InpharmD™





One touch literature search.

So you can spend more time with patients

Ask any clinical question, receive a curated response.

Get Started Free

Trusted by 20,000+ physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists.

                     

Play Circle

Learn about InpharmD™ in under 90 seconds

What is InpharmD™?


Literature searching is tedious. InpharmD™ is here to help.

Clinical pharmacists can ask any question, anytime, from anywhere, and we’ll perform a custom literature search.

(And a 32% chance it’s already been asked.)


103,380

Clinical Pharmacist Hours Saved

4x +

ROI

100%

Customer Satisfaction Rate

This is how InpharmD™ transforms LITERATURE.

What's Being Asked...

Is there data to support greater efficacy of long-acting naltrexone injectable compared to oral naltrexone in patient...
What evidence is there to support intensive induction therapy of infliximab for acute, severe UC? Interested in diffe...
how does sotagliflozin differ from empagliflozin? what are the pros and cons of each?
what information is available for administration of daptomycin in the perioperative period for adult liver transplant...
Provide information for the use of oral tranexamic acid for orthopedic surgery patients specifically in the post-oper...

What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Muna Said, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Direct comparative data on the efficacy of long-acting injectable (LAI) versus oral naltrexone are limited. In alcohol use disorder, evidence suggests comparable efficacy between the two formulations, with some findings indicating superior three-month treatment retention and increased time to relapse with the LAI formulation. However, one study reported lower healthcare utilization with oral naltrexone, implying that LAI may not offer clear advantages to justify its higher cost (see Table 1)....

A 2022 meta-analysis sought to gauge the impact of extended-release injectable naltrexone, in comparison to a placebo, on alcohol consumption among patients dealing with alcohol use disorder (AUD). The analysis incorporated seven trials involving 1,500 adults with AUD who received monthly injections of either placebo or extended-release naltrexone at doses ranging from 150 to 400 mg for 2 to 6 months. These trials were conducted in outpatient clinic settings in the United States or Europe, including specialized alcohol/substance use clinics and HIV clinics. Generally, participants were treatment-seeking adult males or non-pregnant, non-lactating females with moderate to severe alcohol use, assessed through validated tools, and a minimum of one weekly episode of heavy drinking. The analysis measured the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) in drinking days per month and heavy drinking days per month. [1] The WMD favored extended-release naltrexone, showing -2.0 (95% confidence in...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

Is there data to support greater efficacy of long-acting naltrexone injectable compared to oral naltrexone in patients with opioid use and/or alcohol use disorder?

Level of evidence
B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  

READ MORE→

[1] Murphy CE 4th, Wang RC, Montoy JC, Whittaker E, Raven M. Effect of extended-release naltrexone on alcohol consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2022;117(2):271-281. doi:10.1111/add.15572
[2] Magane KM, Dukes KA, Fielman S, et al. Oral vs Extended-Release Injectable Naltrexone for Hospitalized Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. Published online April 21, 2025. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0522
[3] Malone M, McDonald R, Vittitow A, et al. Extended-release vs. oral naltrexone for alcohol dependence treatment in pri...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Dylan Brown, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Data suggests that infliximab as rescue therapy in the hospital setting for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is beneficial for patients refractory to IV glucocorticoids, and may potentially prevent colectomy and improve long-term outcomes. However, the optimal infliximab dosing regimen for ASUC remains debated. Although the standard infliximab dose is 5 mg/kg, some evidence suggests this dose may not adequately target inflammation in patients with severe disease. Intensive induction reg...

