What is the most recent literature regarding of the use of anakinra and siltuximab to treat ICANS?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Based on a search of recent literature, robust clinical data appear to be lacking to support the use of either anakinra or siltuximab for treatment of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), as current utilization is off-label. Most applicable data are case reports or early phase studies, which do show some promise, however. Some guidelines allow for consideration of anakinra as a third-line option for ICANS/CRS. Please refer to Tables 1-6 for a summary of relevant studies.

Pubmed: anakinra + siltuximab + ICANS

Background

A 2022 letter to the editor highlighted the use of anakinra as an alternative treatment option for toxicities associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in pediatric patients. While not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for use, anakinra has often been utilized off-label for the treatment of multiple adult and pediatric autoinflammatory disorders and has been explored as a potential treatment option for toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), that are associated with inflammatory pathways affected by CAR T-cell therapies. Anakinra has been evaluated as an adjunctive and/or refractory treatment for CRS, ICANS, and/or CAR T-cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (carHLH). Experience with anakinra in multiple pediatric care centers for the treatment of ICANS and CRS unresponsive to tocilizumab and/or steroids, as well as carHLH, was often similar across institutional protocols, with minor variations in anakinra initiation based upon toxicity as well as diagnostic criteria for carHLH. While limited, published clinical evidence for anakinra use for the treatment of CAR T-cell therapy-associated toxicities in pediatric patients were provided, as summarized in Table 1. Overall, limited data on anakinra for the treatment of ICANS in pediatric patients secondary to CAR T-cell therapy is available to adequately assure safety and efficacy of anakinra treatment, but may potentially be considered as a potential alternative treatment regimen for ICANS refractory to first and second-line treatment options. [1]

The 2022 guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) regarding the management of immune-related adverse events in CAR T-cell therapy, including CRS and ICANS, suggest the use of tocilizumab, with or without corticosteroids, for the treatment of severe or prolonged CRS associated with CAR T-cell therapy. The guidelines note there is limited experience regarding additional therapies. Anakinra has demonstrated preliminary data for mitigating CRS in some CAR-T patients with high-grade CRS, but it is not yet part of their recommendations. ICANS, in the absence of concurrent CRS, is recommended to be managed only with supportive care and corticosteroids, as tocilizumab does not resolve ICANS and may even worsen the condition. There is no recommendation for the use of anakinra within the guidelines; however, it is noted that anakinra is under investigation for the management of ICANS. [2]

The 2020 Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guidelines for management of CRS and ICANS provide similar recommendations to the ASCO, except that anakinra may be considered as a third-line agent if 2 doses of tocilizumab plus steroids does not improve CRS. Pharmacologic management of ICANS is limited to the use of steroids, as multiple studies have demonstrated the failure of tocilizumab to resolve symptoms of ICANS despite alleviating severe CRS symptoms. The reason for the lack of efficacy may be related to the inability of tocilizumab to cross the blood-brain barrier, and the transient rise in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) can worsen neurotoxicity. [3]

According to a consensus report of the European Myeloma Network on the prevention and management of adverse events during treatment with bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cells in multiple myeloma, tocilizumab is far less effective in ICANS than in CRS and should be administered to patients with concurrent CRS. Anakinra could be considered; however, to date, it has only been shown to decrease ICANS in mice models. [4]

A 2020 letter to the editor described the efficacy of anakinra for CRS and ICANS in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with standard axicabtagene ciloleucel therapy. The authors reported preliminary findings from a study conducted at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Of 100 total patients with relapsed or refractory LBCL treated with standard-of-care axicabtagene ciloleucel, 8 were treated with anakinra (n= 2 with high-grade ICANS and n= 6 with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [HLH]). Anakinra was initiated at a median of 12 days after axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion, with a median daily dose of 100 mg subcutaneously for 7 days, amounting to a median cumulative dose of 700 mg. After initiation of anakinra, patients continued therapy with corticosteroids, but not tocilizumab. Clinical response was observed in 4 patients after starting anakinra, as reflected by ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, while 4 were refractory. Overall, 4 of 6 patients who received anakinra for high-grade ICANS experienced clinical benefit, although the benefit was only transient for one of these 4. Results reported in this letter are merely preliminary and are limited by the single-center, retrospective study design, as well as small sample size and lack of serial IL-1 serum measurements. [5]

