A review article assessing vaccine candidates for COVID-19 states that messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines are advantageous for their capacity to initiate a potent immune response and minimize the risk of infection and insertion-induced mutagenesis, as well as the potential of large-scale production. Despite that, one of the common downsides of mRNA is its instability compared with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and its high production costs. [1]
A review article assessing mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 states that an mRNA vaccine may be advantageous due to improved stability and translation efficacy, and the high potency of generating antiviral neutralizing immunoglobulins with only one or two low-dose immunizations. [2]
A review article assessing vaccine frontrunners in COVID-19 stated that candidate BNT162b1 had moved past phase I safety and immunogenicity studies. The mRNA in candidate BNT162b1 is modified with single nucleoside incorporations of 1-methylpseudouridine, which not only reduces the immunogenicity of the mRNA in vivo but also increases its translation. [3]
A review article assessing vaccine progress in COVID-19 stated that DNA and RNA based vaccines were advantageous as they do not require bio reactor culture techniques, can be made more rapidly in the laboratory, and are based on the genetic sequence of the virus. These vaccines also allow for the development process to be fast-tracked in the event of a pandemic. [4]