Can patients with an allergic reaction to certolizumab pegol be given products that contain polyethylene glycol?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Literature evaluating allergic reactions to certolizumab pegol and other polyethylene glycol (PEG)-containing compounds indicates that certolizumab-related hypersensitivity may, in some instances, be attributable to its PEG component, as illustrated in a patient with a prior PEG-containing laxative reaction and confirmed tolerance to a non-PEG biologic. Broader literature also notes that PEG can cause severe, sometimes delayed, hypersensitivity reactions and may cross-react with structurally related excipients such as polysorbates. Conversely, another case demonstrated isolated certolizumab hypersensitivity with negative PEG skin testing, suggesting the reaction was drug-specific rather than PEG-mediated. Overall, available data show that PEG hypersensitivity is rare but clinically significant, and patients with certolizumab reactions may or may not have true PEG allergy; therefore, careful individual evaluation and specialist-guided testing may be required to determine whether PEG-containing products can be safely used. Our follow-up literature search was unable to identify further relevant literature. Table 1 (McCabe et al.) appears to be a prominently cited paper regarding the subject, despite not being fully specific to the inquiry. Ultimately, as noted above, the information we were able to analyze suggests specialized testing may be needed in cases of certolizumab pegol allergic reactions to identify if the reaction is PEG-mediated or not, which would clarify if other PEG products are safe to administer.

Background

According to the 2022 practice parameter update from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI), although excipients rarely cause immediate or delayed drug reactions, some, like propylene glycol (PEG), are associated with delayed responses. The most concerning reactions involve life-threatening anaphylaxis linked to excipients like PEG and carboxymethylcellulose, especially in injectable corticosteroids. The cross-reactivity of polysorbates with PEG necessitates further research for optimal testing strategies. An excipient allergy may be considered in patients with a history of anaphylaxis to more than two structurally unrelated drugs or products sharing a common excipient, such as PEG-based laxatives or injectable corticosteroids. [1]

While not specific to certolizumab, a 2016 review explored the increasing incidence of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions to polyethylene glycols (PEGs), also known as macrogols. The authors found that PEGs, common excipients in medications, bowel preparations, medical materials, and household products, were frequently overlooked as culprits, leading to repeated severe reactions prior to diagnosis. Most anaphylactic events followed oral or parenteral exposure, particularly to high-molecular-weight PEGs (e.g., PEG 3350, 4000, 6000), and many patients reacted to multiple PEG molecular weights and, in some cases, to structurally related polymers such as polysorbates. Skin testing often demonstrated reproducible immediate-type responses, though risk of systemic reactions required cautious titration. While PEG-specific IgE has not been directly identified, basophil activation and inhibition studies provided supportive evidence for an IgE-mediated mechanism. Overall, the review highlights that PEG hypersensitivity, though rare, is severe, underrecognized, and associated with cross-reactivity across PEGs, PEG-derivatives, and PEGylated drugs, underscoring the need for heightened clinical awareness and careful evaluation of excipients in patients with unexplained or recurrent immediate hypersensitivity reactions. [2]

Another review article focuses on hypersensitivity to PEG, citing the prominent case report by McCabe et al. (Table 1), in which a 37-year-old woman with psoriatic arthritis experienced anaphylaxis after being administered certolizumab pegol. Due to the patient’s history of allergic reactions to other agents containing PEG, this ingredient was suspected of being the most likely trigger for anaphylaxis. Still, allergies specific to PEG are considered to be rare, but severe immediate hypersensitivity reactions have been described in the literature. [3]

References:

[1] Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, et al. Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;150(6):1333-1393. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028
[2] Wenande E, Garvey LH. Immediate-type hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols: a review. Clin Exp Allergy. 2016;46(7):907-922. doi:10.1111/cea.12760
[3] Bianchi A, Bottau P, Calamelli E, et al. Hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycol in adults and children: An emerging challenge. Acta Biomed. 2021;92(S7):e2021519. Published 2021 Nov 29. doi:10.23750/abm.v92iS7.12384