According to the 2020 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines, infliximab or cyclosporine are recommended in hospitalized adult patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) refractory to intravenous (IV) corticosteroids (conditional recommendation, low quality evidence). The panel suggests using either infliximab or cyclosporine in hospitalized adult patients with ASUC refractory to a 3 to 5 day trial of IV corticosteroids. However, no recommendations were made on the routine use of intensive versus standard infliximab dosing in hospitalized adult patients with ASUC, refractory to IV corticosteroids, being treated with infliximab (no recommendation, knowledge gap). [1] A recent 2024 review discusses the latest insight for management of ASUC, including the role of infliximab. For patients admitted to the hospital who are steroid-refractory, infliximab is considered one of the options for rescue therapy along with calcineurin inhibitors. Infliximab and cyc...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 5 studies investigating the researchable question:

Are there any recommendations available to guide when it is appropriate to use infliximab as rescue therapy in the hospital setting for acute severe ulcerative colitis? What are the differences between 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg dosing?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Feuerstein JD, Isaacs KL, Schneider Y, et al. AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(5):1450-1461. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.006
[2] Rivière P, Li Wai Suen C, Chaparro M, De Cruz P, Spinelli A, Laharie D. Acute severe ulcerative colitis management: unanswered questions and latest insights. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;9(3):251-262. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00313-8
[3] Gordon BL, Battat R. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(10):3378. ...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Dylan Brown, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Direct comparative data between sotagliflozin and empagliflozin is currently limited to a single phase 2a study in patients with type 2 diabetes that observed no differences between the two agents in glycemic, metabolic, urinary, and intestinal parameters (see Table 1). Indirect comparative data from meta-analyses have consistently found no significant differences between sotagliflozin and empagliflozin in cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. The dual mechanism of action of sotagliflozin ma...

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) published a 2024 expert consensus statement for optimization of heart failure treatment. While direct conversion between sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and sotagliflozin) is not discussed, the article does provide a comparison of starting and target doses for heart failure. Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin both are recommended to have a starting and target dose of 10 mg daily, but sotagliflozin has a starting dose of 200 mg daily that may be doubled to 400 mg daily. However, there remains a lack of direct clinical comparison data between the agents. The setting of impaired kidney function further complicates dosing, as dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin are contraindicated in patients with an eGFR of 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 or lower, while empagliflozin has no lower bound cutoff. How different renal statuses might affect the conversion between SGLT2 inhibitors largely remains unexplored. [1] A 2024 ...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 9 studies investigating the researchable question:

How does sotagliflozin differ from empagliflozin? What are the pros and cons of each?

Level of evidence
A - Multiple high-quality studies with consistent results  

READ MORE→

[1] Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, Allen LA, et al. 2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(15):1444-1488. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.024
[2] Kani R, Watanabe A, Miyamoto Y, et al. Comparison of Effectiveness Among Different Sodium-Glucose Cotransoporter-2 Inhibitors According to Underlying Conditions: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [published correction appears in J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Tai Huynh, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

While not currently recommended by clinical practice guidelines, two small retrospective studies demonstrate the use of daptomycin for perioperative prophylaxis in the liver transplant setting (see Tables 1 and 2). Both studies found some reduction of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) infection, although impact may be limited to short-term (i.e., within 14 days of operation). Notably, one study reported that none of the patients receiving prophylactic daptomycin developed VRE infections...

Relevant clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis do not currently include a recommendation for use of daptomycin in liver transplant. Rather, a combination of a third-generation cephalosporin plus ampicillin or monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam is recommended. Alternatively, ampicillin sulbactam with or without fluconazole may be considered, as well as echinocandin or liposomal amphotericin B in patients at high risk for invasive fungal infection. [1,2] A 2019 retrospective, single-center analysis presented at the American Transplant Congress reviewed the incidence and outcomes of VRE infections in LTR with documented VRE colonization who had received perioperative daptomycin prophylaxis. The cohort included 18 adult patients who underwent LT between 2013 and 2017 and were colonized with VRE, as determined through perirectal swab cultures. The institutional protocol provided daptomycin prophylaxis in addition to standard surgical prophylaxis at the time ...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

What information is available for administration of daptomycin in the perioperative period for adult liver transplant patients?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Abbo LM, Grossi PA; AST ID Community of Practice. Surgical site infections: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant. 2019;33(9):e13589. doi:10.1111/ctr.13589Abbo LM, Grossi PA; AST ID Community of Practice. Surgical site infections: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant. 2019;33(9):e13589. doi:10.1111/ctr.13589
[2] Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Hea...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Dylan Brown, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

While more limited, investigations into oral tranexamic acid (TXA) in the orthopedic surgery setting suggest a similar benefit to intravenous and intra-articular TXA for reducing transfusion risk, with similar variations in dosing strategies. Available guidelines lack consensus regarding a superior method of administration for TXA in the orthopedic surgery setting. A meta-analysis suggests that multiple-dose oral TXA (e.g., 2 g preoperatively followed by 1 g doses postoperatively) is a safe a...

