InpharmD™





One touch literature search.

So you can spend more time with patients

Ask any clinical question, receive a curated response.

Get Started Free

Trusted by 20,000+ physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists.

                     

Play Circle

Learn about InpharmD™ in under 90 seconds

What is InpharmD™?


Literature searching is tedious. InpharmD™ is here to help.

Clinical pharmacists can ask any question, anytime, from anywhere, and we’ll perform a custom literature search.

(And a 32% chance it’s already been asked.)


94,480

Clinical Pharmacist Hours Saved

4x +

ROI

100%

Customer Satisfaction Rate

This is how InpharmD™ transforms LITERATURE.

What's Being Asked...

What evidence is there for the use of cabozantinib in the treatment of clear-cell carcinoma of the uterus?
Are there alternative anticoagulation strategies to heparin or citrate for intraoperative cell salvage?
How reliable is procalcitonin in identifying bacterial infections (primary and secondary) in patients admitted with i...
what evidence is available for use of epoprostenol in maintaining CRRT patency?
How does Xofluza (baloxavir) compare to Tamiflu (oseltamivir)?

What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: Naveed Aijaz, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Evidence for the specific use of cabozantinib in patients with clear-cell carcinoma of the uterus is limited and reported only in subpopulation cohort groups. These studies found cabozantinib alone or with nivolumab to potentially improve progression-free survival for various histologies of endometrial cancer, but specific outcomes for clear-cell patients remain unreported.

An ongoing randomized, phase 2 study (NCT03367741) is evaluating the efficacy of combination cabozantinib-nivolumab compared to nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced, recurrent metastatic endometrial cancer, including stage III-IV uterine corpus carcinoma. Patients are randomized to one of two arms to receive either 1) cabozantinib orally once daily on days 1-28 and nivolumab intravenously on days 1 and 15, then on day 1 beginning cycle 5 or 2) nivolumab monotherapy. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were followed up for up to 12 weeks. Outcomes assessed include progression-free survival and overall response rate. The estimated completion date is February 2025. [1]

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 2 studies investigating the researchable question:

What evidence is there for the use of cabozantinib in the treatment of clear-cell carcinoma of the uterus?

Level of evidence
B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  

READ MORE→

[1] Cabozantinib S-malate and nivolumab in treating patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03367741. Updated February 5, 2025. Accessed February 14, 2025.

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: Neil Patel, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

The only studied alternatives to acid-citrate dextrose solution A (ACD-A) anticoagulant for plasmapheresis or cell salvage are heparins (primarily unfractionated heparin). While citrate is generally preferred by physicians in plasma exchange (due to the risk of HIT), emerging evidence from Europe suggests heparinized saline has fewer adverse events than ACD-A for cell saving (Table 3). One ex vivo study suggests argatroban may be an alternative anticoagulant for blood salvage in patients with...

Guidelines from the United Kingdom Association of Anaesthetists on perioperative cell salvage recommend using either heparinized saline or acid-citrate dextrose (ACD) as the anticoagulant. The red cells are washed using intravenous saline 0.9% and then pumped into a bag for re-infusion to the patient. While there are no absolute contraindications to cell salvage, a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a contraindication to using heparin as the anticoagulant; an anticoagulant solution containing acid-citrate dextrose should be used instead. If heparinized saline is used as the anticoagulant solution, care must be taken to add the correct volume and concentration of heparin and label the bag clearly so that it is not accidentally given intravenously. [1] A 2018 review discussed the use of various anticoagulants in the setting of plasma exchange, including clinical considerations for optimal management of these patients. The review was compiled based on discussion by ...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 4 studies investigating the researchable question:

Are there alternative anticoagulation strategies to heparin or citrate for intraoperative cell salvage?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Klein AA, Bailey CR, Charlton AJ, et al. Association of Anaesthetists guidelines: cell salvage for peri-operative blood conservation 2018. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(9):1141-1150. doi:10.1111/anae.14331
[2] Shunkwiler SM, Pham HP, Wool G, et al. The management of anticoagulation in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange: A concise review. J Clin Apher. 2018;33(3):371-379. doi:10.1002/jca.21592
[3] Beersemans M, Rex S, Degezelle K, et al. Severe Hypotension After Reinfusion of Autologous Blood Processed With a Cell Saver and Anticoagulated With Acid-Citrate-Dextrose Solution A. J Ca...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: , PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

