InpharmD™





One touch literature search.

So you can spend more time with patients

Ask any clinical question, receive a curated response.

Get Started Free

Trusted by 20,000+ physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists.

                     

Play Circle

Learn about InpharmD™ in under 90 seconds

What is InpharmD™?


Literature searching is tedious. InpharmD™ is here to help.

Clinical pharmacists can ask any question, anytime, from anywhere, and we’ll perform a custom literature search.

(And a 32% chance it’s already been asked.)


104,780

Clinical Pharmacist Hours Saved

4x +

ROI

100%

Customer Satisfaction Rate

This is how InpharmD™ transforms LITERATURE.

What's Being Asked...

What is the clinical efficacy of metronidazole 500 mg IV q12 hours when compared to metronidazole 500 mg IV q8 hours?
Can you take fish oil with a seafood allergy?
What data exists to support aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid given intravesically for hematuria?
Can linezolid be used as an alternative for Listeria meningitis?
Looking for clinical & indication differences between triptorelin and leuprolide

What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Younghee Kwon, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Available data from both a meta-analysis and cohort studies consistently demonstrated no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between metronidazole 500 mg IV administered every 12 hours versus every 8 hours. Across varied infection types, including anaerobic bacteremia and post-surgical prophylaxis, 12-hour dosing showed comparable rates of clinical cure, hospital length of stay, and mortality. Overall, these findings suggest that Q12H dosing may be clinically non-inferi...

A 2016 poster abstract details a retrospective chart review (N= 81) comparing metronidazole 500 mg twice daily (BID) versus three times daily (TID) for appendicitis or diverticulitis. Clinical outcomes and readmission rates were assessed at 30 days follow-up. Patients were excluded if they had concomitant infection, fistula, or chronic appendicitis. The authors did not find a statistical difference in resolution rates (values unspecified). The 30-day readmission rates were similarly nonsignificant with only 1 or 0 patients in the appendicitis or diverticulitis BID and TID groups being readmitted (p= 1 when comparing appendicitis and p= 0.417 when comparing diverticulitis). Yet, due to the small sample size and retrospective nature of the study, stronger evidence is needed to confirm these findings. [1] Despite the limited clinical outcomes regarding Q12H vs Q8H metronidazole dosing, relatively dated pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) studies have observed efficient blood l...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

What is the clinical efficacy of metronidazole 500 mg IV q12 hours when compared to metronidazole 500 mg IV q8 hours?

Level of evidence
B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  

READ MORE→

[1] Béïque L, Tsang C, Geertsema S, et al. Comparison of metronidazole q12h to q8h in combination with other antibiotics on the clinical outcome and readmission rate of patients with appendicitis and diverticulitis. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2016;3(suppl_1):1037.
[2] Lamp KC, Freeman CD, Klutman NE, Lacy MK. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the nitroimidazole antimicrobials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36(5):353-373. doi:10.2165/00003088-199936050-00004
[3] Sprandel KA, Drusano GL, Hecht DW, Rotschafer JC, Danziger LH, Rodvold KA. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte C...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Muna Said, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

There is a paucity of data evaluating the safety of fish oil supplementation in patients with seafood allergy. Prescribing information for Lovaza (omega-3-acid ethyl esters) advises caution in patients with known hypersensitivity to fish and/or shellfish, as it is unknown whether these individuals are at increased risk for allergic reactions. Case reports have documented allergic and anaphylactic reactions following fish oil ingestion in patients with fish and shellfish allergy; however, one ...

A 2023 article addresses the question of whether fish oil supplementation should be avoided in patients with a shellfish allergy. The article states that in a patient allergic strictly to shellfish who tolerates finned fish, it is very unlikely that fish oil would present a risk for an allergic reaction. The article notes that fish oil supplements undergo extensive processing to remove impurities, including protein allergens, although complete removal cannot be guaranteed. Notably, the author was unable to find references specifically addressing fish oil use in shellfish-allergic individuals but cites two sources related to fish-allergic patients. One is a case report (Howard et al., 2014) of an adult with fish allergy who experienced allergic symptoms after taking fish oil, which resolved upon discontinuation. The other is a small study of six fish-allergic patients who underwent skin testing and oral challenges with two fish oil supplements (Mark et al., 2008); all had negative sk...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

Can patients with seafood allergies safely take fish oil supplements?