Interim results of a single-arm, phase 2 trial on the use of anakinra in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma were summarized in a recent article. Patients who were treated with commercial anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy are enrolled into two independent cohorts, with sequential enrollment in cohort 1 followed by enrollment in cohort 2 (currently ongoing enrollment). In cohort 1 (n= 31), patients were subcutaneously administered anakinra 100 mg every 12 hours, commencing either on day 2 post-infusion or after two documented fevers ≥ 38.5°C, whichever occurred first, for a 10-day duration. Three patients (9.7%) experienced severe (grade ≥ 3) ICANS and six patients (19%) experienced any grade ICANS, with a median onset approximately 4.5 days after CAR T-cell infusion. Although five patients required dexamethasone treatment for ICANS management, no patient required high-dose methylprednisolone. All-grade CRS occurred in 23 patients (74%), mostly grade 1 or 2 events. Although prophylactic anakinra shows promise in reducing rates of high-grade ICANS without affecting CAR T-cell efficacy, the study is still ongoing to determine the most optimal timing for CRS and ICANS rate reduction, and the use of a single arm and a small sample size limits how compelling these preliminary results are. [6]

Siltuximab has been used in cases of severe neurotoxicity in CAR-T patients; however, siltuximab is not approved for cytokine release syndrome. While siltuximab binds IL-6 similar to tocilizumab, the evidence for its use in ICANS remains primarily anecdotal. As such, siltuximab is typically reserved for tocilizumab-refractory cytokine release syndrome off-label use. Some authors suggest siltuximab may be a better choice than tocilizumab (which has an established role in cytokine release syndrome) because it is not clear if tocilizumab crosses the blood-brain barrier to a sufficient degree to ameliorate neurotoxicity or brain exposure to IL-6. Siltuximab, in contrast to tocilizumab, binds soluble directly to the IL-6 molecule with a Kd of 1 pM, eliminating the potential for increasing serum IL-6 levels and subsequent diffusion of IL-6 into the central nervous system (CNS). [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]

According to the ClinicalTrials.gov database, a phase 2 pilot study (NCT04975555) is currently underway to evaluate the role of siltuximab in the treatment of CRS and ICANS in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy for FDA-approved hematologic malignancies. Eligible patients are enrolled at the time of CAR-T infusion and are prospectively monitored for the development of grade ≥1 CRS and/or ICANS, at which point siltuximab is administered with close clinical follow-up. Additional doses of siltuximab may be administered for worsening symptoms, with rescue tocilizumab permitted if CRS fails to resolve. The primary endpoint is the response rate of siltuximab in achieving CRS resolution within 14 days, while secondary endpoints include response rates for ICANS resolution, safety of siltuximab, and overall response to CAR-T therapy. The study initiated enrollment on November 15, 2021, and has an estimated primary completion date of December 31, 2026, with no results reported to date. [12]

