Are there other ARBs that have similar pharmacokinetics to olmesartan (i.e., longer duration of action) and which ARBs have shorter half-lives compared to olmesartan?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

While sources may differ, olmesartan has a half-life of approximately 12 to 14 hours which is similar to azilsartan (11 h), candesartan (9-13 h), and irbesartan (12-20 h) and is surpassed by telmisartan (24 h). The other three angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) exhibit a shorter half-life including losartan (4-6 h), eprosartan (5-7 h), and valsartan (7 h). Comparison studies suggest longer-acting ARBs like olmesartan may improve blood pressure control by minimizing the effect of missed or delayed dosing of medication compared to shorter-acting ARBs, but other studies have reported no difference.

Background

The pharmacokinetic characteristics of the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vary based on the discussion article but are similar enough to highlight certain properties of individual agents (see Table 1). Based on the most recent study reporting pharmacokinetic ARB parameters, olmesartan’s half-life ranges between 12 to 14 hours. This half-life is longer than losartan (4-6 h), eprosartan (5-7 h), and valsartan (7 h) but is similar to azilsartan (11 h), candesartan (9-13 h), and irbesartan (12-20 h). Telmisartan is the longest-acting ARB with a half-life of 24 hours. Whether a duration of action is associated with greater control of blood pressure has not been thoroughly investigated. ARBs with a longer duration of action may improve patient compliance by reducing the burden of dosing from BID to once daily in certain cases. However, one study comparing olmesartan versus losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan at recommended starting doses found a significant reduction in mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure for olmesartan. The study authors hypothesize that olmesartan’s longer half-life may contribute to clinical efficacy while reducing the inconsistency between dosing intervals. However, two other studies that compared candesartan, losartan, and valsartan did not report a difference in blood pressure control. [1], [2], [3], [4]

References:

[1] Gallo G, Volpe M, Rubattu S. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in the Management of Hypertension: A Real-World Perspective and Current Recommendations. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022;18:507-515. Published 2022 Jul 11. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S337640
[2] Dézsi CA. The Different Therapeutic Choices with ARBs. Which One to Give? When? Why?. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2016;16(4):255-266. doi:10.1007/s40256-016-0165-4
[3] Abraham HM, White CM, White WB. The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Drug Saf. 2015;38(1):33-54. doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0239-7
[4] Oparil S, Williams D, Chrysant SG, Marbury TC, Neutel J. Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension [published correction appears in J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2001 Nov-Dec;3(6):395]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2001;3(5):283-318. doi:10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.01136.x

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

Are there other ARBs that have similar pharmacokinetics to olmesartan (i.e., longer duration of action) and which ARBs have shorter half-lives compared to olmesartan?

Please see Tables 1-2 for your response.


Pharmacokinetic properties of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)
  Tmax, hours Bioavailability Half-life, hours
Candesartan 3.0 to 5.0 42% 9 to 13
Eprosartan 2.0 to 6.0 13% 5 to 7
Irbesartan 1.0 to 2.0 60% to 80% 12 to 20
Losartan 3.0 to 4.0 33% 4 to 6
Olmesartan 1.4 to 2.8 26% 11.8 to 14.7
Telmesartan 1.0 43% 24
Valsartan 2.0 23% 7
Azilsartan 1.5 to 3.0 60% 11
References:

Adapted from:
Gallo G, Volpe M, Rubattu S. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in the Management of Hypertension: A Real-World Perspective and Current Recommendations. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022;18:507-515. Published 2022 Jul 11. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S337640

 

Efficacy and Tolerability of Olmesartan, Telmisartan, and Losartan in Patients of Stage I Hypertension: A Randomized, Open-label Study

Design

Randomized, open-label, parallel-group, comparative study

N= 57

Objective

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of losartan, telmisartan, and olmesartan as antihypertensive agents

Study Groups

Olmesartan (n= 20)

Telmisartan (n= 19)

Losartan (n= 18)

Inclusion Criteria

Age > 18 years, newly diagnosed with stage I hypertension

Exclusion Criteria

Suffering from diabetes, abnormal liver or kidney function, any other systemic illness; taking other concomitant medication including antihypertensive medication; pregnancy/lactation

Methods

Patients were randomized to receive one of three medications: olmesartan tablet 20 mg PO once daily, telmisartan tablet 40 mg PO once daily, or losartan tablet 50 mg PO once daily. Patients were given two weeks' worth of tablets and followed up at 2-week intervals for 3 months.

Duration

Study enrollment period: January 2013 to September 2014

Follow-up: 3 months

Outcome Measures

Primary: change in sitting cuff diastolic blood pressure (DBP)

0.14

0.48

 

Olmesartan (n= 20)

Telmisartan (n= 19)

Losartan (n= 18)

Age, years

46.2 48.26 49.94

Female

7 7 6

Diastolic BP, mmHg

Systolic BP, mmHg

95.05

147.38

94.53

148.8

93.44

149.9

Results

Endpoint

Olmesartan (n= 20)

Telmisartan (n= 19)

Losartan (n= 18)

Diastolic BP, mmHg

2 weeks

4 weeks

8 weeks

12 weeks

 

85.90*

84.86*

83.71*

81.24*

 

87.37*

86.32*

85.16*

82.53*

 

88.78*

87.33*

87.67*

86.11*

Systolic BP, mmHg

2 weeks

4 weeks

8 weeks

12 weeks

 

136.5*

135.7*

133.2*

131.0*

 

140.4*

140.4*

138.6*

137.1*

 

143.0*

142.0*

141.4*

138.7*

*p< 0.001 versus baseline

Adverse Events

Headache (n= 1 in the olmesartan group), dizziness (n= 1 in the telmisartan group)

No serious adverse events reported

Study Author Conclusions

The most efficacious drug in reducing BP is Olmesartan whereas telmisartan and losartan show equal efficacy.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Follow-up was limited to 3 months which may not represent long-term blood pressure management. Both telmisartan and olmesartan are characterized by a long half-life which the authors believe minimized the effects of missing or delaying medication dosing. However, adherence to the medication regimen was not measured.



References:

Kalikar M, Nivangune KS, Dakhale GN, Bajait CS, Sontakke SD, Motghare VM, Budania R. Efficacy and Tolerability of Olmesartan, Telmisartan, and Losartan in Patients of Stage I Hypertension: A Randomized, Open-label Study. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):106-111. doi: 10.4103/jpp.JPP_39_17