Level of evidence
D - Case reports or unreliable data  

READ MORE→

[1] Demain JG. Fish oil safety in a shellfish allergic patient. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. April 20, 2023. Accessed May 21, 2025.

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:AJ Carvajal, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Available data evaluating the use of intravesical epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) or tranexamic acid (TXA) for hematuria is scarce. One case series evaluating intravesical instillation of EACA reported improvements in hematuria, but noted lack of replication in recent studies. Additionally, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing intravesical EACA for post-transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) bleeding found no significant difference in blood loss between EACA and placebo. In ...

A 2019 Best Practice Report by Canadian Urological Association performed a comprehensive narrative synthesis on the diagnosis and management of radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis, with specific emphasis on treatment options, clinical outcomes, and grading of evidence. The panel states that several intravesical options have been trialed in limited case series, but require replication, etiology-specific assessment, or comparative data before they can be formally included as recommendations. Intravesical instillation of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA), was evaluated in a case series from 1992 involving 37 patients with intractable bladder hemorrhage. The study reported improvement in hematuria in 34 of these patients, the majority of whom suffered from cystitis induced by radiation or cyclophosphamide treatment. Despite these promising results, similar studies have not been replicated in recent years to confirm the efficacy of EACA for this condition. Available review articles not...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

What data exists to support aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid given intravesically for hematuria?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Goucher G, Saad F, Lukka H, Kapoor A. Canadian Urological Association Best Practice Report: Diagnosis and management of radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(2):15-23. doi:10.5489/cuaj.5788
[2] Abramowitz DJ, Warner JN. Clinical management of radiation cystitis: a narrative review. AME Med J. 2021;6:8-8.
[3] Singh I, Laungani GB. Intravesical epsilon aminocaproic acid in management of intractable bladder hemorrhage. Urology. 1992;40(3):227-229. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(92)90479-g

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Neil Patel, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Data to support the use of linezolid as an alternative treatment option for Listeria meningitis is primarily limited to case reports. Linezolid often results in successful treatment in available reports, but is often combined with other agents such as a carbapenem, ceftriaxone, rifampin, gentamicin, or penicillin. In general, linezolid appears to result in adequate in vitro activity against Listeria monocytogenes and adequate cerebrospinal fluid concentrations, making it a useful alternative ...

A clinical review discussing the treatment of listeriosis, including meningitis and bacteremia, notes that linezolid is an oxazolidinone reporting in vitro activity against Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes). Linezolid also results in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and intracellular concentrations that are adequate for the treatment of neurolisteriosis, as identified by animal models. When allergy to both penicillin and cotrimoxazole became of concern, a linezolid-rifampin combination was successfully administered to a patient with brain abscess sustained by L. monocytogenes without any hematological toxicity after 107 consecutive days of treatment. It is suggested that linezolid offers a number of advantages in the empiric treatment of meningitis due to its favourable penetration of CSF and the absence of bacteriolytic effect on S. pneumoniae, which has been observed in various case series highlighting its use as rescue therapy of pneumococcal meningitis. Despite the promising us...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 5 studies investigating the researchable question:

Can linezolid be used as an alternative for Listeria meningitis?

