreF vaccine group as compared with the placebo group in the first RSV season and starting on day 15 after injection

Secondary: vaccine efficacy against RSV-associated acute respiratory illness 

Safety: reactogenicity events, unsolicited adverse events 

Baseline Characteristics

 

RSVpreF vaccine (n= 17,215)

Placebo (n= 17,069)

 

Age, years

60–69 yr

70–79 yr

≥80 yr

68.3 ± 6.14

62.5%

31.9%

5.6%

68.3 ± 6.18

62.6%

31.8%

5.6%

 

Male

51.1% 50.4%  

Race or ethnicity

White

Black 

Asian

Hispanic or Latinx

 

78.3%

12.8%

7.9%

37.1%

 

78.3%

12.9%

7.8%

36.7%

 

Country 

United States

Argentina

Japan

 

59.9%

21.3%

6.7%

 

59.7%

21.4%

6.8%

 

≥1 Prespecified high-risk condition

Current tobacco use

Diabetes 

Lung disease 

Heart disease 

51.5%

15.3%

18.7%

11.4%

12.9%

51.7%

15.1%

19.2%

12.0%

13.1%

 

≥1 Chronic cardiopulmonary condition

Asthma

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Congestive heart failure

15.1%

9.0%

5.9%

1.7%

15.5%

8.8%

6.1%

1.8%

 

The demographic characteristics were broadly similar across the trial groups, and the trial participants were representative of the older population at risk for RSV-related illness. 

Results

Endpoint

RSVpreF vaccine (n= 17,215)

Placebo (n= 17,069)

Vaccine efficacy (96.66% confidence interval [CI])

RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness with ≥2 signs or symptoms, cases

11; 1.19 cases per 1,000 person-years of observation 33; 3.58 cases per 1,000 person-years of observation 66.7% (28.8 to 85.8)

RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness with ≥3 signs or symptoms, cases 

2; 0.22 cases per 1,000 person-years of observation 14; 1.52 cases per 1,000 person-years of observation 85.7% (32.0 to 98.7) 

RSV-associated acute respiratory illness, cases 

22; 2.38 cases per 1,000 person-years of observation 58; 6.30 cases per 1,000 person-years of observation

62.1% (95% CI 37.1 to 77.9) 

Vaccine efficacy values that were calculated in sensitivity analyses and according to RSV A and RSV B subgroups were generally similar to those of the primary endpoints, although the latter had wide confidence intervals reflecting small subgroup sizes. Vaccine efficacy was maintained through the end of the first RSV season. 

Subgroup analyses of the primary endpoints according to participant age group (60 to 69 years, 70 to 79 years, or ≥80 years) and risk status (no prespecified high-risk conditions or ≥1 prespecified high-risk condition) indicated similar vaccine efficacy across subgroups, with wide confidence intervals reflecting small subgroup sizes. 

Concerning five individual signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract illness, wheezing and shortness of breath were more common among participants with at least three signs or symptoms (93.8% and 68.8%, respectively) than among those with at least two signs or symptoms (37.8% and 28.9%, respectively).

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: RSVpreF vaccine vs. placebo local reactions (12% vs. 7%); systematic events (27% vs. 26%); adverse events through 1 month after injection (9% vs. 8.5%; 1.4% vs. 1% injection-related)

Serious Adverse Events: 2.3% vs. 2.3%, with 3 cases considered to be associated with trial intervention 

First event: delayed allergic reaction 7 hours after injection of RSVpreF vaccine, with recovery on the same day

Second event: combination of diplopia, paresthesia of palms and soles, and oculomotor and abducens nerve paralysis 8 days after injection of the vaccine who had a medical history of diabetes mellitus; this event was retrospectively diagnosed as being consistent with the Miller–Fisher syndrome (a subset of the Guillain–Barré syndrome characterized by ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and areflexia). A spinal tap and nerve-conduction studies were not performed, and the participant recovered. 

