Is there any evidence that metformin can be used to slow the aging process?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Metformin has potential to improve longevity in humans by affecting inflammation, cellular survival, stress defense, autophagy, and protein synthesis. A double-blind, randomized trial (MILES; see Table 1) showed metformin can restore youthful gene function in elderly persons with glucose intolerance. Additionally, a large retrospective study conducted in the UK found use of metformin to significantly improve survival compared to controls not receiving metformin (see Table 2). Another large, randomized controlled trial (TAME) is proposed to elucidate the concept that human aging can be targeted by metformin while simultaneously preventing a multitude of major age-related outcomes.
Background

While metformin is approved to treat diabetes, it appears to target a number of aging-related mechanisms as well according to a 2016 review. Some of these crossover with the antidiabetic effect, but these may not be the most important mechanisms with respect to aging. Specifically for aging, metformin leads to decreased insulin levels, decreased insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) signaling, inhibition of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), inhibition of mitochondrial complex 1 in the electron transport chain and reduction of endogenous production of reactive oxygen species, activation of AMP-activated kinase (AMPK), and reduction in DNA damage. Metformin also beneficially influences metabolic and cellular processes associated with age-related conditions (e.g. inflammation, autophagy, and cellular senescence). These actions give credence to the hypothesized downstream effects of metformin to improve longevity by affecting inflammation, cellular survival, stress defense, autophagy, and protein synthesis. [1]

Animal studies in C. elegans (roundworm) show metformin to extend lifespan by several mechanisms altering the microbiome, specifically changing microbial folate and methionine metabolism. Unfortunately, there is no similar evidence in humans. Studies in mice also showed metformin increased lifespan by about 40%, but this effect declined when metformin was started at older ages. The authors of this review propose a large clinical trial, the Targeting Aging with Metformin (TAME) study, which plans to enroll 3,000 patients aged 65-79 to assess the true effects of metformin on longevity in humans. [1]

Another review suggests metformin may be a promising candidate as an anti-aging medication. Microarray analyses show metformin induces the same gene expression profile and pathways as caloric restriction (CR), which has been shown to extend lifespan. Metformin also alters cellular energy by inhibiting gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis. Downstream effects also inhibit parts of the electron transport chain, which leads to decreased reactive oxygen species. Overall, metformin is well tolerated and helps improve survival in diabetic patients, many of the positive results regarding metformin's use for longevity have been obtained using doses that exceed therapeutic levels in humans. Animal studies suggest metformin has positive effects on the lifespan of worms, flies, mice, and rats, while studies in humans show increased survival with metformin in diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease. Moreover, metformin may contribute to the prevention of certain cancers and reduce the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Because of its animal data and tolerability in humans, metformin is a promising candidate as a life-extending drug. [2]

A 2019 review discussing mechanisms of metformin relating to anti-aging notes that one of metformin's potential anti-aging properties targets the mitochondrial respiratory (electron transport) chain. By targeting mitochondrial complex I, metformin lowers the relative energy charge of the cell, raising AMP levels relative to ATP. Among other effects, the rise in AMP allosterically primes activation of the energy sensor AMPK, which is significant to metformin’s antihyperglycemic, pro-longevity, and anticancer effects. Another proposed mechanism is due to mechanistic target of rapamycin complex1 (mTORC1). The protein kinase mTORC1 plays a central role in regulating cell growth, proliferation, and survival in response to nutrient and energy availability. Metformin inhibits mTORC1 activity in cells in culture independently of AMPK. From a longevity perspective, metformin effects on mTORC1 and longevity are in line with the well-known ability of genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of mTORC1 to extend lifespan across multiple models. [3]

Furthermore, to supplement the lifespan-promoting activity of metformin in various model organisms, metformin is capable of reducing the mortality rate of diabetic patients from all causes independent of its effect on diabetes control. This is evident in the Metformin in Longevity Study (MILES) study which essentially showed metformin has the potential to restore youthful gene function in elderly persons with glucose intolerance. This suggests that metformin may provide anti-aging and reduction of aging disease properties (see Table 1). This concept will be further evaluated in the TAME trial. This study will aim to provide the concept that human aging can be targeted by metformin while simultaneously preventing a multitude of major age-related outcomes. This study is suggested to be launched soon; however, evidence of its initiation could not be found. [3], [4]