References: [1] Diorio C, Vatsayan A, Talleur AC, et al. Anakinra utilization in refractory pediatric CAR T-cell associated toxicities. Blood Adv. 2022;6(11):3398-3403. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2022006983
[2] Santomasso BD, Nastoupil LJ, Adkins S, et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: ASCO Guideline [published correction appears in J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 10;40(8):919]. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(35):3978-3992. doi:10.1200/JCO.21.01992
[3] Maus MV, Alexander S, Bishop MR, et al. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune effector cell-related adverse events. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):e001511. doi:10.1136/jitc-2020-001511
[4] Ludwig H, Terpos E, van de Donk N, et al. Prevention and management of adverse events during treatment with bispecific antibodies and CAR T cells in multiple myeloma: a consensus report of the European Myeloma Network. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(6):e255-e269. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00159-6
[5] Strati P, Ahmed S, Kebriaei P, et al. Clinical efficacy of anakinra to mitigate CAR T-cell therapy-associated toxicity in large B-cell lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2020;4(13):3123-3127. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002328
[6] Park JH, Nath K, Devlin SM, et al. CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and prophylactic anakinra in relapsed or refractory lymphoma: phase 2 trial interim results. Nat Med. 2023;29(7):1710-1717. doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02404-6
[7] Yáñez L, Alarcón A, Sánchez-Escamilla M, Perales MA. How I treat adverse effects of CAR-T cell therapy. ESMO Open. 2020;4:e000746. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000746
[8] Gust J, Ponce R, Liles WC, Garden GA, Turtle CJ. Cytokines in car t cell-associated neurotoxicity. Front Immunol. 2020;11:577027. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.577027
[9] O'Rourke DM, Nasrallah MP, Desai A, et al. A single dose of peripherally infused EGFRvIII-directed CAR T cells mediates antigen loss and induces adaptive resistance in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(399):eaaa0984. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0984
[10] Rivera AM, May S, Lei M, et al. CAR T-Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity: Current Management and Emerging Treatment Strategies. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2020;43(2):191-204. doi:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000302
[11] Aghajan Y, Yu A, Jacobson CA, et al. Myelopathy Due To CAR-T Related Neurotoxicity Treated With Siltuximab. Neurol Clin Pract. Published online April 14, 2021:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001078. doi:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001078
[12] ClinicalTrials.gov. Study to Evaluate the Role of Siltuximab in Treatment of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity (ICANS) Related to CAR-T Cell Therapy (NCT04975555) Updated September 22, 2025. Accessed January 29, 2026. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04975555
Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 6 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the most recent literature regarding of the use of anakinra and siltuximab to treat ICANS?

Level of evidence

D - Case reports or unreliable data  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-6 for your response.


 

Summaries of Available Published Literature with Anakinra Use in Pediatric Patients with CAR T-cell Toxicities 

Author

Study Summary

Anakinra Use

Response

Lichtenstein et al., 20211

Phase I trial 

N= 58

Children and young adults treated with CD22 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL)

Of the 58 patients, 19 developed CAR T-cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (carHLH), of which 3 patients were treated with anakinra alone and 5 patients were treated with anakinra in combination with steroids. 

Anakinra was dosed at 2.5-4 mg/kg/dose subcutaneously twice daily.

Patients treated with anakinra for carHLH (n= 8) showed improvement in carHLH toxicity symptoms. One patient showed improvement in carHLH toxicity following one month of anakinra treatment. Overall, no apparent negative impact on CAR T-cell efficacy was seen with anakinra use. 

Dreyzin et al., 20212

Case series

N= 3

Pediatric patients treated with tisagenlecleucel for relapsed/refractory B-ALL

All three patients were treated with anakinra, steroids, and tocilizumab for the treatment of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and carHLH.

Anakinra was dosed at 2-2.5 mg/kg/dose intravenously four times daily.

All three patients showed improvement in ICANS, CRS, or HLH within 1-2 days of anakinra initiation. However, one patient treated for HLH required a prolonged course of anakinra for symptom improvement. No reports of new or worsening infection were seen following anakinra initiation. CAR-T cells were detectable in blood at day +28 in 2 patients and all patients achieved Minimal Residual Diseasenegative complete response. 

Hines et al., 20213

Case series

N= 27

Pediatric and young adult patients treated with tisagenlecleucel or SJCAR19

Of the 27 patients, 4 who developed carHLH were treated with anakinra in combination with steroids (n= 3) or ruxolitinib (n= 1).

Anakinra dosing was not reported. 