Third event: myocardial infarction that developed 6 days after injection of vaccine; this participant then underwent angioplasty and later received a diagnosis of acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, consistent with Guillain–Barré syndrome, that began 7 days after injection.

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: None 

Study Author Conclusions

RSVpreF vaccine prevented RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness and RSV-associated acute respiratory illness in adults (≥60 years of age), without evident safety concerns.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Older and frail adults aged ≥80 years remain underrepresented in the current trial, limiting the generalizability of study results to such population. Given the interim analysis of the current report, the long-term efficacy and safety of RSVpreF vaccine requires further investigation. Additionally, the need for re-vaccination to maintain and boost immune responses remains unknown. 



References:

Walsh EE, Pérez Marc G, Zareba AM, et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Bivalent RSV Prefusion F Vaccine in Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(16):1465-1477. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2213836

 

Bivalent Prefusion F Vaccine in Pregnancy to Prevent RSV Illness in Infants

Design

Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (MATISSE)

N= 7,358 mothers; 7,128 infants

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of maternal respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVpreF) vaccination in preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in infants

Study Groups

RSVpreF (n= 3,682 mothers; 3,570 infants)

Placebo (n= 3,676 mothers; 3,558 infants)

Inclusion Criteria

Healthy women, age ≤ 49 years, at 24 through 36 weeks' gestation on day of planned injection, with an uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy and no known increased risk of pregnancy complications

Exclusion Criteria

High-risk pregnancies (e.g., those with a current risk of preterm birth, multiple pregnancy, or a previous infant with a clinically significant congenital anomaly)

Methods

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a single intramuscular injection of 120 mcg of RSVpreF vaccine (60 mcg each of RSV A and RSV B antigens) or placebo. 

Duration

Trial: June 17, 2020 through October 2, 2022

Follow-up: 360 days

Outcome Measures

Primary

Efficacy: medically attended severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in infants within 90, 120, 150, and 180 days after birth

Safety: reactogenicity and adverse events in the maternal participants and adverse events and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions in infants from the time of informed consent to 1 month after injection

Secondary

Efficacy: medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness, RSV-associated hospitalization, and medically attended lower respiratory tract illness of any cause, all occurring within 360 days after birth

Safety: serious adverse events and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions from birth through 12 months of age (birth through 24 months of age in infants enrolled during the first trial year)

Baseline Characteristics

Maternal participants

RSVpreF

Placebo

 

Age at injection, years

29.1 ± 5.6 29.0 ± 5.7  
Gestation at injection, weeks 30.8 ± 3.5

30.8 ± 3.6

 

Race

White

Black

Asian

 

64.7%

19.6%

12.3%

 

64.4%

19.7%

12.6%

 

Infant participants

RSVpreF Placebo  

Male

50.9% 50.4%  

Gestational age at birth

24 to < 28 weeks

28 to < 34 weeks

34 to < 37 weeks

37 to < 42 weeks

≥ 42 weeks

 

< 0.1%

0.6%

5.0%

93.7%

0.6%

 

< 0.1%

0.3%

4.4%

94.3%

0.8%

 

Apgar score, 5 min

< 4

4 to < 7

7 to 10

Median (range)

 

0.2%

0.8%

99.0%

9 (1-10)

 

0.1%

0.8%

99.1%

9 (2-10)

 

Outcome

Normal

Congenital malformation or anomaly

Other neonatal problems

 

89.9%

4.9%

6.1%

 

88.5%

5.7%

5.6%

 

Birth weight

Extremely low, ≤ 1,000 g

Very low, > 1,000 to 1,500 g

Low, > 1,500 to 2,500 g

 

< 0.1%

< 0.1%

5.0%

 

< 0.1%

0.2%

4.1%

 

Developmental delay

0.3% 0.3%  

Results

Endpoint

RSVpreF

(n= 3,495)

Placebo

(n= 3,480)