The sensitivity of procalcitonin (PCT) when determining bacterial infection ranges from 38-91%, with PCT levels ≥ 0.25 µg/L indicative of bacterial pneumonia and PCT levels ≤ 0.1 µg/L suggesting viral infection. A 2013 meta-analysis derived a PCT sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.64 when identifying secondary bacterial infections among patients with influenza pneumonia, although sensitivity was greater in critically ill patients at 0.91. PCT levels are generally used to guide antibioti...

Per the 2019 clinical practice guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), empiric antibiotic therapy should be initiated if CAP is clinically suspected and radiographically confirmed, independent of serum procalcitonin levels. Studies have suggested that procalcitonin levels may be used to distinguish the etiology of respiratory infection, specifically that procalcitonin levels of ≥ 0.25 µg/L indicate a high likelihood of bacterial pneumonia, while procalcitonin levels ≤ 0.1 µg/L indicate a high likelihood of viral infection. However, a recent study of hospitalized CAP patients failed to identify a procalcitonin threshold that allows for determination between bacterial and viral pathogens. Furthermore, the reported sensitivity of procalcitonin in determining bacterial infection ranges from 38% to 91%, reinforcing the fact that procalcitonin leve...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

How reliable is procalcitonin in identifying bacterial infections (primary and secondary) in patients admitted with influenza being treated for pneumonia?

Level of evidence
A - Multiple high-quality studies with consistent results  

READ MORE→

[1] Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(7):e45-e67. doi:10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST
[2] Carbonell R, Moreno G, Martín-Loeches I, Bodí M, Rodríguez A. The Role of Biomarkers in Influenza and COVID-19 Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(1):161. Published 2023 Jan 12. doi:10.3390/antibiotics12010161
[3] Pfister R, Kochanek M, Leygeber T, e...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: Tai Huynh, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Evidence for use of epoprostenol in maintaining CRRT patency is conflicting as to whether a significant difference in circuit lifespan exists between epoprostenol and other anticoagulant agents; however, bleeding rates tend to be lower with epoprostenol, when used at a rate of 4-5 ng/kg/min. No differences in mortality, hypotension, or thrombosis rates have been observed.

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed the efficacy of prostacyclin-based anticoagulation strategies in critically ill patients requiring extracorporeal support. The analysis incorporated data from 17 studies, encompassing 1,333 patients, the majority of whom were adults undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), with a smaller subset receiving molecular adsorbent recirculating system therapy. The pooled analysis showed no statistically significant difference in circuit lifespan between the prostacyclin and control groups (mean difference 2.5 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI] -12.0 to 16.9; p= 0.74). However, bleeding events were significantly lower in the prostacyclin-treated cohort (9.5% vs. 17.1%; odds ratio [OR] -1.14; 95% CI -1.91 to -0.37; p<0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed in thrombosis rates (3.6% vs. 2.2%; p= 0.35), hypotension (13.4% vs. 11.0%; p=0.40), or mortality (26.3% vs. 32.7%; p= 0.10). A comprehensive risk-of-bia...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

What evidence is available for use of epoprostenol in maintaining CRRT patency?

Level of evidence
C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  

READ MORE→

[1] Aldairi N, Al Ali AS, Alabdulqader M, Al Jeraisy M, Cyrus J, Karam O. Efficacy of Prostacyclin Anticoagulation in Critically Ill Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2023;15(6):e39967. Published 2023 Jun 5. doi:10.7759/cureus.39967
[2] Sondhi E, Stewart M, Harper J, et al. A Comparison of the Anticoagulation Efficacy and Safety of Epoprostenol to Heparin and Citrate in Children Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Blood Purif. 2024;53(10):838-846. doi:10.1159/000540302
[3] Deep A, Alexander EC, Khatri A, et al. Epoprosten...