Patients treated with anakinra and steroids (n= 3) displayed improvement in carHLH. Notably, carHLH patients experienced early death and were reported to be less likely to respond to CAR-T cell therapy. 
References:
[1] Adapted from:
[2] Diorio C, Vatsayan A, Talleur AC, et al. Anakinra utilization in refractory pediatric CAR T-cell associated toxicities. Blood Adv. 2022;6(11):3398-3403. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2022006983
[3] [1] Lichtenstein DA, Schischlik F, Shao L, et al. Characterization of HLH-like manifestations as a CRS variant in patients receiving CD22 CAR T cells. Blood. 2021;138(24):2469-2484. doi:10.1182/blood.2021011898
[4] [2] Dreyzin A, Jacobsohn D, Angiolillo A, et al. Intravenous anakinra for tisagenlecleucel-related toxicities in children and young adults. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2022;39(4):370-378. doi:10.1080/08880018.2021.1988012
[5] [3] Hines MR, Keenan C, Maron Alfaro G, et al. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like toxicity (carHLH) after CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy. Br J Haematol. 2021;194(4):701-707. doi:10.1111/bjh.17662
Anakinra for refractory CRS or ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy
Design

Multicenter retrospective analysis

N= 43

Objective

To evaluate the safety of anakinra to treat refractory CRS and ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy and to evaluate the impact of key treatment, patient, and disease-related variables on time to CRS/ICANS resolution and treatment-related mortality (TRM)

Study Groups

High-dose anakinra (>200mg/day IV) (n=28)

Low-dose anakinra (100-200mg/day SC or IV) (n=15)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with B-cell or plasma cell malignancies treated with anakinra for refractory CRS or ICANS at 9 institutions in the United States and Spain between 2019 and 2022

Exclusion Criteria

Incomplete data

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 43 patients treated with anakinra for refractory CRS or ICANS. Anakinra was administered subcutaneously or intravenously. Dose groups were defined as high-dose (>200mg/day IV) and low-dose (100-200mg/day SC or IV). 

Duration 2019 to 2022
Outcome Measures

Primary: Safety of anakinra

Secondary: Time to CRS/ICANS resolution, treatment-related mortality (TRM)

Baseline Characteristics   High-dose anakinra (n=28)

Low-dose anakinra (n=15)

Age, median years (IQR)

64 (50-71) 51 (32-63)

Malignancy

DLBCL

MCL

B-ALL

PMBCL

FL

MM

 

53.6%

25%

10.7%

0

7.1%

3.6%

 

66.7%

0

13.4%

20%

0

0

CAR T agent

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta)

Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah)

Brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus)

Lisocabtagene maraleucel (Breyanzi)

Investigation agents

 

28.6%

21.4%

21.4%

10.7%

17.9%

 

80%

13.3%

0

0

6.7%

Pre-lymphodepletion values

Ferritin, mcg/L (IQR)

LDH, U/L

CRP, mg/mL

Karnofsky Performance Status (IQR)

 

534 (236-1370)

216 (168-392)

8.75 (2.5-14.4)

80 (80-90)

 

1,724 (705-3400)

609 (288-1300)

8.54 (3.7-26.9)

80 (65-90)

B-ALL: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, CRP: C-reactive protein; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; FL, follicular lymphoma; IQR: interquartile range; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; MM, multiple myeloma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma, PMBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma;
Results  

High-dose anakinra (n=28)

Low-dose anakinra (n=15) p-value

Peak CRS grade per ASTCT 2019 (range)

Peak ICANS grade per ASTCT 2019 (range)

2 (0-4)

4 (0-4)

2 (1-3)

4 (0-5)

0.0=4

0.069

Cumulative anakinra dose, mg (IQR)

Duration of anakinra treatment, days (IQR)

4200 (2600-5700)

7.5 (4.75-12.2)

700 (450-1600)

6 (4.5-10)

0.0001

0.41

Treatment-related mortality at day 28 after anakinra initiation 0%

47%

--

The median time to CRS/ICANS resolution from anakinra initiation was 7 days in patients who received high-dose anakinra and was not reached in patients who received low-dose anakinra.