A 2017 meta-analysis evaluated metformin’s anti-aging effect in humans. Four studies compared diabetic patients being treated with metformin to the general population or nondiabetic patients. Diabetics taking metformin had significantly lower all-cause mortality than non-diabetics (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 to 0.99). Furthermore, diabetics taking metformin compared to diabetics receiving other diabetic therapies had lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.80), insulin therapy (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75), and sulfonylurea therapy (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.97). Metformin users also had reduced cancer and cardiovascular disease compared to non-diabetics and non-metformin users. This analysis suggests metformin may extend lifespan by acting as a geroprotective agent. [5]

References:

[1] Barzilai N, Crandall JP, Kritchevsky SB, Espeland MA. Metformin as a Tool to Target Aging. Cell Metab. 2016;23(6):1060-1065. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.011
[2] Novelle MG, Ali A, Diéguez C, Bernier M, de Cabo R. Metformin: A Hopeful Promise in Aging Research. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016;6(3):a025932. Published 2016 Mar 1. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a025932
[3] Soukas AA, Hao H, Wu L. Metformin as Anti-Aging Therapy: Is It for Everyone?. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2019;30(10):745-755. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2019.07.015
[4] Kulkarni AS, Gubbi S, Barzilai N. Benefits of Metformin in Attenuating the Hallmarks of Aging. Cell Metab. 2020;32(1):15-30. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.001
[5] Campbell JM, Bellman SM, Stephenson MD, Lisy K. Metformin reduces all-cause mortality and diseases of ageing independent of its effect on diabetes control: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;40:31-44. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2017.08.003

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

Is there any evidence that metformin can be used to slow the aging process?

Please see Tables 1-2 for your response.


 

Metformin in Longevity Study (MILES)

Design

Phase 4, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

N= 16

Objective

To examine the effect of metformin treatment on the biology of aging in humans; namely, whether treatment with metformin will restore the gene expression profile of older adults with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) to that of young healthy subjects

Study Groups

Metformin first (n= 8)

Placebo first (n= 8)

Inclusion Criteria

Aged >60 years, impaired glucose tolerance (fasting plasma glucose < 126 mg/dL, 2-hr glucose between 140-199 mg/dL)

Exclusion Criteria

Serious chronic or acute illness (e.g., cancer, clinically significant congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, inflammatory conditions, poorly controlled hypertension, epilepsy), treatment with other drugs known to influence glucose metabolism, history of bariatric or other gastric surgery, cigarette smoking

Methods

Participants were randomized to either metformin 1,700 mg/day (in two doses) or placebo for six weeks. After a two-week washout, the groups were switched.

Duration

Treatment: 6 weeks

Follow-up: 14 weeks 

Outcome Measures

Primary: number of expressed genes in muscle and adipose tissue using RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq)

Secondary: all-cause mortality and adverse events 

Baseline Characteristics 

 

Metformin first (n= 16) [1]

Placebo first (n= 16) [1]

Mean age, years

69 74 

Female

37.5% 37.5%

White

62.5% 87.5%

Mean weight, kg 

84 89

Mean glucose 

Fasting, mg/dL 

2-hour glucose, mg/dL 

 

108

153 

 

102

171

Other therapies 

Antihypertensive 

Statin

Aspirin

 

62.5%

37.5%

25.0%

 

75.0%

37.5%

37.5%

Results

Endpoint

Metformin treatment (n= 14) [1]

Placebo treatment (n= 14) [1]

Genes increased in muscle, units

Genes increased in adipose, units 

245

15

402

132

All-cause mortality 

0/15 0/15

Differential gene expression analysis between metformin and placebo treatments revealed 647 genes in muscle and 146 genes in adipose tissues. Of these, 15 genes were common to both tissues, with 11 genes showing consistent up/downregulation in both muscle and adipose, while four genes were upregulated in muscle but downregulated in adipose.

The genes were analyzed using RNA sequencing. In muscle, pyruvate metabolism, DNA base excision and mismatch repair, NAD biosynthesis, and BRCA role in DNA damage response were some of the key pathways significantly overrepresented.