Level of evidence
D - Case reports or unreliable data  

READ MORE→

[1] Pagliano P, Arslan F, Ascione T. Epidemiology and treatment of the commonest form of listeriosis: meningitis and bacteraemia. Infez Med. 2017;25(3):210-216.
[2] Nau R, Djukic M, Spreer A, Ribes S, Eiffert H. Bacterial meningitis: an update of new treatment options. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13(11):1401-1423. doi:10.1586/14787210.2015.1077700

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author:Neil Patel, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Triptorelin and leuprolide are both gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists approved for the treatment of prostate cancer and central precocious puberty (CPP). Evidence from prostate cancer studies demonstrates that both agents are equally effective in testosterone suppression, with no definitive advantage of one over the other (see Tables 1-2). In the management of CPP, both drugs show comparable efficacy in luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression and in preventing bone age advancements ...

Leuprolide, goserelin, and triptorelin are luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists used for the treatment of prostate cancer. The latest National Comprehensive Care Network (NCCN) guidelines for prostate cancer list the three agents as an option for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which includes localized and regional disease states along with castrate-sensitive metastatic cancer. A formal comparison between the three agents was not provided by the guidelines. [1] A 2022 systematic review investigated the comparative efficacy and safety between different gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, including triptorelin, leuprolide, and goserelin, for prostate cancer. Overall, the findings suggest a similar safety and efficacy profile between the GnRH agonists, with goserelin being the most studied. Various intensities of castration suppression based on T levels were explored. Overall, 90%-100% of investigated patients are reported to have T level suppression...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

What are the clinical and indication differences between triptorelin and leuprolide?

Level of evidence
B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  

READ MORE→

[1] National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate Cancer. Version 2.2025. Updated April 16, 2025. Accessed May 14, 2025. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf
[2] Raja T, Sud R, Addla S, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer: A comparative review of efficacy and safety. Indian J Cancer. 2022;59(Supplement):S142-S159. doi:10.4103/ijc.IJC_65_21
[3] Bolton EM, Lynch T. Are all gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists equivalent for the treatment of prostate cancer? A systematic review. BJU Int. 2018;122(3):371-383. doi:10.1111/bju.14...

Find answers, not documents.

Before InpharmD™


BeforeTime
Your team spends hours per week cobbling together literature from different studies, many behind paywalls, leaving little time for action.
BeforeTime
TI opportunities are discovered (or presented by third parties) months after the fact, resulting in costly missed savings.
BeforeTime
Decisions may be made without a complete picture, or pushed out while gathering consensus.

After InpharmD™


BeforeTime
InpharmD™ delivers customized, actionable drug information in real time, so you can focus on execution.
BeforeTime
Your team stays informed immediately when new data emerges or prices change, and you’ll always be the first to know when any changes impact your formulary.
BeforeTime
With InpharmD™, your team can make faster, more informed decisions and move forward with confidence.

What Clinical Pharmacists Are Saying...


     

Assists in our research and is a great way or us to get an answer to a medical question without spending an average of 2 hours researching UptoDate or PubMed ourselves.


  Jordan C., PharmD, New Jersey

     

Huge time saver with thorough responses.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I’d never heard of a DI pharmacist before, now I have one. In. My. Pocket. Amazing!


     

Holy Shhh. Cow! Holy Cow! These summaries are beautiful.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I just want to say: This is such a brilliant idea! You people are genius.


     

OH MY GOD WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ALL MY LIFE!


     

I can’t tell you how much time I spend literature searching. And how I CANNOT STAND PAYWALLS. THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!! (covers face for sec) thank you, thank you, thank you!


     

So they’re basically connecting academic researchers with front line providers and then automating everything. It’s simply brilliant.


     

The clinical pharmacist was our secret weapon anyway. (Smiles wryly) This pharmacist AI seems superhuman. I’m just blown away, honestly. (Looks at camera somberly.)


     

It’s an ENTIRE DI DEPARTMENT, that lives in Epic. Give me a second. I’m just having a hard time wrapping my head around that.


     

Sorry just give me a second, my mind is blown.


     

Stop reading and just download the app already! I’ve tried all of them. This is by far the most advanced, best-in-class.


What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

Sign up for a free trial & start right away.

Get Started Free