Vaccine efficacy (99.5% or 97.58% CI)

Medically attended severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness

90 days after birth

120 days after birth

150 days after birth

180 days after birth

 

6 (0.2%)

12 (0.3%)

16 (0.5%)

19 (0.5%) 

 

33 (0.9%)

46 (1.3%)

55 (1.6%)

62 (1.8%) 

 

81.8% (40.6 to 96.3)

73.9% (45.6 to 88.8)

70.9% (44.5 to 85.9)

69.4% (44.3 to 84.1)

Medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness

90 days after birth

120 days after birth

150 days after birth

180 days after birth

 

24 (0.7%)

35 (1.0%)

47 (1.3%)

57 (1.6%)

 

56 (1.6%)

81 (2.3%)

99 (2.8%)

117 (3.4%) 

 

57.1% (14.7 to 79.8)

56.8% (31.2 to 73.5)

52.5% (28.7 to 68.9) 

51.3% (29.4 to 66.8)

RSV-associated hospitalization

90 days after birth

180 days after birth

 

10 (0.3%)

19 (0.5%)

 

31 (0.9%)

44 (1.3%)

 

67.7% (15.9 to 89.5)

56.8% (10.1 to 80.7)

Medically attended lower respiratory tract illness of any cause

90 days after birth

 

186 (5.3%)

 

200 (5.7%)

 

7.0% (-22.3 to 29.3)

Safety

RSVpreF Placebo   

Local reactions

Redness

Swelling

Injection-site pain

 

7%

6%

41%

 

<1%

<1%

10%

 

Systemic events

Fever

Fatigue

Headache

Nausea

Muscle pain

Joint pain

Vomiting

Diarrhea

 

3%

46%

31%

20%

27%

12%

8%

11%

 

3%

44%

28%

19%

17%

11%

7%

12%

 

Maternal adverse events

Any

Serious

Immediate

Severe

Life-threatening

Related to vaccine or placebo

Special interest

Leading to withdrawal

 

13.8%

4.2%

<0.1%

1.7%

0.5%

0.4%

2.7%

0

 

13.1%

3.7%

<0.1%

1.3%

0.3%

0.2%

2.5%

 

Infant adverse events

Any

Serious

Severe

Life-threatening

Related to vaccine or placebo

Special interest

Congenital anomaly

Newly diagnosed chronic medical condition

Leading to withdrawal

 

37.1%

15.5%

4.5%

1.0%

<0.1%

8.4%

4.8%

0.2%

0

 

34.5%

15.2%

3.8%

1.0%

0

7.2%

5.9%

0.2%

0

 

CI: confidence interval

Adverse Events

See above

Study Author Conclusions

RSVpreF vaccine administered during pregnancy was effective against medically attended severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in infants, and no safety concerns were identified.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

As the trial is conducted in low-income countries, the present vaccine efficacy may not be readily applicable to developed countries. Additionally, the trial excludes those with high-risk pregnancies, limiting the generalizability of study findings to at-risk populations. 



References:

Kampmann B, Madhi SA, Munjal I, et al. Bivalent Prefusion F Vaccine in Pregnancy to Prevent RSV Illness in Infants. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(16):1451-1464. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2216480

 Efficacy and Safety of an mRNA-Based RSV PreF Vaccine in Older Adults

Design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2-3 trial

N= 35,541

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of the mRNA-1345 (mRESVIA) vaccine in preventing a first episode of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract disease in adults 60 years of age or older

Study Groups

mRNA-1345 (n= 17,734)

Placebo (n= 17,679)

Inclusion Criteria

Adults 60 years of age or older, including persons with stable chronic medical conditions, body mass index from ≥ 18 kg/m2 to ≤ 35 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

History of congenital or acquired immunodeficiency, immunosuppressive condition, or immune-mediated disease, chronic administration (defined as more than 14 continuous days) of immunosuppressants or other immune-modifying drugs within 6 months, administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products within the 3 months, known history of poorly controlled hypertension or hypotension

Methods

Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive one dose of either mRNA-1345 or placebo. Efficacy was measured by the prevention of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease with two and three signs or symptoms. Safety was also comprehensively assessed.