InpharmD's Answer GPT's Answer

Author: Julie Patel, PharmD, BCPS + InpharmD™ AI

INTRODUCTION BY INPHARMD™ RESEARCHER

Recent meta-analyses and pharmacoeconomics studies have found baloxavir to be more effective and less costly than oseltamivir. Baloxavir showed superiority over oseltamivir in reducing influenza viral titers and viral RNA loads (p<0.001) and similar safety profiles, although baloxavir had a lower incidence of nausea (p= 0.03). Baloxavir led to shorter hospitalization periods in the inpatient setting (p= 0.01), though mortality outcomes were comparable. However, benefits seem to be isolated to...

In a 2024 systematic review and meta analysis, efficacy and safety of baloxavir was compared against oseltamivir in patients with influenza virus. Two randomized trials (N= 1,624 outpatients) and two retrospective trials (N= 874 inpatients) were assessed for mortality, hospital length of stay, illness duration and viral load, and treatment adverse events. In outpatients, no deaths occurred with either baloxavir or oseltamivir, and illness duration was comparable between groups; however, baloxavir was superior in influenza virus titer reduction (p<0.001), viral RNA load reduction (p<0.001), and was more tolerable (p= 0.03) compared to oseltamivir. In inpatients, baloxavir patients had a lower hospitalization period (p= 0.01), though mortality outcomes were similar. Based on these findings, baloxavir use may be safer and more efficacious than oseltamivir for treatment of influenza, though more data is required to confirm these findings. [1] A 2024 systematic review and network meta...

READ MORE→

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

What are the benefits of baloxavir (Xofluza) over oseltamivir (Tamiflu)?

Level of evidence
B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  

READ MORE→

[1] Shiraishi C, Kato H, Hagihara M, Asai N, Iwamoto T, Mikamo H. Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir as the treatment for influenza virus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Chemother. 2024;30(3):242-249. doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2023.10.017
[2] Zhao Y, Gao Y, Guyatt G, et al. Antivirals for post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2024;404(10454):764-772. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01357-6
[3] Kuo YC, Lai CC, Wang YH, Chen CH, Wang CY. Clinical efficacy and safety of ba...

Find answers, not documents.

Before InpharmD™


BeforeTime
Your team spends hours per week cobbling together literature from different studies, many behind paywalls, leaving little time for action.
BeforeTime
TI opportunities are discovered (or presented by third parties) months after the fact, resulting in costly missed savings.
BeforeTime
Decisions may be made without a complete picture, or pushed out while gathering consensus.

After InpharmD™


BeforeTime
InpharmD™ delivers customized, actionable drug information in real time, so you can focus on execution.
BeforeTime
Your team stays informed immediately when new data emerges or prices change, and you’ll always be the first to know when any changes impact your formulary.
BeforeTime
With InpharmD™, your team can make faster, more informed decisions and move forward with confidence.

What Clinical Pharmacists Are Saying...


     

Assists in our research and is a great way or us to get an answer to a medical question without spending an average of 2 hours researching UptoDate or PubMed ourselves.


  Jordan C., PharmD, New Jersey

     

Huge time saver with thorough responses.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I’d never heard of a DI pharmacist before, now I have one. In. My. Pocket. Amazing!


     

Holy Shhh. Cow! Holy Cow! These summaries are beautiful.


  Jane D., PharmD, Georgia

     

I just want to say: This is such a brilliant idea! You people are genius.


     

OH MY GOD WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ALL MY LIFE!


     

I can’t tell you how much time I spend literature searching. And how I CANNOT STAND PAYWALLS. THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!! (covers face for sec) thank you, thank you, thank you!


     

So they’re basically connecting academic researchers with front line providers and then automating everything. It’s simply brilliant.


     

The clinical pharmacist was our secret weapon anyway. (Smiles wryly) This pharmacist AI seems superhuman. I’m just blown away, honestly. (Looks at camera somberly.)


     

It’s an ENTIRE DI DEPARTMENT, that lives in Epic. Give me a second. I’m just having a hard time wrapping my head around that.


     

Sorry just give me a second, my mind is blown.


     

Stop reading and just download the app already! I’ve tried all of them. This is by far the most advanced, best-in-class.


What would you like to ask InpharmD™?

Sign up for a free trial & start right away.

Get Started Free