In adipose, metformin primarily affects fatty acid metabolism, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acid, PPAR and SREBP signaling, LXR/RXR activation, collagen chain trimerization, and ECM remodeling. [2] 

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: N/A

Serious Adverse Events: Nausea and vomiting (6.67% vs 0%), hematoma (6.67% vs 0), urinary retention (6.67% vs 0)

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: Two participants withdrew consent after study initiation due to inability to complete the biopsy procedure 

Study Author Conclusions

These findings indicate that metformin can induce favorable metabolic changes in older adults with impaired glucose tolerance, the most common form of glucose dysregulation in this age group.

The investigators believe that if metformin changes the biology of aging in tissues to a younger profile, it supports the notion that this drug may have more widespread use as an anti-aging drug.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

The sample size was small, and not all genes that were differentially expressed were detected. Further, the crossover study design may have been a limitation, leading to carryover effects from metformin to placebo. Results remained unpublished, and a lack of formal statistical analysis may further limit clinical applicability.  



References:

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. Metformin in Longevity Study (MILES). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02432287. Updated May 21, 2021. Accessed September 5, 2022.
[2] Kulkarni AS, Brutsaert EF, Anghel V, et al. Metformin regulates metabolic and nonmetabolic pathways in skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissues of older adults. Aging Cell. 2018;17(2):e12723. doi:10.1111/acel.12723

Can people with type 2 diabetes live longer than those without? A comparison of mortality in people initiated with metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy and matched, non-diabetic controls

Design

Retrospective, observational study

N= 180,926

Objective

To compare all-cause mortality in diabetic patients treated first-line with either sulphonylurea or metformin monotherapy with that in matched individuals without diabetes

Study Groups

Metformin (n= 78,241)

Controls matched with metformin (n= 78,241)

Inclusion Criteria

Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, exposure to glucose-lowering therapy metformin, received treatment for a minimum of 180 days

Exclusion Criteria

Any record of secondary diabetes

Methods

Retrospective observational data was obtained through the UK Clinical Practice Research data link. Patients with type 2 diabetes who progressed to first-line treatment with metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy were followed and matched to similar persons without diabetes using the following criteria: age at baseline (± 2 years), gender, same general practice, prior cancer status, and smoking status. Progression to all-cause mortality was compared using parametric survival models that included relevant co-variables.

Duration

2000 to July 2013

Followed: death or censorship

Outcome Measures

All-cause mortality 

Baseline Characteristics

 

Metformin (n= 78,241)

Control (n= 78,241)

p-value

Age, years

61.2 ± 12.7 61.2 ± 12.7 NS

Men 

44,286 (57%) 44,286 (57%) NS

Body mass index, kg/m2

32.4 ± 5.9 27.4 ± 5.0 < 0.001

Current smoker

13,798 (18%) 13,798 (18%) NS

Prior major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)

8,162 (10%) 5,058 (6%) < 0.001

Prior cancer

7,553 (10%) 7,550 (10%) NS

Charlson index

1.9 ± 1.3 0.7 ± 1.2 NS

Prior medications

Lipid-lowering therapy

Antihypertensive therapy

Antiplatelet therapy



39,407 (50%)

52,016 (66%)

28,285 (36%)



15,913 (20%)

30,585 (39%)

14,619 (19%)



< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

NS, not significant

Results

 

Metformin (n= 78,241)

Control (n= 78,241)

p-value

Number of Deaths 

2,663 (3%) 2,669 (3%)  -

Follow-up period, cumulative years

184,708 175,614 -

Crude event rate, deaths per 1,000 patient-years

14.4  15.2  0.054

Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that survival was significantly improved with metformin compared to non-diabetic controls (p= 0.037). 

Median survival time was 15% lower in controls compared to the group that initiated metformin.

Adverse Events

N/A

Study Author Conclusions

Patients with type 2 diabetes initiated with metformin monotherapy had longer survival than matched, non-diabetic controls. The study supports the use of metformin as first-line therapy and confers that metformin may have a benefit in patients that do not have diabetes.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

This study included a large number of patients, who were followed up for a median of 2.4 years. However, this study was entirely retrospective, which allows for biases and confounding. Patients in the metformin group had a higher baseline incidence of previous cardiovascular events, which may make these results more promising.

It should also be noted that patients with diabetes are encouraged more to exercise and eat healthier than their non-diabetic controls.

References:

Bannister CA, Holden SE, Jenkins-Jones S, et al. Can people with type 2 diabetes live longer than those without? A comparison of mortality in people initiated with metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy and matched, non-diabetic controls. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(11):1165-1173. doi:10.1111/dom.12354