Relevant Prescribing Information

Description [4]
Certolizumab pegol is a TNF blocker. CIMZIA is a recombinant, humanized antibody Fab' fragment, with specificity for human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), conjugated to an approximately 40kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG2MAL40K). The Fab' fragment is manufactured in E. coliand is subsequently subjected to purification and conjugation to PEG2MAL40K, to generate certolizumab pegol. The Fab' fragment is composed of a light chain with 214 amino acids and a heavy chain with 229 amino acids. The molecular weight of certolizumab pegol is approximately 91 kiloDaltons.

Pharmacokinetics [4]
Patients with Renal Impairment:Specific clinical studies have not been performed to assess the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of CIMZIA. The pharmacokinetics of the PEG (polyethylene glycol) fraction of certolizumab pegol is expected to be dependent on renal function but has not been assessed in renal impairment. There are insufficient data to provide a dosing recommendation in moderate and severe renal impairment.

References:

[4] Cimzia (certolizumab pegol injection). Prescribing information. UCB, Inc.; 2025

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

Can patients with an allergic reaction to certolizumab pegol be given products that contain polyethylene glycol?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-3 for your response.


 

Polyethylene glycol: an underrecognized compound in certolizumab pegol and Movicol that may cause anaphylaxis

Design

Case report 

Case presentation

A 37-year-old woman with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) experienced an anaphylactic reaction after self-administering certolizumab pegol, a medication she was started on after unsuccessful treatment with etanercept and ustekinumab, both in combination with methotrexate. Her medical history included allergic rhinitis and a previous severe allergic reaction to Movicol, a polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350-containing laxative, leading her to carry an adrenaline autoinjector. Following certolizumab administration, she developed injection site erythema, a generalized urticarial rash, dyspnea, wheezing, and presyncope, necessitating adrenaline administration by her sister and transfer to the emergency department. There, she presented with tachycardia, tachypnea, and hypotension, though her oxygen saturation remained 99% on room air. She was treated with additional adrenaline, intravenous hydrocortisone, chlorphenamine, and fluids according to anaphylaxis protocol. Her physical examination was mostly unremarkable aside from sinus tachycardia on the ECG, and a normal chest X-ray. Lab results showed elevated white blood cell count, lactate, and borderline CRP, but normal serum tryptase checked over 24 hours post certolizumab exposure, and previous baseline blood parameters were normal. During the admission, she was stable overnight. An investigation into her allergies revealed a severe reaction to Movicol two years earlier, confirming PEG as the common allergen. Skin prick tests confirmed an equivocal delayed reaction to Movicol but no reaction to adalimumab, indicating PEG in certolizumab as the allergen, rather than the anti-TNF portion of the drug. This conclusion, supported by multiple departments, highlighted that both Movicol and certolizumab contain macrogol, the likely cause of her hypersensitivity reactions. 

Study Author Conclusions

This case highlights the importance of inquiring about previous allergic reactions and yellow-card reporting of adverse drug reactions to manufacturers. Patients with a documented anaphylactic reaction should be encouraged to carry an adrenaline pen on their person, regularly confirm that it is in date and wear a Medic-Alert bracelet. 
References:

McCabe E, Tormey V, Doran JP. Polyethylene glycol: an underrecognized compound in certolizumab pegol and Movicol that may cause anaphylaxis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(4):908-910. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kez469

 

Successful Subcutaneous Desensitization to Certolizumab Pegolerence Number

Design

Case report

Case presentation

A 30-year-old woman with spondyloarthritis developed pruritic, erythematous papules on the neck, trunk, and extremities 60–90 minutes after reintroduction of a 400-mg subcutaneous dose of certolizumab pegol (CZP), with a similar reaction after a subsequent dose.

