How does the immunogenicity and safety of vaccine candidate BNT162b2 compare to other candidates?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Vaccine candidate BNT162b2 had a lower incidence and severity of systemic reactions when compared to candidate BNT162b2. Both candidates elicited similar dose-dependent SARS-CoV-2–neutralizing geometric mean titers. Further exploration with BNT162b2 could potentially lead to the development of a safe and efficacious vaccine for COVID-19.
Background

A review article assessing vaccine candidates for COVID-19 states that messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines are advantageous for their capacity to initiate a potent immune response and minimize the risk of infection and insertion-induced mutagenesis, as well as the potential of large-scale production. Despite that, one of the common downsides of mRNA is its instability compared with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and its high production costs. [1]

A review article assessing mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 states that an mRNA vaccine may be advantageous due to improved stability and translation efficacy, and the high potency of generating antiviral neutralizing immunoglobulins with only one or two low-dose immunizations. [2]

A review article assessing vaccine frontrunners in COVID-19 stated that candidate BNT162b1 had moved past phase I safety and immunogenicity studies. The mRNA in candidate BNT162b1 is modified with single nucleoside incorporations of 1-methylpseudouridine, which not only reduces the immunogenicity of the mRNA in vivo but also increases its translation. [3]

A review article assessing vaccine progress in COVID-19 stated that DNA and RNA based vaccines were advantageous as they do not require bio reactor culture techniques, can be made more rapidly in the laboratory, and are based on the genetic sequence of the virus. These vaccines also allow for the development process to be fast-tracked in the event of a pandemic. [4]

References:

1. Al-Kassmy J, Pedersen J, Kobinger G. Vaccine Candidates against Coronavirus Infections. Where Does COVID-19 Stand?. Viruses. 2020;12(8):861. Published 2020 Aug 7. doi:10.3390/v12080861



2.Wang F, Kream RM, Stefano GB. An Evidence Based Perspective on mRNA-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e924700. Published 2020 May 5. doi:10.12659/MSM.924700



3.Chung YH, Beiss V, Fiering SN, Steinmetz NF. COVID-19 Vaccine Frontrunners and Their Nanotechnology Design. ACS Nano. 2020;14(10):12522-12537. doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c07197



4. Sharma O, Sultan AA, Ding H, Triggle CR. A Review of the Progress and Challenges of Developing a Vaccine for COVID-19. Front Immunol. 2020 Oct 14;11:585354. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.585354. PMID: 33163000; PMCID: PMC7591699.

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

How does the immunogenicity and safety of vaccine candidate BNT162b2 compare to other candidates?

Please see Table 1 for your response.


Study Name

Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates

Design

Ongoing, randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, dose-escalation trial

Objective

To evaluate safety and immunogenicity of the 10-μg, 20-μg, and 30-μg dose levels of BNT162b1 and BNT162b2 in adults 18 to 55 years of age and adults 65 to 85 years of age

Methods

Inclusion criteria were healthy adults 18 to 55 years of age or 65 to 85 years of age. Exclusion criteria were known infection with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or C virus, an immunocompromised condition, history of autoimmune disease, or previous diagnosis of COVID-19.

Patients were randomly assigned to groups according to vaccine candidate, dose level, and age range.

Groups of participants 18 to 55 years of age and 65 to 85 years of age were to receive doses of 10 μg, 20 μg, or 30 μg of BNT162b1 or BNT162b2 (or placebo) on a two-dose schedule.

One group of participants 18 to 55 years of age was assigned to receive 100-μg doses of BNT162b1 or placebo. 

All the participants were assigned to receive two 0.5-ml injections of active vaccine or placebo into the deltoid, administered 21 days apart.

The first five participants in each new dose level or age group were observed for four hours after the injection to identify immediate adverse events. All the other participants were observed for 30 minutes.

Immunogenicity assessments were conducted before the administration of vaccine or placebo, at 7 days and 21 days after the first dose, and at 7 days (i.e., day 28) and 14 days (i.e., day 35) after the second dose.

Study Groups/Patients

A total of 195 participants were randomly assigned to 13 groups comprising 15 participants each; in each group, 12 participants received vaccine and 3 received placebo.

 

Outcome Measures

The primary end points were local and systemic reactions as a response to the vaccine, and immunogenicity of both candidates:

Local reactions for adults aged 18-55 years of age after both doses of each candidate

Local reactions for adults aged 65-85 years of age after both doses of each candidate

Systemic reactions for adults aged 18-55 years of age after both doses of each candidate

Systemic reactions for adults aged 65-85 years of age after both doses of each candidate

Immuogenicity - 50% neutralizing geometric mean titers (GMTs) for the two vaccine candidates for both adult groups

Results

Local Reactions:

Participants 18-55 years of age:

BNT162b1 Dose 1

BNT162b1 Dose 2

 

Percentage of Patients

 

Percentage of Patients

Pain at Injection Site:

 

Pain at Injection Site:

 

10 ug

58

10 ug

83

20 ug

75

20 ug

92

30 ug

100

30 ug

100

Placebo

0

Placebo

22

Redness:

 

Redness:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

0

20 ug

0

20 ug

0

30 ug

17

30 ug

17

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

Swelling:

 

Swelling:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

0

20 ug

25

20 ug

8

30 ug

17

30 ug

25

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

 

BNT162b2 Dose 1

BNT162b2 Dose 2

 

Percentage of Patients

 

Percentage of Patients

Pain at Injection Site:

 

Pain at Injection Site:

 

10 ug

67

10 ug

58

20 ug

67

20 ug

83

30 ug

92

30 ug

83

Placebo

0

Placebo

22

Redness:

 

Redness:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

0

20 ug

0

20 ug

0

30 ug

8

30 ug

0

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

Swelling:

 

Swelling:

 

10 ug

17

10 ug

0

20 ug

0

20 ug

0

30 ug

0

30 ug

0

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

 

Participants 65-85 years of age:

BNT162b1 Dose 1

BNT1162b1 Dose 2

 

Percentage of Patients

 

Percentage of Patients

Pain at Injection Site:

 

Pain at Injection Site:

 

10 ug

58

10 ug

67

20 ug

92

20 ug

75

30 ug

92

30 ug

75

Placebo

11

Placebo

0

Redness:

 

Redness:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

0

20 ug

0

20 ug

8

30 ug

0

30 ug

8

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

Swelling:

 

Swelling:

 

10 ug

8

10 ug

8

20 ug

8

20 ug

17

30 ug

17

30 ug

25

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

 

BNT162b1 Dose 1

BNT1162b1 Dose 2

 

Percentage of Patients

 

Percentage of Patients

Pain at Injection Site:

 

Pain at Injection Site:

 

10 ug

33

10 ug

33

20 ug

58

20 ug

58

30 ug

75

30 ug

67

Placebo

0

Placebo

11

Redness:

 

Redness:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

0

20 ug

0

20 ug

0

30 ug

0

30 ug

0

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

Swelling:

 

Swelling:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

0

20 ug

0

20 ug

0

30 ug

0

30 ug

0

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

 

Systemic Reactions:

 

Participants 18-55 years of age:

 

BNT162b1 Dose 1

BNT162b1 Dose 2

 

Percentage of Patients

 

Percentage of Patients

Fever:

 

Fever:

 

10 ug

8

10 ug

8

20 ug

0

20 ug

17

30 ug

8

30 ug

75

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

Fatigue:

 

Fatigue:

 

10 ug

33

10 ug

67

20 ug

67

20 ug

83

30 ug

50

30 ug

83

Placebo

22

Placebo

22

Chills:

 

Chills:

 

10 ug

8

10 ug

25

20 ug

25

20 ug

50

30 ug

58

30 ug

67

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

 

BNT162b2 Dose 1

BNT1162b2 Dose 2

 

Percentage of Patients

 

Percentage of Patients

Fever:

 

Fever:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

0

20 ug

0

20 ug

8

30 ug

17

30 ug

17

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

Fatigue:

 

Fatigue:

 

10 ug

25

10 ug

33

20 ug

42

20 ug

58

30 ug

42

30 ug

75

Placebo

33

Placebo

56

Chills:

 

Chills:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

8

20 ug

0

20 ug

42

30 ug

33

30 ug

58

Placebo

0

Placebo

11

 

Participants 65-85 years of age:

BNT162b1 Dose 1

BNT162b1 Dose 2

 

Percentage of Patients

 

Percentage of Patients

Fever:

 

Fever:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

0

20 ug

0

20 ug

50

30 ug

25

30 ug

33

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

Fatigue:

 

Fatigue:

 

10 ug

17

10 ug

25

20 ug

58

20 ug

58

30 ug

50

30 ug

67

Placebo

44

Placebo

22

Chills:

 

Chills:

 

10 ug

8

10 ug

25

20 ug

8

20 ug

58

30 ug

17

30 ug

33

Placebo

22

Placebo

0

 

BNT162b2 Dose 1

BNT162b2 Dose 2

 

Percentage of Patients

 

Percentage of Patients

Fever:

 

Fever:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

0

20 ug

0

20 ug

0

30 ug

0

30 ug

8

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

Fatigue:

 

Fatigue:

 

10 ug

8

10 ug

17

20 ug

33

20 ug

50

30 ug

25

30 ug

42

Placebo

22

Placebo

11

Chills:

 

Chills:

 

10 ug

0

10 ug

17

20 ug

17

20 ug

8

30 ug

0

30 ug

17

Placebo

0

Placebo

0

 

Immunogenicity:

The 50% neutralizing geometric mean titers (GMTs) for the two vaccine candidates at the 30-μg dose level on day 28 or day 35 ranged from 1.7 to 4.6 times the GMT of the convalescent serum panel among participants 18 to 55 years of age and from 1.1 to 2.2 times the GMT of the convalescent serum panel among those 65 to 85 years of age.

50% Neutralizing Titer (10x)

 

Age 18-55 Years

Age 65-85 Years

BNT162b1

BNT162b2

BNT161b1

BNT162b2

10 ug:

 

 

 

 

Day 1

10

10

10

10

Day 21

13

16

11

10

Day 28

168

157

20

79

Day 35

180

97

33

111

20 ug:

 

 

 

 

Day 1

10

10

10

10

Day 21

13

19

10

10

Day 28

160

363

179

84

Day 35

203

292

105

81

30 ug:

 

 

 

 

Day 1

10

10

10

10

Day 21

29

14

12

12

Day 28

267

361

101

149

Day 35

437

163

105

206

 

Study Author Conclusions

The safety and immunogenicity data support the selection of BNT162b2 for advancement to phase 2–3 safety and efficacy evaluation.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Preliminary data suggest progression to next phases with vaccine candidate BNT162b2. There is uncertainty since cellular immunity to COVID-19 has not been fully established. Additionally, the human convalescent serum panels are not standardized among laboratories, and each represents a unique distribution of donor characteristics and times of collection. 

 

References:

Walsh EE, Frenck RW Jr, Falsey AR, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Neuzil K, Mulligan MJ, Bailey R, Swanson KA, Li P, Koury K, Kalina W, Cooper D, Fontes-Garfias C, Shi PY, Türeci Ö, Tompkins KR, Lyke KE, Raabe V, Dormitzer PR, Jansen KU, Şahin U, Gruber WC. Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 14:NEJMoa2027906. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027906. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33053279; PMCID: PMC7583697.