ASTCT: American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Adverse Events

Anakinra discontinuation due to side effects in 3 patients (7%): Elevated liver enzymes in 2 patients, subcutaneous hematoma in 1 patient

Study Author Conclusions Anakinra treatment for refractory CRS or ICANS was safe at doses up to 12mg/kg/day IV. Higher anakinra dose may be associated with faster CRS/ICANS resolution and was independently associated with lower TRM. 
Critique

The study's retrospective design may introduce selection and treatment allocation bias. The higher TRM in the low-dose group may reflect higher patient frailty not captured by Karnofsky Performance Status. Concurrent corticosteroid use could confound assessments of anakinra's efficacy on CRS and ICANS symptoms.

References:
[1] Gazeau N, Liang EC, Wu QV, et al. Anakinra for Refractory Cytokine Release Syndrome or Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023;29(7):430-437. doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.001

Novel Treatment Modality for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy Complications: A Case Report

Design

Case report

Case presentation

The management of immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in a 54-year-old male with refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) following treatment with blinatumomab-based chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy was described. The patient, who had a history of HIV, type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease, developed fever and tachycardia immediately after initiating blinatumomab infusion. CRS was identified and treated with tocilizumab, but by day four, the patient exhibited abrupt altered mental status and suspected seizures, with an immune effector cell encephalopathy (ICE) score declining from 10/10 to 0/10. Due to rapid neurological deterioration, he was transferred to the neurological intensive care unit (ICU), where infectious etiologies were ruled out through lumbar puncture and imaging, ultimately attributing his condition to blinatumomab toxicity.

Following ICU admission, the patient received an aggressive therapeutic regimen consisting of intravenous dexamethasone 20 mg every eight hours, intravenous levetiracetam 750 mg every 12 hours, and continuous administration of dexmedetomidine for agitation. Notably, anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, was introduced at 200 mg every eight hours in addition to standard care. Serial ICE score assessments, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) imaging, and electroencephalography (EEG) were employed for monitoring neurological status. The patient's condition gradually improved, with resolution of neurotoxicity and full neurological recovery, allowing for his transfer back to the oncology floor.

Study Author Conclusions

The approach to managing and monitoring this patient was unique in that we added anakinra to the standard treatment regimen. With this report, we emphasize the need for further research regarding CAR T-cell therapeutic regimens and how to decrease the morbidity and mortality of its adverse effects.

References:
[1] Rente Lavastida D, De Filippis S, Rivera Torres EG, Aldanese A, Ruxmohan S. Novel Treatment Modality for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy Complications: A Case Report. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e65497. Published 2024 Jul 27. doi:10.7759/cureus.65497

Glofitamab-Associated Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) Presenting as Serial Seizures and Responding Positively to Antiseizure Drugs and Anakinra: A Case Report

Design

Case report

Case presentation

The development of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) following glofitamab administration in a 63-year-old male with a history of aggressive large-cell B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma was discussed. Despite multiple previous treatments, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, the patient experienced several relapses, necessitating the initiation of glofitamab. One week after the ninth cycle, neurological symptoms emerged, including drowsiness, behavioral changes, word-finding difficulties, aphasia, and multiple seizures, ranging from focal to bilateral tonic-clonic events. The absence of metabolic, infectious, or cardiovascular abnormalities, along with cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealing no lymphoma cells, supported the suspicion of glofitamab-associated ICANS.

Management included the administration of dexamethasone, levetiracetam, lorazepam, valproic acid, and midazolam. Given the persistence of seizure activity despite escalating antiseizure therapy, the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra was introduced, after which seizures gradually resolved, and the patient was discharged on stable antiseizure therapy. According to 2024 guidelines from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT), the case was classified as grade 3 ICANS, characterized by significant encephalopathy, aphasia, and repeated seizures. Pathophysiological mechanisms implicated in ICANS include cytokine release, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, and myeloid cell activation, with previous reports linking CD20-directed therapies to similar presentations.