Evaluation showed a positive intradermal test to CZP at 200 mg/mL. To assess potential polyethylene glycol (PEG) allergy, skin prick testing was performed using strawberry-flavored chewable alginate antacid tablets containing PEG 20 000 at concentrations of 0.25, 2.5, 25, and 250 mg/mL, all of which were negative, thus ruling out allergy to the excipient.

After multiple alternative biologic therapies failed, she underwent an eight-step subcutaneous desensitization protocol to CZP, reaching a cumulative dose of 400 mg without adverse reactions, with a repeat procedure two weeks later also tolerated. Subsequent full-dose CZP was tolerated until it was later withdrawn due to loss of efficacy.

Study Author Conclusions

To our knowledge, we describe the first desensitization protocol to certolizumab, in a case of confirmed allergy to CZP with tolerance to another TNFα inhibitor, etanercept.

References:

Peñalver MJ, Bautista-Villanueva S, Barranco R, Crespo JF, Mielgo R. Successful subcutaneous desensitization to certolizumab pegol. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2024;34(4):272-274. doi:10.18176/jiaci.0981.

Patients with previous immediate hypersensitivity reactions to polyethylene glycol can safely receive the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine
Design

Brief communication study

N= 11

Objective To evaluate the safety of administering the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to patients with previous immediate hypersensitivity reactions to polyethylene glycol (PEG)
Study Groups Patients with previous hypersensitivity to PEG (n= 11)
Inclusion Criteria Patients with known or suspected PEG anaphylaxis referred from practitioners in the upper half of the North Island, New Zealand
Exclusion Criteria Not specified
Methods Patients received oral cetirizine or loratadine 20 mg at least 30 min before vaccination. Two patients received BNT162b2 as a split dose (10%/90% at 15 min). Adrenaline, oxygen, and intravenous fluids were available. Patients were observed for 30–120 min after vaccination
Duration Not specified
Outcome Measures Safety of administering BNT162b2 to patients with PEG hypersensitivity
Baseline Characteristics Age (year) Sex Ethnicity Indication Investigations/challenge
52 F NZ Euro Anaphylaxis to Glycoprep-C SPT to 1% Glycoprep negative
66 M NZ Euro Anaphylaxis to Glycoprep-C SPT to 1% PS80 positive
31 M NZ Euro Anaphylaxis to Glycoprep Unable to test due to dermatographism
58 M NZ Euro Anaphylaxis to Klean-Prep None
32 M NZ Euro Anaphylaxis to MoviPrep None
54 F NZ Euro Urticaria, nausea a vomiting with MoviCol None
68 F NZ Euro Urticaria with Glycoprep None
60 F NZ Euro Urticaria with MoviCol None
16 F Chinese Anaphylaxis to pegasparaginase Tolerated erwinase
26 M NZ Euro Anaphylaxis to pegasparaginase None
58 F NZ Euro Anaphylaxis to pegfilgrastim Tolerated unpegylated filgrastim
Results   Reaction to first dose Second dose tolerated
1 None
2 None
3 None
4 None
5 Transient right sided chest pain ~20 min after vaccine
6 Urticaria ~2 h post vaccine
7 None
8 Nausea
9 None
10 None
11 None
Adverse Events Minor symptoms such as transient chest pain, nausea, and delayed urticaria were reported but settled without treatment. No anaphylaxis to the vaccine was observed. 
Study Author Conclusions BNT162b2 can be safely administered to patients with presumed PEG hypersensitivity reactions, including those with previous anaphylaxis, without significant adverse effects
Critique The study provides valuable insights into the safety of administering the BNT162b2 vaccine to patients with PEG hypersensitivity. However, the small sample size and lack of a control group limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the absence of skin testing and reliance on clinical records for diagnosis may affect the accuracy of hypersensitivity assessments
References:

Hurst M, Jordan A, Capstick J, Brewerton M, Cockroft R, Ingram J. Patients with previous immediate hypersensitivity reactions to polyethylene glycol can safely receive the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Intern Med J. 2022;52(10):1818-1820. doi:10.1111/imj.15821