Author:zophia@inpharmd.com, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI
LEARN MORE
There is a limited amount of evidence supporting ertapenem monotherapy to treat methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections. One post-hoc analysis in MSSA complicated skin and skin structure infections demonstrated that ertapenem achieved similar clinical cure and bacterial eradication rates to piperacillin-tazobactam, though MSSA-specific outcomes were not prespecified. Additional in-vitro evidence indicates that ertapenem has low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ...
Several in vitro susceptibility and pharmacodynamic studies evaluated ertapenem activity against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates from respiratory, intra-abdominal, skin/soft tissues, urinary, and bloodstream sources. Across studies, ertapenem demonstrated low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against MSSA, with MIC90 values generally 0.25 to ≤1 µg/mL, and all MSSA isolates tested were categorized as susceptible; MICs were below total plasma concentrations achieved with standard 1 g intravenous (IV) dosing. In high-inoculum and biofilm models, ertapenem monotherapy showed bactericidal activity against MSSA and greater activity than nafcillin in biofilms, though eradication was incomplete, and combination regimens showed greater effects. Notably, these findings can not directly establish clinical efficacy of ertapenem monotherapy for MSSA infections. [1-3]
READ MORE→
A search of the published medical literature revealed
1 study investigating the researchable question:
What is the evidence with using ertapenem monotherapy to treat methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus infections?
Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results
READ MORE→
[1] Hicks PS, Pelak B, Woods GL, Bartizal KF, Motyl M. Comparative in vitro activity of ertapenem against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8(11):753-757. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00461.x
[2] Friedland I, Mixson LA, Majumdar A, Motyl M, Woods GL. In vitro activity of ertapenem against common clinical isolates in relation to human pharmacokinetics. J Chemother. 2002;14(5):483-491. doi:10.1179/joc.2002.14.5.483
[3] Gilbertie J, Ulloa ER, Daiker JC, et al. Potent Activity of Ertapenem Plus Cefazolin Within Stap...
Author: Open AI GPT
Ertapenem Monotherapy for MSSA Infections
Introduction
Ertapenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic commonly used for treating various bacterial infections. Its use in treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections specifically is less well-documented compared to other antibiotics like nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin.
Evidence Overview
1. Antimicrobial Activity: In vitro studies have shown that ertapenem has good activity against MSSA. Its efficacy in practice, however, may be influenced by the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties specific to the infection site.
2. Clinical Studies: There is limited direct clinical trial data assessing ertapenem monotherapy for MSSA infections. Most available evidence comes from broader studies where MSSA was one of several organisms treated.
3. Use in Practice: While not typically a first-line choice for straightforward MSSA infections, ertapenem may be considered in certain clinical scenarios, such as polymicrobial infections or when a patient is intolerant to other beta-lactams.
Considerations
1. Limitations: Due to limited specific studies, caution is advised when considering ertapenem as monotherapy for MSSA, especially in severe infections.
2. Resistance Development: Overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics like ertapenem can contribute to antimicrobial resistance, which is a significant consideration in stewardship efforts.
Conclusion
While ertapenem demonstrates activity against MSSA, its use as monotherapy should be carefully considered within the context of the infection's severity and the patient's overall clinical condition. It is generally not the first-line treatment for MSSA infections, and consultation with infectious disease specialists is recommended for complex cases.