A 2018 clinical practice guideline published by the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) provided recommendations for the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The methodological approach relied on direct and network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials to determine the efficacy and safety of TXA when used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Data from 82 high-quality studies demonstrated that intravenous (IV), topical, and oral TXA, as well as combinations of formulations, significantly reduce calculated blood loss and the need for transfusion compared to placebo. In THA, IV and topical TXA decreased transfusion risk by 60% and 71%, respectively, while network meta-analysis supported the overall blood-sparing properties of TXA across various administration routes. Similarly, in TKA, IV, topical, and oral TXA reduced transfusion risk, with single pre-incision doses of IV TXA demonstrating reduc...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 7 studies investigating the researchable question:

What evidence is there for oral tranexamic acid in the postoperative period following orthopedic surgery? What dosing is recommended and what adverse events should be monitored for? Is there additional guidance on the timing of the doses in relation to prior doses? Are there any considerations for renal impairment or drug interactions with other NSAIDs or anticoagulants?

Level of evidence
B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  

READ MORE→

[1] American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS). Tranexamic Acid in Total Joint Arthroplasty: The Endorsed Clinical Practice Guides of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, The Hip Society, and The Knee Society. Updated January 23, 2024.. Accessed March 26, 2025. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/txa/txa-clinical-guidelines.pdf
[2] Joint replacement (primary): hip, knee and shoulder. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excelle...

Find answers, not documents.

Before InpharmD™


BeforeTime
Your team spends hours per week cobbling together literature from different studies, many behind paywalls, leaving little time for action.
BeforeTime
TI opportunities are discovered (or presented by third parties) months after the fact, resulting in costly missed savings.
BeforeTime
Decisions may be made without a complete picture, or pushed out while gathering consensus.

After InpharmD™


BeforeTime
InpharmD™ delivers customized, actionable drug information in real time, so you can focus on execution.
BeforeTime
Your team stays informed immediately when new data emerges or prices change, and you’ll always be the first to know when any changes impact your formulary.
BeforeTime
With InpharmD™, your team can make faster, more informed decisions and move forward with confidence.

What Clinical Pharmacists Are Saying...


     

Assists in our research and is a great way or us to get an answer to a medical question without spending an average of 2 hours researching UptoDate or PubMed ourselves.


  Jordan C., PharmD, New Jersey

     

Huge time saver with thorough responses.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I’d never heard of a DI pharmacist before, now I have one. In. My. Pocket. Amazing!


     

Holy Shhh. Cow! Holy Cow! These summaries are beautiful.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I just want to say: This is such a brilliant idea! You people are genius.


     

OH MY GOD WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ALL MY LIFE!


     

I can’t tell you how much time I spend literature searching. And how I CANNOT STAND PAYWALLS. THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!! (covers face for sec) thank you, thank you, thank you!


     

So they’re basically connecting academic researchers with front line providers and then automating everything. It’s simply brilliant.


     

The clinical pharmacist was our secret weapon anyway. (Smiles wryly) This pharmacist AI seems superhuman. I’m just blown away, honestly. (Looks at camera somberly.)


     

It’s an ENTIRE DI DEPARTMENT, that lives in Epic. Give me a second. I’m just having a hard time wrapping my head around that.


     

Sorry just give me a second, my mind is blown.


     

Stop reading and just download the app already! I’ve tried all of them. This is by far the most advanced, best-in-class.


What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

Sign up for a free trial & start right away.

Get Started Free