Study Author Conclusions

The case shows that ICANS with drowsiness, behavioral changes, aphasia, and seizures can develop with glofitamab and that patients with structural brain abnormalities may be prone to this.

References:
[1] Finsterer J. Glofitamab-Associated Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) Presenting as Serial Seizures and Responding Positively to Antiseizure Drugs and Anakinra: A Case Report. Cureus. 2024;16(5):e60833. Published 2024 May 22. doi:10.7759/cureus.60833
[2]

Siltuximab for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy–related CRS and ICANS: a multicenter retrospective analysis
Design

Multicenter retrospective analysis

N= 54

Objective To assess the efficacy of siltuximab in treating cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after CAR-T therapy
Study Groups

CRS patients (n= 44)

ICANS patients (n= 30)

Inclusion Criteria Adult patients with hematologic malignancies treated with CAR-T therapy who received siltuximab for CRS and/or ICANS between 2018 and 2023
Exclusion Criteria Not specified
Methods Retrospective chart review was conducted of patients from 6 academic centers. CRS and ICANS grades were noted according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy consensus grading. Management was at the discretion of treating physicians. Siltuximab was administered to patients with CRS and/or ICANS, including those previously treated with tocilizumab or steroids.
Duration 2018 to 2023
Outcome Measures

Primary: Improvement in CRS and ICANS grades after siltuximab administration

Secondary: Time to improvement of CRS or ICANS, overall survival after CAR-T therapies

Baseline Characteristics   All patients (N= 54)
Median age, years (range) 60 (23-81)
Female 27 (50%)
Caucasian 49 (91%)

Diagnosis

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma

Multiple myeloma

 

28 (52%)

12 (22%)

9 (17%)

Cell product - Axicabtagene ciloleucel 23 (42%)
Results   CRS (n= 44) ICANS (n= 30)
Improvement after siltuximab, % 75% (33/44) 60% (18/30)
Median days to resolution (range) 1 (0-7) 4.5 (1-40)
Adverse Events Not specified
Study Author Conclusions Siltuximab appears effective for treating CRS and ICANS after CAR-T therapy, including in cases previously treated with tocilizumab or steroids. These findings support further prospective studies
Critique The study provides valuable real-world data on the efficacy of siltuximab for CRS and ICANS, but its retrospective nature and lack of standardized treatment protocols may introduce bias and limit generalizability. The heterogeneity of the cohort and concurrent use of corticosteroids could confound results
References:
[1] Bajwa A, Zhao Q, Geer M, et al. Siltuximab for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy-related CRS and ICANS: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Blood Adv. 2025;9(1):170-175. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013688

 

Siltuximab as a primary treatment for cytokine release syndrome in a patient receiving a bispecific antibody in a clinical trial setting

Design

Case report

Case presentation

A 77-year-old male patient with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) presented with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) following treatment with the bispecific antibody talquetamab. The patient developed grade 1 CRS and grade 2 ICANS after the second dose of talquetamab. An administration of 11 mg/kg of siltuximab intravenously led to a rapid resolution of CRS within one hour and ICANS within seven hours, without the need for corticosteroids. The patient tolerated subsequent doses of talquetamab without recurrence of CRS or ICANS.

Study Author Conclusions

The patient described in this report adds to the limited literature of patients who received siltuximab as primary treatment for CRS. Siltuximab has been recommended by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation as a potential treatment for patients whose CRS symptoms do not improve with tocilizumab, and by the CARTOX Working Group for patients who are intolerant to tocilizumab. There are no FDA-approved alternatives for the treatment of CRS.

A phase 2 study (NCT04975555) is planned to evaluate siltuximab 11 mg/kg administered IV over 1 h to decrease the severity of CRS and ICANS in patients treated with CAR-T cell therapy for hematologic malignancies.

References:
[1] Lipe BC, Renaud T. Siltuximab as a primary treatment for cytokine release syndrome in a patient receiving a bispecific antibody in a clinical trial setting. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2023;29(4):1006-1010. doi:10.1177/10781552221140320