Duration

November 17, 2021 to October 31, 2022

Outcome Measures

Primary: Prevention of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease with at least two signs or symptoms, and with at least three signs or symptoms

Secondary: Prevention of RSV-associated acute respiratory disease

Baseline Characteristics

 

mRNA-1345 (n= 17,734)

Placebo (n= 17,679)

 

Age, years

68.1 68.1  

Female

48.8% 49.3%  

Race

White

Black

Asian

Other

Unknown

 

63.4%

12.4%

8.7%

15.1%

0.4%

 

63.4%

12.2%

8.6%

15.1%

0.6%

 

Frailty status

Fit

Vulnerable

Frail

Missing data

 

76.2%

15.9%

5.6%

2.2%

 

75.5%

16.4%

5.8%

2.3%

 

No. of coexisting conditions of interest

0

≥ 1

 

70.5%

29.5%

 

71.0%

29.0%

 

Risk factors for lower respiratory tract disease

Present

Congestive heart failure

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Both

Absent

 

6.9%

1.2%

5.4%

0.3%

93.1%

 

7.0%

1.1%

5.5%

0.3%

93.0%

 

Results

Endpoint

mRNA-1345 (n= 17,734)

Placebo (n= 17,679)

Vaccine efficacy* (confidence interval [CI]**)

RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease with ≥2 signs or symptoms

Overall

RSV subtype A

RSV subtype B

60-69 year group

70-79 year group

≥ 80 yr

 

9

3

6

8

1

0

 

55

36

19

33

22

0

 

83.7 (66.0 to 92.2)

91.7 (73.0 to 97.4)

68.5 (21.1 to 87.4)

76.0 (48.0 to 88.9)

95.4 (65.9 to 99.4)

Not evaluated

RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease with ≥3 signs or symptoms

Overall

RSV subtype A

RSV subtype B

60-69 year group

70-79 year group

≥ 80 yr

 

3

1

2

3

0

0

 

17

10

7

11

6

0

 

82.4 (34.8 to 95.3)

90.0 (22.0 to 98.7)

71.5 (−37.0 to 94.1)

72.9 (2.8 to 92.4)

100 (N/A to 100)

Not evaluated

RSV-Associated Acute Respiratory Disease

Incidence per 1000 person-year

 

4.1

 

13.1

 

68.4 (50.9 to 79.7)

* Vaccine efficacy was defined as 1 − the hazard ratio (mRNA-1345 vs. placebo)×100%

** The confidence interval for vaccine efficacy was based on a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. In overall analyses, the adjusted 95.88% confidence interval was for RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease with at least two symptoms. The 96.36% confidence interval was for RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease with at least three symptoms. In subgroup analyses, the 95% confidence interval was calculated. It adjusted for person-years, defined as time from randomization to the earliest of several events like RSV-associated disease, 12 months after injection, discontinuation, death, or data cutoff date.

Adverse Events

The vaccine group reported higher incidences of local (58.7% vs 16.2%) and systemic (47.7% to 32.9%) adverse reactions compared to the placebo group. Most reactions were mild to moderate. Serious adverse events occurred in 2.8% of participants in both groups.

Study Author Conclusions

A single dose of the mRNA-1345 vaccine resulted in no evident safety concerns and led to a lower incidence of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease and of RSV-associated acute respiratory disease than placebo among adults 60 years of age or older.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The study had low case numbers in some subgroups such as adults over 80 and those with RSV B. The follow-up period may be too short to determine long-term efficacy and the necessity of booster doses.



References:

Wilson E, Goswami J, Baqui AH, et al. Efficacy and Safety of an mRNA-Based RSV PreF Vaccine in Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2233-2244. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2307079